<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: ...and the fact that the footage (both audio and video) is not exactly in superb quality.
I don't think so, I don't know who was Rock in Rio director but direction was very good (I like it)more than the Final Live for example, talking about the audio quality the work of sound engineer was terrible during all this tour
I hope not. Not because I don't want it, but because with the Wembley '86 and Milton Keynes '84 show, it would seem ridiculous to next release a show from the tour in between these two shows.
Besides that, Earl's Court, Rainbow, Houston '77 and the Hammersmith Odean show, are all superior concerts.
The next damn live release had better have tracks like Liar, White Queen, Prophet Song and Millionare Waltz or I am going to throw a fit.
I wish Queen productions would realize that the old songs, such as the ones above I mentioned, are far better to release than yet another version of Radio Ga Ga and I Want To Break Free.
How Queen's early material isn't as famous or known will forever be one of those things in life that I just cannot in any way see the logic in.
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: Nope, for the simple reason that the film-crew must've been drunk judging from the quality, the fac that the show was not at all great and the fact that the footage (both audio and video) is not exactly in superb quality.
I think the audio could be fine,'Rock in Rio Blues' for example sounds great. Pity the shows themselves are shit.