FreddiesGhettoTrench 17.02.2006 15:26 |
I <3 Ariel Sharon! I hope he gets better soon. He is MYYYYY Sharona :) |
The Fairy King 17.02.2006 16:01 |
Why don't u go and sit next to him and hold his hand and whisper nice words in his ears and watch him die...like a good ally. |
Sonia Doris 17.02.2006 16:03 |
I must say... there are men that have more milk than him... |
calcium 17.02.2006 16:03 |
Who the fuck is Ariel Sharon? Well he sucks, and so does Bush. |
The Fairy King 17.02.2006 16:04 |
There calcium in cabbage? :o |
Sonia Doris 17.02.2006 16:06 |
no, but it has vitamins. |
Sonia Doris 17.02.2006 16:15 |
more like calcar... |
Sonia Doris 17.02.2006 17:13 |
kaka |
Micrówave 17.02.2006 17:13 |
ooh my little pretty one. Pretty one. When you gonna give me some TIME SHARON-A? |
Music Man 17.02.2006 17:51 |
Unusual - he's got two girl's names. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 17.02.2006 18:24 |
calcium wrote: Who the fuck is Ariel Sharon? Well he sucks, and so does Bush.He is a new washing powder |
calcium 17.02.2006 18:44 |
link ? |
deleted user 17.02.2006 18:44 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: I <3 Ariel Sharon! I hope he gets better soon. He is MYYYYY Sharona :)I thought you were a bit stupid before. Now I'm sure. |
Mr.Jingles 17.02.2006 18:48 |
Why doesn't this thread surprise me. Sarajane has a bizarre fondness of political leaders who have killed innocent people by the use of violent force. Just as long as they're part of the extreme right wing. |
john bodega 18.02.2006 02:55 |
Here's hoping he's dead soon. I'm actually saying this for his sake, he's probably not enjoying how he is at the moment and he's not going to recover. I mean, if I were a cat in his position I'd ask the vet for the big needle. Oh, and then there's the fact that he's a savage and all that crap. :D |
Sonia Doris 18.02.2006 03:24 |
Alex Solan wrote:*agrees*<font color=green> M@tt wrote:HAHA!FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: I <3 Ariel Sharon! I hope he gets better soon. He is MYYYYY Sharona :)I thought you were a bit stupid before. Now I'm sure. |
The Mir@cle 18.02.2006 07:40 |
Sharon ruined all chances of peace in the Middle East! But I understand why FGT admires him so… I mean, Bush and Sharon were good partners. And FGT doesn’t have an own opinion.. what Bush says and does is good! |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 18.02.2006 09:52 |
The Mir@cle wrote: Sharon ruined all chances of peace in the Middle East! But I understand why FGT admires him so… I mean, Bush and Sharon were good partners. And FGT doesn’t have an own opinion.. what Bush says and does is good!No, the terrorists who are obsessed with killing innocent Israelis ruined all chances of peace in the Middle East. |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 18.02.2006 09:54 |
Mr.Jingles wrote: Why doesn't this thread surprise me. Sarajane has a bizarre fondness of political leaders who have killed innocent people by the use of violent force. Just as long as they're part of the extreme right wing.If Sharon hadn't used force, Israel wouldn't be around today. Israel's enemies would just keep sending in suicide bombers to murder Israeli civilians, assassinate Israeli and Israeli-friendly leaders, and take back the land that they want. |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 18.02.2006 09:54 |
Music Man wrote: Unusual - he's got two girl's names.In Israel, Ariel's actually a common male name. It means "Lion of God." |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 18.02.2006 09:55 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Here's hoping he's dead soon. I'm actually saying this for his sake, he's probably not enjoying how he is at the moment and he's not going to recover. I mean, if I were a cat in his position I'd ask the vet for the big needle.I don't give up hope for people. He could recover, even if he won't ever be like he was before. |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 18.02.2006 09:57 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:Gee, so I guess you'd like it if they decided to starve him to death like they did Terri Schiavo, eh? After all, the death penalty's only right against people who can't fight back!FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: I <3 Ariel Sharon! I hope he gets better soon. He is MYYYYY Sharona :)RETARD EXPLANATION: After the length of his coma and the severity of his brain-hemmoraging, he is only alive due to the machinery. He's dead. Face it. |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 18.02.2006 11:08 |
cabbage wrote: Freddiesghettowhatsit are you all there in the head? you look a bit...er..two sandwiches short of a picnic, to put it mildly.No, I just believe that people who are not in good health deserve our good thoughts. What's crazy about that? |
deleted user 18.02.2006 11:20 |
No, I just believe that people who are not in good health deserve our good thoughts. What's crazy about that? You are. And I have always wondered, WTF is a ghettotrench? |
Forever88 18.02.2006 12:51 |
i hate politicians. go get 'em cheney. bang. |
Music Man 18.02.2006 14:30 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:Thanks. I really needed that explanation. I actually thought his parents had mistaken him for a girl and had rightly so adjusted not only his given name, but his surname as well.Music Man wrote: Unusual - he's got two girl's names.In Israel, Ariel's actually a common male name. It means "Lion of God." |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 18.02.2006 19:27 |
<font color=green> M@tt wrote: No, I just believe that people who are not in good health deserve our good thoughts. What's crazy about that?You are. And I have always wondered, WTF is a ghettotrench? Trench is a trenchcoat. "Ghetto" is an all-purpose adjective for everything in Philly. Hence, Freddie's ghetto trenchcoat. |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 18.02.2006 19:31 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:Well, sometimes people have to get worse before they get better. Before his latest problems, many medical officials were saying he had a good chance of at least partial recovery, and so I believe that is good news.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:He's in even worse health than he was beforehand. He's dead. You're stupid.cabbage wrote: Freddiesghettowhatsit are you all there in the head? you look a bit...er..two sandwiches short of a picnic, to put it mildly.No, I just believe that people who are not in good health deserve our good thoughts. What's crazy about that? |
That guy who digs energy domes 18.02.2006 22:25 |
FGT, we should send him a fruit basket. |
SergeantPepperDG 18.02.2006 23:15 |
Ariel Sharon looks like my grandfather, except fatter. Before I learned who he was, when I was in 2nd grade or so, I remember seeing him on the front page of the newspaper and thinking, "HOLY CRAP! I DIDN'T KNOW MY GRANDPA WAS FAMOUS!" |
Music Man 18.02.2006 23:32 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:Same thing with the world. See, in economics we have a long run and a short run. You don't need to come up with immediate fixes to world problems like giving everybody a gun. Sure, it will work fine in the short run, but in the long run, that would simply make things much worse, with far more violent crime. If we let the world heal itself of prejudice and hate, sure things'll get pretty shitty in the short run. But eventually, they'll get a whole lot better in the long run.<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:Well, sometimes people have to get worse before they get better. Before his latest problems, many medical officials were saying he had a good chance of at least partial recovery, and so I believe that is good news.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:He's in even worse health than he was beforehand. He's dead. You're stupid.cabbage wrote: Freddiesghettowhatsit are you all there in the head? you look a bit...er..two sandwiches short of a picnic, to put it mildly.No, I just believe that people who are not in good health deserve our good thoughts. What's crazy about that? |
john bodega 18.02.2006 23:52 |
"No, the terrorists who are obsessed with killing innocent Israelis ruined all chances of peace in the Middle East." Oh brother, of course it's that simple isn't it??? "If Sharon hadn't used force, Israel wouldn't be around today." Probably woulda been a good thing. Ok look - here is the situation, you've got two countries that *have to* get along. If you get right to it, Israel should never have been formed and the Western nations should never have gone about divvying land up in a region that we simply didn't have any right to fuck around with. In short, the USA, Britain, and everyone else should have *kept their fucking noses out of it*. But it's decades too late for that now, and you've got people that aren't going to budge just because they 'shouldn't be there'. Now they've got to get along, and I reckon step one is with arseholes like Sharon gradually dying off. Here's hoping a peacemaker replaces him. If there could just be a sensible leader on each side, things would look up (eventually). |
That guy who digs energy domes 19.02.2006 00:13 |
and the great thing is, if President Bush can help make peace there, he'll go down as one of the Presediental Greats with Washington and Lincoln. |
Haystacks Calhoun 19.02.2006 00:26 |
So..... Are the Arabs that much against the western world that they want Israel, a country founded by Jews, the last "religious group" to be "eliminated" from the human race????? I am not a terribly religious guy, but lets get real, folks. Should the world stand around and giggle while idiots claim that the Holocaust didn't happen? "Oh, that's just that leader of Iran. That crazy sum-bitch is always popping off...." Do people really see what is going on in this world, or do they get blinded by all of the media bullshit? Instead, it is fashionable to blame everyone who has it right. Who, though you may not agree with the politics,, or the way things are handled, are doing the right thing. The ugly thing, the things that people don't want to talk about.... But someone has to do the dirty work. Sad....... |
The Real Wizard 19.02.2006 03:26 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: If Sharon hadn't used force, Israel wouldn't be around today. Israel's enemies would just keep sending in suicide bombers to murder Israeli civilians, assassinate Israeli and Israeli-friendly leaders, and take back the land that they want.This may be the one and only time I will agree with FGT. I don't fully agree, but I agree with the general direction of the post. Isreal knows well that islamic extremists won't be running short of suicide bombers any time soon, so they use the best methods possible to hunt down these terrorists and kill them before they kill more civilians in Isreal. Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: and the great thing is, if President Bush can help make peace there, he'll go down as one of the Presediental Greats with Washington and Lincoln.Yes, since it's up to Bush and the USA to save the world. It's hilarious... one of Bush's campaign promises was to stop the violence in the middle east. In all logic, the only way that will happen before the end of his term is to kill everyone from both sides. Bush is the worst president ever. But you gotta give him credit, as he's running the "politics of fear" better than any other president of the past. On a different note, when is the last time a president didn't do his victory run in the limo after being elected? The limo had to speed away because they thought Bush would get killed. Why else do you think Bush has made less public appearances than every other president in history? |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 19.02.2006 10:40 |
Probably woulda been a good thing. Ok look - here is the situation, you've got two countries that *have to* get along. If you get right to it, Israel should never have been formedSo in other words, the Jews shouldn't have a place they can go to to be safe, eh? If they start getting killed off again, I guess they should just hope there's enough attics for everyone.... |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 19.02.2006 10:43 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: The limo had to speed away because they thought Bush would get killed. Why else do you think Bush has made less public appearances than every other president in history?But, if you remember, it's the presidents many people remember as great who got assassinated: Kennedy, Lincoln, etc. I mean, people are after Bush because Bush doesn't sit on the fence, he does what he feels is right, and that pisses a lot of people off. Same thing with Lincoln. |
deleted user 19.02.2006 11:36 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:Lincoln was killed for his stand on slavery. Kennedy was murdered by his own government for political reasons and his stand on Vietnam. He wanted the troops pulled out. The government didn't. They killed him.Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: The limo had to speed away because they thought Bush would get killed. Why else do you think Bush has made less public appearances than every other president in history?But, if you remember, it's the presidents many people remember as great who got assassinated: Kennedy, Lincoln, etc. I mean, people are after Bush because Bush doesn't sit on the fence, he does what he feels is right, and that pisses a lot of people off. Same thing with Lincoln. So now here's Georgie boy. The only reason people would want him dead is because he has runied America an many different ways. Shall we list some? He and his admin. hold the US in a constant state of FALSE FEAR ie, terrorism. He lied to the world (this is quite clear now isn't it) about the WOMD just to create a war. Wartime Presidents are the best right? His Social Security Reform is a joke, his forign polocies are incredibly lame if not arrogant. He is bringing this county to hell on the fast track. And it's people like you who support this moron. And it's people like you who are blinded by his patriotic bull shit. If you had the capacity to think for yourself you would see the truth in many different ways. |
rachael mae. 19.02.2006 11:45 |
Why does every thread end up like this nowadays? :P |
Sherwood Forest 19.02.2006 11:47 |
yup pretty much thats why i stay out of it :) |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 19.02.2006 12:46 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:FYI, they have a right to be anywhere they damned well want to be. Israel is THEIR COUNTRY, and if you don't like it, too bad. There's no way they should be chased out of their own country by suicide-bombing altacockers. I guess you don't have anyone chasing you out of your home just because of your religious/ethnic background, so you don't care.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:More like, if the ZIONISTS (i.e. Jewish religious FANATICS) would take the Orthodox Jews' example and keep their asses off Israeli soil until the Messiah shows up, the world would be a far calmer place.Probably woulda been a good thing. Ok look - here is the situation, you've got two countries that *have to* get along. If you get right to it, Israel should never have been formedSo in other words, the Jews shouldn't have a place they can go to to be safe, eh? If they start getting killed off again, I guess they should just hope there's enough attics for everyone.... |
The Real Wizard 19.02.2006 22:06 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: FYI, they have a right to be anywhere they damned well want to be. Israel is THEIR COUNTRY, and if you don't like it, too bad. There's no way they should be chased out of their own country by suicide-bombing altacockers. I guess you don't have anyone chasing you out of your home just because of your religious/ethnic background, so you don't care.Isreal became the Jews' country in 1948 as it was handed to them by the UN after kicking everyone else out. Many or even most of these Jews, however, were left over from the holocaust, and needed a place to go - but it was at the expense of all other people who already had lived there and were forced out. That's the reality of it. |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 20.02.2006 08:01 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:If you support the UN in one endeavor - telling us to stay out of Iraq - why don't you support the UN when they did something decent for suffering people? There are many Arab Israelis living in Israel, and THEY'RE getting along with the Israelis fine, it's just the terrorist lunatics like Arafat (before he died obviously) that want to take over Israel.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: FYI, they have a right to be anywhere they damned well want to be. Israel is THEIR COUNTRY, and if you don't like it, too bad. There's no way they should be chased out of their own country by suicide-bombing altacockers. I guess you don't have anyone chasing you out of your home just because of your religious/ethnic background, so you don't care.Isreal became the Jews' country in 1948 as it was handed to them by the UN after kicking everyone else out. Many or even most of these Jews, however, were left over from the holocaust, and needed a place to go - but it was at the expense of all other people who already had lived there and were forced out. That's the reality of it. |
Mr.Jingles 20.02.2006 08:42 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:So you think the terrorists are only one one side?Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:If you support the UN in one endeavor - telling us to stay out of Iraq - why don't you support the UN when they did something decent for suffering people? There are many Arab Israelis living in Israel, and THEY'RE getting along with the Israelis fine, it's just the terrorist lunatics like Arafat (before he died obviously) that want to take over Israel.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: FYI, they have a right to be anywhere they damned well want to be. Israel is THEIR COUNTRY, and if you don't like it, too bad. There's no way they should be chased out of their own country by suicide-bombing altacockers. I guess you don't have anyone chasing you out of your home just because of your religious/ethnic background, so you don't care.Isreal became the Jews' country in 1948 as it was handed to them by the UN after kicking everyone else out. Many or even most of these Jews, however, were left over from the holocaust, and needed a place to go - but it was at the expense of all other people who already had lived there and were forced out. That's the reality of it. I guess that you must be one of those who buy the whole Israeli "retaliation" issue, as some sort of "justice", huh? I'm sorry but targeting villages, destroying homes, and killing women and children while on the pursue for terrorists IS TERRORISM TOO. Sadly there's too many people like you who are just completely biased when it comes to the issue of fighting terrorism. Steven Spielberg recently got blasted by the Israeli community for criticizing the methods of taking "blood for blood" on the movie 'Munich'. Spielberg never once took the side of the Palestinians during the film, and tried to make his film as non-partisan and unbiased as possible. The film does NOT intend to express that the use of force is always wrong, but rather criticize how the methods for finding "justice" are often driven by hatred, revenge, and anger. |
Mr.Jingles 20.02.2006 09:01 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:So one side is allowed to kill innocent people, and the other one doesn't?Mr.Jingles wrote: Why doesn't this thread surprise me. Sarajane has a bizarre fondness of political leaders who have killed innocent people by the use of violent force. Just as long as they're part of the extreme right wing.If Sharon hadn't used force, Israel wouldn't be around today. Israel's enemies would just keep sending in suicide bombers to murder Israeli civilians, assassinate Israeli and Israeli-friendly leaders, and take back the land that they want. How long will it take you to realize that terrorism CAN'T be fought with terrorism? |
That guy who digs energy domes 20.02.2006 22:05 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:You really do enjoy making things up dont you?FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: If Sharon hadn't used force, Israel wouldn't be around today. Israel's enemies would just keep sending in suicide bombers to murder Israeli civilians, assassinate Israeli and Israeli-friendly leaders, and take back the land that they want.This may be the one and only time I will agree with FGT. I don't fully agree, but I agree with the general direction of the post. Isreal knows well that islamic extremists won't be running short of suicide bombers any time soon, so they use the best methods possible to hunt down these terrorists and kill them before they kill more civilians in Isreal.Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: and the great thing is, if President Bush can help make peace there, he'll go down as one of the Presediental Greats with Washington and Lincoln.Yes, since it's up to Bush and the USA to save the world. It's hilarious... one of Bush's campaign promises was to stop the violence in the middle east. In all logic, the only way that will happen before the end of his term is to kill everyone from both sides. Bush is the worst president ever. But you gotta give him credit, as he's running the "politics of fear" better than any other president of the past. On a different note, when is the last time a president didn't do his victory run in the limo after being elected? The limo had to speed away because they thought Bush would get killed. Why else do you think Bush has made less public appearances than every other president in history? What about- John Adams-Didnt even go to his state of union adress Richard Nixon- Not in office long enough George Washington- He counts right? Abraham Lincoln- Shot in mid term, probably would have been impeached during restoration And Bush the worst president? Well, No assassinaton attempts No impeachment charges Lets look who that puts him ahead of Clinton, Lincoln, Kennedy, Garfield, Adams- I could go on. This is another republican revolution, get used to it. |
Maz 20.02.2006 23:44 |
Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: You really do enjoy making things up dont you? What about- John Adams-Didnt even go to his state of union adress Richard Nixon- Not in office long enough George Washington- He counts right? Abraham Lincoln- Shot in mid term, probably would have been impeached during restoration And Bush the worst president? Well, No assassinaton attempts No impeachment charges Lets look who that puts him ahead of Clinton, Lincoln, Kennedy, Garfield, Adams- I could go on. This is another republican revolution, get used to it.What point are you even trying to make? I can't make hide nor hair of that reply. Are you actually saying that an assassination attempt is a sign of a bad President? Also, why is George Washington in that list? And Lincoln was not shot in mid-term, but rather at the beginning of his second term (about 6 weeks in). It is highly unlikely that he would have been impeached since he had better ties to the Radical Republicans than his successor did. Finally, the act of giving a State of the Union (actually giving a speech before Congress) was out of vogue until Woodrow Wilson's presidency. In that light, the fact that John Adams (the father is who I assume you mean) never attended his own State of the Union is not surprising. |
no one but you 28112 21.02.2006 06:02 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:sad, but truth. It would be much better if doctors and family have a bit of sympathy and unplug him from his "life suporting sistem". He is like a vegetableFreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: I <3 Ariel Sharon! I hope he gets better soon. He is MYYYYY Sharona :)RETARD EXPLANATION: After the length of his coma and the severity of his brain-hemmoraging, he is only alive due to the machinery. He's dead. Face it. |
FreddiesGhettoTrench 21.02.2006 06:37 |
no one but you wrote:That's awful. Life is important and if he is still clinging to it, no one should take it away from him.<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:sad, but truth. It would be much better if doctors and family have a bit of sympathy and unplug him from his "life suporting sistem". He is like a vegetableFreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: I <3 Ariel Sharon! I hope he gets better soon. He is MYYYYY Sharona :)RETARD EXPLANATION: After the length of his coma and the severity of his brain-hemmoraging, he is only alive due to the machinery. He's dead. Face it. |
no one but you 28112 21.02.2006 06:59 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:what life? he is practically dead. This "life" is torture for him. i wouldn't like to live that way.no one but you wrote:That's awful. Life is important and if he is still clinging to it, no one should take it away from him.<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:sad, but truth. It would be much better if doctors and family have a bit of sympathy and unplug him from his "life suporting sistem". He is like a vegetableFreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: I <3 Ariel Sharon! I hope he gets better soon. He is MYYYYY Sharona :)RETARD EXPLANATION: After the length of his coma and the severity of his brain-hemmoraging, he is only alive due to the machinery. He's dead. Face it. |
The Mir@cle 21.02.2006 07:51 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:You can give tons of arguments, but FGT will believe it's awful as long as Bush says so!! :PFreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:He's not 'clinging to it', a machine is doing that. This is not life, it's robotics.no one but you wrote:That's awful. Life is important and if he is still clinging to it, no one should take it away from him.<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:sad, but truth. It would be much better if doctors and family have a bit of sympathy and unplug him from his "life suporting sistem". He is like a vegetableFreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: I <3 Ariel Sharon! I hope he gets better soon. He is MYYYYY Sharona :)RETARD EXPLANATION: After the length of his coma and the severity of his brain-hemmoraging, he is only alive due to the machinery. He's dead. Face it. |
That guy who digs energy domes 21.02.2006 08:40 |
Zeni wrote:Getting shot is a great way to go down as a great president, look at Kennedy for example- what did he do?Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: You really do enjoy making things up dont you? What about- John Adams-Didnt even go to his state of union adress Richard Nixon- Not in office long enough George Washington- He counts right? Abraham Lincoln- Shot in mid term, probably would have been impeached during restoration And Bush the worst president? Well, No assassinaton attempts No impeachment charges Lets look who that puts him ahead of Clinton, Lincoln, Kennedy, Garfield, Adams- I could go on. This is another republican revolution, get used to it.What point are you even trying to make? I can't make hide nor hair of that reply. Are you actually saying that an assassination attempt is a sign of a bad President? Also, why is George Washington in that list? And Lincoln was not shot in mid-term, but rather at the beginning of his second term (about 6 weeks in). It is highly unlikely that he would have been impeached since he had better ties to the Radical Republicans than his successor did. Finally, the act of giving a State of the Union (actually giving a speech before Congress) was out of vogue until Woodrow Wilson's presidency. In that light, the fact that John Adams (the father is who I assume you mean) never attended his own State of the Union is not surprising. A. Started a war(well, not acutally a war) B. Slept around (well, Marilyn Monroe to his credit but its still not right) Im saying that Bush is a fine president and Sir GH here should probably worry about his own country before he goes crying about the USA. |
Mr.Jingles 21.02.2006 10:30 |
Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote:What war did JFK start? Are you talking about Vietnam? That was Johnson, dude. Check your history books.Zeni wrote:Getting shot is a great way to go down as a great president, look at Kennedy for example- what did he do? A. Started a war(well, not acutally a war) B. Slept around (well, Marilyn Monroe to his credit but its still not right) Im saying that Bush is a fine president and Sir GH here should probably worry about his own country before he goes crying about the USA.Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: You really do enjoy making things up dont you? What about- John Adams-Didnt even go to his state of union adress Richard Nixon- Not in office long enough George Washington- He counts right? Abraham Lincoln- Shot in mid term, probably would have been impeached during restoration And Bush the worst president? Well, No assassinaton attempts No impeachment charges Lets look who that puts him ahead of Clinton, Lincoln, Kennedy, Garfield, Adams- I could go on. This is another republican revolution, get used to it.What point are you even trying to make? I can't make hide nor hair of that reply. Are you actually saying that an assassination attempt is a sign of a bad President? Also, why is George Washington in that list? And Lincoln was not shot in mid-term, but rather at the beginning of his second term (about 6 weeks in). It is highly unlikely that he would have been impeached since he had better ties to the Radical Republicans than his successor did. Finally, the act of giving a State of the Union (actually giving a speech before Congress) was out of vogue until Woodrow Wilson's presidency. In that light, the fact that John Adams (the father is who I assume you mean) never attended his own State of the Union is not surprising. JFK did something that more politicians should do more often. He avoided a war with the Soviet Union by having a diplomatic agreement with the Russians. Having decided to bomb the Russians after the Cuban missile crisis, perhaps none of us would be here. Sadly those right wing nuts at the CIA thought that JFK was being too soft on communism, and that's why it was probably them who decided to get him killed. Aside from that JFK was the President who despite strong opossition from the south, decided to pass the Bill of Civil Rights and put a complete end to racial segregation by declaring it absolutely unconstitutional. |
Mr.Jingles 21.02.2006 10:39 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:How about the life of those innocent people who have been killed by air-strikes "targeting" terrorists? Just because one is a rich and famous politician, and the other are people living under poverty and opression, doesn't make them less human beings.no one but you wrote:That's awful. Life is important and if he is still clinging to it, no one should take it away from him.<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:sad, but truth. It would be much better if doctors and family have a bit of sympathy and unplug him from his "life suporting sistem". He is like a vegetableFreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: I <3 Ariel Sharon! I hope he gets better soon. He is MYYYYY Sharona :)RETARD EXPLANATION: After the length of his coma and the severity of his brain-hemmoraging, he is only alive due to the machinery. He's dead. Face it. Stop being such a hypocrite, Sarajane. |
Micrówave 21.02.2006 14:20 |
Haystacks asked:
Do people really see what is going on in this world, or do they get blinded by all of the media bullshit?After reading all the Anti-Bush crap on this site, I'd have to say... YES!!!! Someone even said Sharon is the reason there is no peace in Isreal. Hello, Mr. Arafat? I guess you were a "good" terrorist. |
Micrówave 21.02.2006 14:24 |
<font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote: Yes we all know America's past presidents have sucked..but just because Bush hasn't got assasinated doesn't make him a brilliant president. I'm sorry, but that's the most stupid arguement going.Hey Linda. Name some Irish leaders that have done something positive in the world. I challenge you!!! Since America's past presidents "sucked". What did the drunk Irish do? Besides drink? |
Mr.Jingles 21.02.2006 18:35 |
Mircrowave wrote:One word, 4 letters: BONO<font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote: Yes we all know America's past presidents have sucked..but just because Bush hasn't got assasinated doesn't make him a brilliant president. I'm sorry, but that's the most stupid arguement going.Hey Linda. Name some Irish leaders that have done something positive in the world. I challenge you!!! Since America's past presidents "sucked". What did the drunk Irish do? Besides drink? As arrogant as Paul Hewson might be, I have to give the man thumbs up for making a hell of an effort to fight AIDS and stop poverty in Africa. Now, speaking of (the few) U.S. Presidents who have actually done an effort to bring peace and justice to the world, I think Jimmy Carter deserves a honorable mention. Forget about the flaws of his administration. What can't be denied is that the man has done a far bigger effort to help human right causes and put an end to poverty worldwide than any other U.S. president. The guy sure knows that all the millions that are being spent of fabricating weapons and spreading more hatred, could much better be spent helping the hundreds of millions whose lives hang by a thread. |
john bodega 22.02.2006 10:52 |
Bono?? haha, more like "Bone-head". Look, I reckon people who do charity work should do it anonymously. The guy is just so frickin' smug.... I saw him at a press conference and he was holding his fist up next to his face and acting like William Shatner... GUH. |
Music Man 22.02.2006 13:59 |
I love William Shatner. |
Mr.Jingles 22.02.2006 15:56 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Bono?? haha, more like "Bone-head". Look, I reckon people who do charity work should do it anonymously. The guy is just so frickin' smug.... I saw him at a press conference and he was holding his fist up next to his face and acting like William Shatner... GUH.I'm gonna have to agree with you on that one. While I do appreciate Bono's effort, it seems like the guy would only do it as long as it brings him self-publicity. Same thing goes with Oprah Winfrey, who wants all members of the press to be covering events where she's giving away a giant check. Steven Spielberg is been said to be one of the most generous celebrities, but chooses to remain anonymus whenever he gives money for charity. |
Forever88 22.02.2006 16:14 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:shut your cake hole you nazi!Probably woulda been a good thing. Ok look - here is the situation, you've got two countries that *have to* get along. If you get right to it, Israel should never have been formedSo in other words, the Jews shouldn't have a place they can go to to be safe, eh? If they start getting killed off again, I guess they should just hope there's enough attics for everyone.... |
yamaha 22.02.2006 23:39 |
Alex Solan wrote: linkFuzzy Llama link |
The Real Wizard 24.02.2006 01:36 |
Mr.Jingles wrote:Ah yeah, good post.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: If you support the UN in one endeavor - telling us to stay out of Iraq - why don't you support the UN when they did something decent for suffering people? There are many Arab Israelis living in Israel, and THEY'RE getting along with the Israelis fine, it's just the terrorist lunatics like Arafat (before he died obviously) that want to take over Israel.So you think the terrorists are only one one side? I guess that you must be one of those who buy the whole Israeli "retaliation" issue, as some sort of "justice", huh? I'm sorry but targeting villages, destroying homes, and killing women and children while on the pursue for terrorists IS TERRORISM TOO. Sadly there's too many people like you who are just completely biased when it comes to the issue of fighting terrorism. Steven Spielberg recently got blasted by the Israeli community for criticizing the methods of taking "blood for blood" on the movie 'Munich'. Spielberg never once took the side of the Palestinians during the film, and tried to make his film as non-partisan and unbiased as possible. The film does NOT intend to express that the use of force is always wrong, but rather criticize how the methods for finding "justice" are often driven by hatred, revenge, and anger. What war did JFK start? Are you talking about Vietnam? That was Johnson, dude. Check your history books. JFK did something that more politicians should do more often. He avoided a war with the Soviet Union by having a diplomatic agreement with the Russians. Having decided to bomb the Russians after the Cuban missile crisis, perhaps none of us would be here. Sadly those right wing nuts at the CIA thought that JFK was being too soft on communism, and that's why it was probably them who decided to get him killed. Aside from that JFK was the President who despite strong opossition from the south, decided to pass the Bill of Civil Rights and put a complete end to racial segregation by declaring it absolutely unconstitutional.In conclusion, with the evidence presented, JFK was clearly the worst president ever. |
Maz 24.02.2006 02:19 |
The Civil Rights Bill passed in 1964, after JFK's death. LBJ, the southerner, deserves the credit for that one. |
Mr.Jingles 24.02.2006 10:38 |
Zeni wrote: The Civil Rights Bill passed in 1964, after JFK's death. LBJ, the southerner, deserves the credit for that one.My bad about that one. Although I think JFK deserves more credit for passing the Bill of Civil Rights. He was the one who talked to MLK several times, and pushed congress to pass the bill. |
Maz 24.02.2006 10:47 |
LBJ used the memory of JFK to garner support for the bill's passage, which is one reason why it's linked to the Kennedy so much in the public memory. Historically speaking, JFK's importance has been a bit overblown, much like the belief that he would have kept us out of Vietnam. We really don't know what would have happened if he lived, though he was certainly more actively invovled than Eisenhower was. On a side note, LBJ said he lost the South to the Republicans when he signed the bill. |