love of my life 98 15.06.2006 15:03 |
certains source use to say that headlong videoclip has been recorded in november 90, the greatest flix II indicate it was in april 91...who can tell me the truth? I believe more and more it was in november 90, can anybody confirm me this? |
Penetration_Guru 15.06.2006 15:10 |
I can, as I saw it before April 91. In the defence of Flix 2, does it not say that the isngle was released in April, and here's the video for it? |
love of my life 98 15.06.2006 15:15 |
thx for this quick reply, but GFIX II use the word "recorded" at the townhouse studio in april 1991, however the sigle has been released the 15th of May 1991. that's why I doubt because I've seen any pictures of the recording with the following day: november 29-1990.... |
Winter Land Man 15.06.2006 16:38 |
There are three days the video was recorded..... look in the video, their clothes are different three times. |
Winter Land Man 15.06.2006 16:38 |
love of my life 98 wrote: thx for this quick reply, but GFIX II use the word "recorded" at the townhouse studio in april 1991, however the sigle has been released the 15th of May 1991. that's why I doubt because I've seen any pictures of the recording with the following day: november 29-1990....And like January 1991 in the US |
chefman5150 16.06.2006 06:55 |
This is something that kind of boggled my mind too, because Freddie still looks semi-healthy in this video, versus TATDOOL video, where he looks like he's the living dead... |
Winter Land Man 16.06.2006 07:02 |
chefman5150 wrote: This is something that kind of boggled my mind too, because Freddie still looks semi-healthy in this video, versus TATDOOL video, where he looks like he's the living dead...Well it was in black and white, with heavy make up and no beard. If you look at that paparattzi photo of him in August of 1991, you'll see he has a beard, and looks a lot like Freddie in Headlong, but with Kaposi Sarcoma. |
Jazz 78 16.06.2006 08:19 |
The video was actually shot on November 23 or 25 1990. There is a VERY quick shot of the "clapboard" in one of the scenes and you can see the date and director's name on it. I think the clapboard is seen in one of the shots where the band was in the recording studio. |
Winter Land Man 16.06.2006 08:33 |
Jazz 78 wrote: The video was actually shot on November 23 or 25 1990. There is a VERY quick shot of the "clapboard" in one of the scenes and you can see the date and director's name on it. I think the clapboard is seen in one of the shots where the band was in the recording studio.But there are three different days it was filmed. Threee different clothing styles. And Peter Freestone said two days. But there were three different clothing styles. There's two blue outfits on Freddie if you pay attention. |
wesker1287 16.06.2006 09:23 |
[quote]Well it was in black and white, with heavy make up and no beard. If you look at that paparattzi photo of him in August of 1991, you'll see he has a beard, and looks a lot like Freddie in Headlong, but with Kaposi Sarcoma.[/quote] where can I see this picture? |
Stryder 16.06.2006 09:43 |
here link |
Brian_Mays_Wig 16.06.2006 10:02 |
In the Spring 1991 fanclub mag there is a pic of the Headlong Vid shoot. It was recorded Nov/Dec 91 cos It was the first single from Innuendo in the States. |
Stryder 16.06.2006 10:17 |
nov/dec 91?:P |
mayniac316 16.06.2006 10:25 |
I like Brian's Bart Simpson t-shirt!! :D I'm good at these things... I'll figure it out! |
Queen_Rox 16.06.2006 10:33 |
Hey, he used to be a man with a stick in his hand Hoop diddy diddy, hoop diddy doo She used to be a woman with a hotdog stand Hoop diddy diddy, hoop diddy doo... sorry, I love that song! Anyway, I'm assuming that the video shoot was November '90 because Freddie looked semi-skinny then before the May 31st, '91 video shoot of "These Are The Days Of Our Lives." in the video for "Headlong", I love how Brian tried to headbang like a metal fan. |
Asterik 16.06.2006 10:56 |
I had a look at the video yesterday. For me, the performance sequences look too energetic to be filmed in April '91. Fred is able to do quite a lot on that video, he covers quite a lot of ground and moves in an energetic fashion. According to Peter Freestone by April/may he could barely walk but then again I'd question that because only 2 months earlier he appeared mobile on IGSM. Ultimately, it's hard to compare becasue one is in monotone and the other colour, one bearded, one clean shaven. All in all, the thing I find most fascinating is that Fred is more energetic on Headlong than IWIA, depsite being in far better shape on the latter one! |
Serry... 16.06.2006 10:56 |
Video was shown for the first time at January of 1991. Innuendo EPK (with snippets from this video) was shown long before April of 1991. End of discussion. |
Queen_Rox 16.06.2006 11:01 |
Serry... wrote: Video was shown for the first time at January of 1991. Innuendo EPK (with snippets from this video) was shown long before April of 1991. End of discussion.Thanks, Serry :) |
RETROLOVE 16.06.2006 11:51 |
He used to be a man with a stick in his hand Hoop ditty ditty hoop ditty doo!!!! |
Queen_Rox 16.06.2006 11:59 |
<B>Jellybean Queen<h6>sweetbodykisses<B> wrote: He used to be a man with a stick in his hand Hoop ditty ditty hoop ditty doo!!!!**Joins in** She used to be a woman with the hotdog stand Hoop diddy diddy, hoop diddy doo |
Bohemian MAY-niac/Deaconite 16.06.2006 19:25 |
Wow, I can't get over how fast Freddie went down hill between the "Headlong" and "TATDOOL' Videos. He didn't look well in "I'm going slightly mad" video either. I can just imagine how he felt. Poor Freddie! |
Asterik 17.06.2006 17:12 |
it must have been the winter of 1990 that got to him. |
Winter Land Man 17.06.2006 17:13 |
<B>Jellybean Queen<h6>sweetbodykisses<B> wrote: He used to be a man with a stick in his hand Hoop ditty ditty hoop ditty doo!!!!How do you know that song? Did you buy Innuendo or Greatest Hits II or Classic Queen finally? |
TRS-Romania 17.06.2006 17:43 |
Headlong, the video, was supposedly shot before oktober 1990 Stefan |
kdj2hot 18.06.2006 00:50 |
Bohemian MAY-niac wrote: Wow, I can't get over how fast Freddie went down hill between the "Headlong" and "TATDOOL' Videos. He didn't look well in "I'm going slightly mad" video either. I can just imagine how he felt. Poor Freddie!You're seeing things. His condition was about the same I think. Some deterioration but nothing drastic. He might have looked better to you because of his beard. I don't know the specifics of his condition so I don't know if the virus was building resistance to AZT (which was the case of all victims of that terrible disease before the drug cocktail came) but I don't think he went downhill quickly. All of it was probably due to AZT, the symptoms are anemia, pale skin, etc. That and not necesarily the viral infection was why he was so weak. He probably was full of energy after he quit the AZT. Which is probably why he was able to record so close to his death. Then that Pneumonia got him. Sucks. He made his mark though, most people here hold him in high regard and also feel for what he went through when thinking about those final days (certainly not as much those who knew him personally or himself but we definitely still feel.). |
john bodega 18.06.2006 01:52 |
kdj2hot, I think you're pretty much correct. He always looked better with the beard anyway haha. The thing one has to understand when thinking 'he went downhill quickly' is that he was already downhill after '89. He was terribly ill, that's just AIDS for you. He looks energetic in Headlong, and Breakthru, but I'm willing to bet that the poor guy paid for it afterwards. |
Winter Land Man 18.06.2006 02:07 |
Zebonka12 wrote: kdj2hot, I think you're pretty much correct. He always looked better with the beard anyway haha. The thing one has to understand when thinking 'he went downhill quickly' is that he was already downhill after '89. He was terribly ill, that's just AIDS for you. He looks energetic in Headlong, and Breakthru, but I'm willing to bet that the poor guy paid for it afterwards.Personally, I don't think he was too ill. Of course he was ill, but I don't think it was as bad as some people think. AIDS has it's ups and downs, one day you can feel bad, and for the next month you can look and feel great. Even going by his home videos, he wasn't too bad. Liberace performed his last concert performance only a couple months before death. Makes you wonder why Freddie couldn't perform during 'The Miracle' period, doesn't it? He was pretty thin in 1986.... and he probably just stopped lifting weights and loss his muscle tone. If you compare Freddie in 1989, and Freddie in 1975, (body wise) it's not much of a difference in weight. Remember, the AIDS rumors starting coming around the time they performed at Live AID, there's an interview with John on some site that says "the latest rumor is that Freddie has AIDS" and the article is from '85. |
Asterik 18.06.2006 08:01 |
Personally, I don't think he was too ill. Of course he was ill, but I don't think it was as bad as some people think. AIDS has it's ups and downs, one day you can feel bad, and for the next month you can look and feel great. Even going by his home videos, he wasn't too bad. Liberace performed his last concert performance only a couple months before death. Makes you wonder why Freddie couldn't perform during 'The Miracle' period, doesn't it? He was pretty thin in 1986.... and he probably just stopped lifting weights and loss his muscle tone. If you compare Freddie in 1989, and Freddie in 1975, (body wise) it's not much of a difference in weight. Remember, the AIDS rumors starting coming around the time they performed at Live AID, there's an interview with John on some site that says "the latest rumor is that Freddie has AIDS" and the article is from '85. That's a very interesting view. obviously Fred would have had to use more energy than liberace but your comparison of Fred between '75 and '89 is quite salient- he wasn;t very muscular then but I think it was the gauntness in the face that made the difference. I'm one of the camp who believe that had The Miracle been released in 1988, Fred would have toured. |
kdj2hot 18.06.2006 11:35 |
Asterik wrote: Personally, I don't think he was too ill. Of course he was ill, but I don't think it was as bad as some people think. AIDS has it's ups and downs, one day you can feel bad, and for the next month you can look and feel great. Even going by his home videos, he wasn't too bad. Liberace performed his last concert performance only a couple months before death. Makes you wonder why Freddie couldn't perform during 'The Miracle' period, doesn't it? He was pretty thin in 1986.... and he probably just stopped lifting weights and loss his muscle tone. If you compare Freddie in 1989, and Freddie in 1975, (body wise) it's not much of a difference in weight. Remember, the AIDS rumors starting coming around the time they performed at Live AID, there's an interview with John on some site that says "the latest rumor is that Freddie has AIDS" and the article is from '85.That's a very interesting view. obviously Fred would have had to use more energy than liberace but your comparison of Fred between '75 and '89 is quite salient- he wasn;t very muscular then but I think it was the gauntness in the face that made the difference. I'm one of the camp who believe that had The Miracle been released in 1988, Fred would have toured. The reason guys like Kalus Nomi, Sylvester and Liberaci performed and toured extensively despite going through the later stages of HIV infection (late stages of AIDS itself in Liberaci's case and I think Sylvester may have been on AZT in his last few months) is because that was pre AZT. Freddie had to struggle to muster energy to sing in a studio to hear Brian tell it. If Freddie wasn't on AZT he probably could've went on a "Miracle tour"... well no, he probably would've been by the time the album came out like I hear the doctors told him... (in 91 though I don't know if he was building resistance to AZT yet, which happens to all HIV infections treated with AZT alone, it's a smart virus. If he was then he would've been getting all of the dreadful side effects with vey little if any benefits. Again I don't know.) I guess my point is that his last year for the most part would've been higher quality up until a couple of months before before he died. The question is would you want a year or may be 2 at a higher quality or 4 or 5 years feeling weak and living a somewhat limited life? (I won't even get in to the theories on whether anti virals used for HIV and AZT actually causes HIV infection. REsearch it for yourself because you'd probably think I'm conspiracy nut... okay I'll gloss over it. A number of people haven't developed AIDS yet. I mean a guy found out he was HIV positive in 1986 from a sample he had on file from the Hep B trials from 1978 and I believe he's still alive, without reaching status, today. There have been some research that indicate most of those people lived a fairly clean life, no drugs or popper with no other health issues as well. Which leads me to believe that using drugs like cocaine (which suppress the immune system) during early HIV infection aids the drugs... that much I'm proned to believe. The theory goes on to say that the other reason for AIDS comes from the drugs used to treat it (which explains the big question of how kids like Ryan White died of AIDS) I believe the illegal drug theory is plausible in aiding the development of AIDS, but I think AIDS would have probably developed anyway, the drug use just made it happen sooner. Now this may or may not relate to Freddie because I don't know very little first hand of what he was doing outside of making a lot of records). ----------edit--------------- Let me add one more thing to this long ass rambling post: If Freddie found out he had full blown AIDS in 1987 then I would make sense for the doctors to give him a prognosis of around a year or so. AZT wasn't approved for AIDS and HIV (I'm going on the FDA maybe it was approved earlier in |
Bohemian MAY-niac/Deaconite 18.06.2006 23:38 |
kdj2hot wrote:Good Point, I guess my eyes were playing tricks on me. Thanks for clearing that up.Bohemian MAY-niac wrote: Wow, I can't get over how fast Freddie went down hill between the "Headlong" and "TATDOOL' Videos. He didn't look well in "I'm going slightly mad" video either. I can just imagine how he felt. Poor Freddie!You're seeing things. His condition was about the same I think. Some deterioration but nothing drastic. He might have looked better to you because of his beard. I don't know the specifics of his condition so I don't know if the virus was building resistance to AZT (which was the case of all victims of that terrible disease before the drug cocktail came) but I don't think he went downhill quickly. All of it was probably due to AZT, the symptoms are anemia, pale skin, etc. That and not necesarily the viral infection was why he was so weak. He probably was full of energy after he quit the AZT. Which is probably why he was able to record so close to his death. Then that Pneumonia got him. Sucks. He made his mark though, most people here hold him in high regard and also feel for what he went through when thinking about those final days (certainly not as much those who knew him personally or himself but we definitely still feel.). |
arcadata 18.06.2006 23:51 |
Just curious, kdj2hot- are you in the medical profession? You seem to know a lot... |
kdj2hot 19.06.2006 03:11 |
arcadata wrote: Just curious, kdj2hot- are you in the medical profession? You seem to know a lot...lol, oh no I'm far too lazy to be in the medical field. I wouldn't trust a life in my hand if I could help it. I just like to read a lot and AIDS is one of those things where you read a little and want to read more. All the conspiracy theories and history. I like to deal more in proven facts though. Did you know a 15 yr old boy in St. Louis died of AIDS in 1969? Baffled all the doctors, all they could do is take picture, save samples of blood and tissue and just watch him die. Luckily enough for us they had the foresight to save the samples and give a little more insight on the origin of AIDS. Really interesting. |
John.Simon 01.02.2012 05:46 |
Headlong (song 1991) Recorded:November - December 1990 and Freddie yellow sweater march - april 1991 in Metropolis studio,London UK |
John.Simon 09.02.2012 07:06 |
Scenes were filmed recording studio in November 1990 Other scenes were filmed in December 1990 And Freddie in yellow sweater was filmed either in March or April 1991 at Metropolis Studios, London |
John.Simon 02.03.2012 09:06 |
filming of "Headlong" was held November 23, 1990, and there are recorded several weeks before Christmas, which was in December 1990 and Freddie was wearing the yellow jersey at the beginning of January or February 1991 |