QueenZone discussion #863957
Name for the new Queen+PR studio album...
| matias2 22.08.2006 19:21 |
I'm so happy that Queen is going to record a new album!!New album means New tour!!I hope that they could come to south america!! They must use the name QUEEN!!Yes,Queen (Brian and Roger) They are the only owners of their music with John. They can't change their name. THE SHOW MUST GO ON, Freddie wanted this!! |
| Deacon Fan 22.08.2006 20:13 |
Okay. |
| deleted user 22.08.2006 20:41 |
they should use the queen name, but take out a letter and replace it with p(for paul). like "queep" or "pueen." see, it's symbolic. |
| rocks. 22.08.2006 20:49 |
macbethscrazywife wrote: they should use the queen name, but take out a letter and replace it with p(for paul). like "queep" or "pueen." see, it's symbolic.hahahaha, ROFL! |
| Smitty 22.08.2006 21:47 |
macbethscrazywife wrote: they should use the queen name, but take out a letter and replace it with p(for paul). like "queep" or "pueen." see, it's symbolic.Thank god they aren't making an album with Robbie Williams then... |
| deleted user 22.08.2006 22:18 |
<font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY™ wrote:*pause...think...*macbethscrazywife wrote: they should use the queen name, but take out a letter and replace it with p(for paul). like "queep" or "pueen." see, it's symbolic.Thank god they aren't making an album with Robbie Williams then... HAHAHAHA |
| its_a_hard_life 26994 22.08.2006 23:34 |
<font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY™ wrote:LMAO!!!!macbethscrazywife wrote: they should use the queen name, but take out a letter and replace it with p(for paul). like "queep" or "pueen." see, it's symbolic.Thank god they aren't making an album with Robbie Williams then... I hate Robbie's guts anyways. Q-U-E-E-R!!! |
| Daburcor? 22.08.2006 23:37 |
<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote:Kind of like Freddie, eh?<font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY™ wrote:I hate Robbie's guts anyways. Q-U-E-E-R!!!macbethscrazywife wrote: they should use the queen name, but take out a letter and replace it with p(for paul). like "queep" or "pueen." see, it's symbolic.Thank god they aren't making an album with Robbie Williams then... |
| its_a_hard_life 26994 22.08.2006 23:52 |
Dan Corson wrote:No I'm spelling out what "queen" would be if they had the "R" put in at the end... Duh!!!<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote:Kind of like Freddie, eh?<font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY™ wrote:I hate Robbie's guts anyways. Q-U-E-E-R!!!macbethscrazywife wrote: they should use the queen name, but take out a letter and replace it with p(for paul). like "queep" or "pueen." see, it's symbolic.Thank god they aren't making an album with Robbie Williams then... Queer. Is what you end up with if it was Robbie as the "lead" singer. |
| deleted user 23.08.2006 01:07 |
more like W-R-O-N-G. robbie williams is annoying...paul rodgers is pretty cool though. |
| Daburcor? 23.08.2006 02:52 |
<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote:I KNOW. It was a J-O-K-E.Dan Corson wrote:No I'm spelling out what "queen" would be if they had the "R" put in at the end... Duh!!! Queer. Is what you end up with if it was Robbie as the "lead" singer.<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote:Kind of like Freddie, eh?<font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY™ wrote:I hate Robbie's guts anyways. Q-U-E-E-R!!!macbethscrazywife wrote: they should use the queen name, but take out a letter and replace it with p(for paul). like "queep" or "pueen." see, it's symbolic.Thank god they aren't making an album with Robbie Williams then... Christ! People NEVER get my sense of humor around here... |
| dtucra 23.08.2006 03:27 |
I think they should use the name Queen ONLY folllowed by +PR; they should not include PR as member of the band. I will not buy it, anyway. As for the name, Freddie invented it, they were certainly not like "totally happy" about it, they should make some specification. Like Prince did at some moment: formerly known as... There is no Queen without Freddie, John kinda resigned (retired, if you will), so what kind of Queen is that, anyway? |
| DeeEmm 23.08.2006 05:33 |
It's 50% Queen, of course. Maybe Que.5? |
| deleted user 23.08.2006 05:58 |
no, freddie put the Q in queen. and john was the n(n-other one bites the dust, you n i, you're my best fr-n). it's 3 in the morning. pardon the relentless punning. |
| deleted user 23.08.2006 06:04 |
matias2 wrote: I'm so happy that Queen is going to record a new album!!New album means New tour!!It had better mean new tour, because I haven't seen them yet. |
| Hutchence 23.08.2006 06:15 |
Hmm, good topic. Unfortunately, I can't think of any good name:) I just hope that it'll be simple and cathchy. Of course, I expect a decent art-work as well! Oh, by the way, if you think that Robbie Williams is annoying and irritating so how come that he had the best-selling album last year (Intensive Care) and a sold out stadium tour this year (Close encounters tour- 1.5 mil.tickets in 2 hours)!!!??? So, as you can see, many people don't share your opinion...Anyway, can't wait for new tour!!! |
| Poo, again 23.08.2006 07:36 |
I still believe it's wrong to use the name Queen, but it's not up to me. |
| deacyamp 23.08.2006 07:58 |
I'm sorry for saying this : Fuck Off matias2. there's no Queen anymore. Q+PR should be quit now. if BRIAN and ROGER call themselves Queen , So I am Elvis Presley. that fucking tour with that PR was enough to take the QUEEN music down. they should quit now. it's late but not too late. |
| stateside fan 23.08.2006 08:27 |
agrees with deacyamp.but if they make a record i will buy it. |
| Ayreon 23.08.2006 09:16 |
Why not Q + PR? and maybe subtitled "featuring Bm and RT from Queen and PR from Bad co and Free" As for the album title, how about "made on earth" ;) |
| PieterMC 23.08.2006 10:08 |
Who gives a fuck what they call themselves. What matters is if the music is good or not. Whatever name its released under is not going to change the quality of the music either way. |
| Lester Burnham 23.08.2006 11:04 |
PieterMC wrote: Who gives a fuck what they call themselves. What matters is if the music is good or not. Whatever name its released under is not going to change the quality of the music either way.Exactly. And it's not like Brian, Roger, and Paul are going to listen to the dissenters and say, "Well shit, Joe Schmoe in Anytown, USA said that if we record as Q+PR they won't buy our album! Guess it's all over now, lads!" |
| PieterMC 23.08.2006 11:52 |
People are just SO stuck up on the name that they tend to forget that what really matters is if its actually any good or not. It it goes the 46664 route then it will be utter crap. Let's hope for something new and exciting. |
| 7 seas of Rhye 23.08.2006 12:14 |
'"If anyone left Queen, anyone of the four, that would be the end of Queen. We are four equal, interwoven parts. And the others just couldn't function the same without each quarter."- Freddie Mercury |
| Lester Burnham 23.08.2006 12:16 |
7 seas of Rhye wrote: '"If anyone left Queen, anyone of the four, that would be the end of Queen. We are four equal, interwoven parts. And the others just couldn't function the same without each quarter."- Freddie Mercury"It's only a bloody record! People get so excited about these things." - Freddie Mercury |
| PieterMC 23.08.2006 12:21 |
"When I'm dead and gone who cares?" - Freddie Mercury |
| deleted user 23.08.2006 12:34 |
deacyamp wrote: I'm sorry for saying this : Fuck Off matias2. there's no Queen anymore. Q+PR should be quit now. if BRIAN and ROGER call themselves Queen , So I am Elvis Presley. that fucking tour with that PR was enough to take the QUEEN music down. they should quit now. it's late but not too late.Here mate, don't tell someone to fuck off just because they happen to have a different opinion to you. And just to point out that nothing or nobody can take Queen music down. This won't change what anybody thinks of the music, because the music will always be there for people to hear, on the albums. |
| Serry... 23.08.2006 12:35 |
Shit happens |
| Munchsack 23.08.2006 13:31 |
<font color=red>Quonkers wrote:And a new tour with a few gigs in Scotland! Oh yes!matias2 wrote: I'm so happy that Queen is going to record a new album!!New album means New tour!!It had better mean new tour, because I haven't seen them yet. I don't mind them using the Queen name as long as it is not just Queen. Although I would prefer if they came up with a new name altogether. I quite like 'Build Your Own Boat', which was Brian's idea for the name for Queen. |
| hereyugo 23.08.2006 14:48 |
Queen III |
| deleted user 23.08.2006 15:00 |
PieterMC wrote: "When I'm dead and gone who cares?" - Freddie Mercurylol...freddie's having a vicious debate with himself. |
| Rick 23.08.2006 15:09 |
They should release a song called 'The Stepfords Shuffle' or 'Freakin' Freddie Fans'. |
| brENsKi 23.08.2006 15:16 |
or how about Paul Rogers Queen (rogers is a verb) I Want to Break Free of Free What's The Frequeency Kenneth? Good Bad Company Feel Like Getting Down, Making Love All Right Now I'm Here |
| flash! 28068 23.08.2006 15:21 |
<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote: or how about Paul Rogers Queen (rogers is a verb) I Want to Break Free of Free What's The Frequeency Kenneth? Good Bad Company Feel Like Getting Down, Making Love All Right Now I'm HereGenius. |
| Micrówave 23.08.2006 15:44 |
*ignores Queen isn't Queen BS* Hopefully they choose something fresh. I would hate to see "Mercury Rising" or something lamenting on the past. How about "Hiding Deacon" |
| david (galashiels) 23.08.2006 15:45 |
what about -the 3 wise men-or-acorn antiques? |
| david (galashiels) 23.08.2006 15:48 |
3 wise men for making pots of cash-and acorn antiques for being woody and old |
| Poo, again 23.08.2006 15:53 |
Lol. "Crouching Taylor, hidden Deacon". |
| PieterMC 23.08.2006 15:56 |
What about these possible future hits: Freddie? Fuck Deacon Song for Rodgers (Previously unreleased tribute to Paul Rodgers - written by Freddie circa 2004) Bohemian OOOOh Baby Yeah Rhapsody |
| deleted user 23.08.2006 16:52 |
matias2 wrote: I'm so happy that Queen is going to record a new album!!New album means New tour!!I hope that they could come to south america!! They must use the name QUEEN!!Yes,Queen (Brian and Roger) They are the only owners of their music with John. They can't change their name. THE SHOW MUST GO ON, Freddie wanted this!!...United Kingdom where they come from then your country....hehe |
| deleted user 23.08.2006 16:53 |
<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote:hahahha! go jess! xDDan Corson wrote:No I'm spelling out what "queen" would be if they had the "R" put in at the end... Duh!!! Queer. Is what you end up with if it was Robbie as the "lead" singer.<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote:Kind of like Freddie, eh?<font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY™ wrote:I hate Robbie's guts anyways. Q-U-E-E-R!!!macbethscrazywife wrote: they should use the queen name, but take out a letter and replace it with p(for paul). like "queep" or "pueen." see, it's symbolic.Thank god they aren't making an album with Robbie Williams then... |
| deleted user 23.08.2006 16:54 |
Dan Corson wrote:sure....xD<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote:I KNOW. It was a J-O-K-E. Christ! People NEVER get my sense of humor around here...Dan Corson wrote:No I'm spelling out what "queen" would be if they had the "R" put in at the end... Duh!!! Queer. Is what you end up with if it was Robbie as the "lead" singer.<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote:Kind of like Freddie, eh?<font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY™ wrote:I hate Robbie's guts anyways. Q-U-E-E-R!!!macbethscrazywife wrote: they should use the queen name, but take out a letter and replace it with p(for paul). like "queep" or "pueen." see, it's symbolic.Thank god they aren't making an album with Robbie Williams then... |
| popy 23.08.2006 19:00 |
matias2 wrote: I'm so happy that Queen is going to record a new album!!New album means New tour!!I hope that they could come to south america!! They must use the name QUEEN!!Yes,Queen (Brian and Roger) They are the only owners of their music with John. They can't change their name. THE SHOW MUST GO ON, Freddie wanted this!!new album means new tour,also means GVH 3 again put back to lets say,meaning writing songs for the new album,recording them and possibly new tour... let's say end of 2007,beginning of 2008.And GVH 1 is from 2001,GVH 2 is from 2003 and GVH 3 for late 2007,begining of 2008 (and i really think it's only being realesed in 2008 ),so more than 4 years separating GHV 2 from GVH 3 and when i say this for GHV 3,i say also for live concert DVD's of original Queen. well it's good to know they're back in studio again..but i think that first they MUST END the GVH Video Collection |
| bas asselbergs 23.08.2006 19:35 |
SERIOUS: 1) "50% Queen + friends, featuring Paul Rodgers" 2) "1/2 of Queen + friends, featuring Paul Rodgers" 3) "The Brian May Band, featuring Roger Taylor & Paul Rodgers" NOT SERIOUS: 4) "Brian Uniting Roger+Paul" ( BURP ) 5) "Paul Rodgers United Queen" ( PRUQ ) 6) "wannabee Queen again" 7) "we miss Freddie" or: "we need Freddie" 8) "strip to this (music?) darlings" 9) "if you love Queen, don't buy this cd" 10) "the noises on this cd can't be called music" 11) "if you don't buy this cd, make a donation to the Mercury Phoenix Trust" 12) "the last attempt" 13) "this is a rip-off!" 14) "sorry" 15) "especially recorded for Basje" HAHAHAHAHA THE LAST ONE IS MY FAVORITE!!!!!(15) |
| DeeEmm 24.08.2006 01:24 |
I'd buy two copies: One to listen to and the other to throw into the fire. |
| deleted user 24.08.2006 01:30 |
DeeEmm wrote: I'd buy two copies: One to listen to and the other to throw into the fire.lol...i think that's how most of us feel deep down! |
| matias2 27.08.2006 15:01 |
FFFFFFFUUUUUUUCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |