| Freddie's #1 Fan Forever 08.02.2006 18:59 |
The March 2006 edition of "Blender" magazine features an article about the "50 Most Awesomely Dead Rock Stars". Freddie Mercury is listed at the #17 spot and a 1/4 page photograph of him is shown. The article mentions the fact that Queen's worth has greatly increased in the years following Mercury's death. It goes on to mention the "We Will Rock You" musical as well as the current tour with Paul Rodgers. According to the article, while the current tour with Paul Rodgers, "diminishes Queen's brand value, the personal reputation of Mercury has been enhanced, with critical opinion generally agreeing that Rodgers is unfit to wear his predecessor's crown, metaphorical or otherwise". |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 08.02.2006 19:11 |
Loyal2Freddie wrote: The March 2006 edition of "Blender" magazine features an article about the "50 Most Awesomely Dead Rock Stars". Freddie Mercury is listed at the #17 spot and a 1/4 page photograph of him is shown. The article mentions the fact that Queen's worth has greatly increased in the years following Mercury's death. It goes on to mention the "We Will Rock You" musical as well as the current tour with Paul Rodgers. According to the article, while the current tour with Paul Rodgers, "diminishes Queen's brand value, the personal reputation of Mercury has been enhanced, with critical opinion generally agreeing that Rodgers is unfit to wear his predecessor's crown, metaphorical or otherwise".Get Rodgers OUT!!! I Want him OUT!! OUT OUT OUT OUT!!! |
| Freddie's #1 Fan Forever 08.02.2006 19:25 |
Well, BPP, "Blender" definitely agrees with you here! |
| That guy who digs energy domes 08.02.2006 19:45 |
snow flakey wrote: What a pleasing day this is for me. Finally someone out there realized AND decided to say something about this ugly mess with Q+PR. Freddie is gone, that means no "live" Queen..thats it. Pop in a dvd/cd to get the real Queen. Thank You for the wonderful news!I thought Queen died in 1991? How can we get Queen now if it is dead? |
| That guy who digs energy domes 08.02.2006 20:04 |
snow flakey wrote:You say that now but for the last month you've been saying "RIP Queen 1991"Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Slave</h6> wrote:Are you blind? I said Queen as a LIVE act died in 1991. Now all you can do is listen to records or watch dvds to see real Queensnow flakey wrote: What a pleasing day this is for me. Finally someone out there realized AND decided to say something about this ugly mess with Q+PR. Freddie is gone, that means no "live" Queen..thats it. Pop in a dvd/cd to get the real Queen. Thank You for the wonderful news!I thought Queen died in 1991? How can we get Queen now if it is dead? |
| That guy who digs energy domes 08.02.2006 20:37 |
snow flakey wrote:But how can they live on if they're dead?Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Slave</h6> wrote:Thats because Queen really did die in 1991. If you think Brian and Roger are Queen, get some help. Queen is gone, and theres nothing you can do about it, but listen to their records and watch dvds. Queens records and dvds are always going to be there, aren't they? So listen to them and watch them. Their music lives on though records, but the actual band Queen, is gone.snow flakey wrote:You say that now but for the last month you've been saying "RIP Queen 1991"Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Slave</h6> wrote:Are you blind? I said Queen as a LIVE act died in 1991. Now all you can do is listen to records or watch dvds to see real Queensnow flakey wrote: What a pleasing day this is for me. Finally someone out there realized AND decided to say something about this ugly mess with Q+PR. Freddie is gone, that means no "live" Queen..thats it. Pop in a dvd/cd to get the real Queen. Thank You for the wonderful news!I thought Queen died in 1991? How can we get Queen now if it is dead? |
| Smitty 08.02.2006 20:41 |
Company, always on the run Destiny, oooh, and the rising sun I was born, six gun in my hand Behind the gun, I make my final stand That's why they call me Bad company, Oh, I can't deny Bad, Bad company Till the day I die Rebel souls Deserters we are called Chose the gun And threw away the sword All these towns They all know our name Six gun sound Ooh, is our claim to fame That's why they call me Bad company, Oh, I can't deny Bad, Bad company Till the day I die Ahhh, good music featuring THE VOICE!! |
| Music Man 08.02.2006 20:44 |
snow flakey wrote:Didn't Queen die as a live act in 1986?Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Slave</h6> wrote:Are you blind? I said Queen as a LIVE act died in 1991. Now all you can do is listen to records or watch dvds to see real Queensnow flakey wrote: What a pleasing day this is for me. Finally someone out there realized AND decided to say something about this ugly mess with Q+PR. Freddie is gone, that means no "live" Queen..thats it. Pop in a dvd/cd to get the real Queen. Thank You for the wonderful news!I thought Queen died in 1991? How can we get Queen now if it is dead? Anyway, we ALL know how prestigious and dependable a publication like Blender is. |
| it was electric7 08.02.2006 21:57 |
If your a Queen fan,would you rather have the amazing expirience and see Roger and Brian+Paul Rodgers perform and have an awesome time or Brian and Roger to be like "no we arent gunna do anything becuase Freddie is dead" Be happy and they are still willing to entertain us live!! Ofcourse its not the REAL Queen,but still!!! |
| j_stone2525 09.02.2006 02:00 |
I like cheese. Mmmmm....Gouda is Gooda. |
| Mr Drowse 09.02.2006 05:08 |
Parmigiano? Anyone? ;) |
| Fenderek 09.02.2006 05:11 |
Brie or Camembert... Even though it's a bit runny... |
| ok.computer 09.02.2006 05:53 |
Look, I'm refusing to re-engage in these discussions until Coleraine Cheddar is recognised in this forum. |
| no one but you 28112 09.02.2006 06:57 |
snow flakey wrote: Thats why they should go under Smile, because Brian and Roger are not Queen. Queen is a great legendary band, but is nothing but a memory, without Freddie. RIP Freddie + Queen.Why should they go as Smile. Brian and Roger alone are not Smile, there were other band members with them in the Smile. Remember... BTW Do you remember one guy from Queen named John Deacon? I think that all "real fans" like BPP snow flakey and all other PR hater forgot him |
| 7Innuendo7 09.02.2006 08:26 |
can't wait for the tour to start! sure, Blender mag is a real pinnacle of American literary style ;) Haha, another bunch of pinks |
| Munchsack 09.02.2006 08:32 |
I ran out of cheese last night. I didn't have much left, but I just ate what there was but now I regret it because I can't have any more. |
| The Real Wizard 09.02.2006 10:30 |
Bryans Permed Pants wrote: Get Rodgers OUT!!! I Want him OUT!! OUT OUT OUT OUT!!!He's not going anywhere. Maybe after a year of bitching you should be a nice big grown-up man and accept it. |
| greaserkat 09.02.2006 10:38 |
Who was #1 in the Blender Issue? |
| ok.computer 09.02.2006 10:54 |
Well. I found this article on French Cheese. It's highly informative. France's 400 sorts of cheese could puzzle Mickey Mouse... We also get confused when confronted with the uncountable designation of cheese (cheese of guaranted origin, made with milk or pasteurised milk, farm made or mass produced ...). It is a matter of local flavour as well as a matter of money. The origin of cheese is lost in the mist of time. Thousand of cows and sheeps and goats have been milked since someone first decided to curdle milk. The French have always regarded cheese as essential, whether they buy it on site (in farms), or in supermarkets. But which sort of cheese shall you choose ? According to the legislation, cheese means " fermented or not fermented, matured or not matured food, made from dairy produce (milk, can be more or less skimmed, or cream or dasher). It can be used as such or coagulated, before it se drained, partly or not. It keeps at least 23% of dry matter". The kind of milk used has to be notified, it not cow milk. The 400 sorts of French cheese recorded can be made with milk or with pasteurised milk. The "milk" label means that the milk was not heated over 37°C. "This way, it keeps all its properties, although il lose certain pathogenic baceria which can prove dangerous for human beings", Mr Garsault, Head-manager of the International cheese Institute explains. Farm cheese bears such as label. "They back up the French cheese tradition", G. Ripaud, who is in charge of technical cheese related problems near the Food Office asserts. From a legal pont of view, farm cheese "is a hand made in farms, with the milk of a single drove, each day". Small scale production is back again as proved by the high price of products ! The milk used to make pasteurised cheese is heated up to 72°C, for 20 to 30 seconds, which annihilated any pathogenic germ. Then, the milk is seeded again with lactic bacteria, in order to restore the flora indispensable for maturing the paste. "Is it a crime to take the main bacteria out of milk and to replace them by others, which are selected and standarkised in laboratories ? Is it a good thing to add to this milk other synthetic ingrediens ?" Pierre Androuet, a supporter of high quality cheese, asked as far back as 1973. In 1909, he opened a creamery in Paris, rue d'Amsterdam, which, since then, has been crowded by cheese lovers from the whole world. But P. Androuet's question has not been answered yet. For some, mass-produced cheese is not cheese actually : but it ranks first in house-hold consumtion. So, on one hand, you find mass production and low costs, and on the other small scale production. Prices differ mainly. "Still, cheese is a matter of native tang", Raymond Felix, a head cheesemonger at Androuet's notices. "Similar sorts of cheese cna be more or less expensive according to their fame and to the price of milk," Pascal Moingeon, sales manager in charge of Lanquetot labeled camemberts from the calvados region, sets the example fo camembets : "There is a segmentation as concerns brands : Lanquedoc, Lepetit, Gillot, Cooperative d'Isigny are made with milk. Their prices are over FF 10, and they are chosen by 15% of consumers . The pasteurised camenberts, branded President, Bridel or Coeur de Lion are the market core, with a 85% of share ; They are sold under FF 10 ; Ladle moulding accounts for the price difference. For Lanquetot camenbert, the mould is filled with five layers of curdled milk, which are spaced 40mm, so as to allow a slow draining and a different taste". "The difference between cheese made with pasteurised milk or with milk is a bit ambiguous", Mr Garsuault notices, "some prefer to give no detail about it". So can one actually see the difference between a pasteurised and a milk camembert ? "Yes" Pascal Moingeon ass |
| ok.computer 09.02.2006 10:58 |
Again, more controversy...it took ages to ummmm write and research this... Archaeologists have discovered that as far back as 6000 BC cheese had been made from cow's and goat's milk and stored in tall jars. Egyptian tomb murals of 2000 BC show butter and cheese being made, and other murals which show milk being stored in skin bags suspended from poles demonstrate a knowledge of dairy husbandry at that time. It is likely that nomadic tribes of Central Asia found animal skin bags a useful way to carry milk on animal backs when on the move. Fermentation of the milk sugars would cause the milk to curdle and the swaying motion would break up the curd to provide a refreshing whey drink. The curds would then be removed, drained and lightly salted to provide a tasty and nourishing high protein food, i.e. a welcome supplement to meat protein. Cheesemaking, thus, gradually evolved from two main streams. The first was the liquid fermented milks such as yoghurt, koumiss and kefir. The second through allowing the milk to acidify to form curds and whey. Whey could then be drained either through perforated earthenware bowls or through woven reed baskets or similar material. Most authorities consider that cheese was first made in the Middle East. The earliest type was a form of sour milk which came into being when it was discovered that domesticated animals could be milked. A legendary story has it that cheese was 'discovered' by an unknown Arab nomad. He is said to have filled a saddlebag with milk to sustain him on a journey across the desert by horse. After several hours riding he stopped to quench his thirst, only to find that the milk had separated into a pale watery liquid and solid white lumps. Because the saddlebag, which was made from the stomach of a young animal, contained a coagulating enzyme known as rennin, the milk had been effectively separated into curds and whey by the combination of the rennin, the hot sun and the galloping motions of the horse. The nomad, unconcerned with technical details, found the whey drinkable and the curds edible. From Biblical sources we learn that when David escaped across the River Jordan he was fed with 'cheese of kine' (cows) (2 Samuel 17:29), and it is said that he presented ten cheeses to the captain of the army drawn up to do battle with Saul (1 Samuel 17:18). Indeed, records show that there was at one time a location near Jerusalem called 'The Valley of the Cheesemakers'. Clearly, skills had been developed to preserve milk either as an acid-curd based cheese or as a range of lactic cheeses, and fermented milks such as today's unsweetened natural yoghurt. Learning these techniques, the Romans with their characteristic efficiency were quick to develop cheesemaking to a fine art. Cheesemaking was done with skill and knowledge and reached a high standard. By this time the ripening process had been developed and it was known that various treatments and conditions under storage resulted in different flavours and characteristics. The larger Roman houses had a separate cheese kitchen, the caseale, and also special areas where cheese could be matured. In large towns home-made cheese could be taken to a special centre to be smoked. Written evidence shows clearly how far the Romans had changed the art of cheesemaking:- Homer, ca. 1184 BC, refers to cheese being made in the mountain caves of Greece from the milk of sheep and goats. Indeed one variety called 'Cynthos' was made and sold by the Greeks to the Romans at a price of about 1p per lb. This could well have been the Feta cheese of today. Aristotle, 384 - 322 BC, commented on cheese made from the milk of mares and asses - the Russian 'koumiss' is in fact derived from mare's milk and is fermented to provide an alcoholic content of up to 3%. Varro, ca. 127 BC, had noted the difference in cheeses made from a number of locations and commented on their digestibility. By this time the use of rennet had become commonplace, |
| Freddie's #1 Fan Forever 09.02.2006 12:57 |
I don't know much about cheeses, but it looks like a lot of critics out there really do agree with me, BPP and snow flakey. |
| Freddie's #1 Fan Forever 09.02.2006 12:59 |
By the way, #1 was Johnny Cash, #2 The Notorious BIG and #3 Elvis |
| Munchsack 09.02.2006 13:08 |
Elvis isn't dead! Where were Lennon and McCartney? |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 09.02.2006 14:01 |
<font color=gold>§mï<font color=1>ttÿ™ wrote: Company, always on the run Destiny, oooh, and the rising sun I was born, six gun in my hand Behind the gun, I make my final stand That's why they call me Bad company, Oh, I can't deny Bad, Bad company Till the day I die Rebel souls Deserters we are called Chose the gun And threw away the sword All these towns They all know our name Six gun sound Ooh, is our claim to fame That's why they call me Bad company, Oh, I can't deny Bad, Bad company Till the day I die Ahhh, good music featuring THE VOICE!!Get your facts right Roy Orbison was known as "The Voice" link Paul Rodgers has been involved in a couple of MINOR BANDS and remains a below average singer and performer. Most people had never heard of him before Brian and Roger picked him up from the streets. The guy is a joke. BRIAN, ROGER AND PAUL RODGERS ARE SPITTING ON THE GRAVE OF OUR FREDDIE. DISGRACEFUL. |
| Sebastian 09.02.2006 14:11 |
As much as I hate the fact Brian and Roger lost their dignity and are using the Queen name, I think it's unfair to dismiss Rodgers based on such shallow details as "nobody would recognise him" (or whatever you said). Everybody could recognise Bob Dylan, does it make him a better singer than Steve Voice-Of-God Balsamo (who admires Rodgers btw)? |
| deleted user 09.02.2006 14:20 |
Bryans Permed Pants wrote:he was cremated asshole!<font color=gold>§mï<font color=1>ttÿ™ wrote: Company, always on the run Destiny, oooh, and the rising sun I was born, six gun in my hand Behind the gun, I make my final stand That's why they call me Bad company, Oh, I can't deny Bad, Bad company Till the day I die Rebel souls Deserters we are called Chose the gun And threw away the sword All these towns They all know our name Six gun sound Ooh, is our claim to fame That's why they call me Bad company, Oh, I can't deny Bad, Bad company Till the day I die Ahhh, good music featuring THE VOICE!!Get your facts right Roy Orbison was known as "The Voice" link Paul Rodgers has been involved in a couple of MINOR BANDS and remains a below average singer and performer. Most people had never heard of him before Brian and Roger picked him up from the streets. The guy is a joke. BRIAN, ROGER AND PAUL RODGERS ARE SPITTING ON THE GRAVE OF OUR FREDDIE. DISGRACEFUL. |
| Hippolyte 09.02.2006 14:26 |
Bryans Permed Pants wrote: Paul Rodgers has been involved in a couple of MINOR BANDS and remains a below average singer and performer. Most people had never heard of him before Brian and Roger picked him up from the streets. The guy is a joke. BRIAN, ROGER AND PAUL RODGERS ARE SPITTING ON THE GRAVE OF OUR FREDDIE. DISGRACEFUL.As much as I hate to say it, there's a lot of people in the world who don't know who Brian and Roger are either. |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 09.02.2006 14:54 |
Hippolyte wrote:Agreed and Brian and Roger know that hence why they labelled themselves as Queen +. Just shows how important Freddie was to the success of Queen take Freddie out and this is the shambles your left with. I'm pretty sure John Deacon deep down isn't happy with what Brian and Roger are doing but is staying quiet to keep the peace. John didn't even look happy performing at the Tribute Concert. John in my view should be given utmost respect for his decision to retire, pity Brian and Roger won't do the same. Of course they don't have to retire they could do some solo stuff, create a new band become backing singers or session musicians, just let the fans remember Queen as the 4 original members.Bryans Permed Pants wrote: Paul Rodgers has been involved in a couple of MINOR BANDS and remains a below average singer and performer. Most people had never heard of him before Brian and Roger picked him up from the streets. The guy is a joke. BRIAN, ROGER AND PAUL RODGERS ARE SPITTING ON THE GRAVE OF OUR FREDDIE. DISGRACEFUL.As much as I hate to say it, there's a lot of people in the world who don't know who Brian and Roger are either. |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 09.02.2006 14:54 |
Hippolyte wrote:Agreed and Brian and Roger know that hence why they labelled themselves as Queen +. Just shows how important Freddie was to the success of Queen take Freddie out and this is the shambles your left with. I'm pretty sure John Deacon deep down isn't happy with what Brian and Roger are doing but is staying quiet to keep the peace. John didn't even look happy performing at the Tribute Concert. John in my view should be given utmost respect for his decision to retire, pity Brian and Roger won't do the same. Of course they don't have to retire they could do some solo stuff, create a new band become backing singers or session musicians, just let the fans remember Queen as the 4 original members.Bryans Permed Pants wrote: Paul Rodgers has been involved in a couple of MINOR BANDS and remains a below average singer and performer. Most people had never heard of him before Brian and Roger picked him up from the streets. The guy is a joke. BRIAN, ROGER AND PAUL RODGERS ARE SPITTING ON THE GRAVE OF OUR FREDDIE. DISGRACEFUL.As much as I hate to say it, there's a lot of people in the world who don't know who Brian and Roger are either. |
| Hippolyte 09.02.2006 16:02 |
I'm not crazy about Paul either, but I look at it this way: without him, I'd never have the chance to see Roger and Brian. I may be the only one, but I'm damn thankful for the opportunity. Do I miss John and Freddie? Of course I do. But I'd rather they tour with Paul instead of just packing it in. |
| Wiley 09.02.2006 17:47 |
Hippolyte wrote: I'm not crazy about Paul either, but I look at it this way: without him, I'd never have the chance to see Roger and Brian. I may be the only one, but I'm damn thankful for the opportunity. Do I miss John and Freddie? Of course I do. But I'd rather they tour with Paul instead of just packing it in.You sound like a rational person. You shouldn't try to discuss with BPP and company. They've been bitching about this Queen+Paul Rodgers tour for over a year by now and it's always the same. They can bitch all they want and not go to any shows at all while we, tour supporters, go see two members of our favorite band on the road once again. The decision about the use of the Queen brand name is not yours or mine to make, but Brian and Roger's (and Jim Beach, probably) and they have Johns approval, so what's the big deal? It's not OUR BAND, you know? There's no way they are "ruining Queen's legacy", as some say it, because the albums are still there. The book is already written. If this tour turns out to be not so successful, it shall fall into obscurity and fade from the people's minds. Only obsessed fans will regard it as "A DISGRACE TO THE QUEEN NAME", while other more normal people would remember it as "The time I could see two of my idols performing live". It's a dream come true for MANY PEOPLE. More importantly, the band is on the road. Brian and Roger are performing live together and enjoying themselves. They are not doing it for the money. They don't need it. Neither Paul Rodgers. I think Paul was a good choice. They could do it with Robbie Williams but they wouldn't look too good because of the age difference and, besides, Robbie is not so big in the United States (I don't say America because he's bigger in Latinamerica than in the US). Paul Rodgers has a bigger following in the US, from his Bad Company days. Well, they did it again. They got me into posting in one of these topics. No wonder why the other guys prefer to talk about CHEESE, haha :). See ya, Wiley |
| Hippolyte 09.02.2006 18:49 |
If the haters want to consider the rest of us to be "disloyal" Queen fans, then fine. Fuck it. We'll have fun at the Q+PR concerts without those miserable cunts. They can rub salt. |
| ok.computer 09.02.2006 20:11 |
But seriously though, back to the subject of cheese.... |
| KillerQueen1429 09.02.2006 21:21 |
people whine too much on this forum |
| PepsiCo 09.02.2006 21:25 |
im subscribing to Blender then, because Thats very true |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 27.02.2006 18:59 |
PepsiCo wrote: im subscribing to Blender then, because Thats very trueBloody good magazine and they are spot on about Rodgers the talentless waste of space. |
| NOTWMEDDLE 28.02.2006 00:43 |
Wiley wrote:Paul is a US(North American) rock radio staple with not only Bad Company but also his supergroup The Firm(with Jimmy Page), Free, The Law(his group with Kenney Jones and they had a #1 US rock radio hit with Laying Down the Law in 1991) and solo (he released a highly praised tribute album to Muddy Waters which had help from Brian, Jeff Beck, David Gilmour and many others).Hippolyte wrote: I'm not crazy about Paul either, but I look at it this way: without him, I'd never have the chance to see Roger and Brian. I may be the only one, but I'm damn thankful for the opportunity. Do I miss John and Freddie? Of course I do. But I'd rather they tour with Paul instead of just packing it in.You sound like a rational person. You shouldn't try to discuss with BPP and company. They've been bitching about this Queen+Paul Rodgers tour for over a year by now and it's always the same. They can bitch all they want and not go to any shows at all while we, tour supporters, go see two members of our favorite band on the road once again. The decision about the use of the Queen brand name is not yours or mine to make, but Brian and Roger's (and Jim Beach, probably) and they have Johns approval, so what's the big deal? It's not OUR BAND, you know? There's no way they are "ruining Queen's legacy", as some say it, because the albums are still there. The book is already written. If this tour turns out to be not so successful, it shall fall into obscurity and fade from the people's minds. Only obsessed fans will regard it as "A DISGRACE TO THE QUEEN NAME", while other more normal people would remember it as "The time I could see two of my idols performing live". It's a dream come true for MANY PEOPLE. More importantly, the band is on the road. Brian and Roger are performing live together and enjoying themselves. They are not doing it for the money. They don't need it. Neither Paul Rodgers. I think Paul was a good choice. They could do it with Robbie Williams but they wouldn't look too good because of the age difference and, besides, Robbie is not so big in the United States (I don't say America because he's bigger in Latinamerica than in the US). Paul Rodgers has a bigger following in the US, from his Bad Company days. Well, they did it again. They got me into posting in one of these topics. No wonder why the other guys prefer to talk about CHEESE, haha :). See ya, Wiley |
| NOTWMEDDLE 28.02.2006 00:48 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:Roy Orbison sucked! Van Halen's version of Pretty Woman destroyed his. His voice ruined The Traveling Wilburys in my view. Even Bob Dylan and Springsteen are better than Orbison. Bad Company, Free and The Firm were MINOR BANDS! Free were big in England and influenced many blues based rock bands. Bad Company which was born from the remains of Free were HUGE in North America and are staples of US rock radio(five of the original lineup's six albums are either Gold(500,000 copies sold) or Platinum(1,000,000 copies sold) or better). The Firm made only two albums but were great. The pairing of Paul and Jimmy Page was excellent.<font color=gold>§mï<font color=1>ttÿ™ wrote: Company, always on the run Destiny, oooh, and the rising sun I was born, six gun in my hand Behind the gun, I make my final stand That's why they call me Bad company, Oh, I can't deny Bad, Bad company Till the day I die Rebel souls Deserters we are called Chose the gun And threw away the sword All these towns They all know our name Six gun sound Ooh, is our claim to fame That's why they call me Bad company, Oh, I can't deny Bad, Bad company Till the day I die Ahhh, good music featuring THE VOICE!!Get your facts right Roy Orbison was known as "The Voice" link Paul Rodgers has been involved in a couple of MINOR BANDS and remains a below average singer and performer. Most people had never heard of him before Brian and Roger picked him up from the streets. The guy is a joke. BRIAN, ROGER AND PAUL RODGERS ARE SPITTING ON THE GRAVE OF OUR FREDDIE. DISGRACEFUL. |
| The Real Wizard 28.02.2006 00:52 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Bloody good magazine and they are spot on about Rodgers the talentless waste of space.It beats being a tactless waste of sperm. |