On the request of Violonbleu, my Antwerp 2005 recording (MP3) on RapidShare.
49MB MP3 in 25 Files
Running time is 02:04:06
Recorded from Seating Area 142 (Seating plan in the attachment)
Recorded with a simple MP3 player.
Download link: link
Enjoy.
PS: For some traders or "whining people" here... There is NO LOSSLESS version of THIS recording. I recorded it and trust me, it's MP3. Some people e-Mailed me before that there are certain "versions" which look like lossless quality but as I said above, there is no lossless version of this recording.
I hate Paint :P The attachment is almost unreadable. 142 is in the bottom left corner in Red.
The audio quality isn't very high because the audio is already crap so I didn't bother much in creating 10mb 320kbps files :P There are higher kbps versions available in the hub.
many thanks but...could you tell me please how can I do to read the file .rar with Window Media Player??It doesn't work and the computer doesn't recognize the .rar file...
Many thanks you're great
violonbleu wrote: many thanks but...could you tell me please how can I do to read the file .rar with Window Media Player??It doesn't work and the computer doesn't recognize the .rar file...
Many thanks you're great
Download WinRAR. .RAR is not a media file but it is an archive. Which means that if you extract the files from the archive it works with Windows Media Player or WinAMP.
WinRAR can be downloaded here: link
hello Bon Geronamo, thanks...I downloaded it in January...but since them I had a problem with my computer and I have not the file more... So, could you please re-upload it on rapidshare? Or megaupload, or what you like, many thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I wouldn't bother with this.
There are et least two other, superior sources out there. link
Don't take this personaly, but I think you should have kept this recording to yourself.
MDNA wrote: I wouldn't bother with this.
There are et least two other, superior sources out there.
link
Don't take this personaly, but I think you should have kept this recording to yourself.
Yes, now there are... I have those aswell. Why should I keep this to myself... If I want to share with you people (at that time) I do that.
And besides... There is ONLY (READ ONLY!!!) a mp3 version of this recording... If this is offered to you by someone who's claiming it's lossy don't accept it cus there is NO lossless version of my source. I got it offered multiple times and I heared my own voice and someone must have edited it a little because the spectrum looked better. Anyway...
Hm... Made my point already.
Let me see if I got this right:
1. You know there are other sources of the show
2. You are aware that they are better than yours
3. You even have a copy of at least one of them
And yet you choose to share your inferior quality source, in a bitrate that, acording to my experience, makes this unlistenable? (45 MB for a 2 hour show?????)
Someone please let me know what is wrong with this picture.
This is exactly the kind of attitude people don't like to see here.
This is hoarding. If you realy eanted to put out something worth sharing you would make this available at the best quality possible. This is what some people are trying to do in this forum (Sir GH, Tatterdemalion, and others ...)
He, at least, took the effort to RECORD the show and you call it hoarding?
Now you again.
Edit: And then again, I believe Jerome already told that his source isn't really THAT great. So why share with high bitrate, if the quality isn't really different as a low bitrate?
It still is mp3. And if a low bitrate doesn't bring any difference, then it's only comfortable. Small file size, thus faster downloads.
He shared his recording, be happy with it. Go find the other sources yourself. You're not in The Promised Land, you know.
MDNA wrote: Let me see if I got this right:
1. You know there are other sources of the show
2. You are aware that they are better than yours
3. You even have a copy of at least one of them
And yet you choose to share your inferior quality source, in a bitrate that, acording to my experience, makes this unlistenable? (45 MB for a 2 hour show?????)
Someone please let me know what is wrong with this picture.
This is exactly the kind of attitude people don't like to see here.
This is hoarding. If you realy eanted to put out something worth sharing you would make this available at the best quality possible. This is what some people are trying to do in this forum (Sir GH, Tatterdemalion, and others ...)
Stop being a bitch and don't post when you don't have anything positive to say and don't judge a person when he might offer a crap recording as he is at least sharing.
deleted user 08.11.2006 15:23
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this lossless?
I mean, if nothing but mp3 exists then it is lossless. I have always thought that lossless is when an original source hasn't lost quality but this is the original source.
<font type="verdana">_Tatterdemalion_ wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this lossless?
I mean, if nothing but mp3 exists then it is lossless. I have always thought that lossless is when an original source hasn't lost quality but this is the original source.
But by definition, mp3 is allways lossy because in it´s construction it discards frequencies that human ear can´t notice (unless if it´s those 1411kb/s you get if you really want "everything"). That´s why mp3 was invented- to reduce space!
Take care
Pfff.... wankers!
Yes, there is a better version, but it is not here on Queenzone, now is it??
Be happy that someone at least shares his recording with you, no matter the quality. THIS WAS RECORDED IN MP3, not transferred to make it lossy. If you don't want it, just leave it.
By the way: my recording of this show (the one with the slightly cut WWRY) is in the hub.
Be warned though: before you start whining about that one too; it is not fully lossLESS either.