| QueenFan1982 24.02.2006 12:55 |
I don't understand why so many people are so upset with Q+PR. Look, I know it's not Freddie, and the whole name issue has been beaten to death, but relax and enjoy a great show, and possibly a great new album. If the guys who actually were in the band can live with it, how come so many fans can't. And not to say Freddie wasn't the biggest reason why Queen made it, I don't know how you can call yourself a real fan by saying he was the only reason Queen made it. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and I'm sure there are hardcore fans from the beginning who might not like it, fine, but to say that it's not Queen, Freddie was everything, that is the type of response from someone who has maybe heard just the Greatest Hits album. For most of us, who know every aspect of Queen's history, I just can't believe it. Anyway, I was at the NJ show, will go to the NY one, and I thought it rocked. |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 24.02.2006 13:16 |
Freddie WAS Queen. No Freddie NO Queen or Queen + PR. I've watched a couple of segments from Return Of The Champions and it's truly dreadful, embarassing and should not be on sale. This is heartbreaking for most REAL Queen fans who just want to remember them with Freddie. Paul Rodgers is at best very average if not poor singer who has been involved with a couple of minor bands. It's just all very sad and upsetting to see the could name of Queen destroyed whilst 2 former members go on an ego trip trying to relive past glories. |
| goodco 24.02.2006 13:34 |
Heartbreaking? WE take it as a Brian / Roger solo gig, which they did not bring across the pond for us to witness in the late '90s, as they had done in the UK and Europe and Japan. We're grateful to have the chance to see the boys in big arenas, playing to big cheering crowds, and not the small venues such as Hollywood or Las Vegas. Can Paul do EVERYTHING????? Nope, and we're not stupid enough to think so. Are we grateful that we get to see him and the boys play, have fun, and have fun watching them? FUCKING 'EH WE ARE. All you do is show your small-mindedness. Sorry for showing mine and finally replying after all this time. We'll be enjoying a couple of more shows in a few weeks. Maybe you are jealous of those of us who will enjoy going back in time for a couple of hours on those nights. A pity. |
| -luke_taylor- 28432 24.02.2006 13:38 |
How many other people get de javu? |
| flash! 28068 24.02.2006 13:44 |
Is more chaos needed??? Everyone has their opinion, but posting the opinion several times as a topic and annoying others is going too far.. like BBP. We respect your views but constantly parading around the forum causing havoc and anguish to others is pointless. I think members like BBP have made themselves VERY clear about this and don't need to continuously post about it, especially when using inappropriate language and attitude. Wanting to argue about whether Paul Rodgers is crap or not is childish and pathetic! In conclusion, You either like Queen with Paul rodgers or you don't. We all think differently. No need to get angry over it. :D |
| Sherwood Forest 24.02.2006 14:32 |
-Luke_Taylor- wrote: How many other people get de javu?i sure as hell do! |
| faeriequeene 24.02.2006 14:38 |
i wonder if it was the other way round and either brian or roger died, and freddie was touring, if these people would be happy about that |
| Rick 24.02.2006 14:49 |
I'm quoting Freddie: "Not all this crap again..." |
| Thanks 24.02.2006 14:53 |
I don't understand why so many people are so obsessed with making THIS SPECIFIC POINT. Look, I know the whole name issue has been beaten to death, so relax and try and post something original that doesn't just RESTART THE WHOLE FUCKING ARGUMENT. |
| it was electric7 24.02.2006 14:56 |
I dont think your being a REAL Queen fan if you dont like Queen+PR. REAL Queen fans accept the fact that Roger and Brian are not going to fucking sit back in a chair all day and go " oh no,what are we going to do without Freddie" |
| no one but you 28112 24.02.2006 15:13 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Freddie WAS Queen. No Freddie NO Queen or Queen + PR. I've watched a couple of segments from Return Of The Champions and it's truly dreadful, embarassing and should not be on sale. This is heartbreaking for most REAL Queen fans who just want to remember them with Freddie. Paul Rodgers is at best very average if not poor singer who has been involved with a couple of minor bands. It's just all very sad and upsetting to see the could name of Queen destroyed whilst 2 former members go on an ego trip trying to relive past glories.Freddie WAS NOT Queen. He was big part of Queen, irreplaceable part of Queen, but he was not Queen! And yes ROTC is bad but if you don't like don't listen to it, don't think about it, just forget it and listen every(real) queen's cd ad warch every queen's dvd |
| its_a_hard_life 26994 24.02.2006 15:44 |
it was electric7 wrote: I dont think your being a REAL Queen fan if you dont like Queen+PR. REAL Queen fans accept the fact that Roger and Brian are not going to fucking sit back in a chair all day and go " oh no,what are we going to do without Freddie"Your so fucking right! |
| Roger'sGirl72610 24.02.2006 18:49 |
Just because Freddie (RIP) is no longer alive does not mean that Roger and Brian have to stop using the Queen name. They were the two original founders of the band.. Freddie was the person who came up with the name Queen... but they all put their time and effort into making Queen the best band.. Roger and Brian deciding to start touring again is the right thing to do... They honor Freddie during the shows with pictures on the screen. It is a great memoriam of Freddie!! |
| QueenFan1982 25.02.2006 01:34 |
Thanks wrote: I don't understand why so many people are so obsessed with making THIS SPECIFIC POINT. Look, I know the whole name issue has been beaten to death, so relax and try and post something original that doesn't just RESTART THE WHOLE FUCKING ARGUMENT.SORRY didn't mean TO start a TOPIC that you don't LIKE. Obviously this is INTERESTING to some people otherwise NOONE would write BACK. |
| escuderodelareina 25.02.2006 07:19 |
yes, freddie was queen but let´s see..without brian could be queen ? still whit freddie in the band. |
| Thanks 25.02.2006 09:09 |
QueenFan1982 wrote:You don't get it, do you? There's nothing new in all these responses that you use to validate yourself, it's just the same tired old argument. It's not whether I like it or not, it's whether anything is being added by either side.Thanks wrote: I don't understand why so many people are so obsessed with making THIS SPECIFIC POINT. Look, I know the whole name issue has been beaten to death, so relax and try and post something original that doesn't just RESTART THE WHOLE FUCKING ARGUMENT.SORRY didn't mean TO start a TOPIC that you don't LIKE. Obviously this is INTERESTING to some people otherwise NOONE would write BACK. And if you think that only the interesting threads get responses then you're a complete idiot.... |
| its_a_hard_life 26994 25.02.2006 12:33 |
queenmeddows39 wrote: i wonder if it was the other way round and either brian or roger died, and freddie was touring, if these people would be happy about thatExactly... how would you all feel if Freddie and John was the only remaining people left? |
| flash! 28068 25.02.2006 12:38 |
its_a_hard_life. wrote:Totally agree.queenmeddows39 wrote: i wonder if it was the other way round and either brian or roger died, and freddie was touring, if these people would be happy about thatExactly... how would you all feel if Freddie and John was the only remaining people left? This whole website is becoming a massive whirlwind of pointless argument! I think any topic that causes such controversy and havoc should be deleted to prevent anything like this from happening! The End. |
| Ready_Coddie 25.02.2006 12:46 |
If Brian or Roger would have died and Freddie & John would be touring as 'Queen'... I would lose a lot of respect and love for both of them... as I do now for Brian and Roger... I can understand they have to go on and I am happy they are having sucha gala time, but to call themselves Queen is wrong... I mean even if John had died and the other three would have been touring, they should not tour as Queen because all of them in some contributed to make QUEEN! |
| LadyMoonshineDown 25.02.2006 12:53 |
Posting topics regarding those who despise Q+P are just as bad, if not worse, than the ignorant topics about Rogers being a gimp. Sure, I agree with the statement; I don't get why...blah blah lah dee dah. I really do. But what point is there in posting it? It's been posted several times before; you're not the only "clear and level-headed voice of reason" amidst the anger of weird fans. *sigh* It just creates the likes of BPP and other odd balls to spur up more drama than we really need, or care about. Cheers |
| QueenFan1982 25.02.2006 12:57 |
<font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote:You guys all suck ass. Fine I won't post here anymore, I'm sure you'll all be happy. I'll check back, and sure I'll see 500 posts regarding what toothpaste Freddie used. Guess posts about Queen aren't welcome on a Queen board. Should've known. Sorry to disturb your very useful lives with topics about Queen.QueenFan1982 wrote:Your an idiot. Stop spamming the boards with what has already been discussed a million times. I agree with you but there's absolutely no point in bringing up another topic on this.Thanks wrote: I don't understand why so many people are so obsessed with making THIS SPECIFIC POINT. Look, I know the whole name issue has been beaten to death, so relax and try and post something original that doesn't just RESTART THE WHOLE FUCKING ARGUMENT.SORRY didn't mean TO start a TOPIC that you don't LIKE. Obviously this is INTERESTING to some people otherwise NOONE would write BACK. |
| LadyMoonshineDown 25.02.2006 13:23 |
QueenFan1982 wrote:Don't take what one hot-headed Queenzoner to heart. You'll encounter differences on here, but you'll also encounter those with a short thread of patience. Basically, all we're trying to say, some more polite than others, is that this has been posted way too many times. We want you to post topics on here; granted, there are many stupid posts, like you mentioned, but we are trying to move past the BPP-related Paul rants, alright? This only causes them to rant more. Don't stop posting because one idiot overreacted (for a reason that's somewhat understandable).<font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote:You guys all suck ass. Fine I won't post here anymore, I'm sure you'll all be happy. I'll check back, and sure I'll see 500 posts regarding what toothpaste Freddie used. Guess posts about Queen aren't welcome on a Queen board. Should've known. Sorry to disturb your very useful lives with topics about Queen.QueenFan1982 wrote:Your an idiot. Stop spamming the boards with what has already been discussed a million times. I agree with you but there's absolutely no point in bringing up another topic on this.Thanks wrote: I don't understand why so many people are so obsessed with making THIS SPECIFIC POINT. Look, I know the whole name issue has been beaten to death, so relax and try and post something original that doesn't just RESTART THE WHOLE FUCKING ARGUMENT.SORRY didn't mean TO start a TOPIC that you don't LIKE. Obviously this is INTERESTING to some people otherwise NOONE would write BACK. cheers |
| That guy who digs energy domes 26.02.2006 00:25 |
because Paul Rodgers is a terrible man who tears people's valentines to get what he wants... |
| Thanks 26.02.2006 14:20 |
QueenFan1982 wrote:Ooh, the foot-stamping of a twelve year old who isn't used to being disagreed with. You're American, I assume?<font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote:You guys all suck ass. Fine I won't post here anymore, I'm sure you'll all be happy. I'll check back, and sure I'll see 500 posts regarding what toothpaste Freddie used. Guess posts about Queen aren't welcome on a Queen board. Should've known. Sorry to disturb your very useful lives with topics about Queen.QueenFan1982 wrote:Your an idiot. Stop spamming the boards with what has already been discussed a million times. I agree with you but there's absolutely no point in bringing up another topic on this.Thanks wrote: I don't understand why so many people are so obsessed with making THIS SPECIFIC POINT. Look, I know the whole name issue has been beaten to death, so relax and try and post something original that doesn't just RESTART THE WHOLE FUCKING ARGUMENT.SORRY didn't mean TO start a TOPIC that you don't LIKE. Obviously this is INTERESTING to some people otherwise NOONE would write BACK. |
| LadyMoonshineDown 26.02.2006 22:41 |
Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: because Paul Rodgers is a terrible man who tears people's valentines to get what he wants...Hello Kitty, to be exact. Cheers |
| LadyMoonshineDown 26.02.2006 22:45 |
Thanks wrote:Good job; you're fueling the fire. I sure do like ongoing maturity.QueenFan1982 wrote:Ooh, the foot-stamping of a twelve year old who isn't used to being disagreed with. You're American, I assume?<font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote:You guys all suck ass. Fine I won't post here anymore, I'm sure you'll all be happy. I'll check back, and sure I'll see 500 posts regarding what toothpaste Freddie used. Guess posts about Queen aren't welcome on a Queen board. Should've known. Sorry to disturb your very useful lives with topics about Queen.QueenFan1982 wrote:Your an idiot. Stop spamming the boards with what has already been discussed a million times. I agree with you but there's absolutely no point in bringing up another topic on this.Thanks wrote: I don't understand why so many people are so obsessed with making THIS SPECIFIC POINT. Look, I know the whole name issue has been beaten to death, so relax and try and post something original that doesn't just RESTART THE WHOLE FUCKING ARGUMENT.SORRY didn't mean TO start a TOPIC that you don't LIKE. Obviously this is INTERESTING to some people otherwise NOONE would write BACK. Cheers |