for all you roger lurvers out there, i was wondering if you prefered him when he was quite skinny, or when he was slightly more.. weighty, i like him whatever his size, but i was wondereing what everyone else thought, so roger better skinny or nice and plump. oh and i dont mean for him to sound like a turkey, lol!
Well he does look like a Thanksgiving Gobbler these days. I adore him always as a musician and a person, regardless of his looks or age.
But...my honest opinion for liking him for his looks, he was HOT until about the mid to late 80's, then it was all downhill.
But when he was young...He was SMOKIN!
MRfMERCURY wrote: im glad the rotc dvd came out before christmas, if it didnt then i would of forgot to order my turkey for the 25th, thanks for reminding me roger lol
LOL! Don't forget the cranberry sauce. Gobble, gobble!
Im not fussy when it comes to Roger. Id be happy to put up with him,regarless of weight issues.
I wasnt to keen on the wierdy beardy era tho (the full beard not the goatee).
Middle age spread happens to all of us over 30 (older if your lucky),so hes done well for his age. He shed pounds on this tour and has wound up looking absolutely fab.
Its still hard to believe hes the same age as Paul Rodgers tho.
If you compare Roger in Shefield and in Hide Park you'll notice that he's a lot better now, almost at normal weight!
I think that he might have got a nervous breackdown around Christmas last year, because he was alright at the induction in Hall of Fame, then when Queen anounced the tour he got worst almost completely. By the time of 46664 he looked really bad, but now he's back again. Good old RoG...
Take care
I'd say both really, Roger is Roger at the end of the day it shouldnt matter what size someone is, its the person with in.
Hes a great musician, what more could you want?
aww he doesnt look like a turkey lol
i agree with Mrs Taylor i dont like him with the full beard either just the goatee
But ill always still love him no matter what
oh wats your name Mrs Taylor ???just wanted to get to know ppl here
The Original Mrs Taylor wrote:
Im not fussy when it comes to Roger. Id be happy to put up with him,regarless of weight issues.
I wasnt to keen on the wierdy beardy era tho (the full beard not the goatee).
Middle age spread happens to all of us over 30 (older if your lucky),so hes done well for his age. He shed pounds on this tour and has wound up looking absolutely fab.
Its still hard to believe hes the same age as Paul Rodgers tho.
It's really horrible (but Roger has $$$ to get a trainer, unless sick or something).... but some of my housemate came in our TV/etc. room while I was watching ROTC and someone was like... "Oh look they have a hobbit druming for Queen". Totally tastless. Awesome Awesome DVD though, and Roger looks just "rocked out" (soul patch and all) more than hobbitish to me.
j_stone2525 wrote: It's really horrible (but Roger has $$$ to get a trainer, unless sick or something).... but some of my housemate came in our TV/etc. room while I was watching ROTC and someone was like... "Oh look they have a hobbit druming for Queen". Totally tastless. Awesome Awesome DVD though, and Roger looks just "rocked out" (soul patch and all) more than hobbitish to me.
LMAO! Roger the hobbit! I agree, he CAN afford a personal trainer, to exercise and eat right. He needs to see Oprah!
i lyked roger in both but i wasnt keen on him in Breakthru
wtf happened there
and in scandal he looks so different in a kinda bad way
blaming that on middle age
haha
but roger any other time is SEXYYY!!!!!!!!!!!
;)
yeah..roger's always sexy..;)
but honestly, I think that he looked better in the 70s...(Dunno..I just like guys who looks a little bit like girls ...;))
But he's a brilliant musician so...I don't really care about his weight...=P
deleted user 14.11.2005 17:26
I prefer my Roger to be plump, but I'd say he looked great no matter how high his BMI is.