| Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II 14.10.2005 16:07 |
Really?! Are we expecting full or nearly full Houston video bootleg soon?! |
| Jjeroen 14.10.2005 16:35 |
the_hero wrote: the one that leaked out is incomplete and crapI understand you don't want it? Or is it not good enough? You have to be happy with what you get. And besides; if everything you would want to have falls straight into your lap, what's there left to strive for in life? ---- I'm sure the bad quality version will be around somewhere soon. Patience! The excellent, full version? Forget it! Not after all the crap that came towards 'traders' lately. |
| Jay Mantis 14.10.2005 17:28 |
jeroen wrote: The excellent, full version? Forget it! Not after all the crap that came towards 'traders' lately.When that will be released on the internet, I'll be around 70 years old if not dead. |
| Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II 14.10.2005 17:38 |
|
| Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II 14.10.2005 17:38 |
Oh yeah guys... Oh yeah... I'm waiting for the good quality video. |
| Jjeroen 14.10.2005 17:46 |
« Jay » wrote:Nah, don't worry, Jay; you'll get an official release first! :-)jeroen wrote: The excellent, full version? Forget it! Not after all the crap that came towards 'traders' lately.When that will be released on the internet, I'll be around 70 years old if not dead. |
| Saint Jiub 14.10.2005 23:16 |
jeroen wrote:I thought you were classier than that jeroen.the_hero wrote: the one that leaked out is incomplete and crapI understand you don't want it? Or is it not good enough? You have to be happy with what you get. And besides; if everything you would want to have falls straight into your lap, what's there left to strive for in life? ---- I'm sure the bad quality version will be around somewhere soon. Patience! The excellent, full version? Forget it! Not after all the crap that came towards 'traders' lately. I expected those cheap comments to come from some other more bitter traders. Remember that most of "all the crap that came towards 'traders'" was backlash against the instigations of two particularly bitter traders. |
| deleted user 15.10.2005 04:25 |
Rip Van Winkle wrote:I pitty your name isn't a fact.jeroen wrote:I thought you were classier than that jeroen. I expected those cheap comments to come from some other more bitter traders. Remember that most of "all the crap that came towards 'traders'" was backlash against the instigations of two particularly bitter traders.the_hero wrote: the one that leaked out is incomplete and crapI understand you don't want it? Or is it not good enough? You have to be happy with what you get. And besides; if everything you would want to have falls straight into your lap, what's there left to strive for in life? ---- I'm sure the bad quality version will be around somewhere soon. Patience! The excellent, full version? Forget it! Not after all the crap that came towards 'traders' lately. |
| Jjeroen 15.10.2005 04:46 |
Rip Van Winkle wrote:Rip, I'm sorry, but you are once again misinterpreting my words!jeroen wrote:I thought you were classier than that jeroen. I expected those cheap comments to come from some other more bitter traders. Remember that most of "all the crap that came towards 'traders'" was backlash against the instigations of two particularly bitter traders.the_hero wrote: the one that leaked out is incomplete and crapI understand you don't want it? Or is it not good enough? You have to be happy with what you get. And besides; if everything you would want to have falls straight into your lap, what's there left to strive for in life? ---- I'm sure the bad quality version will be around somewhere soon. Patience! The excellent, full version? Forget it! Not after all the crap that came towards 'traders' lately. This has NOTHING to do with MY classiness! Neither is this my OPINION. Someone asked a question and I gave answers based on facts. ONCE AGAIN you read my post with a lot of pre-assumptions! You read in it "hahaha, I have it and I am not going to share it". But that is NOT what I am saying AT ALL!! (The first post wasn't a REQUEST either, by the way! - It was a GENERAL question and I gave a GENERAL answer. You obviously read it as a "who can please upload Houston". AGAIN a pre-assumption.) The fact that a lot of traders are very reluctant in sharing or trading realy rare stuff nowadays is a GENERAL FACT. It's not MY choice, it is not MY will, it's just 'the way of the world'. THAT is what I was trying to say with that sentece. And if all that 'crap' was just backlash from two frustrated traders (assuming you don't see me as one of them)- then why are you still reading/interpreting in their spirit? My intention was to add some 'info' - not to make an 'up-yours-gesture'! I don't know what to say to you to make you more understandable of my words (in this post and others). I think there must be some problems with my figure of speach that you don't understand. Or maybe it's my bad English. Maybe I use the wrong words, I dunno. But please, start yourself with not reading more in a post then the post itsself truly says. Try to read more GENERALLY and less PERSONAL. Fine; from now on I will try to keep my mouth shut whenever people in here talk about rare recordings. |
| john bodega 15.10.2005 05:49 |
Is this the one that finishes with Face it Alone? :P |
| Saint Jiub 15.10.2005 09:15 |
Facts or your convenient spin? My spin is in quotes: You have to be happy with what you get. "Let the eat cake" And besides; if everything you would want to have falls straight into your lap, what's there left to strive for in life? "Oh dear, it's another lazy leecher" The excellent, full version? Forget it! Not after all the crap that came towards 'traders' lately. "Crap as determined by who? Yeah it is all the leecher's fault" |
| Jjeroen 15.10.2005 10:14 |
Rip Van Winkle wrote: Facts or your convenient spin? My spin is in quotes: You have to be happy with what you get. "Let the eat cake" And besides; if everything you would want to have falls straight into your lap, what's there left to strive for in life? "Oh dear, it's another lazy leecher" The excellent, full version? Forget it! Not after all the crap that came towards 'traders' lately. "Crap as determined by who? Yeah it is all the leecher's fault"Yes, you are right. It was my convenient spin! I'm a miserable lowlife scumbag arrogant elite trader fuckhead. As a matter of FACT I'm Queenzone's biggest asshole and I am only here to brag about my ENOURMOUS collection, poke people's eyes out and then tell them to eat shit. |
| deleted user 15.10.2005 11:48 |
jeroen wrote:jeroen, I know it's hard but please calm down. Rip's crazy, he did exactle the same kind of things towards me. Reading things extreemly idiotic. Claiming that I'm bullying with Urk '83.Rip Van Winkle wrote: Facts or your convenient spin? My spin is in quotes: You have to be happy with what you get. "Let the eat cake" And besides; if everything you would want to have falls straight into your lap, what's there left to strive for in life? "Oh dear, it's another lazy leecher" The excellent, full version? Forget it! Not after all the crap that came towards 'traders' lately. "Crap as determined by who? Yeah it is all the leecher's fault"Yes, you are right. It was my convenient spin! I'm a miserable lowlife scumbag arrogant elite trader fuckhead. As a matter of FACT I'm Queenzone's biggest asshole and I am only here to brag about my ENOURMOUS collection, poke people's eyes out and then tell them to eat shit. jeroen, I also had 2 mails with him. Immediatly the first mail he started telling weird things. These mails where about him claiming me to be Holland!. And he said he was sure ass hell. |
| Richy Mercury 15.10.2005 13:14 |
For those that don't have Houston '77, don't sweat it. The quality is VG. Just be patient and get a good (EX) version of Earls Court '77. The Houston '77 show that leaked is full and the sound is pretty good. Its the same sound as the queenzone audio download of the show. There are pictures put in between the songs even while Freddie is announcing a song. The color has dissappered too. If you watch the clip of "Death on Two Legs" from Champions of the World, the color is not even close. There is color but nowhere near as deep. Maybe somebody can put all the released Houston '77 clips mixed in with the bootleg dvd. |
| Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II 15.10.2005 14:10 |
Thank you all guys! So, the leakage is not good. As I understand it is even just pictures with EX audio that we all have... Does anybody know exactly what this leakage is?! Ah?! |
| Saint Jiub 15.10.2005 14:43 |
jeroen wrote:Yes, you are right. It was my convenient spin! I'm a miserable lowlife scumbag arrogant elite trader fuckhead. As a matter of FACT I'm Queenzone's biggest asshole and I am only here to brag about my ENOURMOUS collection, poke people's eyes out and then tell them to eat shit.Jeroen - I never said or implied that. All I did was state that your comments are less than objective and had a heavy pro-trader / anti-leecher spin. |
| Rick 16.10.2005 06:24 |
Not all this crap again. *Sleeps* Yawn... |
| Roy ® 22.10.2005 12:45 |
Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II wrote: Thank you all guys! So, the leakage is not good. As I understand it is even just pictures with EX audio that we all have... Does anybody know exactly what this leakage is?! Ah?!To answer your question: The picture quality is VG(+) en the sound quality is Ex. It isn't the best version around but it is an full version and is absolutly worth watching. The pictures between the songs are not irritating. |
| deleted user 22.10.2005 12:58 |
i take it you have it? |
| Forever88 22.10.2005 18:48 |
Can it be posted? |
| gagabo2 22.10.2005 18:56 |
Queen houston dvd is now on ebay. Maybe it's the convention leak? link |
| Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II 23.10.2005 11:17 |
Thank you, Roy & gagabo2 for the link. Thank you for the first answer to my question. So... this is FULL! ...And it's VG video quality. That's fantastic great! Roy, is it "straight"-filming or filmed from the convention screen (like Knebworth)? If it's straight-filming full version with VG video & EX audio - what else can we dream about?!?!?!?! Roy, if you want to, how do you know all this about Houston '77? :-))) WHEN CAN WE EXPECT IT BEING BOOTLEGGED? HERE! |
| Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II 23.10.2005 11:30 |
Again and again, so few fans talk about this, it suggest an idea that it's a fake. Why we don't see many pictures from this filming etc, etc, etc??? |
| Roy ® 23.10.2005 17:09 |
Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II wrote: Thank you, Roy & gagabo2 for the link. Thank you for the first answer to my question. So... this is FULL! ...And it's VG video quality. That's fantastic great! Roy, is it "straight"-filming or filmed from the convention screen (like Knebworth)? If it's straight-filming full version with VG video & EX audio - what else can we dream about?!?!?!?! Roy, if you want to, how do you know all this about Houston '77? :-)))- It's pro shoot (straigth) - Picture quality VG(+) - Sound quality Ex - Length 114 minutes Not many people talk about because not many people have it. Pictures are widely available on the net. |
| Jjeroen 24.10.2005 04:59 |
the_hero wrote: St. Paul 1980 on the other hand is really only trading worthy. It was shown yesterday as well. It was an audience recording and it seemed that the filmer couldn't get a good position to film clearly.Are you nuts? Unless they showed a realy bad copy, this is one of the best (maybe THE best) old audience recording around! |
| Jjeroen 24.10.2005 07:52 |
Fine, honey! If you say so... You're the expert! |
| Rick 24.10.2005 12:50 |
jeroen wrote:I second that. Uniondale 1977 is also a very good audience recording. Very clear. :-)the_hero wrote: St. Paul 1980 on the other hand is really only trading worthy. It was shown yesterday as well. It was an audience recording and it seemed that the filmer couldn't get a good position to film clearly.Are you nuts? Unless they showed a realy bad copy, this is one of the best (maybe THE best) old audience recording around! |
| Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II 24.10.2005 15:16 |
It's here!... Oh... |
| Jjeroen 24.10.2005 17:16 |
<font color=green>Rick wrote:True - but Uniondale is indeed a bit better then St Paul - in clearness.jeroen wrote:I second that. Uniondale 1977 is also a very good audience recording. Very clear. :-)the_hero wrote: St. Paul 1980 on the other hand is really only trading worthy. It was shown yesterday as well. It was an audience recording and it seemed that the filmer couldn't get a good position to film clearly.Are you nuts? Unless they showed a realy bad copy, this is one of the best (maybe THE best) old audience recording around! |
| Oberon62AU 24.10.2005 21:00 |
Rip Van Winkle wrote: Jeroen - I never said or implied that. All I did was state that your comments are less than objective and had a heavy pro-trader / anti-leecher spin.Hmmm... you certainly put a negative spin on Jeroen's words. I neither know nor care about any bad blood regarding traders, but you certainly appeared to spin Jeroen's words quite strongly. His words could quite easily have been read in an entirely different light - as indeed I did. Instead of your "Let them eat cake" spin, I took it as "The good things in life are worth waiting for and sometimes you have to wait" whether it be for an official release or to find someone with a good copy who will share. The comments about the "excellent full version" seem to me to be saying that its unlikely to surface from traders due to whatever crap happened. He never said or implied that he had it and wasnt trading or had any kind of comment or implication about leeches that I saw. Oh well... each to their own. What is it they say about the truth? There are three versions, yours, mine and the truth. Steve |