| -luke_taylor- 28432 07.03.2006 15:43 |
well after Pierce brosnan who was brilliant in my eyes we got a blonde bond (Daniel Craig), has this guy got acting skills?, so far while filming hes got prickly heat and also had 2 teeth knocked out. i thought james bond was meant to be a good looking womanizer but daniel craig looks like hes had the full dumbell set whacked in his face, also his next car aint a bmw, aston or lotus, its a ford mondeo automatic, apparently daniel cant drive manuals lol To me the best bond was Timothy Dalton, what you guys think? |
| user name 07.03.2006 15:58 |
I'm going to be perfectly honest: I think Brosnan was the best Bond. |
| -luke_taylor- 28432 07.03.2006 16:03 |
brosnan was kewl especially in goldeneye, hes my 2nd best, so u like daniel craig? |
| user name 07.03.2006 16:08 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: I suppose waiting for the film to actually come out before passing your judgement is not an option? I mean, that way, you might ACTUALLY have a clue what you're talking about?I agree with ThomasQuinn, except in a kinder, more diplomatic way. |
| The Fairy King 07.03.2006 16:11 |
hehehe, indeed. Anyway Brosnan is my fave so far. |
| David Jones 07.03.2006 16:14 |
Sean Connery is the stereotypical Bond. Brosnan was good but too smarmy. Dalton was pretty good action wise, but had poor taste in the ladies and didnt stay around long enough to establish the roll. Roger Moore all the way for me! Maybe not the best in a cool spy way, but great for cheese value! Daniel Craig will become a one off like George Lazenby. Just come up with a tedius crap link. The two films Queen did sountracks for had James Bond actors in! Sean in Highlander as Ramirez and Tim as that green bloke in Flash. Sad, I know. |
| user name 07.03.2006 17:06 |
I'm just wondering, why couldn't they get Brosnan back? That would've been perfect. |
| -luke_taylor- 28432 07.03.2006 17:11 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: I suppose waiting for the film to actually come out before passing your judgement is not an option? I mean, that way, you might ACTUALLY have a clue what you're talking about?What you mean!!! its obviously gonna be a shambles have you seen this guy act, he even admitted that he wasnt taking it seriously hes only doing it because he had the opportunity to be bond, |
| Mr.Jingles 07.03.2006 18:18 |
Musicman wrote: I'm just wondering, why couldn't they get Brosnan back? That would've been perfect.Brosnan wasn't too keen on making any more Bond movies. He said he'd only do it if they paid him $50 million, but MGM refused. |
| Togg 08.03.2006 04:26 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: I suppose waiting for the film to actually come out before passing your judgement is not an option? I mean, that way, you might ACTUALLY have a clue what you're talking about?Nail and head my friend, well said, I love the way kids on this board wade in a slag off stuff before they hear it or see it. But hey one day with a bit of luck someone will be giving them the same harsh treatment when they try to make something of themselves, so I guess what goes around comes around. |
| -luke_taylor- 28432 08.03.2006 07:27 |
How the fuck am i a kid, ill probably make more of my life than you ever would, maybe one day when your collecting your pension and theres a war on and these kids are fighting/ruling the country you might see different, why do people in there 40s think they have the right to judge younger peoples oppinions, are you smarter or just plain dumb? |
| Togg 08.03.2006 08:39 |
Good luck making all that money, by the way I run a company and I have been the Managing Director of three others, one stock market listed. So come back when you can match that. If you don't want to be treated like a kid then don't write ignorant statements. It's not your opinion that I find stupid, it's the way you phrase it, has he got any acting skills, well why not wait and see, seems like a few directors have thought so otherwise he would never have had any work. For christ sake, why pre-judge something when you have no information or knowledge, that is ignorannce at it's height. |
| -luke_taylor- 28432 08.03.2006 08:58 |
you run a company oh wow you had to nip that in the bud, my dad has a pub and a restraunt, how about i go and run one of them for him so i can be a stuck up git like you, you seem like someone that doesnt go out much, must be hard |
| Togg 08.03.2006 09:04 |
Good answer, you are really showning your smarter side with that witty retort. |
| -luke_taylor- 28432 08.03.2006 09:06 |
Any way he has no acting skills, hes rubbish, he was wank in tomb raider and young indiana jones and he was rubbish in most of his films, he was even crap at the james bond press interviews and that wasnt even meant to be acting |
| Togg 08.03.2006 09:18 |
Look, I don't disagree with you about the fact it's a shame they replaced the best Bond in years, but why not wait until you have seen something to comment on. The fact is he may turn out to be the best yet, we don't know, but making a statement that he has no acting skills is as lame and the folk that say PR can't sing, he clearly does have acting skills as the producers would not risk such a money making francise on an untalented actor. He has done some very good work, have you seen his TV and film CV? All I am saying is to judge before you have seen is not very smart, you don't know anything, fine you may not like the choice, but maybe one day someone will choose you for something, if they do I hope others will give you the benefit of the doubt before casting you aside! |
| -luke_taylor- 28432 08.03.2006 13:04 |
bump |
| Micrówave 08.03.2006 13:28 |
Togg, you're being a little harsh on Luke. We're all entitled to our opinions, but yours I find interesting:
Togg wrote: by the way I run a company and I have been the Managing Director of three others, one stock market listed. So come back when you can match that.What does that have to do with acting skills and James Bond? That sounds like shameless self-promotion. Kudos to your business saavy! Perhaps Donald Trump will choose you. has he got any acting skills, well why not wait and see, seems like a few directors have thought so otherwise he would never have had any work.Roger Moore looked like he was 80 in A View To A Kill, but they went ahead with him anyway. While Pierce has aged, I don't think it was a wise choice. He has a lot more skins than this new Bond, and let's compare resumes. I don't even know that new Bond's name, yet everyone knew Sean Connery, Roger Moore, Pierce Brosnan, David Niven, and Timothy Dalton. My opinion is: This must be another George Lanzby. There's always a crappy Bond in between two good ones. For christ sake, why pre-judge something when you have no information or knowledge, that is ignorannce at it's height.Then why do the actors hit the talk shows when they release a film? Why do they review movies, albums, and books? Why don't you attack Queenzoners who say "I hope the next DVD is good"? It's not Ignorance (spelled correctly), it's Anticipation. Thank you for listening. |
| -luke_taylor- 28432 08.03.2006 14:26 |
Cheers, your my new best friend |
| Taylor-Mayed 08.03.2006 14:33 |
Yes, Daniel Craig can act. He's utterly wonderful in "Our Friends in the North", for a start. Why he's decided to slum it in James Bond is, of course, another matter. |
| Fraz 08.03.2006 14:37 |
i like the old bond movies cant stand the new ones |
| Togg 09.03.2006 04:29 |
Mircrowave wrote: Togg, you're being a little harsh on Luke. We're all entitled to our opinions, but yours I find interesting:Yes I'm being harsh, because the original comment was childish, to pre-judge something before it has been finished is pointless, you have no base from which to comment.Togg wrote: by the way I run a company and I have been the Managing Director of three others, one stock market listed. So come back when you can match that.What does that have to do with acting skills and James Bond? That sounds like shameless self-promotion. Kudos to your business saavy! Perhaps Donald Trump will choose you.has he got any acting skills, well why not wait and see, seems like a few directors have thought so otherwise he would never have had any work.Roger Moore looked like he was 80 in A View To A Kill, but they went ahead with him anyway. While Pierce has aged, I don't think it was a wise choice. He has a lot more skins than this new Bond, and let's compare resumes. I don't even know that new Bond's name, yet everyone knew Sean Connery, Roger Moore, Pierce Brosnan, David Niven, and Timothy Dalton. My opinion is: This must be another George Lanzby. There's always a crappy Bond in between two good ones.For christ sake, why pre-judge something when you have no information or knowledge, that is ignorannce at it's height.Then why do the actors hit the talk shows when they release a film? Why do they review movies, albums, and books? Why don't you attack Queenzoners who say "I hope the next DVD is good"? It's not Ignorance (spelled correctly), it's Anticipation. Thank you for listening. The MD comment was a reply to the rather foolish "I will earn more money than you ever will" great good luck, here's your starting point then, I agree nothing to do with the Bond issue, but then I didn't raise it, and I had no idea why he thought that would be a cooment worth adding, but hey if he felt it important, I might as well tell him what he had to do to reach his goal. And finally actors do talk shows as promotion, to make people aware that there is something coming out, but they do this when it's finished, when it is out there ready for a review. The point I was making was it seems to me too many people are too quick to judge something just because it's different, the fact is we no NOTHING about what this film will turn out like at this point, it might be great, it might suck, but either way we should give it a chance before casting it aside. Luke is naturally intitled to an opinion, and I frankly don't care one way or the other what it is, but maybe one day when he is trying to make something of himself there will be a point when he hopes people will give him a chance to prove himself before being rejected. I hope for his sake they give him more of a chance then he seems to want to give others, it's a tough world out there. |
| Micrówave 09.03.2006 15:15 |
You said that again. I think my decoder ring is broken. All I'm getting is "CUUU". Let me try it the other way. *gasps in shock!* |
| @ndy38 09.03.2006 15:36 |
<font color=blue>Fraser wrote: i like the old bond movies cant stand the new onesYup me too, the new ones focus too much on special effects.... Kinda like Star Wars... |
| That guy who digs energy domes 09.03.2006 19:45 |
<font color=blue>Fraser wrote: i like the old bond movies cant stand the new onesI agree, the newer ones going back to even The World Is Not Enough cant compare to From Russia With Love, Dr. No, Moonraker, View To A Kill or Goldeneye |
| i'm going slight mad... 09.03.2006 21:14 |
i personally thing that james bond had his day a long time ago. in the 60's haydey, it was accepted that bond was a strong, lethal killer, and a womaniser...today, it is not acceptable on the whole for james bond to go around doing all the things he's famous for. so they try to get bond girls in who are strong and inependant, and can take bond on, which taking a lot away from the concept. i dunno, i kinda think it's turned into a bit of a parody now...maybe not, i have stayed away from it alot recently. then again, i didn't like sean's bond days, being all for equal rights, i found it quite degrading, when he was cavorting around looking great, and the woman cowers in the corner, who he then smooth talks and gets his leg over. i'm being a bit hypocritical now aren't i? |