| Ziggy_SD 23.02.2006 06:57 |
Conditions 1. "Queen + Paul Rodgers" is unacceptable, LOL |
| Serry... 23.02.2006 07:09 |
Free Smile |
| Ziggy_SD 23.02.2006 07:18 |
Bad Smile |
| Sebastian 23.02.2006 08:02 |
Losers In The End + Paul Rodgers |
| Munchsack 23.02.2006 08:35 |
The Underachievers. P.S. I am not knocking them, I have just always thought that would be a great name for a band. |
| An Ordinary Guy 23.02.2006 08:56 |
Should be a name that has no reminiscent sound of their past, as in Royal Company, QPR, Qu33n'05, Seagull, Hitman, Free Smile, Eliberation etc. Should be something totally and surprisingly new. Fresh and solid. Erm, I can't think of one... |
| great king rat 1138 23.02.2006 09:08 |
Grumpy, Chunky and Wiggy Or Cashing in on Former Glory Or The Mortals |
| Hooligan's Holiday 23.02.2006 09:23 |
Queen + Paul Rodgers!!! |
| Daveboy35 23.02.2006 09:34 |
How about TINKY WINKY, LA-LA AND PO. |
| magicalfreddiemercury 23.02.2006 09:36 |
How about "Good Company"? :-) |
| its_a_hard_life 26994 23.02.2006 09:42 |
<font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote: Queen + Paul Rodgers - because that is what it's going to be. Get over itYup :) |
| PieterMC 23.02.2006 09:44 |
Quodgers |
| david (galashiels) 23.02.2006 10:00 |
three poofs and a piano |
| it was electric7 23.02.2006 10:26 |
you people need to shut the hell up, if you cant accept how it is then dont fucking listen to it. |
| john bodega 23.02.2006 10:58 |
Sebastian wrote: Losers In The End + Paul RodgersLosers eh? Well they're doing a shitload better than *we* are, eh Seb? :D |
| deleted user 23.02.2006 11:01 |
A nice guy on msn came with the coold idea of 3 Free Smiling Queens In Bad Company |
| -luke_taylor- 28432 23.02.2006 11:01 |
1)club 55-80 2)free bus passes soon 3)mc-wrinkleys 4)the darkness, the future 5)the way we wernt |
| -luke_taylor- 28432 23.02.2006 11:03 |
or the killer queens work it out for yourself lol |
| That guy who digs energy domes 23.02.2006 13:23 |
its_a_hard_life. wrote:Thank you!<font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote: Queen + Paul Rodgers - because that is what it's going to be. Get over itYup :) |
| All I Hear Is Radio Gaga 23.02.2006 13:27 |
<font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote: Queen + Paul Rodgers - because that is what it's going to be. Get over itagreed |
| ~Blue_Acid~ 23.02.2006 13:51 |
Queen + Pail Rodgers, Brian and Rodger founded Queen, Freddie just changed the name from Smile to Queen. So they have all the rights to use it. But if they did pick a new name, I like the idea of Bad Smile, its interesting. |
| cd0511 23.02.2006 14:16 |
Bad Company + Brian May & Roger Taylor |
| 4freddie 23.02.2006 14:57 |
Royal Company does sound nice............or maybe "Three Queens and One Tiara" freddie musing |
| Micrówave 23.02.2006 15:07 |
The Paul Rodgers show. |
| evaworciM 23.02.2006 15:09 |
Neeuq |
| latina 23.02.2006 15:39 |
Paul Rodgers & Friends |
| 7Innuendo7 23.02.2006 16:11 |
THRONE |
| Sergei. 23.02.2006 16:18 |
i always thought PReen was rather witty. |
| j0ck3 23.02.2006 16:30 |
Paul Rodgers + Queen |
| escuderodelareina 23.02.2006 16:30 |
súbditos de la reina |
| sebaspedre 23.02.2006 16:38 |
Never Will Be The Same That's in my name. |
| eedodededededea 23.02.2006 16:47 |
wallpaPRs |
| englishyob 23.02.2006 16:49 |
do you hear that listen........................... YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWN BORING BORING BORING!!!!!!! |
| Freddie_Jr. 23.02.2006 18:06 |
"Queen Minus Good Vocals" |
| TheImpossibleMan 23.02.2006 18:14 |
Maybe "King", now that Freddie is gone? |
| nibznik 23.02.2006 19:00 |
i think the starter of the topic meant a non-queen, bad company, or free related name. maybe a name like Geezer Blues? (thats not a pun by the way) |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 23.02.2006 19:31 |
The Pension Boys TOO OLD TO ROCK AFTER WE WERE FAMOUS IN IT FOR MONEY DINOSAUR BOYS ROCKERS R US + GIMP BLUE RINSE BRIGADE |
| lmj 23.02.2006 20:55 |
FAT BOTTOMED BOYS THE LOSERS IN THE END |
| Ziggy_SD 23.02.2006 22:08 |
LOL. You can't help but laugh at 'Losers In The End'. |
| Rafael Macedo 23.02.2006 23:17 |
hey... "QUEEN + PAUL RODGERS... THE MUSICAL COMEDY"... THAT SUCKS... I preffer Queen + Paul Rodgers... I like it... |
| The Real Wizard 23.02.2006 23:59 |
Freddie_Jr. wrote: "Queen Minus Good Vocals"Paul generally sings better than Freddie did at most Queen concerts. He may not have Freddie's stage presence, but he has a bigger vocal range on stage, and is more vocally consistent overall. As for the band name, I'd say we call it Queen + Paul Rodgers. It is logical. It's the remaining members plus someone else, rather than including someone else. When Roger Waters left Pink Floyd, I don't think they even thought of calling it GilmourWrightMason. Imagine if Chicago had done something like that in the 80s with its five remaining members. This is ridiculous. A name is a name. What matters is the music. I can't believe how much time has been devoted to this overall useless discussion. |
| john bodega 24.02.2006 01:11 |
"Paul generally sings better than Freddie did at most Queen concerts. He may not have Freddie's stage presence, but he has a bigger vocal range on stage, and is more vocally consistent overall." See when I say stuff like this, people jump down my throat, but it's absolutely true - on good nights when their vocals are in top nick, PR and Freddie Mercury *both* sound incredible. TYMD at Fancourt anyone? What about Somebody to Love at MK?? 2 examples of why they're both great singers (on their best nights) and why I'm right. Hahaha. |
| The prophet's song 24.02.2006 03:08 |
I think "Royal Company". Sounds like a plan.... |
| deleted user 24.02.2006 04:04 |
ROGER BRIAN AND THAT OLD GUY FROM FREE!!!!! LOL |
| Tea 24.02.2006 04:15 |
"Losers in the end", ha, ha, it's very funny, i don't know a name but i know that it can't be Queen anymore, beacuose widought Freddie (he was the most inportant in group) and John offcourse, Queen is not exist anymore, Widout my dear Freddie Queen is not Queen, Queen died on day when Freddie died, and now, Queen and Freddie are gone, they're just in our minds and hearts!!! They're just Brian May, Roger Taylor and Paul Rodgers, he can't replay Freddie, and John is not with them.... so there isn't Queen anymore! I'm sad for this what I wrote, but that is true, and my opinion is that they shoud stop pretending that they're famous rock stars or something like that, beacouse they WAS rock stars... they aren't anymore!! i think that they shoud live their lives like they lived for last 15 years and stop ruining our memories!!! They was something, and now they are nothing, specialy widought my dear FREDDIE..… who agree with my?? Freddie, i'll love you always!!!!! |
| deleted user 24.02.2006 11:51 |
Death on three legs is suitable enough cause,im gettin the impression that people dont like the new line up somehow.What do you think? |
| QueenFan1982 24.02.2006 12:46 |
Good Company |
| Sherwood Forest 24.02.2006 13:11 |
QueenFan1982 wrote: Good Companyyesss thats awesome |
| The Real Wizard 24.02.2006 21:02 |
Zebonka12 wrote: "Paul generally sings better than Freddie did at most Queen concerts. He may not have Freddie's stage presence, but he has a bigger vocal range on stage, and is more vocally consistent overall." See when I say stuff like this, people jump down my throat, but it's absolutely true - on good nights when their vocals are in top nick, PR and Freddie Mercury *both* sound incredible. TYMD at Fancourt anyone? What about Somebody to Love at MK?? 2 examples of why they're both great singers (on their best nights) and why I'm right. Hahaha.People who jump on you for that kind of thing are just Freddie fans who really have little or no touch with the reality of other bands. Anyone who can't grasp the concepts of "an opinion is not fact" and "my opinion is just as valid as someone else's" is a waste of time when trying to have a meaningful discussion. That eliminates quite a few posters, doesn't it? |
| john bodega 25.02.2006 01:55 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:Indeed, it must be some kind of obsession with Freddie.Zebonka12 wrote: "Paul generally sings better than Freddie did at most Queen concerts. He may not have Freddie's stage presence, but he has a bigger vocal range on stage, and is more vocally consistent overall." See when I say stuff like this, people jump down my throat, but it's absolutely true - on good nights when their vocals are in top nick, PR and Freddie Mercury *both* sound incredible. TYMD at Fancourt anyone? What about Somebody to Love at MK?? 2 examples of why they're both great singers (on their best nights) and why I'm right. Hahaha.People who jump on you for that kind of thing are just Freddie fans who really have little or no touch with the reality of other bands. Anyone who can't grasp the concepts of "an opinion is not fact" and "my opinion is just as valid as someone else's" is a waste of time when trying to have a meaningful discussion. That eliminates quite a few posters, doesn't it? I mean - he is my favourite singer, but how does that make it fair to say that everyone else is crap? They're not, especially not PR. |