Fedepetti 28.09.2005 17:27 |
ROTC barely got a second week in the US chart. The boys had luck this time, Return Of The Champions spent another week on the US Billboard 200 chart in the last position: TW Position/LW Position/Wks on chart/Artist/Album/This Week/%Chg/Last Week/Total 200 84 2 Queen & Paul Rodgers, Return of the Champions 4,840 -59 11,340 16,206 So far we got: Sep 05-11: 26 copies (street violations) Sep 12-18: Week 1: #84 (11,340) Sep 19-25: Week 2: #200 (4,840) |
NOTWMEDDLE 29.09.2005 16:03 |
Sales charts do not matter anymore with real music. Brain-dead kids buy what eMptyTV tell them to. |
brENsKi 29.09.2005 16:39 |
sales charts do matter. because sales are the bottom line. if they don't sell enough, then record companies drop them - and this equals NO MORE CDs being released. and that equals NO NEW QUEEN stuff record companies will always have the rights over the back catalogue...but for a band to keep going they need a current money-making contract for new material |
Winter Land Man 29.09.2005 16:43 |
With Queen, they can get anyone to release their music. There has been a lot of advertisement of ROTC in the USA, so no one can blame the record company this time. |
AlexRocks 29.09.2005 16:46 |
WHERE once have you seen an advertisement for "Return Of The Champions" in the U.S. of A.??!!! So how can you say it has been all over the place??!!! |
ok.computer 29.09.2005 16:59 |
As a resident of what the Amerikans like to call the "Olde World", (oh yes, I still eat French, rather than Freedom Fries), I thought I would peruse what the Amerikans quaintly call their Billboard Chart.... What hope has Queen, in a country where an artist called Damian "Jr Gong" Marley is on chart? Who is "Young Jeezy"? And what sort of country allows Mariah Carey to be 24 weeks on chart? I do hold out hope for the Un-united States - I see Gorillaz....I see Coldplay...I see Paul McCartney....I see Bonnie Riatt....I see Counting Crows. Alas, a country who allows tosh like white-boy poodle-haired, rockabilly trash like "Have a Nice Day" to debut at No 2 deserves to have its soft underbelly of social injustice well and truly exposed, indeed ripped open, with hurricane force. Oh, and for the record....I ain't even a Muslim. Cheers Paul PS Anyone wishing to argue with the above sentiments is under freedom of speech freely entitled to respond. Just watch you don't fall foul of the PATRIOT act when you do so. PPS You allowed him to be voted in how many times....?????? |
Gunpowder Gelatine 29.09.2005 19:32 |
AlexRocks wrote: WHERE once have you seen an advertisement for "Return Of The Champions" in the U.S. of A.??!!! So how can you say it has been all over the place??!!!Yeah, I agree...their advertisement here is awful. The only place I've heard Queen mentioned is on my classic rock radio station... |
NOTWMEDDLE 29.09.2005 22:25 |
ok.computer wrote: As a resident of what the Amerikans like to call the "Olde World", (oh yes, I still eat French, rather than Freedom Fries), I thought I would peruse what the Amerikans quaintly call their Billboard Chart.... What hope has Queen, in a country where an artist called Damian "Jr Gong" Marley is on chart? Who is "Young Jeezy"? And what sort of country allows Mariah Carey to be 24 weeks on chart? I do hold out hope for the Un-united States - I see Gorillaz....I see Coldplay...I see Paul McCartney....I see Bonnie Riatt....I see Counting Crows. Alas, a country who allows tosh like white-boy poodle-haired, rockabilly trash like "Have a Nice Day" to debut at No 2 deserves to have its soft underbelly of social injustice well and truly exposed, indeed ripped open, with hurricane force. Oh, and for the record....I ain't even a Muslim. Cheers Paul PS Anyone wishing to argue with the above sentiments is under freedom of speech freely entitled to respond. Just watch you don't fall foul of the PATRIOT act when you do so. PPS You allowed him to be voted in how many times....??????Nirvana came because of Bon Jovi! If it were not for Kurt Cobain then Bon Jovi would have pussified music! |
NOTWMEDDLE 29.09.2005 22:28 |
<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote: sales charts do matter. because sales are the bottom line. if they don't sell enough, then record companies drop them - and this equals NO MORE CDs being released. and that equals NO NEW QUEEN stuff record companies will always have the rights over the back catalogue...but for a band to keep going they need a current money-making contract for new materialBrenski, sales DO NOT MATTER anymore. The Ramones didn't once have a Gold studio album in the US yet they influenced countless bands as has Motorhead, Velvet Underground, The Sex Pistols, Diamond Head and such. Many acts who sold tons of records(New Kids on the Block, Tiffany, Debbie Gibson, etc) are not remembered. America's tastes in music is PATHETIC where fake gangsta rap, pretty boy bands, U2 facsimiles and dolled-up pop tarts are force fed down America's throats. |
7Innuendo7 30.09.2005 17:14 |
I agree, promos have not been 'widespread' like half-page in Rolling Stone, SPIN, etc -- what a great way to promote the gigs AND the ROTC. But, my local rock radio station 94.3 WRLF Fairmont WV plays the heck out of Queen and had last Thursday 9/22 an entire Queen Day and gave away copies of ROTC to callers. Somebody, please make Charlie D'Atri a whole pot of coffee... |
bryans permed poodle 15069 30.09.2005 17:19 |
Fedepetti wrote: ROTC barely got a second week in the US chart. The boys had luck this time, Return Of The Champions spent another week on the US Billboard 200 chart in the last position: TW Position/LW Position/Wks on chart/Artist/Album/This Week/%Chg/Last Week/Total 200 84 2 Queen & Paul Rodgers, Return of the Champions 4,840 -59 11,340 16,206 So far we got: Sep 05-11: 26 copies (street violations) Sep 12-18: Week 1: #84 (11,340) Sep 19-25: Week 2: #200 (4,840) |
bryans permed poodle 15069 30.09.2005 17:20 |
Good. Freddie would love to see it fail |
deleted user 30.09.2005 17:27 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Good. Freddie would love to see it failTwo words - Fuck Off |
bryans permed poodle 15069 30.09.2005 17:34 |
Sarah *Loves Freddie* Forever wrote:2 words to you....."suck it"Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Good. Freddie would love to see it failTwo words - Fuck Off |
deleted user 30.09.2005 17:39 |
Like I'd bother my arse taking advice from you. You are not respected or liked on this board. Why don't you stop living in your little fantasy world and face facts? You obviously don't know what Freddie was like, so why don't you put a sock in it. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 30.09.2005 17:45 |
Sarah *Loves Freddie* Forever wrote: Like I'd bother my arse taking advice from you. You are not respected or liked on this board. Why don't you stop living in your little fantasy world and face facts? You obviously don't know what Freddie was like, so why don't you put a sock in it.I still get plenty of replies to my topics/posts darling many more than you will ever get I am seen as the VOICE of this forum and people generally pay homeage and give FULL RESPECT to my views. When I say Queen + PR is wrong people agree it's as simple as that. I suggest you follow the Poodle as well. You will learn a lot. I have have had 100's of e-mails from people like EnglishYob, Linda Of The Valley praising me with the words of wisdom and common sense that I give |
bryans permed poodle 15069 30.09.2005 17:46 |
Barry © wrote: "2 words to you....."suck it" She's only 13 you nonce.Well she shouldn't be saying " Fuck Off" at 13 then. She should say Poodle your're the best respect. |
deleted user 30.09.2005 17:53 |
I'll say what I wish. I'm not two years old you know. And before you think again about saying I am not a Queen fan or I don't give a toss about Freddie, take a look at my username eh? I follow what's going on with the tour and that, but I wouldn't even be a Queen fan in the first place if it weren't for Freddie, Brian, Roger and John in the very beginning. So don't dare tell me I don't care, or I'm not a real fan. That's all I ask. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 30.09.2005 18:04 |
Sarah *Loves Freddie* Forever wrote: I'll say what I wish. I'm not two years old you know. And before you think again about saying I am not a Queen fan or I don't give a toss about Freddie, take a look at my username eh? I follow what's going on with the tour and that, but I wouldn't even be a Queen fan in the first place if it weren't for Freddie, Brian, Roger and John in the very beginning. So don't dare tell me I don't care, or I'm not a real fan. That's all I ask.If your a real fan you must not support this tour. Queen are gone. Are no more. Can't you see Brian and Roger are just cashing in on the Queen name ? |
YourValentine 01.10.2005 04:24 |
The album entered the German charts at no 13 which is not bad. Live albums don't sell that well here. |
its_a_hard_life 01.10.2005 15:07 |
Can someone just get him out of here! Ban the freak! Hes shite and needs to be stopped before anymore fights happen. |
deleted user 01.10.2005 15:10 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:negative replies... And the voice of the underworld... Just few ppl agreed, the majority disagree...Aparently Linda has changed her view, seeing last topics...And lately ppl are even creating hate topics against you (not me) and aparently they get a lot of succes either...!!!!Sarah *Loves Freddie* Forever wrote: Like I'd bother my arse taking advice from you. You are not respected or liked on this board. Why don't you stop living in your little fantasy world and face facts? You obviously don't know what Freddie was like, so why don't you put a sock in it.I still get plenty of replies to my topics/posts darling many more than you will ever get I am seen as the VOICE of this forum and people generally pay homeage and give FULL RESPECT to my views. When I say Queen + PR is wrong people agree it's as simple as that. I suggest you follow the Poodle as well. You will learn a lot. I have have had 100's of e-mails from people like EnglishYob, Linda Of The Valley praising me with the words of wisdom and common sense that I give |
The Real Wizard 01.10.2005 20:32 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: If your a real fan you must not support this tour. Queen are gone. Are no more. Can't you see Brian and Roger are just cashing in on the Queen name ?Since when is there a criteria between "real" and "non-real" Queen fans? Since you imposed it on us through your hatred of Queen's desire to continue? You've made your point. Give it a rest. |
Aisha Sweetness 02.10.2005 08:29 |
It's at #43 in the irish charts and i have to say it is very expensive to buy over here €21.99 thats prob why its not too high in the chart, i didn't help the chart position either cause i bought it on Play.com for £8.99 which is aprox €13 and $15... how can HMV charge so much for c.d's? I have to say ireland is one of the dearest countries for c.d's it's crap... xx aisha xx |
Fairy 02.10.2005 09:04 |
ok.computer wrote: As a resident of what the Amerikans like to call the "Olde World", (oh yes, I still eat French, rather than Freedom Fries), I thought I would peruse what the Amerikans quaintly call their Billboard Chart.... |
Fairy 02.10.2005 09:09 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: |
deleted user 02.10.2005 11:02 |
what do you want if they like Britney Spears????!!!! |
flash00. 02.10.2005 14:00 |
i must say i thought the live album would of sold a lot more copies in the uk, considering there uk tour was successfull.. im not saying i agree or dissagree with the collaboration, all those tickets sold in the uk and scrapes in at 12 in the charts. i bet brian and roger thought this was gonna be a big seller for them, strange how brian says theres more freddie tracks to come.. imo i think the freddie tracks will end up on a new queen/rogers studio album just to sell more copies. god i miss freddie:( |
Winter Land Man 02.10.2005 15:43 |
<font color=red>BEE<font color=gold>ny wrote: what do you want if they like Britney Spears????!!!!She doesn't chart anymore. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 02.10.2005 16:10 |
flash00. wrote: i must say i thought the live album would of sold a lot more copies in the uk, considering there uk tour was successfull.. im not saying i agree or dissagree with the collaboration, all those tickets sold in the uk and scrapes in at 12 in the charts. i bet brian and roger thought this was gonna be a big seller for them, strange how brian says theres more freddie tracks to come.. imo i think the freddie tracks will end up on a new queen/rogers studio album just to sell more copies. god i miss freddie:(link ROTC now down from 12 to No 26 in the UK album charts. 2 words "IT BOMBED". and so it should. |
NOTWMEDDLE 02.10.2005 17:19 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:Bryan's Permed Poodle can FUCK a poodle up the ass. Live albums rarely have much effect on a performer's career. The only exceptions are Peter Frampton, Bruce Springsteen and Garth Brooks whose live albums are the best selling live albums ever. Garth Brooks' Double Live sold more copies than either Frampton Comes Alive or Springsteen's Live 1975 to 1985. Some live albums did well in recent years like The Eagles' Hell Freezes Over(#1 in 1994 and sold millions), Pink Floyd's PULSE(#1 in 1995 and sold close to three million in the US), Fleetwood Mac's The Dance(#1 in 1997 and sold huge), Black Sabbath's Reunion (live with Ozzy from 1997) was a huge Platinum seller. Metallica's Live S&M hit #2 and sold millions. Led Zeppelin's How The West Was Won(#1 in 2003 and Platinum). Queen's best selling live effort in the US is Live Killers.flash00. wrote: i must say i thought the live album would of sold a lot more copies in the uk, considering there uk tour was successfull.. im not saying i agree or dissagree with the collaboration, all those tickets sold in the uk and scrapes in at 12 in the charts. i bet brian and roger thought this was gonna be a big seller for them, strange how brian says theres more freddie tracks to come.. imo i think the freddie tracks will end up on a new queen/rogers studio album just to sell more copies. god i miss freddie:(link ROTC now down from 12 to No 26 in the UK album charts. 2 words "IT BOMBED". and so it should. |
boy of destiny 02.10.2005 20:59 |
Whether anyone agrees with BPP or not, the album isn't selling well and that is important. Here in Canada, I had to go to 4 stores to even find it and then it was $30 bucks! In the record industry it's all about what you've done lately and if Queen doesn't sell today, it's going to be harder to get new releases out there tomorrow. I had to order the last Chris Robinson cd and looks like I'll have to do the same with the new Blues Traveler. Both of those artists have a lot more to offer than the current shit on the charts. p.s. I'm a huge Queen and BM, but IMO ROTC is a disappointment. There's absolutely nothing on it that really surprised or impressed me. |
deleted user 02.10.2005 21:04 |
Fedepetti wrote: ROTC barely got a second week in the US chart. The boys had luck this time, Return Of The Champions spent another week on the US Billboard 200 chart in the last position: TW Position/LW Position/Wks on chart/Artist/Album/This Week/%Chg/Last Week/Total 200 84 2 Queen & Paul Rodgers, Return of the Champions 4,840 -59 11,340 16,206 So far we got: Sep 05-11: 26 copies (street violations) Sep 12-18: Week 1: #84 (11,340) Sep 19-25: Week 2: #200 (4,840)w00t!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
deleted user 02.10.2005 21:07 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:surely this fag has proven he has to be banned by now! if i have to get on my knees and beg, i willSarah *Loves Freddie* Forever wrote: I'll say what I wish. I'm not two years old you know. And before you think again about saying I am not a Queen fan or I don't give a toss about Freddie, take a look at my username eh? I follow what's going on with the tour and that, but I wouldn't even be a Queen fan in the first place if it weren't for Freddie, Brian, Roger and John in the very beginning. So don't dare tell me I don't care, or I'm not a real fan. That's all I ask.If your a real fan you must not support this tour. Queen are gone. Are no more. Can't you see Brian and Roger are just cashing in on the Queen name ? |
NOTWMEDDLE 03.10.2005 00:18 |
boy of destiny wrote: Whether anyone agrees with BPP or not, the album isn't selling well and that is important. Here in Canada, I had to go to 4 stores to even find it and then it was $30 bucks! In the record industry it's all about what you've done lately and if Queen doesn't sell today, it's going to be harder to get new releases out there tomorrow. I had to order the last Chris Robinson cd and looks like I'll have to do the same with the new Blues Traveler. Both of those artists have a lot more to offer than the current shit on the charts. p.s. I'm a huge Queen and BM, but IMO ROTC is a disappointment. There's absolutely nothing on it that really surprised or impressed me.Look Mack, sales DON'T MATTER! The Ramones didn't have any big selling albums and neither did The Velvet Underground or Motorhead yet are influential even if their albums didn't ever go Gold or Platinum. The Sex Pistols' only official album TANKED in the US yet it sold slowly over time to finally give it certified Platinum in the US 15 years after its initial release. Live albums are not what they used to be, unless you were either Bruce Springsteen or Peter Frampton or Garth Brooks whom all had monster selling live albums. BPP can fuck a poodle! With eMptyTV and E!2(VH1) brainwashing kids with what is cool then it is no wonder many great albums are not selling. Many great albums didn't sell well initially but are regarded now as masterpieces. Pink Floyd - Meddle(tanked initially here in the US and would not go Gold until after Dark Side of the Moon's success) Genesis - The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway Iron Maiden - Killers Black Sabbath - Sabotage Metallica - Ride the Lightning Queen - Queen II(still is not Gold in the US and was worst selling Queen album in the US) Rainbow Rising Rush - Caress of Steel Styx - Equinox Supertramp - Crisis? What Crisis? The Who Sell Out Yes - Drama are all examples of albums that didn't sell yet are regarded as classic works and still sound great today unlike Bratney Sneers or that freak Robbie Williams whom will be forgotten as time proves sales don't matter, contribution and influence will outlive sales! |
john bodega 03.10.2005 08:52 |
Tie Your Mother Down was done better on the two other performances I've heard (the 46664 and Brixton shows). As for this thing not selling well - couldn't give a stuff, it's a live album. I've never been interested in those things. If they were a struggling new act, then sure I'd be worried, but really. It just shows that people are tone deaf, or can't get their tiny brains around the use of the word QUEEN... or whatever. Dump this live shit, bring on new studio stuff. This thread has also cleared up the BPP matter for me. In each thread that guy posted in, I would sometimes try to rationalise with him because I thought he was actually serious. But - the following shows me that it was a joke all along: "I am seen as the VOICE of this forum and people generally pay homeage and give FULL RESPECT to my views. When I say Queen + PR is wrong people agree it's as simple as that. I suggest you follow the Poodle as well. You will learn a lot. I have have had 100's of e-mails from people like EnglishYob, Linda Of The Valley praising me with the words of wisdom and common sense that I give " Of course, like most of the other cowards on this forum, you've got yer e-mail hidden! Clever cat, I wonder how Linda of the Valley found it? Seriously people, I can't believe I was gullible enough to believe this guy wasn't just a shit stirrer. Quit falling for it you shmos! |
Fairy 03.10.2005 11:05 |
Barry © wrote: 99% of the bickering on this noticeboard would dissappear if that numpty left of his own accord which he will never do. I prefer the banned scenerio where he slips up and out the door for him. If he was genuine and posted properly instead of deliberately shit-stirring it wouldn't bother me he was around. This guy is posting here with the sole intention of causing uproar. The board is going downhill through wankers like him.Yes, but it wouldn't if people would just let certain types of posts slip away by not replying. Sometimes I feel that many who criticize guys like BPP actually have fun "fighting" with him. I'm not necessarily referring to you. Fairy |
Tero 03.10.2005 11:17 |
NOTWMEDDLE wrote: Live albums rarely have much effect on a performer's career. The only exceptions are Peter Frampton, Bruce Springsteen and Garth Brooks whose live albums are the best selling live albums ever. Garth Brooks' Double Live sold more copies than either Frampton Comes Alive or Springsteen's Live 1975 to 1985. Some live albums did well in recent years like The Eagles' Hell Freezes Over(#1 in 1994 and sold millions), Pink Floyd's PULSE(#1 in 1995 and sold close to three million in the US), Fleetwood Mac's The Dance(#1 in 1997 and sold huge), Black Sabbath's Reunion (live with Ozzy from 1997) was a huge Platinum seller. Metallica's Live S&M hit #2 and sold millions. Led Zeppelin's How The West Was Won(#1 in 2003 and Platinum). Queen's best selling live effort in the US is Live Killers.So... What ARE you saying with this post? I can't really be sure whether you don't care about the sales, or if you are disappointed with them. :/ First you tell us how live albums are rarely succeful, and then list a dozen albums which have sold 50 times better than the QPR effort... |
TheOpposition. 03.10.2005 12:04 |
Barry said: "The board is going downhill through wankers like him." No Barry, the board is going downhill through wankers like you, who encourage every troll that posts here by replying to most of their topics and getting all worked up over them. This makes them feel important, and hence they will post more. Its been happening for years, Jake Britt being another example. Ignore them and they will go away. But you (and others) never have and never will. So they are here to stay. You see, on a subconcious level, yourself and alot of other people here LIKE arguing with the trolls. It seems you have nothing better to do. |
NOTWMEDDLE 03.10.2005 15:11 |
Tero wrote:I meant live albums really don't sell as well as studio efforts for the most part. Although many people like having live albums or buying them(me included), they really don't have much effect on their careers.NOTWMEDDLE wrote: Live albums rarely have much effect on a performer's career. The only exceptions are Peter Frampton, Bruce Springsteen and Garth Brooks whose live albums are the best selling live albums ever. Garth Brooks' Double Live sold more copies than either Frampton Comes Alive or Springsteen's Live 1975 to 1985. Some live albums did well in recent years like The Eagles' Hell Freezes Over(#1 in 1994 and sold millions), Pink Floyd's PULSE(#1 in 1995 and sold close to three million in the US), Fleetwood Mac's The Dance(#1 in 1997 and sold huge), Black Sabbath's Reunion (live with Ozzy from 1997) was a huge Platinum seller. Metallica's Live S&M hit #2 and sold millions. Led Zeppelin's How The West Was Won(#1 in 2003 and Platinum). Queen's best selling live effort in the US is Live Killers.So... What ARE you saying with this post? I can't really be sure whether you don't care about the sales, or if you are disappointed with them. :/ First you tell us how live albums are rarely succeful, and then list a dozen albums which have sold 50 times better than the QPR effort... I used the sales of Frampton, Springsteen and Garth Brooks' live albums as examples of live albums which were exceptions to the rule of live albums being monster sized flops. There are many great live albums which were not Earth-shattering sellers but are still classics: AC/DC - If You Want Blood You've Got It+ Black Sabbath - Live Evil(with Dio in Ozzy's place) Genesis - Seconds Out(the first double live effort with Phil Collins on vocals) Iron Maiden - Live After Death* Judas Priest - Unleashed in the East+ Kansas - Two For the Show+ Ted Nugent - Double Live Gonzo+ Ozzy Osbourne - Speak of the Devil+ Pink Floyd - Is There Anybody Out There?+ Queen On Fire Live at the Bowl Rolling Stones - Live Licks* Rush - Different Stages* Styx - Caught in the Act Supertramp - Paris* Triumph - King Biscuit Flower Hour The Who at The Royal Albert Hall Some may have gone Gold* or Platinum+ by ship or by hook by crook(either upon release or in later years) but for the most part, these live efforts didn't sell too well upon release yet are still held in high regard by fans. |
flash00. 03.10.2005 18:51 |
Fairy wrote:i agree with you totaly fairy :))))) oh dear where's my little wooden cart lolBarry © wrote: 99% of the bickering on this noticeboard would dissappear if that numpty left of his own accord which he will never do. I prefer the banned scenerio where he slips up and out the door for him. If he was genuine and posted properly instead of deliberately shit-stirring it wouldn't bother me he was around. This guy is posting here with the sole intention of causing uproar. The board is going downhill through wankers like him.Yes, but it wouldn't if people would just let certain types of posts slip away by not replying. Sometimes I feel that many who criticize guys like BPP actually have fun "fighting" with him. I'm not necessarily referring to you. Fairy |
boy of destiny 03.10.2005 21:23 |
Notwmeddle...I'm not saying an album has to sell millions of copies to be a great album. Actually quite the opposite. Most of the stuff I buy isn't likely to be carried by Walmart or even most of the usual record chains. I've never really been a mainstream guy, but unfortunately in the shitty state of the record industry if you don't chart you get dropped. Both of the artists I mention are with small labels now with poor distribution. Even though I don't think ROTC is all that great, I really want Queen + PR tour in Canada and it's not going to happen if you can't find the cd anywhere because the record co. didn't think it would sell enough to bother to widely distribute it. |
NOTWMEDDLE 04.10.2005 01:43 |
boy of destiny wrote: Notwmeddle...I'm not saying an album has to sell millions of copies to be a great album. Actually quite the opposite. Most of the stuff I buy isn't likely to be carried by Walmart or even most of the usual record chains. I've never really been a mainstream guy, but unfortunately in the shitty state of the record industry if you don't chart you get dropped. Both of the artists I mention are with small labels now with poor distribution. Even though I don't think ROTC is all that great, I really want Queen + PR tour in Canada and it's not going to happen if you can't find the cd anywhere because the record co. didn't think it would sell enough to bother to widely distribute it.Queen + PR will hit Canada next year. Major labels are now like the stock market. I hope Bratney Sneers and Pisstina Aquafina both die or fall from GRACE HARD! I know the former's career is dead due to her having a baby and her erratic behavior. Teen idols' careers are usually 5 to 6 years the most. With falling album sales each album, it is safe to say the career is over! |
john bodega 04.10.2005 11:10 |
I think the Q+PR thing was an interesting experiment, but I do wish they'd move on. Unless they come to Perth, Australia (like HELL, if they can't even manage a little trip to Scotland!) then I could care less about this whole live thing... as long as people enjoy themselves, yay for them. But I'm understandably bitter about being on the other end of the world and missing out. And there are things about this outfit that don't work for me, despite thoroughly enjoying a lot of the songs - heck, just hearing those guys play again was enough for me. But - it seems odd. Up next to the QUEEN name is the name 'Paul Rogers'. But the guy is not their frontman. You have Brian and Roger doing the introductions, mostly. It's a little awkward to have 2 frontmen, when they don't really interact cleanly enough. Basically - I really think that they should just drop the 'guest singer' gag. I'm going to get shot for saying this, but I really think Brian and Roger are good enough. Paul Rogers is a fine singer, but what is he - backup singer or frontman? And if he's backup, why is he center stage? If he's frontman, why does he hide in the wings on certain songs? It just doesn't work well enough to me. |
Erin 04.10.2005 11:23 |
ok.computer wrote: As a resident of what the Amerikans like to call the "Olde World", (oh yes, I still eat French, rather than Freedom Fries), I thought I would peruse what the Amerikans quaintly call their Billboard Chart.... What hope has Queen, in a country where an artist called Damian "Jr Gong" Marley is on chart? Who is "Young Jeezy"? And what sort of country allows Mariah Carey to be 24 weeks on chart? I do hold out hope for the Un-united States - I see Gorillaz....I see Coldplay...I see Paul McCartney....I see Bonnie Riatt....I see Counting Crows. Alas, a country who allows tosh like white-boy poodle-haired, rockabilly trash like "Have a Nice Day" to debut at No 2 deserves to have its soft underbelly of social injustice well and truly exposed, indeed ripped open, with hurricane force. Oh, and for the record....I ain't even a Muslim. Cheers Paul PS Anyone wishing to argue with the above sentiments is under freedom of speech freely entitled to respond. Just watch you don't fall foul of the PATRIOT act when you do so. PPS You allowed him to be voted in how many times....??????Was this really necessary? We are talking album sales.. Why don't you go to the personal section and argue with Freddie's Ghetto whatsername..*eyeroll* PS I'm in the South, AND I voted for Kerry... |
Fairy 04.10.2005 12:59 |
flash00. wrote: i agree with you totaly fairy :))))) oh dear where's my little wooden cart lolSweet as always honey! Oh your cart, you left it here! Better come get it! LOL |
motherkins 04.10.2005 14:27 |
Well they obviously dont know a good thing when they see it,lol!!!! |
jackie 04.10.2005 15:21 |
I´m thinking, those 16.000 copies sold in USA is a very very very poor number of sales.... It seems Queen will never become famous there anymore. As I remember the european multi-platinum "Innuemdo" only reached no. 42 over there.... The problem is: All the Queen fans WANT this new group to be a new Queen or to be succesfull like the real Queen. But ask people on street! All my friends are saying "That´s not Queen anymore, I´m not interested in this music without Freddie. Freddie was Queen"...... That´s the global opinion of the people!!!! The Queen fans stuck at this board and want Q+PR to be superstars, but they are really not! |
Lester Burnham 04.10.2005 16:11 |
Am I the first to mention that I'm surprised the album charted in the US, considering that Queen hasn't toured as any kind of a band since 1982? And that there isn't even a full-scale tour planned yet? With those factors, No. 84 isn't a terrible position at all; I don't even think any of the albums since Made In Heaven made the charts. |
Tero 04.10.2005 18:36 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Basically - I really think that they should just drop the 'guest singer' gag. I'm going to get shot for saying this, but I really think Brian and Roger are good enough. Paul Rogers is a fine singer, but what is he - backup singer or frontman? And if he's backup, why is he center stage? If he's frontman, why does he hide in the wings on certain songs? It just doesn't work well enough to me.There is a certain past of your posta I agree with... The one where they should decide whether he's the frontman or a backup singer. The part where I disagree is "queen" being good enough without him. Bri and Rog are embarrassing to listen to, and all the while they were on I kept wondering to myself... "They have a singer. Why doesn't HE song these songs?" |
RainMustFall2 04.10.2005 19:14 |
ok.computer wrote: Alas, a country who allows tosh like white-boy poodle-haired, rockabilly trash like "Have a Nice Day" to debut at No 2 deserves to have its soft underbelly of social injustice well and truly exposed, indeed ripped open, with hurricane force.Hellz yeah. |
groover 04.10.2005 19:31 |
Yes - DramaWhat? Speaking as one who owns the enitre Yes catalogue including the remastered version of said album, I must say, that's kooky talk. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 14.10.2005 18:34 |
Now down to No 40 in the UK album charts after selling only 50 copies in the last weeks. Tragic. |