| bohemianrhap84 19.02.2006 23:16 |
Is there going to be any new releases from Queen this year? Hopefully if there is, it's not another Q + PR live show. Hopefully it would be one of the following: 1. Greatest Video Hits III 2. Queen Live At The Rainbow 1974 CD & DVD 3. Queen Live In Houston 1977 CD & DVD I'm sure none of these are actually going to come but one can hope. I'm still holding my breath for the Queen Anthology that's coming out in 2036!! |
| John S Stuart 20.02.2006 03:22 |
No: I am sorry, but no one can confirm this for you. What I will say is, you do not need to be Miss Marple to work out that the 5th September 2006 will be Freddie's 60th Birthday Anniversary. If this special date does not call for a unique and exceptional release, nothing ever will. PS: You read it here first! |
| Roger's Beard 20.02.2006 04:15 |
Greg Brooks stated at convention last year that EMI intend to release the Queen boxset in 2009 (correct me if it was 2008) with a NEW Freddie Release before that. As John says above - September this year would be the obvious time (so expect it delayed!!!!!) Let's hope it's an unreleased 'cracking' song that get's to number one. Dear God, the music industry needs some decent music. |
| Rick 20.02.2006 05:04 |
Greg Brooks confirmed that they were cleaning the footage of Paris 1979, just after MK 1982 was released. |
| Negative Creep 20.02.2006 06:37 |
<font color=blue>Rick<h6>Queenboots</h6> wrote: Greg Brooks confirmed that they were cleaning the footage of Paris 1979, just after MK 1982 was released.Well theyve already cleaned up and remixed Rainbow '74 and Earls Court, and theyre far more worthy of release I think. |
| pcgenius9 20.02.2006 07:29 |
I'm not fussed, any or all will do! :D |
| deleted user 20.02.2006 08:11 |
Negative Creep wrote:Earls Court's performance sucks. the show is visual great, and their appearance very nice, but technical it sucks.<font color=blue>Rick<h6>Queenboots</h6> wrote: Greg Brooks confirmed that they were cleaning the footage of Paris 1979, just after MK 1982 was released.Well theyve already cleaned up and remixed Rainbow '74 and Earls Court, and theyre far more worthy of release I think. Releasing stuff like Paris, Hammersmith or Houston would be the final step in making them the ultimae DVD band. |
| john bodega 20.02.2006 08:13 |
Wrong. Earls Court is great. Er. In parts anyway. But I won't call a faulty mic a 'bad performance'. |
| deleted user 20.02.2006 08:16 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Wrong. Earls Court is great. Er. In parts anyway. But I won't call a faulty mic a 'bad performance'.they simply sang false |
| Rick 20.02.2006 09:30 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:I'll second that. It's a bootleg video, not a copy of the master.<font color=black>Dennis Daja<h6>QZs God wrote:Dennis, their vocals were very good. The 'false' notes are for a large part to blame on damaged recording reels which warp the sound.Zebonka12 wrote: Wrong. Earls Court is great. Er. In parts anyway. But I won't call a faulty mic a 'bad performance'.they simply sang false |
| Bobby_brown 20.02.2006 09:31 |
John S Stuart wrote: No: I am sorry, but no one can confirm this for you. What I will say is, you do not need to be Miss Marple to work out that the 5th September 2006 will be Freddie's 60th Birthday Anniversary. If this special date does not call for a unique and exceptional release, nothing ever will. PS: You read it here first!Yes, i heard that they're gonna release a Freddie solo work, but what could it be? I mean, as far as i'm aware that could only be the missing tracks from his Boxset (Michael Jackson and Cliff Richards). Perhaps they re-release the Mr. Bad Guy with bonus tracks (as far as i know, this album is out of print for a long time- you can only buy it in the Mini-Box with Barcelona or with the Box-set wich is expensive!) And with Queen the rumour is that they have found three finished songs a couple years ago, and they were going to do a MIH kind of thing with them. About Live DVD's, Greg stated many times that in the future they would release a Live Box-Set. With the new technology arriving (like BlueRay) it's possible that they release more stuff with a single release. Take care |
| Rick 20.02.2006 09:38 |
Freddie solo project? What about: - Freddie with the Royal Ballet 1979 video - Freddie and Elton John 1982 video (Elton John's 40th birthday, they performed 3 songs together) - Some songs that were not on the Solo Box - and even more! I rather have a Live Box of Queen offcourse... |
| Freya is quietly judging you. 20.02.2006 09:41 |
I really hope they release a '79 concert, Paris would be fantastic. |
| Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury 20.02.2006 18:53 |
i can take hits III but I think that any other concert would be released only for the money |
| Bobby_brown 20.02.2006 19:10 |
Adolfo wrote: i can take hits III but I think that any other concert would be released only for the moneyEverything is released for the money, even GH3. Take care |
| Wiley 20.02.2006 22:14 |
Bobby_brown wrote: Everything is released for the money, even GH3. Take careEverything is released for the money, SPECIALLY GH3. :) Wiley |
| john bodega 21.02.2006 09:26 |
I have a simple philosophy. Release *everything*, and fuck the cost. |
| ibanez122 21.02.2006 16:13 |
<font color=black>Dennis Daja<h6>QZs God wrote:big fuckin deal. You cant sing perfect live - if you didnt already know that.Zebonka12 wrote: Wrong. Earls Court is great. Er. In parts anyway. But I won't call a faulty mic a 'bad performance'.they simply sang false Add in the fact that most Queen fans could care less if they sang "false" as you claim, just as long as we have the footage to view and see that band at that time in their history. |
| brENsKi 21.02.2006 17:11 |
John S Stuart wrote: What I will say is, you do not need to be Miss Marple to work out that the 5th September 2006 will be Freddie's 60th Birthday Anniversary. If this special date does not call for a unique and exceptional release, nothing ever will. PS: You read it here first!so it's gonna be the ANATO 31st Anniversary Re-Package Rip-Off then? |
| Negative Creep 22.02.2006 17:14 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:Damaged reels? You mean 10th generation video dubs of a rough cut that hasn't even been mixed, let alone processed or mastered? I love reading numerous posts about these so called "false" vocals. How does one sing "false" exactly? Were they singing in different accents or something? Or are you referring to the fact that you have only heard a dry monitor mix?<font color=black>Dennis Daja<h6>QZs God wrote:Dennis, their vocals were very good. The 'false' notes are for a large part to blame on damaged recording reels which warp the sound.Zebonka12 wrote: Wrong. Earls Court is great. Er. In parts anyway. But I won't call a faulty mic a 'bad performance'.they simply sang false |
| luthorn 22.02.2006 23:56 |
They should release Greatest Flips with PR on vocals. |
| Fireplace 23.02.2006 10:14 |
Never mind. |
| Rick 23.02.2006 15:01 |
Negative Creep wrote:Indeed. You are right. It's just a bloody bootlegvideo.<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:Damaged reels? You mean 10th generation video dubs of a rough cut that hasn't even been mixed, let alone processed or mastered? I love reading numerous posts about these so called "false" vocals. How does one sing "false" exactly? Were they singing in different accents or something? Or are you referring to the fact that you have only heard a dry monitor mix?<font color=black>Dennis Daja<h6>QZs God wrote:Dennis, their vocals were very good. The 'false' notes are for a large part to blame on damaged recording reels which warp the sound.Zebonka12 wrote: Wrong. Earls Court is great. Er. In parts anyway. But I won't call a faulty mic a 'bad performance'.they simply sang false |
| ibanez122 23.02.2006 21:18 |
Negative Creep wrote:I think in false he measn flat/out of tune. As I stated earlier, shit like that happens live so deal w/ it.<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:Damaged reels? You mean 10th generation video dubs of a rough cut that hasn't even been mixed, let alone processed or mastered? I love reading numerous posts about these so called "false" vocals. How does one sing "false" exactly? Were they singing in different accents or something? Or are you referring to the fact that you have only heard a dry monitor mix?<font color=black>Dennis Daja<h6>QZs God wrote:Dennis, their vocals were very good. The 'false' notes are for a large part to blame on damaged recording reels which warp the sound.Zebonka12 wrote: Wrong. Earls Court is great. Er. In parts anyway. But I won't call a faulty mic a 'bad performance'.they simply sang false Whats the lowest gen video available for the Earls Court Show ?!?! |