| deleted user 04.06.2006 18:37 |
I Personaly think he should cause Dave has been friends with Queen for a long time and have done gigs with them in the past |
| RETROLOVE 04.06.2006 18:39 |
Ameri-Queen will blast you in 5 4 3 2.... LOL (but seriously, get ready for the tomatoes buddy, you're gonna have more ketchup on you than a hot dog!!!) |
| its_a_hard_life 26994 04.06.2006 18:41 |
<B>Jellybean Queen<h6>sweetbodykisses<B> wrote: Ameri-Queen will blast you in 5 4 3 2.... LOLLMAO, how comes? |
| Nathan 04.06.2006 18:46 |
Because they're a rocket ship on their way to Mars. |
| RETROLOVE 04.06.2006 18:53 |
<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote:This is the reason:<B>Jellybean Queen<h6>sweetbodykisses<B> wrote: Ameri-Queen will blast you in 5 4 3 2.... LOLLMAO, how comes? link |
| Daburcor? 04.06.2006 19:52 |
Gotta love Dave! |
| deleted user 04.06.2006 19:55 |
Hell no! He seems nice, but I'm sorry, no. |
| its_a_hard_life 26994 04.06.2006 19:58 |
I don't think so...Sorry your the winkest link GOODBYE! xD But Foofighters are cool in general. |
| it was electric7 04.06.2006 20:11 |
Dave Grohl looks like a really nice guy, infact I read an article about him in Peoples magazine and he is such a sweetheart! But I dont think Queen should change their singer, it would look very desperate. |
| turini 04.06.2006 20:20 |
he has absoultly no vocal capability compared to him or freddie |
| bonnzzo 04.06.2006 20:29 |
Roy Thomas Baker is their friend and I hear that he can do a great version of Stone Cold Crazy.... |
| Danny Buoy 04.06.2006 22:30 |
hmm, i'm sure he's a nice guy and he respects Queen highly and all, but did you hear him sing Now I'm Here live somewhere or other? tch. |
| deleted user 05.06.2006 03:13 |
Hmmm. I am a Foo Fighters/Nirvana fan so I wouldn't be against Grohl replacing Paul, however, I think that Paul is still better suited to Queen. |
| john bodega 05.06.2006 03:22 |
No. I won't dump on his singing because he's such a nice guy, but... no. Didn't like TYMD when he did it. |
| Owlbee 05.06.2006 03:30 |
Absolutely NOT! He was SCREAMING the vocals for Tie Your Mother Down! He was Terrible!!! And Paul Rodgers should call it a day. He can NOT cut it with Queen songs. No matter how much Brian and Roger lie and say that he can. "Paul Rodgers was Freddie's favorite singer" as quoted consistently by Roger...I think NOT. I don't believe it for a second. |
| boca 05.06.2006 06:40 |
Robbie Williams is also good friend of Queen... :) |
| Munchsack 05.06.2006 07:37 |
Yeah, but Robbie Williams sucks, though. |
| deleted user 05.06.2006 07:43 |
Munchsack wrote: Yeah, but Robbie Williams sucks, though.lol i agree with you their he thinks hes absaloutly awsome but hes nothing |
| AspiringPhilosophe 05.06.2006 08:49 |
How ironic! Last week me and Sir GH were talking over MSN and we started talking about the Paul Rogers Tour with Queen (mostly him razzing me for not having the money to go and see them when they came to Detroit). I remember I asked if Paul was any good, and we came to a conclusion: No one can replace Freddie, and anyone who tries to imitate him is just going to sound like shite. So it's almost better to have someone who doesn't try and imitate him...it keeps the songs and music alive without trying for the corney "I'm the New Freddie" bit. Although I have thought before about if there were any singers today who reminded me of the way Freddie sounded. The best one I could come up with was the guy who fronts Nickleback...but only because of the power in his voice. Freddie had that too, like he could sing to the entire arena without a mike. But Freddie had a much smoother, melodic voice than that guy. |
| All I Hear Is Radio Gaga 05.06.2006 09:36 |
CMU HistoryGirl wrote: How ironic! Last week me and Sir GH were talking over MSN and we started talking about the Paul Rogers Tour with Queen (mostly him razzing me for not having the money to go and see them when they came to Detroit). I remember I asked if Paul was any good, and we came to a conclusion: No one can replace Freddie, and anyone who tries to imitate him is just going to sound like shite. So it's almost better to have someone who doesn't try and imitate him...it keeps the songs and music alive without trying for the corney "I'm the New Freddie" bit. Although I have thought before about if there were any singers today who reminded me of the way Freddie sounded. The best one I could come up with was the guy who fronts Nickleback...but only because of the power in his voice. Freddie had that too, like he could sing to the entire arena without a mike. But Freddie had a much smoother, melodic voice than that guy.Cheers |
| Daburcor? 05.06.2006 14:05 |
it was electric7 wrote: But I dont think Queen should change their singer, it would look very desperate.They already have. |
| teleman 05.06.2006 14:13 |
No Dave = No Foos |
| La_Pazza_e_Qua 05.06.2006 15:18 |
OMG DAVE GROHL NOOOOOOOOOOOOO |
| Sherwood Forest 05.06.2006 15:20 |
i think paul rodgers should get hit by a bus and thats the end of it |
| it was electric7 05.06.2006 15:44 |
No shit, I know that Queen has changed their singer to Paul Rodgers but changing it again would be a bit too drastic. |
| teleman 05.06.2006 16:22 |
Jamie SureWould wrote: i think paul rodgers should get hit by a bus and thats the end of itThat's a little extreme. Did he piss in your corn flakes? |
| Carol! the Musical 05.06.2006 16:39 |
teleman wrote:No need to wish death or anything upon someone.. :S Paul Rodgers makes it possible for some of the younger fans to actually see Queen live. While it's not really Queen, that's as close as we're ever gonna get.Jamie SureWould wrote: i think paul rodgers should get hit by a bus and thats the end of itThat's a little extreme. Did he piss in your corn flakes? |
| Sherwood Forest 05.06.2006 16:43 |
<font color=336600>ChinesedogTorture wrote:i didnt say i wish he was dead-teleman wrote:No need to wish death or anything upon someone.. :S Paul Rodgers makes it possible for some of the younger fans to actually see Queen live. While it's not really Queen, that's as close as we're ever gonna get.Jamie SureWould wrote: i think paul rodgers should get hit by a bus and thats the end of itThat's a little extreme. Did he piss in your corn flakes? i said i wish he would get hit by a bus. and i know im one of those younger fans- saw em twice! |
| Mr Faron Hyte 05.06.2006 16:48 |
So you paid to see him twice and still wish he would get run over by a bus? Ok. |
| Sherwood Forest 05.06.2006 16:52 |
Mr Faron Hyte wrote: So you paid to see him twice and still wish he would get run over by a bus? Ok.ha yea well barely paid really- i didnt go for him i dont think half of the youngins who were at the concert paid to go see paul- |
| Carol! the Musical 05.06.2006 17:03 |
Jamie SureWould wrote:I know you didn't mean death, that's why I said "death or something".<font color=336600>ChinesedogTorture wrote:i didnt say i wish he was dead- i said i wish he would get hit by a bus. and i know im one of those younger fans- saw em twice!teleman wrote:No need to wish death or anything upon someone.. :S Paul Rodgers makes it possible for some of the younger fans to actually see Queen live. While it's not really Queen, that's as close as we're ever gonna get.Jamie SureWould wrote: i think paul rodgers should get hit by a bus and thats the end of itThat's a little extreme. Did he piss in your corn flakes? Damn, you saw them twice? I haven't seen them once! X0 Please let them go to Brazil, I'll fly there faster than anything! XD |
| Poo, again 05.06.2006 17:38 |
No one can replace Paul Rodgers. Queen died back in 1966 when Paul died. PAUL IS DEAD. |
| Sherwood Forest 05.06.2006 18:02 |
<font color=336600>ChinesedogTorture wrote:i hope they do go to S America for you sake!Jamie SureWould wrote:I know you didn't mean death, that's why I said "death or something". Damn, you saw them twice? I haven't seen them once! X0 Please let them go to Brazil, I'll fly there faster than anything! XD<font color=336600>ChinesedogTorture wrote:i didnt say i wish he was dead- i said i wish he would get hit by a bus. and i know im one of those younger fans- saw em twice!teleman wrote:No need to wish death or anything upon someone.. :S Paul Rodgers makes it possible for some of the younger fans to actually see Queen live. While it's not really Queen, that's as close as we're ever gonna get.Jamie SureWould wrote: i think paul rodgers should get hit by a bus and thats the end of itThat's a little extreme. Did he piss in your corn flakes? it was fine the shows that is when i say fine i mean like thinking about paul the shows made me want to kill myself but thinking about everyone else made it the best days of my life |
| rocks. 05.06.2006 21:11 |
Um, in a word, NO! I am grateful for Paul Rodgers doing the tour, because otherwise I would never have been able to see Brian or Roger live, but I think that should be the end of it, unless they go on tour again. PLEASE, dont realease any studio work under the name Queen, its not Queen! HOW many times was Freddie quoted as saying "if any of the four left, for any reason, that would be the end of Queen" PLEASE listen to the man, he was so right. Listen to Freddie, please! Brian, Roger, Paul, and a bassist isnt Queen, its half of Queen and two guys subbing.. Its Queub. Sorry, I rant. I dont believe that Freddie's favourite singer for "some time" was Paul Rodgers, how many times have we heard that Aretha Franklin and Montserat Cabballe were some of his favourite? I just dont see Paul fitting in there... But Paul is better than Dave Grohl, at least he can sing some of the vocally diverse Queen songs... |
| Daburcor? 06.06.2006 01:31 |
Jamie SureWould wrote: i think paul rodgers should get hit by a bus and thats the end of itThat's pretty funny. There may be hope for you yet, young one. |
| deleted user 06.06.2006 08:25 |
Jamie SureWould wrote: i think paul rodgers should get hit by a bus and thats the end of itlmao |
| Sherwood Forest 06.06.2006 16:30 |
Dan Corson wrote:that means a lot to me, thank youJamie SureWould wrote: i think paul rodgers should get hit by a bus and thats the end of itThat's pretty funny. There may be hope for you yet, young one. |
| Cwazy little thing 06.06.2006 16:43 |
In a word, No. But if you want a slightly longer version, Really No. Paul Rodgers is doing a great job, and I have nothing against Grohl, but he's not got the voice or the credentials. |
| deleted user 07.06.2006 00:58 |
Can I just say to everyone who is talking about Paul "replacing" Freddie, I've read quotes by Roger and Brian and they say that Paul is not replacing Freddie. He's singing with them to keep Queen going. They name themselves "Queen + Paul Rodgers", not just "Queen" for that reason. |
| The Real Wizard 07.06.2006 13:00 |
CMU HistoryGirl wrote: How ironic! Last week me and Sir GH were talking over MSN and we started talking about the Paul Rogers Tour with Queen (mostly him razzing me for not having the money to go and see them when they came to Detroit).And I did it in the friendliest way possible! :) The best one I could come up with was the guy who fronts Nickleback...but only because of the power in his voice. Freddie had that too, like he could sing to the entire arena without a mike. But Freddie had a much smoother, melodic voice than that guy.Whoooooooooa, you just compared Freddie to Chad Kroeger. If I believed in cardinal sin, I'd have you crucified... or, something like that. ;) Seriously... I hate Nickelback and everything they stand for. Simply put, they, along with Theory Of A Deadman, Default, etc. are a key contributer to the destruction of any remaining quality in commercial rock music. Rock in its most creative days used to push the envelope (Queen, Yes, Floyd, etc.), and nowadays it's a shadow of that, at best. The innovators are somewhat still there today, but in our mainstream, there just isn't room for them, because quality and creativity just aren't what are looked for anymore. |