Wiley 27.09.2006 13:02 |
I was thinking some time ago about this and I might have brought it up in some other thread back then. I know Queen made a huge experiment with Hot Space and it wasn't very successful and they needed a strong album to follow it. Then came 'The Works', where I think they wanted to play it safe and get back on their feet. I had never cared a lot about this album, apart from the singles and Machines (but never as a whole) and I can only imagine how this album could have been recieved by the fans (I was 3 years old back then). Maybe someone can bring some memories of it back? On the other hand, I can't help but notice similarities of this album's tracks with Queen's past hits. For instance: * It's a Hard Life - Typical Freddie ballad reminiscent of Play the game. * Man on the Prowl - a bit in the style of Crazy Little Thing Called Love * Tear it up - A bit of We will rock you in there (beat oriented track with A/D riffs) * ITTWWC - Acoustic little number reminiscent of Love of my life and that's almost half of the album, hehe :). What do you guys think? |
louvox 27.09.2006 16:14 |
In my opinion “The Works” is a crappy album. It sounds to me as if they were simply going through the motions. You are absolutely right about the songs you mentioned. There just re-writes of pervious songs. The entire record sounds uninspired and flat. Drenched in awful synthesizers. The only decent song in that line up is “Hammer to fall”. I was 22 years old when that album was released and it only cemented the downfall of Queen in the USA for most fans. US Radio stations didn’t even bother playing anything of it. Most Queen fans in the USA refers to “Radio Ga Ga” as “Radio Ca Ca” (That means shit in Spanish) Every album except for “Innuendo” from them on was pretty much sub-par at best. Most fans in Europe will disagree with me, but Queen could fart on a record and most fans in Europe would praise it as pure genius. |
Legy 27.09.2006 16:41 |
louvox wrote: In my opinion “The Works” is a crappy album. It sounds to me as if they were simply going through the motions. You are absolutely right about the songs you mentioned. There just re-writes of pervious songs. The entire record sounds uninspired and flat. Drenched in awful synthesizers. The only decent song in that line up is “Hammer to fall”. I was 22 years old when that album and it only cemented the downfall of Queen in the USA for most fans. US Radio stations didn’t even bother playing anything of it. Most Queen fans in the USA refers to “Radio Ga Ga” as “Radio Ca Ca” (That means shit in Spanish) Every album except for “Innuendo” from them on was pretty much sub-par at best. Most fans in Europe will disagree with me, but Queen could fart on a record and most fans in Europe would praise it as pure genius.Funny you mention Radio Ga Ga. The original title was Radio Ca Ca, which is also "sh!t" in French. link It's also on youtube, but I can't link the video since I'm at work. |
Joeker 27.09.2006 23:26 |
louvox wrote: In my opinion “The Works” is a crappy album. It sounds to me as if they were simply going through the motions. You are absolutely right about the songs you mentioned. There just re-writes of pervious songs. The entire record sounds uninspired and flat. Drenched in awful synthesizers. The only decent song in that line up is “Hammer to fall”. I was 22 years old when that album and it only cemented the downfall of Queen in the USA for most fans. US Radio stations didn’t even bother playing anything of it. Most Queen fans in the USA refers to “Radio Ga Ga” as “Radio Ca Ca” (That means shit in Spanish) Every album except for “Innuendo” from them on was pretty much sub-par at best. Most fans in Europe will disagree with me, but Queen could fart on a record and most fans in Europe would praise it as pure genius.I pretty much agree with you. Hammer to Fall was the best song on that album, very strong powerful song. Those other songs, I want to break free, radio ga ga, its a hard life, ITTWC are all decent songs...but they aren't very strong. I think it was the works that did it in for the USA fans as well. Hot Space didn't do as badly as people say....I mean cmon body language was a bigger hit than anything from the works haha |
Benn 28.09.2006 07:29 |
Whilst I agree with you about the album as a whole (basically an album to placate EMI and eventual exploitation of the fan base by releasing every song from the album in some version on a single / 12" release), I believe Keep Passing The Open Windows to be one of the band's finest moments. I wonder if there was ever any more material recorded for that aborted film soundtrack? |
The Fairy King 28.09.2006 07:45 |
louvox wrote: Most fans in Europe will disagree with me, but Queen could fart on a record and most fans in Europe would praise it as pure genius.Please, Europeans have taste...Americans don't. Just look at the top 10 of your charts ffs! The Works isn't a bad album and the follow-ups aren't either. They still sounded better than the other shit that was going on in the 80's...especially in America. |
GreatKingSam 28.09.2006 09:24 |
<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:Im not being funny, but look at the top of our chart! Crazy Frogs, un-inspirational generic emo-rock, Busted clones, knob-heads like Chico... we can't exactly talk can we?!louvox wrote: Most fans in Europe will disagree with me, but Queen could fart on a record and most fans in Europe would praise it as pure genius.Please, Europeans have taste...Americans don't. Just look at the top 10 of your charts ffs! The Works isn't a bad album and the follow-ups aren't either. They still sounded better than the other shit that was going on in the 80's...especially in America. |
The Fairy King 28.09.2006 09:44 |
GreatKingSam wrote:UK? It's not a bad top 10 at the moment compared to the US.<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:Im not being funny, but look at the top of our chart! Crazy Frogs, un-inspirational generic emo-rock, Busted clones, knob-heads like Chico... we can't exactly talk can we?!louvox wrote: Most fans in Europe will disagree with me, but Queen could fart on a record and most fans in Europe would praise it as pure genius.Please, Europeans have taste...Americans don't. Just look at the top 10 of your charts ffs! The Works isn't a bad album and the follow-ups aren't either. They still sounded better than the other shit that was going on in the 80's...especially in America. 1. Scissor Sisters - I Don't Feel Like Dancin' 2 Killers - When You Were Young 3 Justin Timberlake - Sexyback 4 Nelly Furtado Ft Timbaland - Promiscuous 5 Fergie - London Bridge 6 Shakira Ft Wyclef Jean - Hips Don't Lie 7 Cascada - Everytime We Touch 8 Snow Patrol - Chasing Cars 9 Jamelia - Something About You 10 Pink - U & Ur Hand US: 1 Justin Timberlake - SexyBack 2 Ludacris Feat. Pharrell - Money Maker 3 The Fray - How To Save A Life 4 Fergie - London Bridge 5 Hinder - Lips Of An Angel 6 Snow Patrol - Chasing Cars 7 JoJo - Too Little Too 8 Jibbs - Chain Hang Low 9 Chingy Feat. Tyrese - Pullin' Me Back 10 The Pussycat Dolls Feat. Snoop Dogg - Buttons |
FriedChicken 28.09.2006 10:14 |
I think the songs on The Works are great, but that they suck because they were produced so bad. The drums sound so terrible and the guitars are so thin. If they would've recorded a song like Tear it Up or Keep Passing the Open Windows in the late 70's (NOTW/JAZZ) it could've been huge hits |
zaiga 28.09.2006 10:40 |
FriedChicken<br><font size=1>The Almighty</font> wrote: I think the songs on The Works are great, but that they suck because they were produced so bad. The drums sound so terrible and the guitars are so thin. If they would've recorded a song like Tear it Up or Keep Passing the Open Windows in the late 70's (NOTW/JAZZ) it could've been huge hitsI agree with the above, except that I don't think that Keep Passing The Open Windows could ever have been a hit, even with different arrangement. It's not a bad song, but not catchy enough to become a hit single. Nothing wrong with that, it's a good "album" song. When I think of "The Works" I always think it is a weak album, but when I consider the individual songs, then I actually like them all, more-or-less. Perhaps Machines is a weaker track, but again that is a song that suffers more from weakish production than being a truly bad song. IWTBF, ITTWWC, RGG, HTF are all truly outstanding songs. The album is definately too short, with just 9 songs, and being under 40 minutes. I wish they included "I Go Crazy" on this album. It's a good song and could have made the album a bit harder and edgier. So, on the whole, as an album The Works doesn't stand out, but the individual songs range from average to very good, which is better than, say, A Kind Of Magic or Hot Space which contain some weaker songs. |
louvox 28.09.2006 10:59 |
I stand by my opinion. I am an ardent Queen fan and have been since 1976 when I was lucky enough to see them live in concert for the first time. I believe they are one of the best bands of all time and sometimes they don’t get the recognition they so richly deserve especially here in the USA. The reason for that in my opinion is that after nearly a decade of grand, carefully crafted & uniquely sonic albums; Queen abandoned its original sound and premise. They started to copy and imitate what was going on around them at that time. Most fans will agree and support Queen branching out and trying new sounds, styles & rhythms. I don’t think any true fan can fault them for that, but instead of incorporating those new sounds and making it their own (i.e. The Beatles, Led Zeppelin) they simply copied what others were doing at that time and therefore as one you so aptly put it; became part of the same shit that was going on in the 80’s in the USA & Europe. You couldn’t really tell them apart from the rest of those Euro-trash-pop-synth bands turning out weak dance tunes. |
Going Back 28.09.2006 11:02 |
The Works is a masterpeace IMO ! |
great king rat 1138 28.09.2006 11:26 |
I have to say that I really don't like The Works as an album. It has some god tunes (eg keep passing the open windows, it's a hard life and man on the prowl), but the crap like machines and Radio Gaga just spoils it for me. This is my own opinion of course (and considering that my 3 equal favourite Queen Albums are Queen, Queen 2 and Hot Space it probably won't be shared)but whereas the few electro/disco stylings of Hot Space sounded like a band experimenting with something new and enjoying it (whether they did or not!) Alot of the works just sounds to me like a band going through the motions. Definitely my least favourite album. |
runner70 28.09.2006 12:07 |
louvox wrote: You couldn’t really tell them apart from the rest of those Euro-trash-pop-synth bands turning out weak dance tunes.DOn't agreee with you at all I'm afraid! |
Wiley 28.09.2006 12:51 |
great king rat 1138 wrote: considering that my 3 equal favourite Queen Albums are Queen, Queen 2 and Hot SpaceIt's good to see that I'm not the only one who likes Hot Space, hahaha :). It never comes out of my car's CD player. It's the only Queen studio album that I ever listen to while driving. It's either Hot Space or any of the Greatest Hits. I would feel weird or stupid listening to the Prophet's Song or March of the Black Queen in my car with somebody else. Back to "The Works", I think the album was Queen's last try to get America back. They even started recording the album in Los Angeles before heading back to Munich. Maybe if they had released Hammer to Fall as their first single in America?? Don't get me wrong, I like GaGa and BreakFree but they don't have exactly "Billboard hit" written all over them. Oh, crap, they should have toured North America again... but they simply gave up... :S |
una999 28.09.2006 13:10 |
I used hate hammer to fall now i think its one of their best songs keep passing the open windows - used to hate that too cos thought was too goody goody but now i love it Americans are nothing but a bunch of right wing conservative obsessive freaks (not all he he!!) queen did bad in the states cos freddie was gay - as simple as that - and america is the land of the free??? I dont think so. Europe is far more liberal Anyway that american guy did say that we in europe think everythin he did was great - i agree there, like the way we hear freddie is no 1 in UK charts - it doesnt matter But i know better - i didnt buy lover of life, singer of songs cos whats the point buying it? we already have the songs on how many issues already??? but yes europeans have better tastes in music - or shud i say americans like rubbish? I mean ye produce shows like gerry springer (i know he's english), jenny jones (spelling) etc. A president wins an election over gay marriage, and ye shoot john lennon. By the way i love america |
Lester Burnham 28.09.2006 13:18 |
una999 wrote: I used hate hammer to fall now i think its one of their best songs keep passing the open windows - used to hate that too cos thought was too goody goody but now i love it Americans are nothing but a bunch of right wing conservative obsessive freaks (not all he he!!) queen did bad in the states cos freddie was gay - as simple as that - and america is the land of the free??? I dont think so. Europe is far more liberal Anyway that american guy did say that we in europe think everythin he did was great - i agree there, like the way we hear freddie is no 1 in UK charts - it doesnt matter But i know better - i didnt buy lover of life, singer of songs cos whats the point buying it? we already have the songs on how many issues already??? but yes europeans have better tastes in music - or shud i say americans like rubbish? I mean ye produce shows like gerry springer (i know he's english), jenny jones (spelling) etc. A president wins an election over gay marriage, and ye shoot john lennon. By the way i love americaWhat the hell. Honestly people, can we keep the America bashing to a minimum, especially when related to a Queen album? There were still fans in America, and I'm sure the band would have toured there except to do so would involve a lot of time and a lot of energy, neither of which the band had in 1984 or 1985. Also, Freddie's manager, Paul Prenter, was saying some disparaging things to journalists at the time, and Capitol Records wasn't interested in promoting Queen. Just remember that 'Radio Ga Ga' reached No. 16 in the US, and that there was a controversy at Capitol that was similar (I believe) to the Payola scandal from the 1960s, and Queen lost a lot of important allies in the states because of this scandal. Men appearing in drag may have been new to Americans at the time, but it wasn't frowned upon: Dustin Hoffman won serious plaudits for Tootsie, released in 1982, and even bands like the New York Dolls and Twisted Sister wore heavy make-up and things like that. If anything, you'd think that Freddie prancing around in a one-piece, low-cut leotard would clue people in to his sexuality, not prancing around in white jeans and a moustache. I'm sure the 'Break Free' caused SOME controversy, but not all of America turned their backs to the band. So why not do a bit of research next time before blindly shooting off your mouth? |
louvox 28.09.2006 13:39 |
To Lester Burnham, Well said. The “gay” card seems to be the excuse offered up by most Europeans on why Queen didn’t tour in the USA anymore or why their popularity declined. That had absolutely nothing to do with it. What is the excuse for never returning to Japan? It was quite simply the music they were putting out at the time. In spite of all the success they were having in Europe the music was crappy and just because something is successful; it doesn’t necessarily make it good. |
Boy Thomas Raker 28.09.2006 14:09 |
Queen's worst material was better than most bands best because of their vocal and instrumental talent. However, comparing The Works to anything from the debut album to Jazz, it's a like a different group, with inferior songwriting. Good points on the "gay card", total copout by people who can't see that America didn't accept Queen as a keyboard heavy pop band after 7 albums of being a guitar heavy rock band. |
Legy 28.09.2006 14:38 |
Both Roger and Brian have said the IWTBF video is what killed any chance of a Queen comeback in the States. IWTBF was banned from MTV due to having men in drag! The ban was lifted in 1991. |
Legy 28.09.2006 14:44 |
That said, I don't think its Americas fault. Boy George was huge around this time and everyone know he was gay! The Works is not Queens' best album and the American public knew this. |
Boy Thomas Raker 28.09.2006 15:14 |
Good point, I forgot about what Brian and Roger said. Can't wait for their book when WWRY is rightfully listed along with My Fair Lady and West Side Story as history's greatest musicals. |
Micrówave 28.09.2006 15:28 |
<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:1. The new FM still being on the UK charts... and ONLY the UK charts prooves TFK's point, I think. Top ten? In this age of music? Clearly sympathy is playing a factor in the sales of this new album.louvox wrote: Most fans in Europe will disagree with me, but Queen could fart on a record and most fans in Europe would praise it as pure genius.Please, Europeans have taste...Americans don't. Just look at the top 10 of your charts ffs! The Works isn't a bad album and the follow-ups aren't either. They still sounded better than the other shit that was going on in the 80's...especially in America. 2. The 80s in America was one of the biggest and most successful periods in music history. Did you notice? Synths are back! The UK was still churning out prog rock and trying electronica. 80's pop was conquering the world. Wham had to drop the name "Wham U.K." to even get noticed, but when they did (in America) they blew up. Men At Work were struggling until they invaded America. Hall & Oates still hold the record for most #1s by a duo. Robert Fripp couldn't get Daryl heard anywhere! If The Works had been a more 80's pop feel to it, Queen would have survived in America. Heck, The Stones figured it out with Tattoo You, and that album isn't really THAT good, but it sure sold!!! |
louvox 28.09.2006 16:12 |
Brain and Roger may have said that about the IWTBF video, but they also said that they were "too busy else where" and were interested in playing stadiums only (something of course we don’t have in the USA). So which is it? In either case it’s a cop out. Yes the video was band here, but not by their fans. It became a very sought out. The song however was totally ignored by US radio and fans a like. It’s a lightweight pop song with a stupid synthesizer solo that sounds like someone taking a shit; that’s not even played by any of them. All the reasons we keep hearing from Queen and their fans in Europe why they never returned to the USA don’t add up. They go to South America & Mexico where they are relatively unknown and society is a lot more conservative than the USA (especially at that time) and take on that challenge full on. Face it. Their songs were weak for most of the 80’s and didn’t want to face the criticism they would have probably received here. The songs were mature and complex in the 70’s when they didn’t care what anybody thought about them. From “Hot space” through ‘The miracle” their songs became bland, mundane & immature when all they cared about was trying to appease European radio. |
Asterik 28.09.2006 16:18 |
It's a shame this has descended in to a Europe vs America argument. I think The Works was a fine album, not their absoute best but far better than Hot Space or The Game which was their biggest US album and in Hammer To Fall Tear it Up we see a slow return to hard rock. Radio Ga Ga combined old anthemic qualities with new sounds, Keep passing The Open Windows is one of Freddie's finest songs, so energetic and soul searching. Is This The World We created and it's A Hard life conjure the old melodrama and Man on The prowl is really underrated- catchy with some super piano work. In my view only Break Free and Machines are let downs and they do have a lot of synths on them, that said they aren't bad.I like The Works; it's a shame number of US fans didn't catch on. But as Freddie sings in IWTBF "life still goes on" and it did- you only need to see the magic tour to know that. |
Asterik 28.09.2006 16:29 |
louvox wrote: Brain and Roger may have said that about the IWTBF video, but they also said that they were "too busy else where" and were interested in playing stadiums only (something of course we don’t have in the USA). So which is it? In either case it’s a cop out. Yes the video was band here, but not by their fans. It became a very sought out. The song however was totally ignored by US radio and fans a like. It’s a lightweight pop song with a stupid synthesizer solo that sounds like someone taking a shit;The point is Radio Ga ga had done well in the US and was climbing the charts- that decision had a very big effect on Queen's popularity. Moreover, IWTBF was a massive worldwide hit even if it was a lightweight synth tune; in short you're trying to suggest that somehow the US is a bastion of taste, a filter of all the rubbish. Give me a break. if it was big everywhere else you can't blame it's lack of quality for it not doing well in the US, after all Sting's won 13 Grammys in your country! |
Asterik 28.09.2006 16:37 |
I've not meant this as an attack on all US fans, I perfectly understand their concerns. I'm just saying that taste is equal throughout the world. no country has a better taste than the other, it's subjective. |
louvox 28.09.2006 18:54 |
To HJ I am not bashing Euopean Queen fans either. Nor I am saying that we here have better taste. I remember quite well when "The works" was released. I was very excited about it. It wasn’t until I finally listened to it that I largely disappointed. I stand by opinion on that album. I rated it as their third worse album behind “A kind of magic & Hot Space”. Radio ga, ga was NEVER a big hit here. I don’t know where you are getting your information. The reason is sold copies in the USA is because of Queen fans like me who buy anything and everything Queen released. Oh I am sure there were those who bought it because they actually like it. |
akindofmagic 28.09.2006 21:57 |
Wiley wrote: I was thinking some time ago about this and I might have brought it up in some other thread back then. I know Queen made a huge experiment with Hot Space and it wasn't very successful and they needed a strong album to follow it. Then came 'The Works', where I think they wanted to play it safe and get back on their feet. * It's a Hard Life - Typical Freddie ballad reminiscent of Play the game. * Man on the Prowl - a bit in the style of Crazy Little Thing Called Love * Tear it up - A bit of We will rock you in there (beat oriented track with A/D riffs) * ITTWWC - Acoustic little number reminiscent of Love of my life and that's almost half of the album, hehe :). What do you guys think?I agreed with you on those tracks, tehy are way too reminiscent of previous hits. But that doesn't mean they aren't great songs. They surely are. and the hits(radio GaGa, Break Free,Hammer, plus Machines and Open Windows) are fab. It is a great album, althought "safe".one thing doesn't mean another. |
Wiley 29.09.2006 12:26 |
Oh well, I didn't say I did not like those songs. I actually enjoy "It's a Hard Life" very much, I love how it builds tension before the guitar solo and then goes back to the chorus, that is pure genius. Any other band would have stopped before the solo, after those ascendent melodies by guitar (that were played by synths live because Brian could not play them all in a row). Then comes the guitar solo and it's almost like you're flying now, hehe :). I don't know, I like that part very much. I also like I want to break free. I mean, some of the songs are great but as an album..? Maybe if they had included I go crazy and there must be more to life than this in the album and it were about 45 minutes long, but it is very short! Yet, The Game and Sheer heart attack are almost equally short and they are very solid albums (IMO). |
Asterik 29.09.2006 16:15 |
louvox wrote: To HJ I am not bashing Euopean Queen fans either. Nor I am saying that we here have better taste.I'm sorry but Radio Ga Ga was top 20 at least it was a start, climbing up. And no you have not answered my point at all, you are saying IWTBF ddin't do well because it was rubbish, when it did well everywhere else so yes you are saying that the US has better taste even if its indirect. |
YourValentine 30.09.2006 21:38 |
btt |
una999 01.10.2006 12:24 |
Look the works is a good album - hammer to fall is rock - why wasn't that a bit success in the states then. I dunno, i want to break free obviously had something to do. It's like a mystery - or maybe its because they never had a chance to reclaim the US market - didnt i want it all make it in the top 5 in the US??? |
g2000 02.10.2006 08:15 |
to have a hit in any country, on the whole you, need a record company that need to put in $$$, the more the better, and you need support from radio and MTV and also the planets have to align. One of the reasons why the Works wasnt a hit may have been for one of those reasons. Plus there were also record company difficulties. It really hasnt got anything to do as such with the audience in a particular country. Like most audiences we just eat what we are fed. |
Neppset 30.03.2007 17:43 |
The Works is an okay album. Was a favorite before, but not anymore, I've grown tired of it... Radio Ga Ga is overrated, boring. Tear It Up is fun. It's a Hard Life is one of the best songs ever (period). Man on the Prowl is terrible. Machines is torture. I Want To Break Free is great pop. Keep Passing the Open Windows is good, kinda reminds me of Don't Stop Me Now (best song ever, title shared with Ogre Battle) Hammer to Fall is kinda weak in the studio, but it is one of the best live songs ever. Is This the World We Created...? is a nice little ballad. |
Daveboy35 02.04.2007 12:49 |
I first heard this when i was 10 at the end of 1984 i had it given to me for christmas and i loved it, as my memory serves me 1984 was a popular year for queen with MASSIVE SALES of radio gaga and i want to break free and the montreux pop festival. I thought this was them at their best (this was the first proper intro to queen for me) esp hammer to fall, keep passing the open windows and tear it up were kick ass tunes, some times a bit bland (man on the prowl) and other times brilliant (it's a hard life ITTWWC) so really IMO a great album at the time when synths were well in use by practically everybody. I sometimes think through past postings that the impression of some was that queen shouldn't have use synths or overuse them, but i'm glad did they did as the songs vary in style and delivery. One more thing I Go crazy should have been on the album it was wasted as a b-side to gaga the song is full of energy fun and having a rocking time, and of course would have extended the running time a little bit. |
Neppset 03.04.2007 05:37 |
Yeah, I Go Crazy is actually very nice. Beyond me that they included the horrible Machines instead of this nice little pop/rocker on the album. I think it was on in the re-issue, at least. |
kosimodo 03.04.2007 15:51 |
I heard today Radio Ga Ga on radio... fantastic!! From the beginning til the end.. Allways liked the song.. Still havent heard anything like it.. That must be quit original!! Any suggestions?? The drums in the beginning... so recognizable.... And later with the live versions i began to love the song.. Love the guitars in there!! But ITTWWC is my album favoutite...! |
bigV 03.04.2007 17:14 |
I wonder if anyone knows what's the reason for the title of the album. Brian May explained in an interview that the band said to themselves "Let's give them the works!". The album attempts to revisit all the trademarks that made Queen famous in the 70's and still bring something fresh to the table. In that respect I think that the album is more than successful. And no, I don't think that "I Go Crazy" belonged on the album. It's a good, fun song, but it doesn't fit the album's premise. On the other hand I will never understand why they decided to leave off "Let Me In (Your Heart Again)", which by the way I desperately want to hear! V. |
Asterik 04.04.2007 17:40 |
louvox wrote: In my opinion “The Works” is a crappy album. It sounds to me as if they were simply going through the motions. You are absolutely right about the songs you mentioned. There just re-writes of pervious songs. The entire record sounds uninspired and flat. Drenched in awful synthesizers. The only decent song in that line up is “Hammer to fall”. I was 22 years old when that album was released and it only cemented the downfall of Queen in the USA for most fans. US Radio stations didn’t even bother playing anything of it. Most Queen fans in the USA refers to “Radio Ga Ga” as “Radio Ca Ca” (That means shit in Spanish) Every album except for “Innuendo” from them on was pretty much sub-par at best. Most fans in Europe will disagree with me, but Queen could fart on a record and most fans in Europe would praise it as pure genius.It's called subjectibity of opinion. |
Asterik 04.04.2007 17:40 |
|
Asterik 04.04.2007 17:43 |
louvox wrote: To Lester Burnham, Well said. The “gay” card seems to be the excuse offered up by most Europeans on why Queen didn’t tour in the USA anymore or why their popularity declined. That had absolutely nothing to do with it. What is the excuse for never returning to Japan? It was quite simply the music they were putting out at the time. In spite of all the success they were having in Europe the music was crappy and just because something is successful; it doesn’t necessarily make it good.Sorry I've posted on this before and didn't realise. My goodness this topic has been on the kiln for a while. |