Sharron .G 26.09.2005 23:00 |
Ok... I know this is straight out of the "who gives a shit files" but what I want to know is, who is 1) For the Queen + PR tour 2) Who is against the Queen + PR tour The reason I ask, is that if you guys will notice, Permed Poodle will post a wild ass topic about someone burning in hell for this current tour.... 10 of you will tell him to fuck off, but then...to my suprise, 2 others will say "I'm against the tour also".. So this is a simple question, you don't even need to go into detail if you don't want to... just a simple FOR or AGAINST is all I would like to see. thanks |
Tero 26.09.2005 23:28 |
You forgot the "I'm against the name of the current tour" -option. :P Personally, I'm happy that Peter Paul and Mary have hit it off so well. I just don't appreciate them calling it Queen (or Queen+Paul Rodgers). Thank you. |
Oberon 27.09.2005 04:21 |
I'm for. Never saw the real deal, so to see Bri and Roger doing the songs is the best I'll get. Not upset by the name, as I can understand the reason behind it and am not so irrational as to let it get to me. It would, however, bother me a bit if they released new material under the Queen name. That might sound hypocritical (especially after No One But You which I like), but there you go. I'd still buy it of course :-) . Just call me a stepford.... |
CC1 27.09.2005 04:23 |
Im for the Q+PR thing + the whole tour |
Robin 27.09.2005 07:36 |
100% for. Tour, name, everything. I think it's great. |
Serry... 27.09.2005 07:47 |
3) Against using Queen name, but for tour |
jamesB 27.09.2005 07:51 |
For. I had a great time. |
Daburcor? 27.09.2005 07:54 |
Option #1 for me. This tour has brought people more ejoyment than it has anything else. |
Fenderek 27.09.2005 08:08 |
I like it. Don't care about the name, there are bands that I listen to as often as Queen (just don't collect them), so it's all about music for me... I saw 7 gigs, enjoyed them THOROUGHLY, drank incredible amount of beer in GREAT company at every one of them... Why would I bother about the stupid name? I don't care what someone is going to write n some Encyclopedia- I've got my memories and no-one will ever take them away from me; they are much more important for me than some stupid biography line or chapter...I'm waiting for a new album as well. As for BPP- the flower pot has more IQ... I don't ahve problems with people who are against the tour as long as they don't hit the "QUEEN RIP, i know Freddie better than anyone, even Brian" stuff which is pathetic... As long as someone says "it's not for me"- I'm cool with it. Same way I'm cool with people who prefer chocolate to cookies... But I really dislike few idiots who can't make sense in any sentence and should really take a chill pill before typing endless tirades about "what REAL fans think"... Back to topic :)- I'm for, can't see anything bad with few ppl who paly rock together... We've got more serious "problems" in this world... :S |
tia 27.09.2005 08:11 |
Im for them. Thier keeping the Queen music alive. |
Munchsack 27.09.2005 08:24 |
For tour, for name, against studio album of name Q+PR. |
its_a_hard_life 27.09.2005 08:26 |
tia wrote: Im for them. Thier keeping the Queen music alive.Same, im 100% behide Brian, Roger and Paul. |
gihona 27.09.2005 09:00 |
i'm for. i'm listening right now to ROTC - sounds great. though i admit it makes me sad for Freddie, makes me kinda miss him... |
JDL2nd 27.09.2005 10:00 |
Robin wrote: 100% for. Tour, name, everything. I think it's great.I AGREE 1000000000 % for |
dimcyril 27.09.2005 10:46 |
i'm for it i thought it was excellent i know it would have been better with freddie but sadly he is dead |
englishyob 27.09.2005 12:14 |
for the tour |
Fairy 27.09.2005 12:41 |
I'm kind of against the tour. For the most part I don't like the name they picked, as wel as the title of the album. Their actual touring kind of bothers me but I know they have the right to do it if they wish. Fairy |
Localboy80 27.09.2005 13:04 |
100% behind the tour!!! |
james gaden 2072 27.09.2005 14:16 |
I'm totally behind the new tour, the album, the DVD when it comes out and anything else that comes along. Brian and Roger have been dormant too long. JG |
gem27 27.09.2005 14:31 |
i think Brian Roger and John have earned the right to do what they feel is best but i am against the tour. Havent got a problem with them using the name Queen in fact if they made up some other silly name i would feel its stupid and pointless and it is Queen+ not just Queen but i personally do not like Paul Rodgers and am against but like i say its up to them i wouldnt want to go and see them but it doesnt burn me with rage either! |
ok.computer 27.09.2005 14:50 |
For. I had a fab evening.... |
Sharon G. 27.09.2005 14:52 |
I'm against then using the name "Queen"+PR, because this group is not Queen. |
tia 27.09.2005 15:14 |
Who are they then? They are just as much of Queen as the four of them. Its not thier fault Freddie died and John does not want to participate. They are playing the songs that they wrote as Queen and keeping Queen alive. They also are letting younger generations who were not even around when the four of them were together become fans of Queen. In my opinion it wouldnt matter who they got as a frontman or what they called themselves,they would still be criticized. |
deleted user 27.09.2005 15:23 |
FOR! QUEEN RULE!!! |
Sharron .G 27.09.2005 15:30 |
tia wrote: Who are they then? They are just as much of Queen as the four of them.I disagree. Its not thier fault Freddie died and John does not want to participate.True. Well, Freddie dying anyway. Brian & Roger were never as close with John as they are to each other. They are playing the songs that they wrote as Queen and keeping Queen alive.No, they are playing the songs they wrote as individuals...ie: "Fat Bottom Girls" = Brian May... and played under the umbrella of the name Queen. But Queen was the 4 we know. Spike & Danny aren't in the credits of my old Queen albums. They also are letting younger generations who were not even around when the four of them were together become fans of Queen.But in a "tribute band" type atmosphere. If I say so myself, I am one hell of guitar player, and practice my ass off.... if I go out on the road with John Deacon, and 3 other musicians....and John + his band plays the songs he played while in Queen.... is he allowed to use the Queen name?? can he be Queen + Timmy, Bill Bob, and Sharron G, featuring Barry Manilow on vocals??? Kind of lame, huh?? Some say the current name is lame too. In my opinion it wouldnt matter who they got as a frontman or what they called themselves,they would still be criticized.Disagree. If they went out as Brian May & Roger Taylor FROM QUEEN + legendary front man Paul Rodgers...no one could have a problem with that. |
mystic_rhythms 27.09.2005 15:57 |
I am FOR the tour. Any Queen is better than no Queen, am I right? :D |
7Innuendo7 27.09.2005 16:24 |
*for the tour* |
its_a_hard_life 27.09.2005 18:05 |
me_and_my_innuendo wrote: I am FOR the tour. Any Queen is better than no Queen, am I right? :DTotally right! Im seeing 50% of Queen im glad thats better then 0% then all of them being dead... How would you all feel about that? Freddie 25% Brian 25% Roger 25% John 25% freds dead, johns retired... Thats 50% gone and 50% still performing... Makes those who agree and been to the tours are seeing 50% and yes this had to turn out as a maths lesson as some do not and i repeat do not get it. Thank you. |
Mr_Bad_Guy_91 27.09.2005 18:09 |
go for it hard life QUEEN ROCK QUEEN ROCK QUEEN ROCK WELCOME TO THIS WORLD QUEEN AND PAUL RODGER WE LOVE YOU ALL to those who dont like it tough They are going ahead Japan and usa |
Sir Archie Leach 27.09.2005 18:30 |
Apart from Paul Rodgers I like it. Would rather see just Brian and Roger through my rose tinted glasses. |
mrjordy 27.09.2005 18:41 |
100% behind the tour. |
Mr_Bad_Guy_91 27.09.2005 21:20 |
Well i guess you lost count on people all for it lol there loads here that will back Queen up time for you to drop your battles and start playing ROTC cd LOL |
chslchs 27.09.2005 22:18 |
I'm all for it!......Queen will forever live on. I think what their doing is great......ROCK ON! Maybe Paul doesn't fit in ,but at least Queen(if only part of Queen) are still touring and giving us the music we love.......M. |
deleted user 27.09.2005 22:43 |
I am for it because this will probablt the closest I ever get to Brian and Roger. Paul isn't Freddie but he is a good singer and he really seems to respect Queen. It could be worse, they could've called themselves Queen, but its not, its Queen + Paul Rodgers. |
Fairy 28.09.2005 09:48 |
Sharron .G wrote: |
bryans permed poodle 15069 28.09.2005 16:53 |
Serry... wrote: 3) Against using Queen name, but for tourSame here also lose Paul Rodgers and the tour would be a great success |
bryans permed poodle 15069 28.09.2005 16:58 |
Mr_Bad_Guy_91 wrote: go for it hard life QUEEN ROCK QUEEN ROCK QUEEN ROCK WELCOME TO THIS WORLD QUEEN AND PAUL RODGER WE LOVE YOU ALL to those who dont like it tough They are going ahead Japan and usaSad and misguided and not a REAL Queen fan. Queen rocked for the last time 19 years ago. Stop kiddin yourself it's not Queen or Queen +++++++++ in any shape or form. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 28.09.2005 17:01 |
There's a lot of people on here who have been "BrainWashed" into believing such crap as "It's the closest thing I will get to the real Queen" Wrong!! Because it's not Queen or Queen + it's a tribute band. |
kagezan1313 28.09.2005 17:16 |
I was going to suggest this yesterday, Sharron! Then I was going to suggest a war between the sides, filled with intellectual battles, etc, at the end of which, none of it really would have mattered, because Brian and Roger don't give a shit about what the "pros" say, any more than they care about what the "antis" say. Queen+ is happening, it's a great success, and most importantly, two of our greatest idols are having fun again in their golden years. Incidentally, I'm against the use of the Queen name, but hey, that's only cause I think Freddie would hate seeing someone standing in his place and singing his songs. But carry on Bri and Rog! Rock the world one more time. You've earned it. |