| breakthru1989 23.02.2006 20:56 |
hello..this is my first torrent. it is yet another concert from the MAGIC TOUR. IT IS...QUEEN live at WEMBLEY STADIUM 11-07-1986. LONDON ENGLAND. More then 70.000 people were there. the Songs were one vision tie your mother down a kind of magic under pressure who ants to live forever brighton rock love of my life tutti frutti bohemian rhapsody friends wiil be friends and more.. all in mp3 and an complete concert. 20 years of the Magic Tour 1986 |
| Smitty 23.02.2006 21:15 |
This is partly official. |
| deleted user 23.02.2006 22:18 |
remove songs on the second disk of live at wembly |
| The Real Wizard 23.02.2006 23:32 |
No, don't remove anything. This is an AUDIENCE RECORDING, people. Like I've said before, I hardly think this torrent will be an alternative to buying the official Wembley DVD. I think it's pathetic how people generously share recordings and are practically forced to remove a couple songs because they appear on an official release in different form. On the other hand, if there are bootlegs that have better quality and content than Queen Productions releases, then it's QP's own fault if people download the bootlegs instead of buying the official releases. |
| L-R-TIGER1994 24.02.2006 00:06 |
Post it again. |
| FEEL THE FORCE 2 24.02.2006 02:44 |
Hi, dosen´t work for me |
| frank39 24.02.2006 05:43 |
To be konsequent, almost all the well known DVDs/Videos like Earls Court, Buenos Aires, Hammersmith75 and 79 (and a lot more) would have to be removed. Parts of all those shows are in either Doro or Queen Prod. videos..... So where is exactly the point when a video is official or not? For example: the 3 missing Houston files are said to be official. Konsequently "Love of my Life" from Buenos Aires 81 should also be cut out of the DVD, here available. This one is almost complete on a Doro video, and partly on other QP releases Same can be found on almost every Queen Video here in QZ or the Queen hub. So, where is the point, Richard? |
| kudilja 24.02.2006 06:03 |
it doesn't work |
| magicmatze 24.02.2006 06:26 |
to frank39: and the same thing with the recordings from the jazz-european-tour, because it is not known for sure, which song on the Live killers LP was recorded on which date. "no official suff" meant, that no official released albums, songs and vidoes should be shared. But there are people, who misunderstood the whole thing: for example, Houston 77, there were two tracks released on Rare Live, so they were cut out form the download. If you have Rare Life, you will notice, that these two tracks aren't complete on Rare Live, so Houston is still uncomlete, even when you have Rare live. So what I want to say is, that people exaggerate the whole thing with "official" and they force other people to cut those few Official songs. And then they wonder, why no rare stuff is shared on this site. |
| j0ck3 24.02.2006 07:02 |
if this would have to be removed then remove all the songs from knebworth appearing on live magic but wait knebworth isn't going to be removed cause it's a audience recording and neither is this going to be removed |
| Ale_Pisa 24.02.2006 07:39 |
Don't work! If this is official then this dvd/audio are official: Houston 77 San Pauolo 81 Buenso Aires 81 Earls Court 77 Knebworth 86 Hyde Park 76 and many others... Cheers Ale |
| kudilja 24.02.2006 07:42 |
please, repost, it doesn't work. Thanks! |
| Fenderek 24.02.2006 08:10 |
magicmatze wrote: So what I want to say is, that people exaggerate the whole thing with "official" and they force other people to cut those few Official songs. And then they wonder, why no rare stuff is shared on this site.Agree. I haven't been downloading anything recently, but it's... well, if not annoying than at least pathetic... "Remove thsi- it's official" and stuff like that... What a bunch of crap...! It's so fucking simple- DVD rip from Montreal 1981 is a "no". "Hijack My Heart" is a "no". Fucking Cross record are "No"... But the audienc recording of a Sheffield gig is a big freaking "yes"...!!! Same goes for houston 1977 (bloody complete!) and so on... I guess few morons really believed in this "we fight bootlegsers with the 100 bootlegs, so now they become officially released material"... |
| Nummer2 24.02.2006 08:17 |
If QP or any other company has an interest in closing down this site, they would easily find a reason – no matter if some semi-official material is shared or not. I think the positive effect of spreading Queen material and infecting new fans is much bigger than the negative effect of a few not sold CDs and DVDs. Of course that doesn't mean that copyright laws can be broken. But, please tell me, who t.. f... is the copyright owner of a bootleg?!? |
| Sithmarauder 24.02.2006 08:32 |
<font color=000000>Fenderek wrote:I think you missed a post that I did a while ago regarding the Bootleg releases. Richard gave us the okay to share concerts released as bootlegs by Queen Production (top 100 bootlegs). The problem in Queenzone is we have too many naive people who think its okay to share releases or part of releases, of DVDs and cds that are officially being sold in stores.magicmatze wrote: So what I want to say is, that people exaggerate the whole thing with "official" and they force other people to cut those few Official songs. And then they wonder, why no rare stuff is shared on this site.Agree. I haven't been downloading anything recently, but it's... well, if not annoying than at least pathetic... "Remove thsi- it's official" and stuff like that... What a bunch of crap...! It's so fucking simple- DVD rip from Montreal 1981 is a "no". "Hijack My Heart" is a "no". Fucking Cross record are "No"... But the audienc recording of a Sheffield gig is a big freaking "yes"...!!! Same goes for houston 1077 (bloody complete!) and so on... I guess few morons really believed in this "we fight bootlegsers with the 100 bootlegs, so now they become officially released material"... I have to agree with SirGH about sharing audience recordings of official releases, I can 't see how sharing such recordings can have any impact on sales of Official recording. I just wish some people here would exercise some common sense and knock it off with all the offensive name calling. It's childish and most of all cowardice to be calling other names behind the protection of privacy. Wait for a Queen convention and say what you have to say to someone face to face. Then you'll be a man. |
| Mr. Bulsara 24.02.2006 11:10 |
Hei, this thing is not working, please repost |
| kudilja 24.02.2006 11:43 |
yes,please repost,something is wrong |
| john bodega 24.02.2006 12:05 |
"I just wish some people here would exercise some common sense and knock it off with all the offensive name calling. It's childish and most of all cowardice to be calling other names behind the protection of privacy. Wait for a Queen convention and say what you have to say to someone face to face. Then you'll be a man." I agree with everything you said except this. I *do* say this shit to people in real life because they're usually smart enough to know that they deserve it. |
| Sithmarauder 24.02.2006 12:24 |
Zebonka12 wrote: "I just wish some people here would exercise some common sense and knock it off with all the offensive name calling. It's childish and most of all cowardice to be calling other names behind the protection of privacy. Wait for a Queen convention and say what you have to say to someone face to face. Then you'll be a man." I agree with everything you said except this. I *do* say this shit to people in real life because they're usually smart enough to know that they deserve it.You're right, in some cases people do desrve to be called certain names, but too often, I've seen people here make innocent mistakes and are cursed at. I some cases it's in fun because the parties involved know each other, but to strangers, I disagree with that kind of behavior. Some comments here are immature. |
| Thanks 24.02.2006 14:33 |
1. This isn't your first torrent, you uploaded Leiden a week ago. 2. I assume this is from the torrent I did for you 3 days ago? |
| breakthru1989 24.02.2006 15:06 |
yes thanks you’re right. thank you for the concerts. i just wanna try to make a torrent. if i know exactly how then i seach my own cds. thank you. |
| kudilja 24.02.2006 16:55 |
please, repost it. thanks! |
| The Real Wizard 24.02.2006 21:12 |
Nummer2 wrote: But, please tell me, who t.. f... is the copyright owner of a bootleg?!?The band, because they still own rights to the songs contained on the bootleg. |
| chefman5150 25.02.2006 06:15 |
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is precisely why I DO NOT and repeat DO NOT post any more material here anymore...I love Queen, and i like most of the people on here I really do...but it gets so petty on here!! If I'm not mistaken, the Wembley '86 was from the 12th, not the 11th...so why does this poor guy have to remove it?? Esp. if it's an audience recording?? And what makes this or even part of this concert official?? There is I believe 3 or 4 songs from the bonus part of the DVD that are from the 11th...but come on!! |
| John S Stuart 25.02.2006 07:08 |
Sithmarauder wrote: Some comments here are immature.Perhaps that's because the behaviour of some is also immature. Forget about the odd mistake, we can all make the occassional boob now and again, but recently it has become so out of hand, that we are now seeing the deliberate flaunting of official material. Within the last few days we have witnessed the likes of Smile, and Greatest Video Hits being uploaded - and the likes of Live Aid being damanded. Now, no matter how stupid one is - there is no justification for this sort of provocative behaviour, infact, it is almost as if to see how far they can get away with. But the simple rule is NO OFFICIAL UPLOADS. Why don't these idiots take their demands over to Queenonline, and see how long they last over there. |
| on my way up 25.02.2006 11:26 |
can anyone seed please? |
| kudilja 25.02.2006 12:25 |
please, seed... |
| bitesthedust 25.02.2006 15:48 |
I don't think this will be shared unfortunately. Whilst I understand and appreciate everything that John has said here...remember Houston 77? The audio was uploaded in complete format - including the songs that appeared on Rare Live & Greatest Video Hits 1. So what's the difference? |
| Sithmarauder 25.02.2006 17:08 |
John S Stuart wrote:In those cases I agree with you, I've seen the frustration in your words when you clearly spell out the simple rule and the person or persons don't get it. I myself have many choice words for those ignorant people but choose to keep them to myself because I have 3 children who sometimes visit the site. I was referring to the one's un familiar with this site that just need a little guidence who get ripped apart.Sithmarauder wrote: Some comments here are immature.Perhaps that's because the behaviour of some is also immature. Forget about the odd mistake, we can all make the occassional boob now and again, but recently it has become so out of hand, that we are now seeing the deliberate flaunting of official material. Within the last few days we have witnessed the likes of Smile, and Greatest Video Hits being uploaded - and the likes of Live Aid being damanded. Now, no matter how stupid one is - there is no justification for this sort of provocative behaviour, infact, it is almost as if to see how far they can get away with. But the simple rule is NO OFFICIAL UPLOADS. Why don't these idiots take their demands over to Queenonline, and see how long they last over there. |
| Freddie89 25.02.2006 17:22 |
hi, could this be posted again plz Thanx :-) |
| white special 02.03.2006 10:18 |
can anyone seed please? |
| Peta 24.03.2006 12:06 |
Could anyone seed, please, again? Thanks! |
| macman223 08.04.2008 18:21 |
I need some seeders please I just started |
| theCro 09.04.2008 10:25 |
Come one share it someone? SEED?!? wtf |