QueenZone discussion #796289

Queen Archivist wrote: GREG BROOKS - QUEEN ARCHIVIST (the real GB, before someone again, rather tediously, says "if it IS really you Greg." Yes, it honestly is. I just wrote another diatribe as a reply to John Stuart's PERSONAL APPEAL to me... and at the end of it I made my own genuine challenge to you all. I would like to reiterate that part of the thread here. Sorry for the CAPITAL letters... it made it easier to read in that particular thread. Here goes. Here is my challenge. ....I'M WORKING IN PRIVATE WITH HUGELY KNOWLEDGABLE FANS/EXPERTS LIKE FRANK PALSTRA, GARY TAYLOR, JIM JENKINS, PAUL BIRD, ANDREAS VOIGTS, RINUS WALSTIJN, ERNST. ETC. SERIOUSLY... I'M ALRIGHT JACK! I'M GETTING THE JOB DONE, WITH FRIENDS FROM THE QUEEN COMMUNITY, AS YOU'LL SEE WHEN 'QUEEN SINGLES' EMERGES... AND, MIRACULOUSLY, THAT WAS DONE WITH NO QZ HELP!!!! IF QZ EXPERTS WANT TO APPROACH ME PRIVATELY - INCLUDING YOU JSS, THEN FINE. IF I DEAL DIRECT WITH PEOPLE (IN FACT I DO KNOW A FEW QZ-ERS PRIVATELY) I GET THE BEST OF ALL WORLDS, WITH NO NASTINESS AND JUVENILE SILLINESS FROM CERTAIN 'PERSONS'. IT'S LIKE A FILTER PROCESS. TRULY, I GET WHAT I NEED PRIVATELY FROM PEOPLE I KNOW WELL AND TRUST. SEVERAL QZ-ERS CONTACT ME ON THE QUIET, AND WE COMMUNICATE. I HONESTLY FEEL THAT I HAVE ACCESS TO ALL THE GREATEST AND MOST ACKNOWLEDGED AUTHORITIES ON QUEEN THAT EXIST ON THIS PLANET. I have 70-80 experts in my Queen email address book. IF ANY OF YOU KNOW OTHERWISE THEN CERTAINLY TELL ME, BECAUSE I WILL PERSONALLY CALL UP THAT PERSON/S AND SEE IF WE ARE MISSING OUT... GENUINELY. THAT IS MY 'APPEAL' TO QZ. John Stuart stated - Who knows, even you may be surprised by the depth of talent which lurks between these anonymous pages. WELL... WE WILL SOON SEE, WON'T WE. COME ON, TRUE EXPERTS THAT REALLY HAVE A GOOD DETAILED KNOWLEDGE, MAKE YOURSELVES KNOWN. I AM ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS HAPPY TO FIND TRUE EXPERTS AND CREATIVE THINKERS TO MAKE QUEEN PRODUCT EVEN BETTER. ARE YOU? I WILL REPORT BACK IN A MONTH, OR LESS, AND TELL YOU JOHN IF YOU ARE CORRECT ABOUT YOUR FELLOW QZ-ERS. LET US SEE IF, AMONG ALL THOSE WHO WILL REPLY TO THIS WITH VENOM AND RESENTMENT, THERE ARE ANY REAL AUTHORITIES ON ASPECTS OF QUEEN THAT WE HAVE OVERLOOKED. BEST REGARDS GB

Sebastian wrote: I might be an expert (although I've got so much to learn) in some Queen fields, but I'd rather die than work on a QP product.

Queen Archivist wrote: GREG BROOKS - QUEEN ARCHIVIST (the real GB, before someone again, rather tediously, says "if it IS really you Greg." Yes, it honestly is. I just wrote another diatribe as a reply to John Stuart's PERSONAL APPEAL to me... and at the end of it I made my own genuine challenge to you all. I would like to reiterate that part of the thread here. Sorry for the CAPITAL letters... it made it easier to read in that particular thread. Here goes. Here is my challenge. ....I'M WORKING IN PRIVATE WITH HUGELY KNOWLEDGABLE FANS/EXPERTS LIKE FRANK PALSTRA, GARY TAYLOR, JIM JENKINS, PAUL BIRD, ANDREAS VOIGTS, RINUS WALSTIJN, ERNST. ETC. SERIOUSLY... I'M ALRIGHT JACK! I'M GETTING THE JOB DONE, WITH FRIENDS FROM THE QUEEN COMMUNITY, AS YOU'LL SEE WHEN 'QUEEN SINGLES' EMERGES... AND, MIRACULOUSLY, THAT WAS DONE WITH NO QZ HELP!!!! IF QZ EXPERTS WANT TO APPROACH ME PRIVATELY - INCLUDING YOU JSS, THEN FINE. IF I DEAL DIRECT WITH PEOPLE (IN FACT I DO KNOW A FEW QZ-ERS PRIVATELY) I GET THE BEST OF ALL WORLDS, WITH NO NASTINESS AND JUVENILE SILLINESS FROM CERTAIN 'PERSONS'. IT'S LIKE A FILTER PROCESS. TRULY, I GET WHAT I NEED PRIVATELY FROM PEOPLE I KNOW WELL AND TRUST. SEVERAL QZ-ERS CONTACT ME ON THE QUIET, AND WE COMMUNICATE. I HONESTLY FEEL THAT I HAVE ACCESS TO ALL THE GREATEST AND MOST ACKNOWLEDGED AUTHORITIES ON QUEEN THAT EXIST ON THIS PLANET. I have 70-80 experts in my Queen email address book. IF ANY OF YOU KNOW OTHERWISE THEN CERTAINLY TELL ME, BECAUSE I WILL PERSONALLY CALL UP THAT PERSON/S AND SEE IF WE ARE MISSING OUT... GENUINELY. THAT IS MY 'APPEAL' TO QZ. John Stuart stated - Who knows, even you may be surprised by the depth of talent which lurks between these anonymous pages. WELL... WE WILL SOON SEE, WON'T WE. COME ON, TRUE EXPERTS THAT REALLY HAVE A GOOD DETAILED KNOWLEDGE, MAKE YOURSELVES KNOWN. I AM ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS HAPPY TO FIND TRUE EXPERTS AND CREATIVE THINKERS TO MAKE QUEEN PRODUCT EVEN BETTER. ARE YOU? I WILL REPORT BACK IN A MONTH, OR LESS, AND TELL YOU JOHN IF YOU ARE CORRECT ABOUT YOUR FELLOW QZ-ERS. LET US SEE IF, AMONG ALL THOSE WHO WILL REPLY TO THIS WITH VENOM AND RESENTMENT, THERE ARE ANY REAL AUTHORITIES ON ASPECTS OF QUEEN THAT WE HAVE OVERLOOKED. BEST REGARDS GB

<font color=lime>KillerKing840 wrote: If people have nothing useful to say, what's the point in replying? Give GB a break, for fuck's sake. He's "challenging" the so-called "experts". If you think you're an expert and you're interested, contact him. If not, then why can't you just click on the little "X" on the corner of your screen?

<font color=0099FF>Poppy wrote: May I just point out, as much as I 'detest' Greg Brooks (which I don't, but he thinks I do) You lot are being bloody useless. By posting these replies you're proving him right - we are a bunch of useless wankers, or whatever he's calling us.

Queen Archivist wrote: COME ON, TRUE EXPERTS THAT REALLY HAVE A GOOD DETAILED KNOWLEDGE, MAKE YOURSELVES KNOWN.