| FreddiesGhettoTrench 17.01.2006 12:25 |
Who here saw it? I looooove <3 |
| That guy who digs energy domes 17.01.2006 14:04 |
It sucks |
| Sherwood Forest 17.01.2006 14:26 |
isnt that the movie about the two gay cowboys? |
| Gunpowder Gelatine 17.01.2006 15:09 |
I loved it, I want to see it again. :) |
| inthelapofthegods 17.01.2006 16:05 |
I cried so hard. Best movie I've ever seen. For serious. |
| Erin 17.01.2006 16:09 |
It's not even showing here. |
| Haystacks Calhoun 17.01.2006 16:51 |
JamieSureWould wrote: isnt that the movie about the two gay cowboys?Eating pudding, no less. |
| FreddiesGhettoTrench 17.01.2006 16:53 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: FGT is showing SOME improvement. From dead people she's moved on to UGLY gay cowboys. Maybe HANDSOME gay cowboys next? Who knows, she might actually have a more or less normal sphere of interest in, say, 40 years.Hey, I don't know what movie YOU were looking at - Jack and Ennis/Jake and Heath are HOT. The PERFECT couple. So cute together, and so tender! |
| Mercuryworks 17.01.2006 16:56 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: Who here saw it? I looooove <3Arent you against gays? I mean I know Freddie but that is only cause he is dead right? |
| Music Man 17.01.2006 19:53 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: FGT is showing SOME improvement. From dead people she's moved on to UGLY gay cowboys. Maybe HANDSOME gay cowboys next? Who knows, she might actually have a more or less normal sphere of interest in, say, 40 years.I find it strikingly odd when straight males judge the aesthetic qualities of other males - unless... Mercuryworks wrote:I don't think very many Queen fans are against gays...especially if you're a big enough Queen fan to post on a Queen notice board.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: Who here saw it? I looooove <3Arent you against gays? I mean I know Freddie but that is only cause he is dead right? |
| SergeantPepperDG 17.01.2006 20:09 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: FGT is showing SOME improvement. From dead people she's moved on to UGLY gay cowboys. Maybe HANDSOME gay cowboys next? Who knows, she might actually have a more or less normal sphere of interest in, say, 40 years.UGLY gay cowboys?! What the hell are you TALKING about? Seriously, what's hotter than watching two fantastically gorgeous cowboys getting it on? I could go on and on and on all day about HOT GAY COWBOYS. Okay, so I'm a bit of a perv... To make up for it, it actually was a very good movie. There wasn't even much sex in it (not that I'm complaining or anything...), and it was also incredibly depressing. |
| Music Man 17.01.2006 20:28 |
SergeantPepperDG wrote:When are they going to make the movie about the HOT LESBIAN COWGIRLS? I want to reserve tickets.<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: FGT is showing SOME improvement. From dead people she's moved on to UGLY gay cowboys. Maybe HANDSOME gay cowboys next? Who knows, she might actually have a more or less normal sphere of interest in, say, 40 years.UGLY gay cowboys?! What the hell are you TALKING about? Seriously, what's hotter than watching two fantastically gorgeous cowboys getting it on? I could go on and on and on all day about HOT GAY COWBOYS. Okay, so I'm a bit of a perv... To make up for it, it actually was a very good movie. There wasn't even much sex in it (not that I'm complaining or anything...), and it was also incredibly depressing. |
| Forever88 17.01.2006 22:22 |
Eh, kinda boring. |
| That guy who digs energy domes 17.01.2006 22:38 |
Forever, go to the Freddie adventure thread |
| iron eagle 17.01.2006 22:41 |
eww yea all 36 seconds of it in a 90+minute movie!!!! wooooooooooooooooo can the breeders take that much graphic gay cowboy stuff???? *perplexing questions of life continue* |
| Saint Jiub 17.01.2006 23:22 |
The female breeders have been taking it pretty well ... |
| Haystacks Calhoun 17.01.2006 23:42 |
Breeders? Is that what the Poofs label straight folk? I guess it would be difficult to have a butt baby. |
| Saint Jiub 18.01.2006 00:17 |
Charming response. I find the breeders term to be amusing, but somehow you are offended by it. Evidently your best condescending response is a contrived link between infants and anal sex. Thank you for being tolerant and open minded. |
| blerp 18.01.2006 00:47 |
I wanted to see that too, but I wouldn't dare take a chance going out to see it with my friends, who have the mentality of 5 year olds and talk too much during the movie...Plus of course there's going to be sex, and they'd get so annoying about it. |
| Music Man 18.01.2006 01:36 |
LadyMercury wrote: I wanted to see that too, but I wouldn't dare take a chance going out to see it with my friends, who have the mentality of 5 year olds and talk too much during the movie...Plus of course there's going to be sex, and they'd get so annoying about it.To be honest, 'witnessing gay sex' is not on my "things to do" list. However it IS on my "things I hope I never have to bear" list, right next to 'being stabbed in the stomach with a rusty knife' and 'falling into a dark abyss.' |
| Yuri 18.01.2006 01:42 |
took my best friend to see it for her birthday, she kept on giggling at the gayness... I didnt cry, everyone else did. It did melt my heart though. It was good. But it made me hate living in the boonies (even more than i did before)and remember the last time i rode a bull. daaang. Guess I should be glad I live 30 minutes away from civilization. |
| rachael mae. 18.01.2006 02:44 |
It was the best film I've seen in a long time. I went to see it with my gay best friend, and we were complaining that there wasn't enough gay sex. *lol* It was definitely a good movie though (with the added bonus of Jake Gyllenhaal) and I wish I could go see it again. |
| FreddiesGhettoTrench 18.01.2006 06:56 |
Mercuryworks wrote:Nope, I'm not against gays, never have been, never will be.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: Who here saw it? I looooove <3Arent you against gays? I mean I know Freddie but that is only cause he is dead right? |
| That guy who digs energy domes 18.01.2006 08:43 |
FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:Youre a fellow Bushette and you support gay marriage?Mercuryworks wrote:Nope, I'm not against gays, never have been, never will be.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: Who here saw it? I looooove <3Arent you against gays? I mean I know Freddie but that is only cause he is dead right? |
| FreddiesGhettoTrench 18.01.2006 09:35 |
<marquee>Queen Of Wrestling</marquee> wrote:Well, I don't support marriage being defined by the courts, but if it were to come up for a vote, I would vote for it, definitely.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote:Youre a fellow Bushette and you support gay marriage?Mercuryworks wrote:Nope, I'm not against gays, never have been, never will be.FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: Who here saw it? I looooove <3Arent you against gays? I mean I know Freddie but that is only cause he is dead right? |
| Haystacks Calhoun 18.01.2006 10:13 |
Rip Van Winkle wrote: Charming response. I find the breeders term to be amusing, but somehow you are offended by it. Evidently your best condescending response is a contrived link between infants and anal sex. Thank you for being tolerant and open minded.Thank you for not being able to take a joke..... |
| Erin 18.01.2006 10:30 |
Haystacks Calhoun wrote: I guess it would be difficult to have a butt baby.KG from Tenacious D did it..;-D |
| Haystacks Calhoun 18.01.2006 10:52 |
Good point. |
| PieterMC 18.01.2006 11:13 |
link |
| Haystacks Calhoun 18.01.2006 12:35 |
ah yeah |
| tupincs 19.01.2006 05:47 |
Haystacks Calhoun wrote: Breeders? Is that what the Poofs label straight folk? I guess it would be difficult to have a butt baby.From that point on I guess my English is poor. (I don't want to think that I understood this properly.) 8( |
