QueenZone discussion #877635

freddie lives wrote: Of course it'll not be as good as a proper one as you'd need individual elements, but there are a couple of good 5.1 dts cds out there of DATR and SHA done by a fan. There's also a Q2, but that's got a few problems...

father to my son wrote: these links are for 5.0 dts upmix , they have used a software to make these , which takes around 15 mins a track , i like them , its better than nothing , and the roger taylor fun in space dts upmix is great , simple really if you dont like them , dont get them

Crezchi wrote:

father to my son wrote: these links are for 5.0 dts upmix , they have used a software to make these , which takes around 15 mins a track , i like them , its better than nothing , and the roger taylor fun in space dts upmix is great , simple really if you dont like them , dont get them

That's fine, then people who do not have the knowledge of Studio and mixing audio shouldn't label these as 5.1 mixes.

Fireplace wrote:

Crezchi wrote:

father to my son wrote: these links are for 5.0 dts upmix , they have used a software to make these , which takes around 15 mins a track , i like them , its better than nothing , and the roger taylor fun in space dts upmix is great , simple really if you dont like them , dont get them

That's fine, then people who do not have the knowledge of Studio and mixing audio shouldn't label these as 5.1 mixes.

Wrong sonny! I happen to be someone who does know a fair bit about audio processing, and I say if I take a stereo recording and add 4 tracks of white noise, it's still a 5.1 mix. Whether or not the result is listenable is a different discussion entirely. I am just being curious what it sounds like, that's all. By the way, which studio do you work at?

Crezchi wrote:

Fireplace wrote:

Crezchi wrote:

father to my son wrote: these links are for 5.0 dts upmix , they have used a software to make these , which takes around 15 mins a track , i like them , its better than nothing , and the roger taylor fun in space dts upmix is great , simple really if you dont like them , dont get them

That's fine, then people who do not have the knowledge of Studio and mixing audio shouldn't label these as 5.1 mixes.

Wrong sonny! I happen to be someone who does know a fair bit about audio processing, and I say if I take a stereo recording and add 4 tracks of white noise, it's still a 5.1 mix. Whether or not the result is listenable is a different discussion entirely. I am just being curious what it sounds like, that's all. By the way, which studio do you work at?

And you have made a fool out of yourself! If you do not have the MULTI-TRACK recording, you cannot create a true 5.1 mix. It is like taking an old VHS and converting it to dvd. You cannot create quality that is simply not there from the original. You may mask it and make it sound better, or copy certain parts or tracks in to the others to make it seem 5.1, but technically you cannot creat a true 5.1 mix without multi-tracks. lol funny that you ask what studio i work at! lol Actually my dad owns and operates a recording studio, and 2 of my friends are Studio pros who work for a company called "Live Technology" and i have another friend who works for a Studio down in L.A. plus i am a musician and i have taken studio recording/mixing classes in High School and college, and own my own recording equipment and software, mixing equipment, and i have recorded around 20 bands since 2 years ago. But that doesn't matter, the fact is what it is.

freddie lives wrote: Crezchi. Stop being such an ARSE. Nobody is disputing the fact that these aren't made using the multi track master tapes and they won't be as good as if they were made by using said master tapes, BUT someone has put in a lot of work messing about with frequencies and bringing background instruments into the foreground and isolating various sounds as best as possible to create a surround mix that is as good as you will get without the using multi track master tapes. Anyway - if bloody Queen themselves can bang out a live DVD that has been "upmixed" to produce sounds that eminate from 5 speakers and a subwoofer AND then call it a 5.1 mix, then so can we!!! Now then, Father To Son. I've been waiting for that Fun in space surround dts cd - have you a link please!!?? Thanks,

FriedChicken<br><font size=1>The Almighty</font> wrote: Maybe these so called surround mixes do the same technique as the quadrophonic or whatever it's called sets do. They make an out of phase signal from the original stereo signal and put in the 2 speakers in the back

Fireplace wrote: For someone who is such a genius you sure read badly. Anything containing six separate audio channels is true 5.1, even it's the same mono channel six times over. You can choose to have 6 different tracks on 6 channels, or the same track with slight EQ differences, it's still 5.1. On most older live music DVD's you only hear the audience and a bit of reverb in the rear speakers. Whether or not you approve of that is completely irrelevant, although I agree that fan mixers shouldn't try to pass it off as the genuine thing. For the record, in this case nobody did. Perhaps you ought to be a bit careful who you call a fool, I might still come and collect my copy of Sunbury 1974.

father to my son wrote: link this might help you

young_strat_man wrote: Still NOT TRUE 5.1 So quit calling them that!

young_strat_man wrote:

Adam Baboolal wrote:

young_strat_man wrote: Still NOT TRUE 5.1 So quit calling them that!

You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!!

haahahaha Hello Jack! lol i will retire from this thread now that you have made me laugh. :) Cheers Adam, :)