thomasquinn 32989 31.07.2006 07:10 |
Hello there, anyone interested. I am looking for the COMPLETE set of BBC Sessions (so N-O-T the official stuff on 'Queen At The Beeb'). I will trade for concert recordings; ask me for a list if you are interested. My e-mail address is casparmulders[@]hotmail[.]com |
John S Stuart 31.07.2006 07:32 |
Thomas, I have these things as lossless masters, but no-one seems to be interested, as they are so commonly available as MP3. |
Leonardo Venegas 31.07.2006 09:50 |
I'm really interested Mr. Stuart! I'd love to have those songs in Flac Greetings! |
John S Stuart 31.07.2006 10:15 |
Leonardo Venegas wrote: I'm really interested Mr. Stuart! I'd love to have those songs in Flac Greetings!Leonardo: I don't mind uploading these sessions (or other rare material) as FLAC files, but the problem for me is that I do not have much 'family silver' left. Over the years, I have given away freely so much stuff, yet, there are still a great number of rarities out there - like 'Face It Alone’ and other studio material - which no one wants to swap (especially for lossless - as MP3 seems to satisfy most palates). I know that it is a sh*tty philosophy, as I too think that ‘giving to receive’ is not in the spirit of true file sharing, but as I do not have any other leverage to obtain similar unreleased demo tracks, I guess that publicly uploading these FLAC files is not in my own best interests. However, if someone was to be actually kind enough to reciprocate my past generosity, then I promise, I will upload these BBC master-tape sessions in return. I can not say fairer than that – can I? Who knows? if someone does reply (either as a personal e-mail, or in this forum), perhaps we could all benefit. |
sebas_qsry 31.07.2006 13:50 |
Mrs Stuart: What type of material, are you interested?... to return the past attentions? |
John S Stuart 31.07.2006 14:26 |
sebas_qsry wrote: Mrs Stuart: What type of material, are you interested?... to return the past attentions?sebas_qsry: Nothing impossible - just some of the tracks currently secretly traded inside this very community. No more – or less. I certainly do not think that I am DUE these tracks, or that I even deserve them - I am neither that presumptuous nor egotistical - but I feel no shame in using FLAC as a bartering tool. I do confess to feeling somewhat guilty, as I really do believe that it is a sad day resorting to such tactics – and I know that this is not the way to either win friends or influence people - but what else would you do in my position? PS: It's Mr - not Mrs! |
pow wow 31.07.2006 17:21 |
FLAC is great! |
turini 31.07.2006 17:43 |
i think there is a request forum? you always scream at people to go there why dont YOU |
TheGame 31.07.2006 17:53 |
turini wrote: i think there is a request forum? you always scream at people to go there why dont YOUBecause this is the Announce/trading forum, that's why he posted it here. |
Penetration_Guru 31.07.2006 17:55 |
At the risk of being indiscreet, what Mr Stuart has in the way of BBC sessions sounds WAY better than any mp3 I've heard. Do him a deal, you won't regret it. |
Bobby_brown 31.07.2006 19:35 |
John S Stuart wrote:I understand your point, and you don´t have to give a thing to this comunity. I don´t see any other colectors give away such gems like you did in the past.sebas_qsry wrote: Mrs Stuart: What type of material, are you interested?... to return the past attentions?sebas_qsry: Nothing impossible - just some of the tracks currently secretly traded inside this very community. No more – or less. I certainly do not think that I am DUE these tracks, or that I even deserve them - I am neither that presumptuous nor egotistical - but I feel no shame in using FLAC as a bartering tool. I do confess to feeling somewhat guilty, as I really do believe that it is a sad day resorting to such tactics – and I know that this is not the way to either win friends or influence people - but what else would you do in my position? PS: It's Mr - not Mrs! I´m not a trader, even though i collect things, so if i don´t share rare tracks it´s simply because i don´t have it! About the BBC sessions, just answer me this question, please: The "Modern times rock n roll" on session 4 seems to be with a lot of noise. And, i´ve never heard a real good version (without the background noise)anywhere, wich leads me to think that the problem comes from the mastertape. Is this true?- Is your version clean or does it have the noise too? Take care |
John S Stuart 31.07.2006 21:01 |
Bobby: Clean. |
Bobby_brown 01.08.2006 13:32 |
John S Stuart wrote: Bobby: Clean.Thanks. Take care |
John S Stuart 01.08.2006 14:49 |
Just as I thought - it doesn't look like anyone wants to take me up on the offer - because most people are happy with their MP3 versions. |
bitesthedust 01.08.2006 15:14 |
if I had something of equal value to offer, John - I would take you up on it. |
Ian R 01.08.2006 16:02 |
Scream_for_reality wrote:Scream,John S Stuart wrote: Just as I thought - it doesn't look like anyone wants to take me up on the offer - because most people are happy with their MP3 versions.I have nothing to trade anymore. But could you upload the clear version of Modern times rock 'n'roll in mp3? I think John would only be too happy to share a lossless version of that recording, if someone else was willing to share something rare. Seems reasonable to me. Ian. |
PieterMC 01.08.2006 16:15 |
I wish I had something of equal value because I would love to hear these. |
modify 01.08.2006 17:47 |
I don't even have these mp3s. Could somebody post them...maybe? Thanks. |
John S Stuart 01.08.2006 17:55 |
Repetition of earlier ideas - sorry. |
Roger's Beard 01.08.2006 18:17 |
Is there anything in particular you're after john? fan filmed concert recordings? Queen, solo...? |
John S Stuart 01.08.2006 19:59 |
pootle1 wrote: Is there anything in particular you're after john? fan filmed concert recordings? Queen, solo...?Pootle1: I am looking for 'Face It Alone', and some of the other Queen studio demos which surfaced earlier this year. I know that this may SEEM like a tall order, but, these tracks are currently ‘working the rounds’, and inevitably will be made publicly available sooner or later. I guess I am just too impatient to wait for that day to arrive. So, I fail to see the point of sitting on these demos now, when in return, I am willing to upload FLAC versions of these sessions for everyone to share, while keeping the donor's promise of anonymity and exclusivity intact. For the donor, s/he would also benefit from the quality of the FLAC downloads. From my view-point, it is a situation whereby everyone in Queenzone wins – but is there anyone in here willing to take that anonymous first step? However, I must point out, that I do not wish to be viewed as a ‘bully’, and I do not wish to manipulate anyone into a situation where they feel either uncomfortable or coerced. Being honest, I am just trying to use a little leverage for selfish reasons, and I view that as just another part ‘of the game’. I would be extremely unhappy if this was misconstrued, and forced anyone to do anything against their will. At the end of the day, we are all just chasing a few songs – and that should be a fun experience – not emotional blackmail, and I hope that this ‘begging’ letter is read as the former, and not the latter. |
Roger's Beard 02.08.2006 05:31 |
John, I've been after those for years myself. Seems like I get copies of other demos before most other folks (like headlong & delilah months before they appeared here - under threat of death if they ever did!!), but not face it alone! Actually, I'm surprised you don't have them as I thought you had everything!! :) For information purposes, would you mind listing the other studio demos that have surfaced this year please? Thanks, |
Bobby_brown 02.08.2006 09:50 |
John S Stuart wrote: Pootle1: I am looking for 'Face It Alone', and some of the other Queen studio demos which surfaced earlier this year.I remember you saying, a while ago, that you didn´t have these songs, but after 8 months i thought that you would have it. It´s uncomprehensive the Queen collectors behaviour! If i were you, i would keep the BBC flac recordings for myself. They´re more valuable than "Face it Alone". Eventually the "Face it Alone" will be released on the box-sets, how about the BBC recordings?- I'm not so shure!! Wasn´t "face it alone" recorded on a convention, or was leacked from the studio?- Probably the quality isn´t that good either. But wait, there´s still hope. there´s a Queenzoner willing to share that demo: link We just have to wait and see what happens! Lately, this forum is full of great collectors, who have the most incredible gems, and without nobody asking them they say they want to share. Then some guy says something it shouldn´t and.... the same thing happens again-"i won´t share anymore, and i don´t have to prove nothing to anybody". It´s allways the same thing, over and over again. Why bother?? Take care |
John S Stuart 02.08.2006 12:53 |
pootle1 wrote: Actually, I'm surprised you don't have them as I thought you had everything!! :) For information purposes, would you mind listing the other studio demos that have surfaced this year please? Thanks,Pootle 1: I wish I did have everything, but unfortunately, I don't - I guess we are all human after all. As to what else has been 'released', it seems that I am an embarrassment to the ‘established’ collecting world – because I am not afraid to publish what I think. I guess the view is that my ‘mouth is too big’, and that I can not keep a secret, thus making me a liability in ‘elite circles’. So it seems that I am ‘forbidden’ to discuss such material. While I freely admit the charge, I do not see this as some sort of Judas-like betrayal, as after all I do not have copies of the tracks to share. In my mind, it is one thing to ‘betray’ what is available – while it is another, perhaps more ‘serious crime’ to betray a donor’s actual ‘property’. First: The sad thing is that I feel like a used whore. All serious collectors eventually will. As we slowly release all our valuable treasures, little remains to swap with. Suddenly, a new batch of rarities hits ‘the market’, but because of previous personal generosity, one can no longer play in the current game. When this current batch of rarities becomes common, another fresh batch of collectables will appear, and suddenly those collectors who are currently flavour of the month, will lose that prestige, as they too are relegated to the used whore status. It just seems so sad that no-one is willing is move in any direction, for what is, after all, (usually) the stolen property of Queen Productions. Second: As I live in a democracy, I will not give up my right to publish what I see as free information. I have not signed the Official Secrets Act, nor do I see the discussion of a few Queen songs as a danger to any nation’s National Security. It seems to me that the Stalinist-Mafioso mentality of these collectors is almost akin to the breaking of religious vows or the Masonic oath. Why should we be ‘forbidden’ to discuss such material – and by whom? What do they have to gain – or lose by these discussions? So, as a long-winded answer, I know excellent studio quality demos (not convention recordings) like ‘Victory’ and Roger Taylor/Freddie Mercury ‘Fun In Space’ tracks are being exchanged, but, you really need to be part of the club to have any chance of getting these. Unfortunately, as I said above, because I am willing to talk about such things, I think that makes my admission null and void. I think I will request these tracks over in the request forum, and see what happens from there! |
John S Stuart 02.08.2006 12:53 |
Double post - sorry. |
Roger's Beard 02.08.2006 13:15 |
Thanks for the little bit of information John. I agree with you. Virtually all my rarities have been exhausted over the last 8 years and I don't even get info anymore on what's out there! The people I used to trade with have all long gone, and I'm an outsider these days. Occasioanlly something good crops up and I then I feel dirty because some people on here would call me an elite trader for not sharing it... |
John S Stuart 02.08.2006 13:41 |
pootle1 wrote: Thanks for the little bit of information John. I agree with you. Virtually all my rarities have been exhausted over the last 8 years and I don't even get info anymore on what's out there! The people I used to trade with have all long gone, and I'm an outsider these days. Occasioanlly something good crops up and I then I feel dirty because some people on here would call me an elite trader for not sharing it...Why not drop me a private mail? It is in my profile. |
Saint Jiub 02.08.2006 23:05 |
John S Stuart wrote:Good post John, but I think your plea will fall on deaf ears. Maybe next year.pootle1 wrote: Actually, I'm surprised you don't have them as I thought you had everything!! :) For information purposes, would you mind listing the other studio demos that have surfaced this year please? Thanks,Pootle 1: I wish I did have everything, but unfortunately, I don't - I guess we are all human after all. As to what else has been 'released', it seems that I am an embarrassment to the ‘established’ collecting world – because I am not afraid to publish what I think. I guess the view is that my ‘mouth is too big’, and that I can not keep a secret, thus making me a liability in ‘elite circles’. So it seems that I am ‘forbidden’ to discuss such material. While I freely admit the charge, I do not see this as some sort of Judas-like betrayal, as after all I do not have copies of the tracks to share. In my mind, it is one thing to ‘betray’ what is available – while it is another, perhaps more ‘serious crime’ to betray a donor’s actual ‘property’. First: The sad thing is that I feel like a used whore. All serious collectors eventually will. As we slowly release all our valuable treasures, little remains to swap with. Suddenly, a new batch of rarities hits ‘the market’, but because of previous personal generosity, one can no longer play in the current game. When this current batch of rarities becomes common, another fresh batch of collectables will appear, and suddenly those collectors who are currently flavour of the month, will lose that prestige, as they too are relegated to the used whore status. It just seems so sad that no-one is willing is move in any direction, for what is, after all, (usually) the stolen property of Queen Productions. Second: As I live in a democracy, I will not give up my right to publish what I see as free information. I have not signed the Official Secrets Act, nor do I see the discussion of a few Queen songs as a danger to any nation’s National Security. It seems to me that the Stalinist-Mafioso mentality of these collectors is almost akin to the breaking of religious vows or the Masonic oath. Why should we be ‘forbidden’ to discuss such material – and by whom? What do they have to gain – or lose by these discussions? So, as a long-winded answer, I know excellent studio quality demos (not convention recordings) like ‘Victory’ and Roger Taylor/Freddie Mercury ‘Fun In Space’ tracks are being exchanged, but, you really need to be part of the club to have any chance of getting these. Unfortunately, as I said above, because I am willing to talk about such things, I think that makes my admission null and void. I think I will request these tracks over in the request forum, and see what happens from there! |
The Real Wizard 09.08.2006 01:58 |
John S Stuart wrote: However, if someone was to be actually kind enough to reciprocate my past generosity, then I promise, I will upload these BBC master-tape sessions in return. I can not say fairer than that – can I?You know exactly who the key people are. Many are members here, and have read this topic. They'll never share anything, because it's collecting suicide. Like you said, the only time something interesting gets posted is when it has made its rounds in the trading circles and can't be traded anymore. But the posting is done by bottom-end collectors, never the long-time collectors who first got the material. John S Stuart wrote:Me too. I'm in the same position as you. We both probably have a couple rarities the other doesn't have, so drop me a line.pootle1 wrote: Thanks for the little bit of information John. I agree with you. Virtually all my rarities have been exhausted over the last 8 years and I don't even get info anymore on what's out there! The people I used to trade with have all long gone, and I'm an outsider these days. Occasioanlly something good crops up and I then I feel dirty because some people on here would call me an elite trader for not sharing it...Why not drop me a private mail? It is in my profile. |
queen2trade 09.08.2006 17:52 |
have an excellant quality copy of complete bbc sessions please visit my site & send me a list of trades offered link |
queen2trade 09.08.2006 17:55 |
have an excellant quality copy of complete bbc sessions please visit my site & send me a list of trades offered link |
frank39 10.08.2006 04:14 |
"Key people", "bottom-end collector" what a nice terminology, shows more than long posts. "They'll never share anything",... but I am sure they take it all here. Any lists of those 2 species here arround? |
Bobby_brown 10.08.2006 10:13 |
frank39 wrote: "Key people", "bottom-end collector" what a nice terminology, shows more than long posts. "They'll never share anything",... but I am sure they take it all here. Any lists of those 2 species here arround?Now you´ve said it all!! They don´t share a thing, but they come here too for free downloads. I don´t care about them anymore. If they don´t want to share, it´s fine. We´ll survive, but i supose that in your case it´s more frustating, because you have shared freely some great stuff that you bought in the first place. Let´s hope that in the future they´ll see you and others as a good example, and if they are downloading for free, the least they could do is upload for free too. I don´t think there are more worthy fans that others, even if they only have 14 years old. Music is for everybody!! But it takes time to change minds! Take care |
The Real Wizard 12.08.2006 00:59 |
Bobby_brown wrote: They don´t share a thing, but they come here too for free downloads. I don´t care about them anymore. If they don´t want to share, it´s fine. We´ll survive, but i supose that in your case it´s more frustating, because you have shared freely some great stuff that you bought in the first place.It's not nearly that simple. When unusual things get shared here, do you think the cds just fell into someone's mailbox and onto the Internet, or that there was some kind of long process in order to obtain them? I don't see you in collecting circles trying to obtain rare things with intention of sharing them here, so who are you to talk? |
frank39 12.08.2006 04:49 |
In fact it is simple: "THEY never share anything", how true is that!! But take it all from here for free. Sorry, I forgot: THEY shared 3 sec. of Puebla, or 30 sec. fish snippet. |
Bobby_brown 12.08.2006 09:52 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> It's not nearly that simple. When unusual things get shared here, do you think the cds just fell into someone's mailbox and onto the Internet, or that there was some kind of long process in order to obtain them? I don't see you in collecting circles trying to obtain rare things with intention of sharing them here, so who are you to talk?So, are you trying to say to me that every good collector already have the DVD Frank39 shared here for free with that quality?- I doubt it. And about Silver Salmon or Polar Bear? They didn´t got that from colleting circles. Even big collectors don´t have everything you know? But what i see, is John S Stuart looking for "Face it alone" and other demos and he doesdn´t have many things left for a good trade. Some collectors are leechers too, and they too come to queenzone to leech and in the end don´t share anything in return. Of course, they´re good collectors, they only trade. Who am i to talk? Please, read the Frank39 replys so you can see how much he has payed for the Houston77 DVD that he shared here for free. I really don´t care about if they share or not, i don´t guive a shit about them! I just don´t like their quiet leeching attitude! At least they could say thanks for the original uploader. Do they do that? No, because they don´t admit they are leechers. Take care |
Fat Lizzy 12.08.2006 12:26 |
I'm getting quite sick and tired of the people here whining about the "traders". In this case I'll consider myself a trader and all the things said on this forum about traders (that 'we' are bloodsuckers and only want to profit from the recordings we work hard and work long for to get - and spend a lot of money on them; with postage and CDs it's normal if you 'pay' €2,- per recording, imagine if you have 200+ recordings...) there are maybe 1 or 2 sick minded 'traders' around who sell recordings and profit from them. Therefore I would say that it would be better to have 99% of the recordings posted on this forum. Why do you think, that there are almost no new (lossless) recordings posted on this forum? Because traders are being scared away and frustrated due to the mentality of most of the people on this forum. Would you give something to people who only whine about the trading mentality? It's just not true what most of you guys say about us. To go on about the fact that almost no new (lossless) recordings are shared on this forum is in my opinion due to the fact that a lot of people here are happy with a simple mp3 recording. As long as those low quality standards and the sh*tty mentality (mentioned above) doesn't change I don't think bloodsucking people (traders) will post ANYTHING here. So won't I and I think that these are some of the prime reasons for John not posting the BBC recordings for free here. And if this goes on, I feel sorry for you John, I don't think that someone will offer a rare recording so that these BBC recordings can be shared on here. To go back on topic; I don't think that Thomas, a nice trader who actually tried to get more people sharing their recordings here by posting some great recordings, want's to see the BBC masters end up here. Not due to the fact that he's greedy but just because of the great trading mentality he has. Everyone can get to nice and (now) rare recordings. It just takes time. If you don't want to take the time to get to these recordings don't whine on the people who do want to spend years and years of time on it. |
Bobby_brown 12.08.2006 16:15 |
<font size="1">Ðon Gerolamo</font> wrote: To go on about the fact that almost no new (lossless) recordings are shared on this forum is in my opinion due to the fact that a lot of people here are happy with a simple mp3 recording. As long as those low quality standards and the sh*tty mentality (mentioned above) doesn't change I don't think bloodsucking people (traders) will post ANYTHING here. So won't I and I think that these are some of the prime reasons for John not posting the BBC recordings for free here. And if this goes on, I feel sorry for you John, I don't think that someone will offer a rare recording so that these BBC recordings can be shared on here. .I´ve never called any names to traders, and of course there are traders and traders. Let me just ask you this: Where do you think they got the 2005/2006 Queen+Paul Rodgers tours?- Did they waited for the bootlegs, or did they downloaded here for free?- Did they ever thanked the uploader? Did they ever shared something in return, even if it was mp3, so they could keep the lossless format for themselves? Of course in this forum we have great traders, and we know who they are, and if they don´t want to share something rare they don´t have to! We know who they are and at least they treat everybody as equals. They don´t have the smartass attitude! First, i don´t believe that traders don´t share their stuff because they´re afraid of people converting it to mp3, simply because if they are going to share in Lossless they don´t need to buy it afterwards! They already have the better version. Trading is about strenght, and that strenght comes when you have something rare, dificult to find! As i said before i don´t care if they share or not, but it´s hard to see guys like Frank39, John S Stuart and others sharing some great and rare stuff, loosing streght to those who can only leech! When you say that John S Stuart doesn´t share the BBC sessions in lossless for free because of the low quality standarts of this forum, i think you´re so wrong! He doesn´t share them for free, because he has lost the power of trade to the others that kept leeching his stuff for nothing in return, so the only way John has to have something in return is to propose these deals. If he uploads the lossless formats of this sessions for free do you think he would get something in return? How about the very high quality standards of traders as you call it?- John is ofering the lossless in return of the mp3 demos (assuming the lossless is in the hands of QueenProductions), and still no one accepted his offer. They don´t mind having the mp3 version like the rest of us. So much for the standards!!! And by the way, when you say that you are a trader, making looking very important, let me just say that i don´t guive any importance at all to that title! - you guys take that very seriously-like it´s some kind of a secret society- You almost got to the DaVinci Code!! Take care |
Fat Lizzy 13.08.2006 04:58 |
We don't have the DaVinci Code or something else like that, and I'm not trying to be a smartass. I'm just commenting on the sh*tty attitude of some people on this forum. That's what keeps me from sharing recordings here. Yes I have recordings nobody has, that doesn't make me God, but IF the recordings were shared here in lossless quality and all for free it would be a much better place. I'm not saying that every trader or collector get scared from people saying that but some just don't want to give away the recordings they got with a lot of efford to people who just call them names and pollute the trading pool by converting it to mp3. Ofcourse that is good for people who don't have a great internet connection. But look at other communities like from Bon Jovi and Nirvana. They share almost everything with eachother and have a huge sense of perfectionism about the lineage and things like that. Ok tell me I'm a dreamer, but this would be great for the Queen community to have. About the reason why John doesn't post it for free... Let him reply. If I'm mistaking I'll eat one of my socks and tape it for you. And I'll SHARE IT HERE FOR FREE. So please flame on on me but this is how I think and in this world everyone has a right on his own opinion. |
frank39 13.08.2006 05:54 |
one more word to Houston77: After having uploaded it to Rapidshare, which took me some days and nights, there was really a lot of Thank-You, Great, what a nice concert... Thanks back for these kind words here. It was quite interesting to see, who did NOT say any thanks, The well known KEY PEOPLE here didn´t leave single reply. There can only be 2 reasons: All those so called Key people already had Houston77 for quite a long time!!!! Sitting with their ass on it since years. And THEY were angry about me for this upload, their perl was no longer a trading perl. I even got mails with "send Rapidshare to hell". Nice, isn´t it?? Or THEY didn´t have it yet, but downmoaded it here for free, of course, like some ungrateful leechers. |
YourValentine 13.08.2006 06:06 |
3 versions of Houston came out about the same time: two were sold on ebay, one of them was shared here on QZ by Marknow. The 3rd version was released by Digital Queen Archive. If people did not thank you it was maybe because they just bought Houston on ebay or from DQA - that does not mean they were sitting on it for ages. I wish people would not not judge so much, all the fun is spoilt by this. Of course there is no excuse for sending you hate mails for sharing. |
Serry... 13.08.2006 06:10 |
Frank, a lot of people aren't saying "thanks" just because they don't say "thanks" to anyone, no matter who is uploader and what have been uploaded... There was recently a thread by the_hero where he and me shared some non-rare (though not-so-easy-to-find-for-newbies on other hand), but frequently asked tracks and tracks by requests from Request forum; so according to my RapidShare premium account - those tracks (only mine) were downloaded for about 1700 times, but you could find about just 7-8 "thanks"... I don't care anymore if people thanks me, I used to such things, but it says a lot about modern times... I always wanted to make links inivisible for non-QZers and to show the list who have downloaded the file (as it's in the Hub)... I'm extremist, I know... :) |
frank39 13.08.2006 09:11 |
I am not fishing for compliments, it was only quite interesting for me to see, who did, and who did not. Thats all. Thanks Serry, and Barbara: I´d like to say here, that she is the only person here on QZ, who ever send me a Queen show, allthough I didn´t ask for it! Maybe 5 years ago, I recieved Paris 79 from her,what a surprise, can you imagine my joy? Hope, you don´t bother me for saying this here -:) And now look at some of these selfish posts here, and much more on other threads? Can you imagine that from the KEY People (what a horrible word)? All the joy is going down, the more I visit this forum. |
frank39 13.08.2006 11:08 |
And Marknow, you can´t imagine, how happy I was, when I first saw your announe of Houston. Actually it was you, who first came up with this "long time hidden" Queen show. I was searching since years. Later I found it on Ebay. Only the 3 songs, cut out, that was somehow senseless, the 3 tracks were in the hub, just some days after the first announce, so why not offer the complete show directly? official or not, look at Ebay and Trancer, nobody cares. |
The Real Wizard 13.08.2006 12:47 |
Bobby_brown wrote: So, are you trying to say to me that every good collector already have the DVD Frank39 shared here for free with that quality?- I doubt it. And about Silver Salmon or Polar Bear?Absolutely. These songs were floating around for years before they were shared here, or in the hub, or wherever. I had them four or five years ago. Houston was an exception. Because it got in the wrong hands, it was circulating amongst collectors only for about 6 months until some not-so-collectors got it and then finally shared it. Frank wasn't the first person to spread it to the public. They didn´t got that from colleting circles. Even big collectors don´t have everything you know? But what i see, is John S Stuart looking for "Face it alone" and other demos and he doesdn´t have many things left for a good trade.I never said John or anyone had everything. But be sure that collectors have anything before it's shared here, 99 times out of 100. The only exceptions I can think of are when the collectors aren't aware of something's existence, like the recently emerged new sources of London 9-7-84 and 9-8-84, and the complete Dallas 78 coming out last year. How about the very high quality standards of traders as you call it?- John is ofering the lossless in return of the mp3 demos (assuming the lossless is in the hands of QueenProductions), and still no one accepted his offer. They don´t mind having the mp3 version like the rest of us. So much for the standards!!!No, that's not the reason. Nobody wants to share what they have, because it's still good trading material. The BBC sessions already exist in some format, so why would a trader give up a *new* song just to receive a slight upgrade of something they already have? And by the way, when you say that you are a trader, making looking very important, let me just say that i don´t guive any importance at all to that title!With this attitude, you aren't going to get anywhere. Don't you understand? When things get shared here, they're bottom of the barrel. They have no more collectible value! Ðon Gerolamo knows what he's talking about. He's 100% correct. I have many things I'd like to share, but I won't share them here, because they'll be converted to mp3 almost immediately by someone who just don't understand the difference between lossy and lossless. Queenzone's lack of quality standards have given Queen collectors a HORRIBLE reputation in the wider Queen world. Whenever I share anything, I'll do it at The Trader's Den, Dimeadozen, or something like that. Slowly, as more decent Queen recordings emerge there, hopefully people will begin to take Queen collectors seriously again, and maybe we'll see some more new recordings. But at the moment, there are so many recordings being hoarded for this reason. |
Mr. Scully 13.08.2006 13:28 |
Something from me too... I do have quite a few recordings (concerts, demos) that 99% people on QueenZone do not have. In most cases I'm not allowed to trade/share them and I have to respect that. There are a few recordings that I *could* share/trade (the newly surfaced Barcelona 1979 for example) but I won't do that simply because I have zero free time. I don't even have time for trades that ARE interesting for me - how can you blame me that I won't share for free for all the leechers here? I'm not in the hub, I don't download from rapidshare, the only torrents I ever downloaded from QZ were from the Q+PR tour (and I "paid" for those torrents by recording quite a lot of Q+PR gigs, some of my recordings later appeared on QueenZone). Also my data transfer is limited to 2 GB / month which speaks for itself :-) So you can think whatever you want about my attitude - but it's MY life and nobody else's business. I don't share - but I don't take either. I live my own life and I have about enough time for my family, job and Queen websites. But what looks strange to me is the approach of some collectors. The long-time collectors have NEVER shared anything really rare. NEVER. NOBODY. (Me included). I can admit that. But some collectors here are big hypocrites. They always complain about how "others should share" because they want to look like good collectors who wouldn't hesitate to share all of their rarities. The truth is the opposite. Collectors trade, they don't share. If they share (very very scarcely), it's 0.01% of their collection and it's only because it leaked already. I have never seen a single *rarity* on QueenZone. Think about it. Btw. I admire people like frank39 who invest their money and then share. QueenZone needs more members like that. |
Marknow 13.08.2006 15:53 |
frank39 wrote: And Marknow, you can´t imagine, how happy I was, when I first saw your announe of Houston. Actually it was you, who first came up with this "long time hidden" Queen show. I was searching since years. Later I found it on Ebay. Only the 3 songs, cut out, that was somehow senseless, the 3 tracks were in the hub, just some days after the first announce, so why not offer the complete show directly? official or not, look at Ebay and Trancer, nobody cares.Hi Frank. Belive me buddy i did want to post the uncut version of Houston here, but i could not do so with a clear conscience. The rules on official material are clear and should be respected. The hub however does have slightly different rules so the edits could be shared there no prob. Mark. |
Bobby_brown 13.08.2006 16:09 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:Let me just say that Houston 77 is in good hands now!!Bobby_brown wrote: So, are you trying to say to me that every good collector already have the DVD Frank39 shared here for free with that quality?- I doubt it. And about Silver Salmon or Polar Bear?I had them four or five years ago. Houston was an exception. Because it got in the wrong hands, it was circulating amongst collectors only for about 6 months until some not-so-collectors got it and then finally shared it. Frank wasn't the first person to spread it to the public.And by the way, when you say that you are a trader, making looking very important, let me just say that i don´t guive any importance at all to that title!With this attitude, you aren't going to get anywhere. Don't you understand? When things get shared here, they're bottom of the barrel. They have no more collectible value! Ðon Gerolamo knows what he's talking about. He's 100% correct. I have many things I'd like to share, but I won't share them here, because they'll be converted to mp3 almost immediately by someone who just don't understand the difference between lossy and lossless. Queenzone's lack of quality standards have given Queen collectors a HORRIBLE reputation in the wider Queen world. You have talked about my attitude. what attitude?? Did i said something wrong, or was i desrespectfull? I was answering to don Geralmo and your reply just suported what i said before. You said that with my attitude i wasn´t going to get anywhere?- Where do you think i whant to go? I´m not here to make pen frinds or to make friends among traders! I can speack freely what i think, without being desrespectull. I´m shocked about how Horrible the Queen collectors reputation is among the wider Queen world. And all because of Queenzone!!! Get real, there are more important things to worry about! You say that you don´t share some concerts because they would be transfered to mp3. So, what your problem? And what´s the other traders problems? They don´t come here to leech, they only trade, isn´t that right? NO, IT ISN'T, and that´s the big problem among traders. After that you simply can´t tell if it was traded or downloaded, and then you´ve got to ask if this person is a reliable trader or not. Do i buy it or not?- you think to yourself. And then there is only one way to erase the bad quality tapes from the market. You have to share the best version avaiable to stop the spread of the bad version. This way you won´t get fooled again! You´ve said that 99.9% of things shared here are already among traders. Wrong!- how about the new Queen+Paul Rodgers tour, that was shared (some videos and audios) here from fans to the fans, simply because they wanted everybody to share that experience? Let me just say this again: I´ve nothing at all against traders, i just want to point out some bad atitudes that i´ve witnessed here among the years. If you don´t want to share, or can´t share, you don´t have to! It´s your choise, and i understand. But sometimes when someone asks for something at the request forum (and persons who shared freely everything), the only reply´s they get is something like "i have this but i only trade, drop me a mail...", but of course if you ask them, they never come to Queenzone for downloads. This attitude is the one you should condemn, not mine! I´m just writing what i see, of course there are always exceptions, and you shouldn´t take my words so personally, because they weren´t directed to anyone in particular. Just trying to change some mentalities here, but if you think wisely, you´ll see that i´m not completely wrong. Take care |
Fat Lizzy 13.08.2006 18:23 |
Bobby_brown wrote:Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:Let me just say that Houston 77 is in good hands now!!Bobby_brown wrote: So, are you trying to say to me that every good collector already have the DVD Frank39 shared here for free with that quality?- I doubt it. And about Silver Salmon or Polar Bear?I had them four or five years ago. Houston was an exception. Because it got in the wrong hands, it was circulating amongst collectors only for about 6 months until some not-so-collectors got it and then finally shared it. Frank wasn't the first person to spread it to the public.And by the way, when you say that you are a trader, making looking very important, let me just say that i don´t guive any importance at all to that title!With this attitude, you aren't going to get anywhere. Don't you understand? When things get shared here, they're bottom of the barrel. They have no more collectible value! Ðon Gerolamo knows what he's talking about. He's 100% correct. I have many things I'd like to share, but I won't share them here, because they'll be converted to mp3 almost immediately by someone who just don't understand the difference between lossy and lossless. Queenzone's lack of quality standards have given Queen collectors a HORRIBLE reputation in the wider Queen world. |
The Real Wizard 13.08.2006 18:57 |
You have talked about my attitude. what attitude?? Did i said something wrong, or was i desrespectfull?By "attitude" I meant your personal position on the matter, not your interpersonal skills, which are just fine. Sorry for the confusion. I´m shocked about how Horrible the Queen collectors reputation is among the wider Queen world. And all because of Queenzone!!! Get real, there are more important things to worry about!You obviously don't take this seriously, which of course is okay, as it's not one of life's requirements. But you should know, this is the reason why few new recordings emerge. If this place wouldn't have so many crappy mp3s and mpeg videos, people would share their rare recordings more often, because they would be in "good hands". Good hands don't convert something to mp3 because the file is smaller. Who in their right mind wants to share a gem, only to have it converted to mp3 and on rapidshare the next day? This is the reputation the Queen community has gained, and consequently everyone suffers in the end. The collectors are left frustrated, and the downloaders have nothing new to download if they've downloaded everything available to them. And what´s the other traders problems? They don´t come here to leech, they only trade, isn´t that right? NO, IT ISN'T, and that´s the big problem among traders.If it wasn't for the traders, nearly everything that has been shared here wouldn't have been shared in the first place. Queenzone is the end of the line. A dvd, cd, or song has been making the rounds for months or even years before it's made available here for anyone to download. Honestly, do you think someone just found the Houston 77 DVD in a bargain bin at their local record store, or do you think it went through some kind of process before it got here? Or did Silver Salmon come as a bonus track on a store-bought cd that only one person was able to find? Think logically, please. After that you simply can´t tell if it was traded or downloaded, and then you´ve got to ask if this person is a reliable trader or not. Do i buy it or not?- you think to yourself.When a collector trades a show, they send a sample in flac or wave format, and then a frequency analysis is done to be sure that the file is lossless. Here, however, the majority of concerts shared are mp3. Many flac concerts here are converted from mp3, as a means of disguise, and are thus not true flac. And then there is only one way to erase the bad quality tapes from the market. You have to share the best version avaiable to stop the spread of the bad version. This way you won´t get fooled again!Finally, you make some sense. But this is some kind of utopia you're talking about. At the moment, not everyone cares about lossy vs lossless, so the mp3 versions will continue to circulate. You´ve said that 99.9% of things shared here are already among traders. Wrong!- how about the new Queen+Paul Rodgers tour, that was shared (some videos and audios) here from fans to the fans, simply because they wanted everybody to share that experience?I'm generally referring to older material. Naturally, one can't stop an over-excited fan from sharing their cell phone videos of recent shows, of which there are thousands. There isn't a huge demand for 05-06 stuff the way there is demand for 70s stuff. But trust me, those who want the unusual 05-06 stuff will find a way to get it, because it's usually much easier to get than an uncirculated video from 1977. And even when that 1977 video is found, chances are it will be a 10th generation copy, as the video is 30 years old. A video filmed last year has not been VHS copied ten times over. But sometimes when someone asks for something at the request forum (and persons who shared freely everything), the only reply |
Bobby_brown 13.08.2006 20:08 |
<font size="1">Ðon Gerolamo</font> wrote: [QUOTE Yes, you were disrespectful, though I don't need respect from an ignorant person like you..You need someone to teach you good maners! 18 years old? Is this the best you can do? People see bad things where they wan´t to see bad things! To make yourself be understood you don´t need to talk like that. You replied to my post feeling very offended, and tried to put yourself among the traders community to do so. People often speak in general, but you choosed to be offended. When you said with all authority that you are a trader, you tried to get in a position of importance, wich i simply don´t guive any, and said so. If you want to be ofended, i really don´t care. You are as much important to the Queen community as i am or any fan is! DON GERALDO WROTE: No, you didn't just answer. You tried to make a fool out of me. By saying "I don't give any importance to that title". It's not a title, it's a way of showing how deeply some people care about the importance of preserving the many great recordings there are of the best band we all love on this forum; Queen.. mY REPLY: I never tried to make a fool out of you. On the contrary, you took all the earlier replys on yourself and tried to make a fool out of everybody else, by trying to justify some atitudes! I already said that i talk in general, you don´t need to be ofended, but please keep those excuses for yourself, ok? We are talking about some stuff that shouldn´t be outside QueenProductions in the first place, oK?- So please, don´t come here with that angel atitude of traders, because we both know how some things get out of the archives! Let´s not be naive, because i´m not. And yes, i too listen to those demos. Guilty!! I´m not a saint and neither are you. DON GERALDO WROTE: Yes, you can speak freely about what you think. I did that too. But don't think it will always go unpunished. There are many people who agree with me. There might be more leeches on this forum who don't agree but that doesn't matter because that is the key issue on this forum and that's why (as I said in my original post) there are no good things shared here at this time.. MY REPLY Wrong! Leeches on this forum agree with you, you can be shure about that! DON GERALDO WROTE: Trading doesn't depend on whether a person downloaded a recording or not, I (and certainly some others) won't understand what you're trying to say there. It just doesn't make sense. You're right about how we can get rid of a part of the 'dirty' tapes. By sharing everything here. Just like I said, seems you actually have learned something today. But why doesn't that happen? Ask yourself you seem to know best.. MY REPLY: Wrong again! Trading depends on that and you know it. That´s why you have a black list for bad traders. Yes, i´ve learn something, and since you don´t know i´ll share it with you: That doesn´t happend because the person (trader) who knows he has the best generation tape (let´s call it this way), don´t need to share it! He will only trade it and don´t guive a f**K if the less quality one are being spreaded or not! He won´t be fooled with it. But the funny thing is, traders fool other traders! You think about it. DON GERALDO WROTE: You say you have something against some traders. It seems to me that you have something against me... What have I done to piss you off? No bullshit just tell me. If you proof to me that I've insulted, threatened or mistreated YOU in ANY way before this post I promise to share atleast 10 recordings not shared on this forum before.. MY REPLY: Well, i make you the same question! I´m very good with psychics! It´s a gift i have. You try to analise your last sentence and you tell me that |
Bobby_brown 13.08.2006 20:51 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:You have talked about my attitude. what attitude?? Did i said something wrong, or was i desrespectfull?By "attitude" I meant your personal position on the matter, not your interpersonal skills, which are just fine. Sorry for the confusion. |
The Real Wizard 13.08.2006 23:23 |
Thanks for the reply. But you still seem to think that trading is limited to requesting and downloading things publically. It goes much, much deeper than that. |
YourValentine 14.08.2006 04:04 |
Martin, I'll make an offer you cannot deny :) |
Mr Mercury 14.08.2006 06:05 |
frank39 wrote: I am not fishing for compliments, it was only quite interesting for me to see, who did, and who did not. Thats all. Thanks Serry, and Barbara: I´d like to say here, that she is the only person here on QZ, who ever send me a Queen show, allthough I didn´t ask for it! Maybe 5 years ago, I recieved Paris 79 from her,what a surprise, can you imagine my joy? Hope, you don´t bother me for saying this here -:) And now look at some of these selfish posts here, and much more on other threads? Can you imagine that from the KEY People (what a horrible word)? All the joy is going down, the more I visit this forum.Barbara also sent me a copy of Japan 1982 to which I am still grateful for!! The difference being I did ask for it all those years ago. Thanks Barb! As for recieving thanks for posting files through Rapidshare, I too dont bother about whether I get any thanks for uploading anything and posting the links here. And the reason why? Not all the leechers are from QZ. Most of the time you find that someone has copied the link from here and posted it on some other forum or site as if it was their own. And so the original uploader hardly ever gets a "thank you". Finally, and this is just a suggestion, why doesnt QZ have a trial run of banning MP3 and possibly poor quality video just to see how things go if that is what traders have a bug bear with here? Its just possible then that John might get his original request done in the manner he spoke of. |
Saint Jiub 14.08.2006 08:02 |
Censorship of mp3? Brilliant - especially considering that lossless files can be easily detected by frequency analysis. John still will not be able to use his flac BBC sessions for trade bait because the traders are content with having the mp3 source. |
tilomagnet 14.08.2006 08:35 |
<font color=green><b>Mr Mercury</b> wrote: Finally, and this is just a suggestion, why doesnt QZ have a trial run of banning MP3 and possibly poor quality video just to see how things go if that is what traders have a bug bear with here? Its just possible then that John might get his original request done in the manner he spoke of.Even though the banning of mp3 material would definately be a good step at some point, it is completely useless considering the current sorry state of this board with 80% of the users demanding mp3s and claiming there was no difference between lossless and lossy anyway. It is the attitude of the large majority of members of this board that needs to change. Why would any collector want to seed a high quality lossless source if hardly anyone does really appreciate that while most of the people demanding an mp3 version? High quality sources and lossy audio compression are two things that don't work together. As long as most people on this board do not accept and/or understand this fact you'll never see any of these rare gems shared on QZ. |
Bobby_brown 14.08.2006 09:19 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Thanks for the reply. But you still seem to think that trading is limited to requesting and downloading things publically. It goes much, much deeper than that.I know that! Don´t get me wrong, i´m not against trading. Even me in the past have traded for rare vinyls. Please, everything i said is in the Queenzone context, and was just the reply to what was being said. If i could, i would trade for Sunbury 74, because it´s something i would really love to have. I´m not against trading at all. i just don´t like the so called traders coming to this board to tease with the fans, when we know that even them in the past have downloaded something from Queenzone. If they don´t want to share, that´s OK, but at least they should show some respect for newbies or fans in general, and this is what´s missing in Queenzone. The last couple of months i´ve witnessed many things wich i don´t aprove and i´m just saying that. And i´m shure you know what i´m talking about. Take care |
YourValentine 14.08.2006 09:33 |
Before we begin a discussion about what else Richard should do to solve the issues on the forums - he is out of the country and still travelling for a while. I am sure when he comes back we can sit down and discuss how the forums can be improved. I see a tendency of adding forum to forum to please everyone and there will still be people being dissatisfied. As much as traders dislike mp3, they are not hell-made - many people still prefer mp3 because they listen to their bootlegs on mp3 players anyway. Martin is right - not too many traders do share anything here, so they should not decide on the rules. Maybe it's possible to have a forum for the mp3 and VCD uploaders and one for flac and DVD. I would like to upload some material in VCD format (simply because it's the only format I have of these videos) but I am tired of being attacked by the purists (who rarely upload anything themselves). I think I am not the only one who feels that way. A more tolerant and a kinder attitude would be so helpful. |
omega 14.08.2006 10:06 |
Hi all sorry to interupt this thread, but maybe it would be good to take a look at this site. link might get some good ideas for QZ. |
Fat Lizzy 14.08.2006 12:35 |
Bobby_brown, you just don't get the point. I am not trying to make me look important and frankly I don't give a flying elephant that I'm just 18 and that you are older. I'll end the discussion here, because of the above named reason that you don't get the point especially the downloading/trading combination. Goodbye. |
Mr Mercury 14.08.2006 18:15 |
YourValentine wrote: Before we begin a discussion about what else Richard should do to solve the issues on the forums - he is out of the country and still travelling for a while. I am sure when he comes back we can sit down and discuss how the forums can be improved. I see a tendency of adding forum to forum to please everyone and there will still be people being dissatisfied. As much as traders dislike mp3, they are not hell-made - many people still prefer mp3 because they listen to their bootlegs on mp3 players anyway. Martin is right - not too many traders do share anything here, so they should not decide on the rules. Maybe it's possible to have a forum for the mp3 and VCD uploaders and one for flac and DVD. I would like to upload some material in VCD format (simply because it's the only format I have of these videos) but I am tired of being attacked by the purists (who rarely upload anything themselves). I think I am not the only one who feels that way. A more tolerant and a kinder attitude would be so helpful.Sorry, Barb I forgot that Richard was out of the country. But like I said what I suggested was just that - a suggestion and one that maybe should be put up for decent discussion. By that I mean a serious debate that doesnt involve any kind of attacks by "purists" (or anyone else for that matter) on anyone who's point of view happens to be different to them. Also, maybe I was being a wee bit overboard with the comments about video - but that was just a suggestion as well. That may be less of a debate considering that some people dont mind having video that appears to suffer from severe generation loss only because it has historic value. I personally dont mind if it VCD, Mpeg1 or 2 and DVD And finally, you are right, Barb, a more tolerant and a kinder attitude would be so helpful. Amen to that! |