caviar 09.07.2005 14:35 |
I prefer by far to listen to an old live performance of Queen or to watch a concert with Freddie than to listen or watch the remaining members with PR. I was fortunate enough to attend a great show in 80 in Paris and another show in Italy. Freddie was Queen, there was no need to introduce him, people knew he was Queen and the main source of creation in the group. John might be the smarter of the remaining member, he left and quit the show business. He knew that without Freddie everything would be so different that he was better to stop there even after the mourning. Brian and Roger never stopped touring but what they do now is not comparable with what Queen did in the past. It is different but not as good. Freddie out what the point? It is like Pink Floyd without Roger Waters, The Doors without Jim Morrison. The party must have been over. They had a great career but what they do now is nothing else that refurbushing the old shows of 86. The claim that it is different but they play the same songs. These songs without Freddie are pointless for me. Why don't they write new songs with the new guy and go live like that? We could have stayed with wonderful souvenirs. Anyway that's what I do but I regret that Brian and Roger didn't keep their word of stopping as it would be pointless to continue under the name Freddie created. |
Taylorette 09.07.2005 14:42 |
Freddie, Brian, Roger and John WERE Queen!!!!!!!! And Bri and Rog ARE Queen!!! We love the 'old' Songs. Why shouldn't they play it? Freddie is dead. In it nothing is to be changed. But Rog and BRi were/are Queen such as Freddie. Do not forget that! Queen rocks!!!! |
Serry... 09.07.2005 14:43 |
So new, so fresh... |
Bobby_brown 09.07.2005 14:56 |
Not this topic again!! Take care |
doremi 09.07.2005 15:52 |
I'm surprised Brian's Permed Poodle hasn't rung in on this yet! We should introduce these 2. Love at first sight. Brilliant minds think alike. Ohhh! :) |
englishyob 09.07.2005 16:15 |
em caviar just so you know Pink Floyd did continue a good few years and 2 album without Roger Waters until Live8 so it shows how much you know and haven’t the door been on about getting back together but one of the member is trying to stop it, even INXS are getting a new singer to reform but as I said in the following link Just cos a member of the band dies doesn’t mean its the end Freddie was showman and he would of wanted his music to live on without him and that what Brian and Roger are doing with the help of Paul who is a very brave man to take on the responsibility of lead vocals of one of the greats bands ever. Lets just hope we get a new Queen album with what ever is left over in the queen out take achieves and some with Paul Rogers |
englishyob 09.07.2005 16:31 |
caviar wrote: They had a great career but what they do now is nothing else that refurbushing the old shows of 86. The claim that it is different but they play the same songs. These songs without Freddie are pointless for me. created.Hang on just read your post again and refurbushing the old shows of 86??? 2005 Set list Reaching Out Tie Your Mother Down I Want To Break Free Fat Bottomed Girls Wishing Well Another One Bites The Dust Crazy Little Thing Called Love Say It's Not True '39 Love Of My Life Hammer To Fall Feel Like Making Love Drum solo I'm In Love With My Car Guitar solo Last Horizon These Are The Days Of Our Lives Radio Ga Ga Can't Get Enough A Kind Of Magic I Want It All Bohemian Rhapsody The Show Must Go On All Right Now We Will Rock You We Are The Champions 1986 Set list One Vision Tie Your Mother Down In the Lap Of The Gods rev. Seven Seas Of Rhye Tear It Up A Kind Of Magic Under Pressure Another One Bites The Dust Who Wants To Live Forever I Want To Break Free Impromptu Brighton Rock solo Now I'm Here Love Of My Life Is this the World We Created? (You're So Square) Baby... Hello Mary Lou (Goodbye) Tutti Frutti Bohemian Rhapsody Hammer To Fall Crazy Little Thing Called Love Radio Ga Ga We Will Rock You Friends Will Be Friends We Are The Champions I only see 11 song which are the same so can you elaborate how the 2005 and 1986 sets are the same ? |
Eviltwin 09.07.2005 18:53 |
Arlene R. Weiss wrote: I'm surprised Brian's Permed Poodle hasn't rung in on this yet! We should introduce these 2. Love at first sight. Brilliant minds think alike. Ohhh! :)*Lol* |
Sharon G. 09.07.2005 23:06 |
Freddie lives on in the hearts of Queen fans everywhere. Freddie - You and only you. We love you and miss you. |
Taylorette 10.07.2005 05:08 |
Sharon G. wrote: Freddie lives on in the hearts of Queen fans everywhere. Freddie - You and only you. We love you and miss you.Yeah, you´re right. FREDDIE is the only one.We will always miss and love him! Freddie, you are the BEST! But Paul does a great job, too. |
bitesthedust 10.07.2005 11:09 |
I fully agree with that Mari has posted here. Even though I do not the support the tour, it does not change the fact that Paul Rodgers is the lead singer now. Whether Brian & Roger should be still be using the Queen name is another matter, but they are netherless and they've chosen him to sing with them. Just a bit of advice for Sharon G & BPP - like me, you obviously do not agree with the tour so why don't you do what I'm doing; instead of whingeing about it just ignore it and allow those who do like it to enjoy it? By the way, Long Away live is brilliant.... |
bryans permed poodle 15069 10.07.2005 11:45 |
bitesthedust wrote: I fully agree with that Mari has posted here. Even though I do not the support the tour, it does not change the fact that Paul Rodgers is the lead singer now. Whether Brian & Roger should be still be using the Queen name is another matter, but they are netherless and they've chosen him to sing with them. Just a bit of advice for Sharon G & BPP - like me, you obviously do not agree with the tour so why don't you do what I'm doing; instead of whingeing about it just ignore it and allow those who do like it to enjoy it? By the way, Long Away live is brilliant....Problem is some people on this board are convinced they are actually seeing Queen when infact they are seeing Brian and Roger + Guest vocal that's what get's my back up. Problem is some people on hear find it difficult to accept Queen as a band whether it be Queen or Queen + ceased when Freddie died. I think it's a disgrace to call the band Queen when 2 of it's original members are not there. We all know it's a big con trick by Brian and Roger who should been more sensitive to Queen fans. Why not give your new line up a new name lads ? What about creating a new group like The Travelling Wilbury's did ? Paul Rodgers remains a second rate singer nobody has ever heard of. Point being Queen songs were meant to be sung by Freddie and nobody else. |
Serry... 10.07.2005 12:02 |
BPP, I'm curious about what 'real Queen' shows you've seen? Dates and venues, please. (Note I agree with some of your points, but only with some and I'm not gonna discuss about them anymore, it's meaningless) |
Sharon G. 10.07.2005 12:13 |
I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this. I have seen Queen with FM and John in milwaukee and Chicago in the 70's and 80's. And have seen PR with Bad Co. also. The Show Must go On - but without Freddie and John, it just won't be the same Queen I knew and loved. And for younger fans who think the 2005 group is Queen, it's not. Sorry. |
englishyob 10.07.2005 12:27 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:No one is saying we are seeing Queen we are seeing Queen and Paul Rogers the fact is that you cannot get it into you sad lonely head.bitesthedust wrote: I fully agree with that Mari has posted here. Even though I do not the support the tour, it does not change the fact that Paul Rodgers is the lead singer now. Whether Brian & Roger should be still be using the Queen name is another matter, but they are netherless and they've chosen him to sing with them. Just a bit of advice for Sharon G & BPP - like me, you obviously do not agree with the tour so why don't you do what I'm doing; instead of whingeing about it just ignore it and allow those who do like it to enjoy it? By the way, Long Away live is brilliant....Problem is some people on this board are convinced they are actually seeing Queen when infact they are seeing Brian and Roger + Guest vocal that's what get's my back up. Problem is some people on hear find it difficult to accept Queen as a band whether it be Queen or Queen + ceased when Freddie died. I think it's a disgrace to call the band Queen when 2 of it's original members are not there. We all know it's a big con trick by Brian and Roger who should been more sensitive to Queen fans. Why not give your new line up a new name lads ? What about creating a new group like The Travelling Wilbury's did ? Paul Rodgers remains a second rate singer nobody has ever heard of. Point being Queen songs were meant to be sung by Freddie and nobody else. When your parent die are you going to stop using your family name cos it the same thing just cos Freddie is dead doesn’t mean Queen is dead Queen will live on in Brian, Roger and John (even know he has retired from the music business) If you are the Queen and Freddie fan you say you are you would know Freddie would of wanted them to continue no matter what im sick of saying it JUST GET OVER IT YOU PRAT. |
deleted user 10.07.2005 12:33 |
Taylorette wrote:dont mean to heavily criticize your opinion, but...Sharon G. wrote: Freddie lives on in the hearts of Queen fans everywhere. Freddie - You and only you. We love you and miss you.Yeah, you´re right. FREDDIE is the only one.We will always miss and love him! Freddie, you are the BEST! But Paul does a great job, too. PAUL FREAKIN' SUCKS |
Taylorette 10.07.2005 13:14 |
Sharon G. wrote: I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this. I have seen Queen with FM and John in milwaukee and Chicago in the 70's and 80's. And have seen PR with Bad Co. also. The Show Must go On - but without Freddie and John, it just won't be the same Queen I knew and loved. And for younger fans who think the 2005 group is Queen, it's not. Sorry.You´re right. I know and love Queen since 12 years and it is not the same with Paul. I am only 22 and I never had the chance to see Queen with Freddie and John! But I was on a queen+pr concert this year and it pleased me. Paul does a great job. It means Queen and Paul Rodgers, not Queen. We should be glad that they are on tour again. Freddie will not come again ;( So we should accept it like it is! Queen rocks |
bitesthedust 10.07.2005 13:26 |
Queen songs were meant to by sung by Freddie only? like '39, Sail Away Sweet Sister, Tenement Funster, Drowse you mean? |
GreatKingSam 10.07.2005 13:37 |
The problem is, those of us who aren't close minded prats with homogenised opinions have never said it was Queen. We seem to be able to grasp that the two members of our favourite band who have decided they want to tour again have teamed up with some musician friends and a great singer called Paul Rodgers and are touring under the name of Queen+ Paul Rodgers. Rather than sitting here with your invalid opinions and whinging that we are wrong to see them etc, why not shut up and realise that perhaps YOU are the ones who are wrong? For ''fans'', you are certainly not being very supportive. |
englishyob 10.07.2005 13:40 |
Amen |
Taylorette 10.07.2005 13:42 |
Exactly. Rog and Bri sang even some songs. Some people think Freddie was Queen. But that´s not correct. Freddie, Roger, Brian and John were Queen! Freddie did not write each song. Bri wrote just as many. And Rog and John a lot too. |
Zephyr 10.07.2005 14:04 |
Still and again the same old thing... Now, let ME tell YOU one thing. I am a student of high school so I never had the chance to see Freddie with remaining members live on stage. If I saw them I would never tell Queen + Paul Rodgers was the best concert I ever saw. But, unfortunately I missed the oportunity see Queen live because I was just a little kid when Freddie died. I presume many of you who are a part of Queenzone community including me had a very unique possibility for first time in life see brilliant drumer and brilliant guitarist, two great members of the group Queen being there only for us. Let me ask you something. What would be better...read in newspaper that Queen with Paul still rocks or that Queen died on 24. November 1991? I am very sad Freddie is not live, but be a part of audience on Queen+PR´s gig was for me chance to be a step closer to him. And now, my only dream is read Brians announce about another tour in Europe. |
Taylorette 10.07.2005 14:09 |
You´re so right! I am happy to have seen QUEEN and pr now , as never. Unfortunately without Freddie and John, but better then never. Queen rocks, again! |
bryans permed poodle 15069 10.07.2005 15:37 |
Serry... wrote: BPP, I'm curious about what 'real Queen' shows you've seen? Dates and venues, please. (Note I agree with some of your points, but only with some and I'm not gonna discuss about them anymore, it's meaningless)Friday night at Wembley 1986. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 10.07.2005 15:44 |
bitesthedust wrote: Queen songs were meant to by sung by Freddie only? like '39, Sail Away Sweet Sister, Tenement Funster, Drowse you mean?Not exactly well known Queen songs are they ? How many Queen songs do you hear regularly played on the radio that hasn't got Freddie singing on them ? Plus I don't hear radio or TV shows queing up to play anything with Queen + Paul Rodgers this is because apart from a few low-life and anti Freddie people on hear no one gives a toss that PR is fronting Freddie's band. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 10.07.2005 15:48 |
GreatKingSam wrote: The problem is, those of us who aren't close minded prats with homogenised opinions have never said it was Queen. We seem to be able to grasp that the two members of our favourite band who have decided they want to tour again have teamed up with some musician friends and a great singer called Paul Rodgers and are touring under the name of Queen+ Paul Rodgers. Rather than sitting here with your invalid opinions and whinging that we are wrong to see them etc, why not shut up and realise that perhaps YOU are the ones who are wrong? For ''fans'', you are certainly not being very supportive.FUCK being supportive BOTH Brian and Roger are a down right disgrace. And for the dickheads who say Freddie would want Queen to go on after his death FUCK WOULD HE. The song "show must go on" meant Freddie was happy for the other 3 to continue without him but not as Queen. This is because Freddie knew there would be no Queen without him. I dare anyone to challenge me ? PAUL RODGERS I WOULD RATHER HAVE BUCK RODGERS |
bryans permed poodle 15069 10.07.2005 15:50 |
Zephyr wrote: Still and again the same old thing... Now, let ME tell YOU one thing. I am a student of high school so I never had the chance to see Freddie with remaining members live on stage. If I saw them I would never tell Queen + Paul Rodgers was the best concert I ever saw. But, unfortunately I missed the oportunity see Queen live because I was just a little kid when Freddie died. I presume many of you who are a part of Queenzone community including me had a very unique possibility for first time in life see brilliant drumer and brilliant guitarist, two great members of the group Queen being there only for us. Let me ask you something. What would be better...read in newspaper that Queen with Paul still rocks or that Queen died on 24. November 1991? I am very sad Freddie is not live, but be a part of audience on Queen+PR´s gig was for me chance to be a step closer to him. And now, my only dream is read Brians announce about another tour in Europe.I would rather go for the Queen died in 1991 myself. |
englishyob 10.07.2005 16:04 |
AHHHHH BPP JUST FUCK OFF YOU SAD FUCKING LOSSER BEFORE I FIND YOU AND KICK THE LIVING HELL INTO YOU QUEEN WAS NOT FREDDIES BAND IT STARTED LIFE AS ROGERS/BRAINS AND TIM STAFFELFS BAND THEN FREDDIE TOOK OVER WHEN TIM LEFT AND THE JOHN WAS BROUGH IN.... COME ON ME QUEEN YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT |
englishyob 10.07.2005 16:09 |
don’t get me wrong people i have respect for the people who may not support the tour but I have no respect for the fucking sad loosers who come on here and go on about how we are all disgracing the Queen name and Freddie memory. |
Taylorette 10.07.2005 16:10 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:Does it go still?Zephyr wrote: Still and again the same old thing... Now, let ME tell YOU one thing. I am a student of high school so I never had the chance to see Freddie with remaining members live on stage. If I saw them I would never tell Queen + Paul Rodgers was the best concert I ever saw. But, unfortunately I missed the oportunity see Queen live because I was just a little kid when Freddie died. I presume many of you who are a part of Queenzone community including me had a very unique possibility for first time in life see brilliant drumer and brilliant guitarist, two great members of the group Queen being there only for us. Let me ask you something. What would be better...read in newspaper that Queen with Paul still rocks or that Queen died on 24. November 1991? I am very sad Freddie is not live, but be a part of audience on Queen+PR´s gig was for me chance to be a step closer to him. And now, my only dream is read Brians announce about another tour in Europe.I would rather go for the Queen died in 1991 myself. |
englishyob 10.07.2005 16:28 |
The 3rd verse from the show must go one, what is freddie saying here apart from "you mush continue when im gone " Whatever happens I'll leave it all to chance (here is freddie saying it's ok to have a new singer) Another heartache another failed romance (Freddie saying don’t try and solo careers cos it will fail ) On and on Does anybody know what we are living for I guess I'm learning I must be warmer now I'll soon be turning round the corner now Outside the dawn is breaking But inside in the dark I'm aching to be FREE (and at the end of the verse he drops a big hit who they should go for) |
englishyob 10.07.2005 16:31 |
And the last verse I'll top the bill I'll overkill I have to find the will to carry on (Freddie saying when im gone it will take time but you must keep the Queen name alive) On with the On with the show The show must go on, go on, go on, go on, ... (Freddie saying the show will gone without me) and BTW BPP never dare a fool i will always take up a challenge (and don’t come back with a sad little comment like "your a fool for believing your seeing queen cos you not... QUEEN RIP 1991" cos i know im not seeing Queen well the true Queen Freddie/Brian/Roger and John i went to see the next best thing Brian and Roger with Paul Rogers |
Taylorette 10.07.2005 16:34 |
And the show goes on. It´s not the same as with Freddie, but the show does go on and on on on |
Sharron .G 10.07.2005 23:17 |
English Bob, How many beers did you down, and how many hispanic mens cocks were in your ass when you disected TSMGO?? The lyrics of that song are what they are... we'll each draw our own conclusions on what they meant. The more I hear you guys ramble on about how given the chance, you'd probably toss Paul Rodgers salad... Bryans Poodle is starting to seem like the smart one here. Paul Rodgers = a good singer. But, Queen are the original 4. If we all would have just assumed that Queen rapped up in 1991, and left the legacy alone, that would have been fine with me. |
GreatKingSam 11.07.2005 04:42 |
If you pissed off or started to grow up, that would be fine with a lot of us, too. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 11.07.2005 13:18 |
englishyob wrote: The 3rd verse from the show must go one, what is freddie saying here apart from "you mush continue when im gone " Whatever happens I'll leave it all to chance (here is freddie saying it's ok to have a new singer) Another heartache another failed romance (Freddie saying don’t try and solo careers cos it will fail ) On and on Does anybody know what we are living for I guess I'm learning I must be warmer now What a load of Bollox. Grow up. Fuckin kids on here. I'll soon be turning round the corner now Outside the dawn is breaking But inside in the dark I'm aching to be FREE (and at the end of the verse he drops a big hit who they should go for) |
bryans permed poodle 15069 11.07.2005 13:23 |
englishyob wrote: And the last verse I'll top the bill I'll overkill I have to find the will to carry on (Freddie saying when im gone it will take time but you must keep the Queen name alive) On with the On with the show The show must go on, go on, go on, go on, ... (Freddie saying the show will gone without me) and BTW BPP never dare a fool i will always take up a challenge (and don’t come back with a sad little comment like "your a fool for believing your seeing queen cos you not... QUEEN RIP 1991" cos i know im not seeing Queen well the true Queen Freddie/Brian/Roger and John i went to see the next best thing Brian and Roger with Paul RogersActually dickhead the show must go on is about Freddie's determination to fight aids and continue singing and writing until he physically cannot continue to do so. Freddie was determined to fight Aids until the very end. IE for your pee Brain EnglishYob the show must go on isn't really about what Queen should do without Freddie. |
englishyob 11.07.2005 13:53 |
oh dam i must of been wrong all this time !!!! None of us will know what Freddie really wanted the other three to do but if he was the showman, everyone took him for he would have wanted them to carry on. Freddie lived of the music the fan and the other band members as we all know he was in the recording studio until he physically could not do anymore. If he didn’t want the music of Queen to live on after he died he wouldn’t bothered with the tracks for the last album and left us with the Innuendo album as Queen’s last album P.S. i just but the show must go on thing in just to piss you off BPP as i know you cry about stuff like that |
englishyob 11.07.2005 14:18 |
Sharron .G wrote: English Bob, How many beers did you down, and how many hispanic mens cocks were in your ass when you disected TSMGO?? The lyrics of that song are what they are... we'll each draw our own conclusions on what they meant. The more I hear you guys ramble on about how given the chance, you'd probably toss Paul Rodgers salad... Bryans Poodle is starting to seem like the smart one here. Paul Rodgers = a good singer. But, Queen are the original 4. If we all would have just assumed that Queen rapped up in 1991, and left the legacy alone, that would have been fine with me.heh didn’t see that before that made me laugh but to answer you question none sorry to disappoint. But might have a few beers tonight |
bitesthedust 11.07.2005 14:55 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Not exactly well known Queen songs are they ? How many Queen songs do you hear regularly played on the radio that hasn't got Freddie singing on them ? Plus I don't hear radio or TV shows queing up to play anything with Queen + Paul Rodgers this is because apart from a few low-life and anti Freddie people on hear no one gives a toss that PR is fronting Freddie's band.I heard '39 on Radio 2 the other day, actually... Can I just ask the other people in this thread; you can see the difference between me and BPP can't you? |
englishyob 11.07.2005 15:34 |
well bitesthedust yeah you don’t bore us all to death with "QUEEN RIP 1991" ok you don’t support the tour which is ok as you don’t tell us all we are disgracing Freddie’s memory and where not "REAL" Queen fans for supporting it. And id BPP could get this though his thick docile head QZ would be a much nicer place |
englishyob 11.07.2005 15:35 |
. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 11.07.2005 15:43 |
bitesthedust wrote:I'm the good looking one your the ugly one. Ps does everyone think all ugly people should be put on one island and left to die ?Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Not exactly well known Queen songs are they ? How many Queen songs do you hear regularly played on the radio that hasn't got Freddie singing on them ? Plus I don't hear radio or TV shows queing up to play anything with Queen + Paul Rodgers this is because apart from a few low-life and anti Freddie people on hear no one gives a toss that PR is fronting Freddie's band.I heard '39 on Radio 2 the other day, actually... Can I just ask the other people in this thread; you can see the difference between me and BPP can't you? |
englishyob 11.07.2005 15:49 |
you'd be a lonely person on the island by yourself |
bitesthedust 11.07.2005 16:11 |
meaning? |
bryans permed poodle 15069 11.07.2005 16:20 |
englishyob wrote: you'd be a lonely person on the island by yourselfNo I would have you for company and I would teach you how to be a loyal Queen fan |
bitesthedust 11.07.2005 16:21 |
|
englishyob 11.07.2005 16:41 |
no need BPP i am a loyal Queen fan as well as a Queen and Paul Rogers fan |
bryans permed poodle 15069 11.07.2005 17:49 |
englishyob wrote: no need BPP i am a loyal Queen fan as well as a Queen and Paul Rogers fanYour not a Queen fan you are a Brian and Roger fan and do a lot of sucking up to their new found chum. |
Grantcdn 12.07.2005 10:01 |
All I can say is that this site is full of whiners....and really there are probably less than 15 people who don't support this tour and they happen to be whining on here all the time.................for the real Queen Fans and Queen + Paul Rodgers fans and there are hundreds of thousands more of them, this tour is fantastic, listening to Queen music live is fantastic........ For the 15 who don't support it, just don't go, don't buy and just shut up... For the rest of us who actually like to hear Brian's solos and Roger's drum rolls and their voices as well as them playing rocking versions of Queen songs including some from The Miracle and Innuendo that have never been played in a previous tour, we will enjoy every minute of it THE SHOW MUST GO ON!! QUEEN ROCKS FOREVER |
Taylorette 12.07.2005 11:05 |
Yeah, you´re so right!!!!!! QUEEN ROCKS FOREVER |
bohemian 11513 12.07.2005 11:48 |
If our beloved John Deacon ever wants to "go on tour" with Ricky Martin... is it going to be under "the label" of Queen + Ricky Martin then??? ;-) Queen were: Freddie Mercury + John Deacon + Roger Taylor + Brian May But dont get me wrong! Brian May, Roger Taylor and Paul Rodgers did "a hell of a job" touring and entertaining europe in spring 2005!!! |
bryans permed poodle 15069 12.07.2005 13:16 |
Bohemian777 wrote: If our beloved John Deacon ever wants to "go on tour" with Ricky Martin... is it going to be under "the label" of Queen + Ricky Martin then??? ;-) Queen were: Freddie Mercury + John Deacon + Roger Taylor + Brian May But dont get me wrong! Brian May, Roger Taylor and Paul Rodgers did "a hell of a job" touring and entertaining europe in spring 2005!!!Problem is the thickies on here think Brian, Roger + Paul Rodgers = Queen + Paul Rodgers. Thick people or what. |
englishyob 12.07.2005 13:55 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:yea that was i said Queen and Paul Rogersenglishyob wrote: no need BPP i am a loyal Queen fan as well as a Queen and Paul Rogers fanYour not a Queen fan you are a Brian and Roger fan and do a lot of sucking up to their new found chum. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 12.07.2005 17:26 |
englishyob wrote:Englishyob you are so thick you would pay to see Queen + Teletubbies, Wombles and Dale Winton.Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:yea that was i said Queen and Paul Rogersenglishyob wrote: no need BPP i am a loyal Queen fan as well as a Queen and Paul Rogers fanYour not a Queen fan you are a Brian and Roger fan and do a lot of sucking up to their new found chum. PAUL RODGERS I WOULD RATHER HAVE BUCK RODGERS. |
Grantcdn 13.07.2005 00:54 |
so what BPP, stay home and listen to your REM, and watch your Buck Rodgers.....actual Queen fans and Queen + Paul Rodgers fans will all be enjoying the shows, the touring etc. I can't believe you even think of calling yourself a Queen fan when you don't like Brian's guitar work and Roger's drumming and the songs that they wrote......I suppose you don't think that I'm In Love With My Car or '39 are Queen songs either |
Mr Drowse 13.07.2005 03:30 |
I am going to skip these kind of topics. Always the same over and over. Just too boring :( |
bryans permed poodle 15069 13.07.2005 13:47 |
Grantcdn wrote: so what BPP, stay home and listen to your REM, and watch your Buck Rodgers.....actual Queen fans and Queen + Paul Rodgers fans will all be enjoying the shows, the touring etc. I can't believe you even think of calling yourself a Queen fan when you don't like Brian's guitar work and Roger's drumming and the songs that they wrote......I suppose you don't think that I'm In Love With My Car or '39 are Queen songs eitherQueen songs are meant to be sung by Freddie and Freddie only. |
englishyob 13.07.2005 14:04 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:you know me to well of course id pay to see queen play with anyone !!!!! get a life i didnt buy the Queen and Five shite cos it was shiteenglishyob wrote:Englishyob you are so thick you would pay to see Queen + Teletubbies, Wombles and Dale Winton. PAUL RODGERS I WOULD RATHER HAVE BUCK RODGERS.Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:yea that was i said Queen and Paul Rogersenglishyob wrote: no need BPP i am a loyal Queen fan as well as a Queen and Paul Rogers fanYour not a Queen fan you are a Brian and Roger fan and do a lot of sucking up to their new found chum. |
Grantcdn 13.07.2005 16:15 |
BPP....so now you say that Queen songs are meant to be sung by Freddie and Freddie only which means that you do not consider '39 and I'm In Love With My Car as Queen songs....so are you now saying that Roger and Brian shouldn't have even put their vocal harmonies on there....therfore no Bohemian Rhapsody either....you really are just a Freddie fan and a Freddie fan only....I guess the only album that you can ever like is Mr. Bad Guy as even his other solo album had different vocalists.... to stop all your complaining that anyone other than Freddie can consider themselves as part of Queen, you should create your own Freddieonlyzone.com |
Zephyr 14.07.2005 12:32 |
Queen will never die. The show is going on and Queen music still makes our life better. And that is the only thing which Freddie wanted. To be immortal and he proved it. A piece of my hearth will be forever yours Freddie... |
bryans permed poodle 15069 14.07.2005 12:54 |
Zephyr wrote: Queen will never die. The show is going on and Queen music still makes our life better. And that is the only thing which Freddie wanted. To be immortal and he proved it. A piece of my hearth will be forever yours Freddie...Queen will never die. Queen + PR should. We all know it's not Queen in any shape or form. Brian and Roger should rename the band. A good one would be "Former Queens" |
Grantcdn 14.07.2005 22:06 |
Queen + PR is still different than Queen....even just putting the Queen+ makes it different....they are not trying to make it exactly how it was but putting something on there to make it distinct.... although BPP thinks Freddie was the only person in the band that should have had a vocal microphone which I still can't understand.....You probably think Queen should have been named Freddie anyway, for the rest of us who care about Brian May, Roger Taylor and their music, QUEEN ROCKS FOREVER - THE SHOW MUST GO ON with QUEEN+PAUL RODGERS!! |