Hello folks..!
Surfing through the forums of Queenzone and many other sites, i saw that there are many people that don't like Paul Rodgers on the front of the new band, some say that his singing sucks...
So, if Paul doesn't fit Queen+, who could do it..?
Please, don't start that "Freddie can't be repleced" jive talking again, we all know he's THE only one, we just want to see Brian and Roger (and why not John) rocki'n together again...
Bruce Dickinson should have been the only possible choice in my opinion. Great range, great voice, great presence.
Plus he could fly the tour jet and save QPL some money which could be used to sort out the boxsets. Nuff said!
:-p
Robbie Williams is sucks.
Who? Annie Lennox! It would be interesting. If Paul cannot sing rightly the most of Queen songs - she could sing high notes. But Paul is OK - he does everything he can.
Paul over any of these eat shits listed above.
C'mon guys....this is Queen.... you know Freddie f**king Mercury's band...
If they are going out on the road again, it couldn't be with a joke like Robbie (wannabe Freddie) Williams.
Jeff Soto?
The guy from Thunder?
Are you guys doing stand up comedy?
Paul Rodgers is perfect.
1) He's a legend in his own right.
2) He's nothing like Freddie
3) He doesn't think that "he is now in Queen".... he has the brain power to realize he's simply filling in for Freddie because he isn't here.
Can you guys imagine Justin Hawkins or Robbie??
In one of their crack smoking frenzie's they'd be wet dreaming that "Freddie is out...I'm in, I rule!"
If you listened Jeff Scott Soto show at Queen Convention 2003, you know what I'm talking about. He sang all songs which Paul obviously can't. He ROCKED!!!
At this point, Robbie Williams is THE only person capable of being Queen frontman. Why? Well, he's a very good singer, very emotional performer, he's selling out stadiums wherever he comes (and CDs too), a big fan of Queen...Need I say more ? I mean, forget his TT days, look at him now- he is No.1 artist in Europe. Anyway,I vote for Robbie!!!