Queen Archivist 04.09.2006 09:20 |
« Jay » wrote: What I don't understand is why every interesting thread turns into a huge discussion or even a fight when it reaches two pages or more. Seriously what is up with that? We should be working together and share information. Not endlessly argue with each other. Call me naive if you must but this place would be a lot more fun if everybody would accept and respect each other for who they are and left their personal issues behind them.Jay... there are MANY people here on MoanZone, and FEW and an ever dwindling number of genuine people, who really care about getting at serious Queen and related issues. Sadly, you will always find that decent honest and reasonable questions and threads get sabotaged or hijacked by a series of morons intent upon spoiling it for everyone. That is the nature of these kinds of forum sites. It cannot be avoided. You have young idiots, utter morons and spanners (as we call them here) that have nothing constructive to contribute, no knowledge or experience, and can only offer something stupid, untrelated, insulting, banaal, predictable. There are MANY of them, and they even piss off other QZ-ers. But STILL they are here!!!!! STILL THEY ARE TOLERATED. GOD ONLY KNOWS WHY. You will soon see comments added to this point of mine, now, that will endorse the point. Some of them seem to be 9 or 10 years old. Is that feasible? I guess it must be. And even those in their late teens and 20s seem as mad as march hares. Some are the kind of people you would serious avoid if you saw them on the street. Believe me, I know what I'm talking about on this issue. Some are genuinely 'dangerous' individuals with what's going on inside their heads. You can determine this easily enough by some threads on this site, as you know. This is the nature of these sites. I'm aware of that. That's why most people who want serious debate and whom want to get at the real essence of interesting Queen issues, do so in private email without the risk of dickheads interrupting and getting in the way just because they can. Sad, isn't it. There is some great stuff here on QZ, which I read, and sometimes follow up on, or which I direct certain people within the Queen circle towards. BUT it is littered with so much pollution and unrelated trash and stupidity from people who know nothing, that most of the main people I direct to things, get bored very quickly and leave. Is this what you want? I think it would be great if there was some efficient and ruthless way of filtering away those who seek only to sabotage, hijact, corrupt and generally fuck up what could otherwise be a forum/site with an unusual and enviable reputation. This is, as far as I can see, the main reason that a lot of key people avoid this site. It COULD be very different. At the moment QZ's reputation is far from enviable. Of course there will be those to disagree with this, but those people would argue with ANYTHING at all, just for the sake of it. But you know what I mean. If QueenZone were a high street shop, many of the people who come in and abuse it, who try to pollute and break it, would surely be thrown out - some with a good and well-earned smack round the ear as they were ejected. But here on QZ, ANY nasty sod can say what he/she likes - to disrupt good conversation and block proper progress, to the huge detriment of it all. It's so tedious and, I think, unnecessary. There seems to be NO policing, no care, no monitoring of this sight. Imagine if you tried to run a shop or office company that way! Why can't there be some sensible filtering of those who use and abuse this site? Ok, I might get thrown off too, as too might the mean and moody Poppy (who said she made a 13-years old QZ-er cry and bugger off), but that might not be a bad thing. I for one would certainly sacrifice myself and my extremely amusing and entertaining presence, and my genius comments and huge wit, fro |
Freya is quietly judging you. 04.09.2006 09:37 |
Firstly, you have posted this in the wrong forum. (Try personal) Secondly, Why you insist on starting 2 topics a day full of your inane rantings, god only knows. You maintain you don't like this site and yet you just can't stay away.. Thirdly, Greg, please don't put words in my mouth. I never said that I made a Queenzoner cry, I'm not that heartless. |
Sergei. 04.09.2006 10:00 |
It's ANGST, you idiot. Buy a dictionary. And you wasted space. PS: Raf, where's your don't feed the trolls? :D |
The Fairy King 04.09.2006 10:16 |
You're the biggest spammer on this board Greg. Piss off. |
Smitty 04.09.2006 10:42 |
Oh I know for sure that this board has a biG proBlem. |
Togg 04.09.2006 11:00 |
Greg As I understand it Richards concept for the site is one of 'free speech' which rightly or wrongly he sticks to. Unfortunately life is not as simple as you would like it to be, and much like life on Queenzone you can't filter out the numpties that populate the Internet. On a few occasions I would support more moderation than is here at present, but only when it comes to things like trying to con money from kids etc, free speech is what makes the internet so powerful, sadly you have to wade through pages of idiots to get to the really intelligent comments but it's worth it, otherwise we end up with someone else's choice for freedom which usually as history tells us, is not one we would all agree with. I do however take one thing you say with a large ? Queenzones reputation, what reputation? other than folks on QOL nobody else knows it's here, so what are you talking about? just because you and two or three friends like to bash the site doesn't mean it has a reputation. Most people on QOL visit here and we go there, one is heavily moderated one isn't, the reputation you speak of is between a handful of people, hardly something to get worried about. I do applaud your more helpful and polite return to the site, recent posts have been much more positive and far less bitchy, you may even find people warming to you and helping you if you continue to join the spirit of the site, however, I am a little unsettled by your recent fascination with Poppy, which frankly is a little disturbing given your age difference. Fortunately I think she is more than capable of looking after herself, but to the casual observer you recent comments do make the flesh crawl a little, so keep that in mind, I think it serve to alienate people against you here again. |
Sebastian 04.09.2006 12:04 |
In that case you'd be the first one sent into internet oblivion: > there are MANY people here on MoanZone So without you it's not a big loss. Fuck off. > and FEW and an ever dwindling number of genuine people You excluded, fuck off. > you will always find that decent honest and reasonable questions and threads get sabotaged or hijacked by a series of morons intent upon spoiling it for everyone. Starting with you, fuck off. > You have young idiots And a bigger old idiot: you. Fuck off. > no knowledge Especially you. Fuck off. > But STILL they are here!!!!! Starting with you. Fuck off. > STILL THEY ARE TOLERATED. GOD ONLY KNOWS WHY. Because people here have been so kind, instead of telling you to fuck off. But I'm not that nice, so I tell you again: fuck off. > Some of them seem to be 9 or 10 years old. And yet 9 or 10 light years beyond you in terms of knowledge, manners and productivity. Fuck off. > Believe me, I know what I'm talking about You knowing what you're talking about is entirely laughable. Fuck off. > most of the main people I direct to things, get bored very quickly and leave. Yes that's sad, but we can live without them. Fuck off. > I think it would be great if there was some efficient and ruthless way of filtering away those who seek only to sabotage, hijact, corrupt and generally fuck up what could otherwise be a forum/site with an unusual and enviable reputation. And that's how you'd be the first one banned. Fuck off. > It COULD be very different. Without you, surely. Fuck off. > At the moment QZ's reputation is far from enviable. QZ, with all it's negative features, is in many ways the best source of info regarding this band. Much much much much much better than your "Freddie sang all the verses in Who Wants To Live Forever / Queen played 'Mull' in May 1977 / Crystal was Freddie's roadie / John didn't play bass in the Barcelona album" senseless answers or comments. Fuck off. > But here on QZ, ANY nasty sod can say what he/she likes Starting with you. Fuck off. > It's so tedious and, I think, unnecessary. Yes, then: fuck off. > Imagine if you tried to run a shop or office company that way! The cunt who wrote a book with more mistakes than words and who has said some of the most stupid things about the band he's allegedly an expert about is coming here to advise us how to run something? That's laughable. Fuck off. > Why can't there be some sensible filtering of those who use and abuse this site? Coming here, insulting some of our celebrities, referring to QZ as Moan Zone, writing in capitals ... that's abusing. Then: fuck off. > I might get thrown off too Finally your only neuron worked!: fuck off. > but that might not be a bad thing. Surely not. Fuck off. > I for one would certainly sacrifice myself and my extremely amusing and entertaining presence, and my genius comments and huge wit, from this site Then do it: fuck off. > I can't spell And you can't think or be nice either. Fuck off. > I'm just giving you a 'for instance'. For instance, you could ... I forgot what I was going to say... Oh yes: fuck off! > I mean only the abusive people that insult and never offer anything remotely useful or knowledgeable. That'd be you. Fuck off. > QZ has massively deteriorated. Since you came here. Fuck off. All in all, nice post Greg. Fuck off. |
Queen Archivist 04.09.2006 12:27 |
Poppy, you have a sense of humour bypass at the moment. But anyway.... Pop: Firstly, you have posted this in the wrong forum. (Try personal) GB: Who cares? Does that matter one tiny iota in the scheme of things. Is this miniscule point an issue in your world. Pop: Secondly, Why you insist on starting 2 topics a day full of your inane rantings, god only knows. GB: I have builders in my house at the moment, until Sept 16, and cannot get in my office - just my laptop. I was bored. I was very very bored. So, I came onto QZ and rubbed you up the wrong way because, for reasons best known to yourself, you are uptight and lacking a sense of humour just now. This may be uncharacteristic for you, it may not. This is just a bit of fun. Don't take things so seriously. Who realy gives a bugger which part of QZ a thing sits in - other than you? Pop: You maintain you don't like this site and yet you just can't stay away.. GB: Not quite correct. I maintain that I don't like PARTS of this site, and certain faceless individuals who hide behind their bogus identities, while people like John Stuart and I are totally up-front, open and honest. I further maintain that people without a sense of humour are to be treated with kid gloves. I think someone other than me, as well as me, has upset you, and this site is your outlet. Make of that whatever you like. You over-react to the tiniest point, when you could instead be calm and take it, and me, and my rantings, in your stride. Frankly, today and yesterday it was QZ or clearing out my shed! And I'm scared of big spiders. Hence, would rather come here and spout off some rubbish - as well as my normal flashes of brilliance and genius. Stay calm. I can feel your heartrate increasing. It was a JOKE for goodness sake. If my words upset your teenage sensitivities, don't read my rantings, ignore them, and me, and do something more constructive with your time. Why are you wasting time reading crap by me anyway? You have other more important things to do, like study, surely. Pop: Thirdly, Greg, please don't put words in my mouth. I never said that I made a Queenzoner cry, I'm not that heartless GB: Oh dear! I got the pedantic details wrong, and that was enough to get your back up. You must be huge fun to be around at the moment. Chill out, Poppy. Have fun on this site. I do. Now then... put some words in my mouth. I don't give a sod. Say what you like about me, but i do have a sense of humour. Lastly: It's 'angst', not anx or anxt. Thanks for that, whoever offered it. My spelling's not good, is it? Don't be cruel and heartless with me. Have pity instead. Can anyone tell me how to spell that legal word which sounds like SEPINA, but which actually begins suph??????? I can't find it in my dictionery. Poppy, we don't get along very well, do we? Never mind, aye!Think yourself lucky we are not neighbours. Can you imagine? Now then... don't be so uppity. It's like Rob Bryson (sp ??) says: "It's just a bit of fun!" Say something nice and without scorn. Go on..... |
Marcelo_argentina 04.09.2006 12:47 |
This just like a big Family, everyday fighting for stupid things (sometimes very rude), but they love each other and need to keep on being together. it´s funny and sad at the same time. "We have to build this page together or we´ll have no more future at all! Time". |
Serry... 04.09.2006 12:54 |
Let's all together call for BPP! He is a police officer... We need in his help... |
TheGame 04.09.2006 13:05 |
Damn, behave people!!!!! I don't like this fuck off thing nor the bad language. Too bad some people have to behave like this. |
Queen Archivist 04.09.2006 14:03 |
To Togg, You write a good deal of sence. I can tell you are an older chap - not a kid, I mean. While you make good logic sense, you do also have a nasty part to your thread which is inappropriate, and wide of the mark. I would say offensive too, but that wouldn't bother you I guess. You say... however, I am a little unsettled by your recent fascination with Poppy, which frankly is a little disturbing given your age difference. GB: This is only in your head, Togg. What a creepy thing for you to say. That is just YOUR perception. My dialogue with Poppy was not remotely what you imply. That you chose to take it that way, says something about your outlook - it says more about you than it does me. What I said to Poppy was friendly and without any agenda. Most people took it that way, but you and a couple of others did not. Poppy DID NOT take it in a sinister way, only people like you did. You are synical and have a low opinion of people. You saw something sinister where there was nothing like that to see. Shame on you. I pity you for seeing something dark when there was nothing to see. Togg: to the casual observer you recent comments do make the flesh crawl a little, so keep that in mind, I think it serve to alienate people against you here again. GB: I'm not looking for an argument with you Togg, but when people find horrible agendas among things which are innocent, I feel sick in my stomach. I feel sorry for you that your mind works that way - to make such a connection. Perhaps it is YOU that has a problem in that area - I mean, that in order to make such a connection your mind must work in a particular, pecular, way. It must do, because I for one never ever made the connection you did. That kind of comment, Togg, is really ugly, and not in keeping with an intelligent person as you seem to be. Stop thinking that way. Stop adding 2 + 2 and reaching 6. See the innocence in things, not the ugliness that doesn't exist. |
Smitty 04.09.2006 14:12 |
*nonsense forum nomination* |
Donna13 04.09.2006 15:07 |
subpoena |
Fireplace 04.09.2006 15:29 |
It's "subpoena", Greg. As in "the old mentally unstable geezer who sucked up to an underage girl on an internet forum was supoena'd". Hope that helps! |
Freya is quietly judging you. 04.09.2006 15:35 |
Queen Archivist wrote: Poppy, you have a sense of humour bypass at the moment. But anyway.... Pop: Firstly, you have posted this in the wrong forum. (Try personal) GB: Who cares? Does that matter one tiny iota in the scheme of things. Is this miniscule point an issue in your world. Pop: Secondly, Why you insist on starting 2 topics a day full of your inane rantings, god only knows. GB: I have builders in my house at the moment, until Sept 16, and cannot get in my office - just my laptop. I was bored. I was very very bored. So, I came onto QZ and rubbed you up the wrong way because, for reasons best known to yourself, you are uptight and lacking a sense of humour just now. This may be uncharacteristic for you, it may not. This is just a bit of fun. Don't take things so seriously. Who realy gives a bugger which part of QZ a thing sits in - other than you? Pop: You maintain you don't like this site and yet you just can't stay away.. GB: Not quite correct. I maintain that I don't like PARTS of this site, and certain faceless individuals who hide behind their bogus identities, while people like John Stuart and I are totally up-front, open and honest. I further maintain that people without a sense of humour are to be treated with kid gloves. I think someone other than me, as well as me, has upset you, and this site is your outlet. Make of that whatever you like. You over-react to the tiniest point, when you could instead be calm and take it, and me, and my rantings, in your stride. Frankly, today and yesterday it was QZ or clearing out my shed! And I'm scared of big spiders. Hence, would rather come here and spout off some rubbish - as well as my normal flashes of brilliance and genius. Stay calm. I can feel your heartrate increasing. It was a JOKE for goodness sake. If my words upset your teenage sensitivities, don't read my rantings, ignore them, and me, and do something more constructive with your time. Why are you wasting time reading crap by me anyway? You have other more important things to do, like study, surely. Pop: Thirdly, Greg, please don't put words in my mouth. I never said that I made a Queenzoner cry, I'm not that heartless GB: Oh dear! I got the pedantic details wrong, and that was enough to get your back up. You must be huge fun to be around at the moment. Chill out, Poppy. Have fun on this site. I do. Now then... put some words in my mouth. I don't give a sod. Say what you like about me, but i do have a sense of humour. Lastly: It's 'angst', not anx or anxt. Thanks for that, whoever offered it. My spelling's not good, is it? Don't be cruel and heartless with me. Have pity instead. Can anyone tell me how to spell that legal word which sounds like SEPINA, but which actually begins suph??????? I can't find it in my dictionery. Poppy, we don't get along very well, do we? Never mind, aye!Think yourself lucky we are not neighbours. Can you imagine? Now then... don't be so uppity. It's like Rob Bryson (sp ??) says: "It's just a bit of fun!" Say something nice and without scorn. Go on.....I'm not uppity, I just find you incredibly boring. Now, Greg, as fun as it may be for you winding up 17 year olds, please give it a rest. (Well done for working out how to 'Quote' though.) |
Crezchi 04.09.2006 17:44 |
Greg, if you are bored, go find something to do other than call us Moanzone and other ignorant names. Not everyone here is what you say. I have nothing against you except for the way that you come here and try to intimidate people, but these actions of yours are going to catch up with you one day and you will then relize that you have accomplished absolutley nothing. Me and you had our 1 spat, we quickly said 'sorry' in our own ways, why can't this be done here with 90% of your spats? You are an adult, i think you and everyone here knows that, you are the Queen Archivist, you and everyone here knows that also. Now, your username (if you intend it to be or not) is an affiliation to Queen, and if you are going to use your 'title' as your username, PLEASE use some decorum and change your 1 track mind towards Queenzoners, yes it is called Queenzone, NOT Moanzone as you wish to call it. You came back with some calm and intelligent posts, but it seems you get pissed off to easy Greg. As i stated, you are an adult, if someone says "Fuck you Greg" IGNORE it! Or at least don't give them the time or the day to argue with you for 10 pages! As for John Stuart, Greg, what do you have against him? I agree that repeating his posts everywhere is not exacly mature, but i do see the same thing with you as well. Don't take this to heart Greg, i can get along with almost anyone, especially on the internet, it's easy, if you don't like it, ignore it! I honestly do not think that you have set out to come to Queenzone to call us names and insult us. I beleive that you do have some resourceful information to share with us about Queen, but you are the only person who can calm yourself down and possibly answer legit questions and comments. I know there are some childish people here, but Greg this is the same in the real world! How do you handle people like this in real life? Do you insult them? No i don't think you do. SO please Greg for the love of Queen, stop insulting us, and be someone who can cope with the fact that not everyone thinks the same way as you and agrees with you. |
pow wow 04.09.2006 18:16 |
I agree Greg. A filtering system would be a great idea. How about one that blocks people who are overweight, sport a dodgy goatee, have a penchant for young ladies beginning with P and who have the negotiating skills of a donkey. WHY do you come here? |
newcastle 86 04.09.2006 19:39 |
YEAH LETS GET RID OF THE FAT PONCE WHO SPAMS THIS BOARD EVERY SIX MONTHS OR SO GREG PROOPS (I THINK HES KNOWN BY) WHO UNLIKE THE LOTS OF PEOPLE HAS A SAD LACK OF SELF CONFIDENCE IT COMES FROM BEING A FAT KID YOU KNOW GREG THEN AS THE YEARS GO BY..A FAT ADULT AND A FAT WIFE NO DOUBT. I love queenzone its so much fun |
Togg 05.09.2006 03:54 |
Queen Archivist wrote: To Togg, You write a good deal of sence. I can tell you are an older chap - not a kid, I mean. While you make good logic sense, you do also have a nasty part to your thread which is inappropriate, and wide of the mark. I would say offensive too, but that wouldn't bother you I guess. You say... however, I am a little unsettled by your recent fascination with Poppy, which frankly is a little disturbing given your age difference. GB: This is only in your head, Togg. What a creepy thing for you to say. That is just YOUR perception. My dialogue with Poppy was not remotely what you imply. That you chose to take it that way, says something about your outlook - it says more about you than it does me. What I said to Poppy was friendly and without any agenda. Most people took it that way, but you and a couple of others did not. Poppy DID NOT take it in a sinister way, only people like you did. You are synical and have a low opinion of people. You saw something sinister where there was nothing like that to see. Shame on you. I pity you for seeing something dark when there was nothing to see. Togg: to the casual observer you recent comments do make the flesh crawl a little, so keep that in mind, I think it serve to alienate people against you here again. GB: I'm not looking for an argument with you Togg, but when people find horrible agendas among things which are innocent, I feel sick in my stomach. I feel sorry for you that your mind works that way - to make such a connection. Perhaps it is YOU that has a problem in that area - I mean, that in order to make such a connection your mind must work in a particular, pecular, way. It must do, because I for one never ever made the connection you did. That kind of comment, Togg, is really ugly, and not in keeping with an intelligent person as you seem to be. Stop thinking that way. Stop adding 2 + 2 and reaching 6. See the innocence in things, not the ugliness that doesn't exist.Well if you read back you will see I am far from alone in coming to this conclusion, so I don't feel too ashamed of myself! But a whole thread about her, lots of sudden attention, you write to her in just about every topic...come on... too much time looking at her profile I think. However, if as you say it is purely innocent than we must give the benefit and all that, but in my view it's better to be made aware you are acting in a rather unsavoury fashion and allow you the chance to adjust your comments, I'd far rather be wrong and be accused of being overly sensitive or (sick) as you say, than be proved right! Moving on to another matter, things were going so well and then you once again jumped on your old band wagon of John S Stuart bashing again, isn't it time you dropped this, I think we all know your views on him, so do we have to be reminded every time you post? |
Queen Archivist 05.09.2006 10:52 |
TOGG WROTE... Well if you read back you will see I am far from alone in coming to this conclusion, so I don't feel too ashamed of myself! GB: I WASN'T EXPECTING YOU BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF. EVEN IF YOU WERE, OR IF YOU WERE JUST EMBERRASSED, YOU WOULDN'T SAY SO, WOULD YOU. THAT'S OBVIOUS. THAT WOULD REQUIRE A STRONG CHARACTER - TO ADMIT TO BEING WRONG. I THINK THAT FOR YOU TO MAKE THAT CONNECTOIN, WAS UNSAVOURY AND TASTELESS, AND SOME WOULD SAY 'SICK', AND I GENUINELY BELIEVE THAT IT SAYS SOMETHING ABOUT YOU, NOT ME. A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD AGREE WITH ME TOO, BUT NOT ON QZ NECESSARILY BECAUSE THEY PERCEIVE THEIR QZ 'CRED' WOULD SUFFER. MORE FOOL THEM IF THAT'S HOW SHALLOW THEY ARE. YOU THINK THAT JUST BECAUSE SOME OTHER SILLY PEOPLE ON THIS SITE - MOSTLY YOUNG KIDS; WHICH IS CLEAR FROM THEIR VOCABULARY - SEE THE SAME TACKY CONNECTION AS YOU DO, THAT IT EXCUSES YOU TOO. TOGG... THERE WAS NOTHING DARK OR HORRIBLE IN MY WORDS TO POPPY, BUT OF COURSE YOU, AND A FEW PEOPLE LIKE YOU, HAD TO SEE SOMETHING NASTY AND COMMENT ON IT. THAT IS REALLY DISCUSTING, AND OF COURSE IT KILLED AN INNOCENT THREAD AND TARNISHED IT IN PEOPLES' MINDS - THANKS TO HOW YOUR PECULIAR MIND WORKS. YOUR MIND, NOT MINE, NOT POPPY'S. But a whole thread about her, lots of sudden attention, you write to her in just about every topic...come on... too much time looking at her profile I think. SO WHAT! I CREATED A THREAD ASKING "WHERE IS POPPY?" GROW UP, TOGG. STOP SEEING UGLINESS AND DIRT WHERE THERE IS NONE. WHAT'S THE MATTER WITH YOU? However, if as you say it is purely innocent than we must give the benefit and all that, GEE THANKS, THAT'S VERY BIG OF YOU... HAVING DONE YOUR BEST TO CAUSE AN UGLY SLUR!!!!! but in my view it's better to be made aware you are acting in a rather unsavoury fashion and allow you the chance to adjust your comments, NO. KEEP THOSE KINDS OF UNUSUAL, PECULIAR TO PEOPLE LIKE YOU, COMMENTS TO YOURSELF. AND THEN THERE WILL NOT BE ANY HINT OF NASTINESS WHERE IT DID NOT OTHERWIE EXIST BEFORE YOU CAME ALONG. I SUGGEST YOU THINK HARD ABOUT THIS AND BE BIG ENOUGH TO ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG TO SUGGEST SUCH A THING... DESPITE YOUR FLAWED EXPLANATION TO THE CONTRARY. I'd far rather be wrong and be accused of being overly sensitive or (sick) as you say, than be proved right! MY GOD TOGG, HOW MANY TIMES HAVE WE HEARD PEOPLE LIKE YOU SAY THINGS LIKE THAT IN THE MEDIA, AFTER THEY HAVE CAUSED IMMENSE SUFFERING AND PAIN TO INNOCENT PARTIES? LIKE THAT CASE WHEN 11 CHILDREN WERE TORN APART FROM THEIR PARENTS IN THE UK, BECAUSE SOME SO CALLED MEDICAL 'EXPERT' IMAGINED THEY WERE BEING SEXUALLY ABUSED - WHEN THEY WERE NOT. HE MERELY 'SUSPECTED' IT, SO HE SAID SO OPENLY, THEREBY ACCUSING THE PARENTS OF SOMETHING THAT WAS LATER PROVEN NEVER TO HAVE HAPPENED. THE CHILDREN WERE DISTRAUGHT, AND THE PARENTS. THE MEDIC WAS 100% WRONG AND HIS ATTITUDE AND EXCUSE WAS EXACTLY THE SAME AS YOURS. IT IS YOU, AND PEOPLE LIKE THAT SUSPICIOUS MEDIC, THAT HAVE THE PROBLEM. YOU SHOULD RE-CONSIDER YOUR VIEWS ON THIS AND ALSO HAVE THE GOOD GRACE TO APOLOGISE - IF YOU ARE BIG ENOUGH. |
Togg 05.09.2006 11:30 |
I seem to have touched a nerve, your response is frankly astonishing. Why should I apologise? I have not said anything other than how YOUR comments made MY flesh crawl. You on the other hand have loaded your post with the usual insults, and done nothing to change my view. It was still very creepy. Maybe you should consider how you correspond with people, you never seem to be able to do it without getting into a fight! I stand by my comments, your post made me feel very unsettled, now you seem to think I have to apologise for the way you made me feel, if you check you will see that I have not called YOU anything, or for that matter said anything except how you made ME feel when reading the post. Maybe you should be the one to apologise for writing in such a way! But if it will make you feel better, I am indeed sorry if I have offended you, it was not the intention, it was however the intention to point out that you need to be aware that your manner of correspondence is shall we say questionable. |
Lisser 05.09.2006 11:31 |
Crezchi wrote: Greg, if you are bored, go find something to do other than call us Moanzone and other ignorant names. Not everyone here is what you say. I have nothing against you except for the way that you come here and try to intimidate people, but these actions of yours are going to catch up with you one day and you will then relize that you have accomplished absolutley nothing. Me and you had our 1 spat, we quickly said 'sorry' in our own ways, why can't this be done here with 90% of your spats? You are an adult, i think you and everyone here knows that, you are the Queen Archivist, you and everyone here knows that also. Now, your username (if you intend it to be or not) is an affiliation to Queen, and if you are going to use your 'title' as your username, PLEASE use some decorum and change your 1 track mind towards Queenzoners, yes it is called Queenzone, NOT Moanzone as you wish to call it. You came back with some calm and intelligent posts, but it seems you get pissed off to easy Greg. As i stated, you are an adult, if someone says "Fuck you Greg" IGNORE it! Or at least don't give them the time or the day to argue with you for 10 pages! As for John Stuart, Greg, what do you have against him? I agree that repeating his posts everywhere is not exacly mature, but i do see the same thing with you as well. Don't take this to heart Greg, i can get along with almost anyone, especially on the internet, it's easy, if you don't like it, ignore it! I honestly do not think that you have set out to come to Queenzone to call us names and insult us. I beleive that you do have some resourceful information to share with us about Queen, but you are the only person who can calm yourself down and possibly answer legit questions and comments. I know there are some childish people here, but Greg this is the same in the real world! How do you handle people like this in real life? Do you insult them? No i don't think you do. SO please Greg for the love of Queen, stop insulting us, and be someone who can cope with the fact that not everyone thinks the same way as you and agrees with you.You might want to take your own advice here? Ignore it when people say things about you that you don't like? |
Asterik 05.09.2006 12:42 |
newcastle 86 wrote: YEAH LETS GET RID OF THE FAT PONCE WHO SPAMS THIS BOARD EVERY SIX MONTHS OR SO GREG PROOPS (I THINK HES KNOWN BY) WHO UNLIKE THE LOTS OF PEOPLE HAS A SAD LACK OF SELF CONFIDENCE IT COMES FROM BEING A FAT KID YOU KNOW GREG THEN AS THE YEARS GO BY..A FAT ADULT AND A FAT WIFE NO DOUBT. I love queenzone its so much funHah hah, you certainly know how to make a point. |
S@turn 05.09.2006 13:02 |
Let's not pretend to be better then any other and let us for all not tell others in public what to do and what not If you realy care, a personal message is more approperiate then here posting here those things is not helping and might only give a person some extra spotlight, far away from the true problem or solution |
Bobby_brown 05.09.2006 15:48 |
Togg wrote: I seem to have touched a nerve, your response is frankly astonishing. Why should I apologise? I have not said anything other than how YOUR comments made MY flesh crawl. You on the other hand have loaded your post with the usual insults, and done nothing to change my view. It was still very creepy. Maybe you should consider how you correspond with people, you never seem to be able to do it without getting into a fight! I stand by my comments, your post made me feel very unsettled, now you seem to think I have to apologise for the way you made me feel, if you check you will see that I have not called YOU anything, or for that matter said anything except how you made ME feel when reading the post. Maybe you should be the one to apologise for writing in such a way! But if it will make you feel better, I am indeed sorry if I have offended you, it was not the intention, it was however the intention to point out that you need to be aware that your manner of correspondence is shall we say questionable.She´s 17 years old, so she can defend herself, but in this case i don´t think she has anything to worry about. But if i´m not mistaken, you were inplying some sorth of paedophilia, wich could never be the case if her age is indeed correct. I completely understand GB comments on her because this is a discussion that started before. . He´s just teasing with her, because of previous topics where she got childish offended. It´s like private jokes between them and those who have read those topics! iI have never witnessed that kind of behaviour on GB previous posts on Poppy. I´ve found them very amuzing and funny, because i understood the joke. Greg Brooks has responsabilities with Queen Productions and outside Queen productions, and as you know he has "some" haters at this forum. Now, if everyone started to pick on this issue, this would be very bad for him personally, and it could ruin his life. Remember what the press did to Pete Townshed of the Who?- He said he has thought in suicide. Really, this is something that could ruin peoples lives, even if it only starts has a rumours. So, let´s not bring these issues here unless it´s really necessary! Take care |
Queen Archivist 05.09.2006 20:17 |
To BOBBY_BROWN. You have hit the nail on the head. For those unfamiliar with that phrase, I mean that Bobby is exactly right. He is SPOT ON. Genuine thanks Bobby for taking the time to explain what I felt I did not want to get into, but you are quite correct. Much of what you say is precisely the case. If I had said that (which I thought about doing), it would have played right into the hands of some truly nefarious people here, and I wouldn't give them the satisfaction. People like Togg are for the most part oblivious to the damage their careless comments, inferences, and ill-thought out words can imply. I could not have made my point clearer than I did in my last thread, about the doctor fiasco, but still Togg fails to see the real heart of the matter. HE WOULD SEE IT PLAIN ENOUGH IF THE SITUATION WERE REVERSED, I assure you. I doubt Togg was meaningfully malicious - no more than was the doctor in my earlier analogy - and he did apologise for offending me, which he certainly did with his nasty undertone... but nevertheless people who think that way, who see things that are not there, are ALSO creepy, and also a worry to the rest of us. I am NOT suggesting Togg has any nasty thoughts himself in 'that' sickening area, I only mean that he has a mind that is very quick to see something tacky and cringful where there is nothing to see. That is HIS problem, but I take offence when his type of nastiness touches me. Bobby_Brown is a clear example, like he says himself, of someone who saw nothing dark or inappropriate in my words to Poppy (and neither did Poppy, by the way). He saw and took the humour and private joke precisely as it was intended. THANK GOD FOR INNOCENT THINKING PEOPLE LIKE HIM. Not everyone has a corrupted, polluted mind, thank Christ. I am sincerely pleased he said what he said, not least, Togg, because now you can see that many people would not have gone that path, had you not said what you said - feeding them that damaging nonsense. Togg, you CANNOT imply that any person has the kind of nasty agenda in mind that you implied I had. It is ugly in the extreme. In fact it could border on slanderous or libelous, actually. By the way, Poppy is 17, not 7, not 5, so your comments were even more wide of the mark than you seem to realise. It's like one cannot have even a joke on QZ sometimes without someone or other looking for a dirty aspect or sinister element. I feel sorry for such people who have allowed their mind to become so tarnished. Anyway... enough said on this. I genuinely appreciate Togg's apology for the real offence he caused. Bobby... you have restored my faith in decent thinking people and I thank you. I owe you a shandy. Regards GB |
newcastle 86 05.09.2006 20:26 |
SHUT UP FAT BOY ITS LIKE A FUKIN MONTY PYTHON SKETCH IN HERE THERES SO MUCH SPAM ON YOUR FAT LIPS isnt queenzone so quaint? |
Queen Archivist 05.09.2006 20:32 |
Hey Newcastle 86. You are a prize prick. Come and visit me and let me beat you into the next world. Come on... Mr Mouth, he who hides like a slimy slug behind his silly QZ identity because he's scared of facing me with his real identity. Twat! |
newcastle 86 05.09.2006 20:38 |
YEAH ILL MEET U FAT BOY ILL KICK YOUR FAT MOUTH INTO NEXT WEEK IM NOT HIDING CUM VISIT ME OK 123 WALACE GARDENS WASHINGTON TYNE AND WEAR FANCY IT FAT CUNT? |
newcastle 86 05.09.2006 20:40 |
NO SLIMY SLUGS HERE FAT BOY CUM ON ONLU SLIMY ONES IN HERE ARE THE FAT SPAMMERS IM UP FOR IT FANCY IT? |
newcastle 86 05.09.2006 20:55 |
OH AND MY MOBILE NUMBER............BUT BE CAREFUL LWITH THOSE FAT FINGERS..........07833755577 |
Smitty 05.09.2006 21:57 |
I am laughing...so hard right now. Greg, you are so easy to wind up. |
TheGame 06.09.2006 02:47 |
Well, i don't think Greg even bother about these last comments, they are just too stupid. |
Togg 06.09.2006 03:53 |
For the record, I am not saying anything other than I found the behaviour inappropriate. You leaped on the 'he's calling me a paedophile' bandwagon, which is astonishing behaviour again, I merely pointed out that the age difference was so great that it was rather creepy to have this sudden fascination with the girl, and school boy chat-up routine going on. I am well aware of her age and as I think I said she is more than capable of looking after herself, I think it is highly questionable to turn this into a parody of the Orkney case, a case which bears no resemblance to me stating that certain behavior is not appropriate on the Internet. The fact that you instantly jumped on it and claimed or inferred that I said something that I did not is more a testament to your insecurity than anything else, if we are not allowed to point out inappropriate behaviour for fear of being labeled 'sick' than we truly do live in a world gone mad where the real pedophiles and sick cases both rule the world and can safely get away with anything, in the knowledge that they can just shout loudly 'unfair you are calling my a pedophile' If as you say it was slanderous, than you truly dont understand the definition of the word, believe me if I had meant it to be slanderous I would have stated it loud and clear. Greg your protesting was so loud and over the top that you actually drew attention to yourself in an extremely attention seeking way, totally unwarranted compared to my comments. I state again I am indeed sorry to cause offence, however there is nothing wrong in pointing out inappropriate behaviour, it is certainly not slanderous (if you think it is, bring it on I would dearly love to see the Lawyers face when you presented it) However, I will continue to point out such behaviour when I see it, not because I believe it is the actions of a paedophile, which is laughable, but because this site does need some policing from its own members, we are the ones that effectively own this site, we decide how we want to live and communicate here. To whoever else is reading this, DO NOT LET GREGS RESPONSE PUT YOU OFF REPORTING ANY BEHAVIOUR THAT UNSETTLES YOU, is is fine to do so, we are in a free world and bullying tactics to suppress others point of view cannot be allowed to rule. I am very comfortable with my own intentions here, YOU blow it up into something it was not, for reasons that escape me, to make a comparison to the Orkney case totally trivialises that situation were children were taken away from their families, it bears NO similarity to me stating you behaved in a way I felt inappropriate. |
Queen Archivist 06.09.2006 04:27 |
Togg, your comments might not have been overt, but certain people got the gist of what you meant - misguided though it was, wrong and unfair and unfounded as it was. The implication was clear enough for some nasty people to see, pick up and run with. Just take a look at the kinds of nasty comments that YOUR implications provoked. YOU are responsible for that. Look back and see. That is the kind of thing that people like you, with your particular way of thinking, can provoke from others who are likeminded (few of you, thank God) - and it wasn't called for or necessary. I have nothing else to say to you Togg. You have no grace and you are not going change your opinion or the wy you carelessly express it. I don't want to waste any further time trying to make you understand what you clearly cannot see. Bobby_Brown understood exactly, so WHY CAN'T YOU? Don't answer that, just go away and take your nasty mind with you. Leave people to joke and be flippant here on QZ without you tarnishing it and putting a horrible spin on it. |
Queen Archivist 06.09.2006 04:34 |
Newcastle. How old are you. 14, 16? 8 or 9? You are the most irritating idiot on QZ - and the most illiterate too (if you know what that means). This is probably why NO-ONE, NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON, answered your thread from the other day. Oh dear, they can all see what a simpleton you are. They can tell this also because people like you (exactly as I said in a thread the other day here, and you prove the point for me) always have to resort to the F word and the C word and calling people fat, etc, because you are so illiterate and unintelligent you cannot express yourself properly without swearing. Your anger gets the better of you. Every other word you write is a swear word. Your vocabulary runs to roughly the same number as your brain cells - 2 or 3. Your parents must be very proud!!!!!!! Stop wearing all the time you illiterate uneducated moron. Learn some new words. |
Togg 06.09.2006 04:55 |
I am happy to agree to disagree here Greg, you think it was unfair, I think it was appropriate to comment. enough said, I bear no malice towards you and have no intention to carry this further into other threads as so often happens. I have made my points clearly and I am happy with the fact they are there to be read by others and interpret in whatever way they want. We both know that the Internet is full or idiots that leap at every opportunity to insult and abuse verbally, that is a fact of life that we have to live with. I am not concerned with the fact we view this from opposite sides of the fence, you can't agree with everyone, it was not meant in an offensive way as well you know. I stand by my posts as I am sure you do too, that is fine, and there is no reason to continue this unless you wish to... As I said before I bear you no malice. |
Crezchi 06.09.2006 05:15 |
Queen Archivist wrote: Newcastle. How old are you. 14, 16? 8 or 9? You are the most irritating idiot on QZ - and the most illiterate too (if you know what that means). This is probably why NO-ONE, NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON, answered your thread from the other day. Oh dear, they can all see what a simpleton you are. They can tell this also because people like you (exactly as I said in a thread the other day here, and you prove the point for me) always have to resort to the F word and the C word and calling people fat, etc, because you are so illiterate and unintelligent you cannot express yourself properly without swearing. Your anger gets the better of you. Every other word you write is a swear word. Your vocabulary runs to roughly the same number as your brain cells - 2 or 3. Your parents must be very proud!!!!!!! Stop wearing all the time you illiterate uneducated moron. Learn some new words.Hi Greg, did you get these words from your "Dictionery"? lmfao! hahahaha If you don't understand what i am talking about refer to my comment on this post link |
john bodega 06.09.2006 06:40 |
Crezchi wrote:That's impressive. I bet it took you hours to find that too, unless you had it bookmarked under "Ammunition-For-Use-Against-GB".Queen Archivist wrote: Newcastle. How old are you. 14, 16? 8 or 9? You are the most irritating idiot on QZ - and the most illiterate too (if you know what that means). This is probably why NO-ONE, NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON, answered your thread from the other day. Oh dear, they can all see what a simpleton you are. They can tell this also because people like you (exactly as I said in a thread the other day here, and you prove the point for me) always have to resort to the F word and the C word and calling people fat, etc, because you are so illiterate and unintelligent you cannot express yourself properly without swearing. Your anger gets the better of you. Every other word you write is a swear word. Your vocabulary runs to roughly the same number as your brain cells - 2 or 3. Your parents must be very proud!!!!!!! Stop wearing all the time you illiterate uneducated moron. Learn some new words.Hi Greg, did you get these words from your "Dictionery"? lmfao! hahahaha If you don't understand what i am talking about refer to my comment on this post link. Honestly.... these threads are soul destroying. Pop quiz - is anything positive going to come out of this bullshit? (Perhaps - more knowledge, god forbid some Rarities Haha), because if not, I can finally stop reading them. |
newcastle 86 06.09.2006 06:48 |
this is exactly my point.Indeed i decided to use the capitals and expletifs route just to get a reaction oh boy did it work! Greg youve astonished me i thought (and rather hoped) that you would reply to my most ridiculous post and bingo!. The point being in all this is a pyscoligical one. hook line and sinker .......... |
Fireplace 06.09.2006 06:52 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Honestly.... these threads are soul destroying. Pop quiz - is anything positive going to come out of this bullshit? (Perhaps - more knowledge, god forbid some Rarities Haha), because if not, I can finally stop reading them.Hear, hear..... Let's talk Queen again. |
Crezchi 06.09.2006 15:00 |
Zebonka12 wrote:I agree, but if Greg wants to insult everyone here and say that we do not correct grammar and/or spelling, then i will show he IS ALSO HUMAN! We all make errors. I will stop as long as he does, or is banned.Crezchi wrote:That's impressive. I bet it took you hours to find that too, unless you had it bookmarked under "Ammunition-For-Use-Against-GB". Honestly.... these threads are soul destroying. Pop quiz - is anything positive going to come out of this bullshit? (Perhaps - more knowledge, god forbid some Rarities Haha), because if not, I can finally stop reading them.Queen Archivist wrote: Newcastle. How old are you. 14, 16? 8 or 9? You are the most irritating idiot on QZ - and the most illiterate too (if you know what that means). This is probably why NO-ONE, NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON, answered your thread from the other day. Oh dear, they can all see what a simpleton you are. They can tell this also because people like you (exactly as I said in a thread the other day here, and you prove the point for me) always have to resort to the F word and the C word and calling people fat, etc, because you are so illiterate and unintelligent you cannot express yourself properly without swearing. Your anger gets the better of you. Every other word you write is a swear word. Your vocabulary runs to roughly the same number as your brain cells - 2 or 3. Your parents must be very proud!!!!!!! Stop wearing all the time you illiterate uneducated moron. Learn some new words.Hi Greg, did you get these words from your "Dictionery"? lmfao! hahahaha If you don't understand what i am talking about refer to my comment on this post link. |
TRS-Romania 30.09.2006 17:54 |
Greg Brooks has a problem which is: Dissocial-Narcistic-Paranoid- Antisocial Personality Disorder Personality disorder, usually coming to attention because of a gross disparity between behaviour and the prevailing social norms, and characterized by - very low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for discharge of aggression - callous unconcern for the feelings of others - gross and persistent attitude of irresponsi- bility and disregard for social norms, rules and obligations - persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults, injuries, or slights - perceives attacks on his or her character and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack - displays rapidly shifting and shallow expression of emotions - shows self-dramatization, theatricality, and exaggerated _expression of emotion - shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes - markedly dysharmonious attitudes and behaviour, involving usually several areas of functioning, e.g. affectivity, arousal, impulse control, ways of perceiving and thinking, and style of relating to others |
Leaky Luke 05.10.2006 12:56 |
Mr Queen Archivist wrote: Hey Newcastle 86. You are a prize prick. Come and visit me and let me beat you into the next world. Come on... Mr Mouth, he who hides like a slimy slug behind his silly QZ identity because he's scared of facing me with his real identity. Twat! Thijs Arends wrote: Oh yeah, who is Mr Mouth now... my god you sound like an 11 year old waiting at a school's playfield to beat someone up. Btw, are you still willing to answer questions during the Dutch convention in 2 weeks time... cause I'll be there, or do you want to beat me to the next world as well? Now I know you can't resist to complain about any sort of comments towards you and you have to backfire everyone that criticizes you. But the worst part is your arselicking comments towards people that agree with you. |
wstüssyb 05.10.2006 15:09 |
oblivion is a pretty good Xbox 360 game for sure. |