| bryans permed poodle 15069 03.07.2005 18:55 |
Robbie stormed Live8 London yesterday and did justice to WWRY. Okay Freddie cannot be replaced but Robbie would be the second best thing. Whether you like his songs or not he has an excellent way of getting a crowd going and has that bit of arrogance (which Freddie did as well)needed on a stage like that. I'm sure Robbie would have been a much better option than that gimp Rodgers. Drop the Queen name Brian and Roger and employ Mr Williams and I might just go to your gig. RODGERS OUT ROBBIE IN. |
| stutopia 03.07.2005 18:59 |
i couldn't disagree more. robbie would want to command the band. |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 03.07.2005 19:14 |
stutopia wrote: i couldn't disagree more. robbie would want to command the band.So what ?..and Freddie didn't ? |
| kdj2hot 03.07.2005 19:30 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:atleast paul rodgers is a vocalist, robbie williams is a teen idol/celebrity in my opinion. singing definitely isnt on the top of the list of things he does well and if it is thats pretty sad...that was mean, i'm trying not to be so negative so i can have good karma. anyway george michael is definitely a singer and could handle a lot of the queen songs vocally. i dont know if george has the versatility to pull off a tie your mother down or hitman but he could sing a ot of the songs freddie and john wrote...lol, ironically the two members not in queen because of two totally different circumstances.stutopia wrote: i couldn't disagree more. robbie would want to command the band.So what ?..and Freddie didn't ? |
| *3*Playful as a pussycat 03.07.2005 19:59 |
*twitch* Robbie...Williams...*twitch* |
| Ray D O'Gaga 03.07.2005 21:20 |
kdj2hot wrote: ... robbie williams is a teen idol/celebrity in my opinion ... anyway george michael is definitely a singer ...I think one could fairly say that George Michael was a teen idol/celebrity for the first several years of his career as well. Wham! were about as teen idol-y as you could get in the 80s. |
| kdj2hot 03.07.2005 22:25 |
Ray D O'Gaga wrote:the difference is george michael was a great singer in addition to thar.kdj2hot wrote: ... robbie williams is a teen idol/celebrity in my opinion ... anyway george michael is definitely a singer ...I think one could fairly say that George Michael was a teen idol/celebrity for the first several years of his career as well. Wham! were about as teen idol-y as you could get in the 80s. |
| DarkQueen 04.07.2005 05:15 |
Sack Rodgers Employ Robbie Williams? OVER MY DEAD BODY!! They employ Williams and I'll walk. I'm serious, I will turn my back on 'em and just become a casual fan... Oh who the fuck am I trying to kid? They employ Williams and I'll have a go at Brian on his soapbox for it to say the least. I'd probably think up a dastardly plan if they did hire the bugger, but since that ain't happening in the forseeable future, then I can definitely sleep at night... |
| kerfuffle87 04.07.2005 05:42 |
No no no no what are you on? Queen + Paul Rodgers (for me at least) = two greats of classic rock, Robbie Williams = a wannabe. |
| tomtoms 04.07.2005 05:54 |
Paul Rodgers or Robbie Williams? Are you serious? William's hasn't got one tenth of Paul Rodger's vocal talent. And he looked like young Steptoe on Saturday. |
| The Mir@cle 04.07.2005 06:01 |
Just ignore that hairy creep! |
| Jjeroen 04.07.2005 06:41 |
The Poodle!!! Yay! "In the beginning, God made the light. Shortly thereafter God made three big mistakes. The first mistake was called 'man'. The second mistake was called 'wo-man'. And the third mistake was the invention of the poodle. The reason the poodle was such a big mistake, was because God originally wanted to build a Schnauzer, when he fucked up(...)" (Frank Zappa) |
| Lord Blackadder 04.07.2005 07:06 |
I don't think Brian or Roger want you at their gigs you silly twat. |
| GreatKingSam 04.07.2005 07:44 |
What's everyones problem with Robbie Williams? He ain't that bad... in fact I quite like him. No offence to Paul, who I think is awesome, but I recon Robbie could command a crowd far better than Paul - and in a more Freddie like way (given Freddie - and Queen - are heroes of his). And I think it is so idiotic to say he can't sing - that's crap. Liking him or not liking him is fine, but making stupid criticisms is pointless. We Will Rock You, vocally, mayb not be the best song he could have chosen, and apart from a few Freddie-isms thrown in, he tried to be nothing more than himself. Some of you need to realise that that is what it's all about. He did Freddie proud out there. |
| Sharon G. 04.07.2005 11:25 |
Freddie- you and only you............. |
| Fenderek 04.07.2005 11:58 |
BPP- I thought you were about QUEEN RIP 1991 Now you're saying they should do it with Robbie. You're nothing but a foockin' hypocrite!!! More appeal to the young audience? Maybe.. But would I want to hear few Robbie tracks at the Queen gig? Nope... Would it be Queen + Robbie Williams or Robbie Williams + Queen? Would you really want to see Brian and Roger reduced to backing musicians? Not really... |
| Ray D O'Gaga 04.07.2005 12:04 |
kdj2hot wrote:I don't think that was obvious when he was singing 'Wake me Up Before You Go-Go'.Ray D O'Gaga wrote:the difference is george michael was a great singer in addition to thar.kdj2hot wrote: ... robbie williams is a teen idol/celebrity in my opinion ... anyway george michael is definitely a singer ...I think one could fairly say that George Michael was a teen idol/celebrity for the first several years of his career as well. Wham! were about as teen idol-y as you could get in the 80s. |
| englishyob 04.07.2005 12:19 |
oh christ he's back
Fenderek wrote: BPP- I thought you were about QUEEN RIP 1991 Now you're saying they should do it with Robbie. You're nothing but a foockin' hypocrite!!! More appeal to the young audience? Maybe.. But would I want to hear few Robbie tracks at the Queen gig? Nope... Would it be Queen + Robbie Williams or Robbie Williams + Queen? Would you really want to see Brian and Roger reduced to backing musicians? Not really...heh nice one Fenderek |
| kdj2hot 04.07.2005 12:42 |
GreatKingSam wrote: What's everyones problem with Robbie Williams? He ain't that bad... in fact I quite like him. No offence to Paul, who I think is awesome, but I recon Robbie could command a crowd far better than Paul - and in a more Freddie like way (given Freddie - and Queen - are heroes of his). And I think it is so idiotic to say he can't sing - that's crap. Liking him or not liking him is fine, but making stupid criticisms is pointless. We Will Rock You, vocally, mayb not be the best song he could have chosen, and apart from a few Freddie-isms thrown in, he tried to be nothing more than himself. Some of you need to realise that that is what it's all about. He did Freddie proud out there.i'm trying to be very positive and good natured but i'm just so compelled to say...ARE YOU DEAF robbie williams is not a strong singer, his voice is real weak, what i've heard of it. i'm not talking about his live 8 thing, i didnt even see live 8, i'm talking about him in general. he strain to hit 'easy' notes. about george michael, it was very obvious he was a good singer on wake me up before go go, i love that song because the tone in his voice is amazing. i could listen to any wham song because ghe's that good of a singer, i dont think many would disagree with that. i even like wham rap, for comical reasons more so than as a masterpiece. |
| john bodega 04.07.2005 12:52 |
How could anyone have enjoyed Robbie Williams?? He was crap! This is supposed to be a world stage, a showcase of the VERY BEST ENTERTAINERS the world has to offer. The man was completely average, he just ran around in a stupid trenchcoat imploring the crowd to 'let him entertain them'. No thankyou. He's such a bloody average singer too. Off the top of my head - Paul McCartney. The guy is 63, it's been around 38 years since he recorded Helter Skelter and at Live 8 he could STILL nail it in excellent form. And people are supposed to accept the lukewarm Robbie Williams? Go to hell. Finally, the suggestion that he front Queen +. Basically, you have Paul Rogers who isn't that remarkable. How would replacing him with another average singer help anything? |
| kdj2hot 04.07.2005 13:00 |
I was just listening to this mid 80's dance record called Mr. Bad Guy by this fellow named Freddie Mercury and he sound like he would be a perfect fit for Queen. Whatever happened to taht chap, he only made one record I think. |
| Mr.Jingles 04.07.2005 13:53 |
All I'm going to say is that Paul Rodgers is less likely to forget the lyrics to Queen songs. |
| Taylorette 04.07.2005 13:56 |
Robbie Williams is the worst Freddie Mercury Impersonator on earth!!!! I saw Queen+Paul Rodgers in concert in Leipzig and in my opinion Paul was fantastic. He's a great singer. |
| kingogre 04.07.2005 14:01 |
With Paul Rodgers they are more of a proper band. He is a great rock singer who is the same age and has worked with many of the others in the band before(though not Roger). They know each other and can releate to each other and this makes them into a band that can be creative and could go to new places musically. With Robbie Williams it would just be a big circus and I think we have had enough of those. Also I am certain that Im not alone in being really tired of these anti-Rodgers topics coming up all of the time. IMHO Paul is doing GREAT. |
| kingogre 04.07.2005 14:06 |
With paul Rodgers they are a rock band again, Robbie williams would just be like another Five+Queen. I am glad that they are back to being more of a serious band instead of just rehashing the same hits one more time together with the flavour of the month whoever that may be. |
| dixie 04.07.2005 14:30 |
robbie is a good singer and did well at live8 but rodgers is so much better and seeing them in manchester made my assumption he is a great rock singer |
| englishyob 04.07.2005 16:52 |
kdj2hot wrote: I was just listening to this mid 80's dance record called Mr. Bad Guy by this fellow named Freddie Mercury and he sound like he would be a perfect fit for Queen. Whatever happened to taht chap, he only made one record I think.I'm sure he did another album with some opera singer, her name was something like Monserrat Cabelle and im sure the Barcelona song was used for the Olympic games !!! |
| Russian Headlong 04.07.2005 17:25 |
Paul Rodgers a ROCK legend. Robbie Willaims a boy band overhyped cunt! Taylor and May are shrewd business men to have dabble with the likes of George Michael, Williams, 5ive, Pinketc to get the cash in from the teen audience when it suitds them. However, when it comes to the crunch Queen are still a hard rock band who like to experiment, if that means make some shit records every now and then to gain more exposure,c ash whatever then good luck to them. |
| Queen Maeve 04.07.2005 19:02 |
No, I dont think you should sack Rodgers. Queen+PR have managed to sell out the complete tour without a pop idol like robbie williams. I agree that Robbie is a good singer and performer. He would be a suitable frontman as he has the energy and talent except he's too young. The age difference most probably wouldnt work and I think it would be another Five episode where brian and roger would just look out of place. Anyway whats wrong with Paul? The majority of Queenzone members have accepted him and everyone(including myself)who went to the concerts can agree that Paul did an excellent job fronting Queen.I think it would end up as a Robbie Williams+Queen concert if it did come to that. But thats just my opinion. |
| Eviltwin 04.07.2005 22:16 |
Robbie Williams xD |
| 7Innuendo7 04.07.2005 23:23 |
BPP are you aware of John Deacon's comments re: Robbie Williams & WATC? Or does an informed opinion like JRD's mean anything to you? |
| Fenderek 05.07.2005 03:39 |
7Innuendo7 wrote: BPP are you aware of John Deacon's comments re: Robbie Williams & WATC? Or does an informed opinion like JRD's mean anything to you?That's what I wanted to say... So far BPP was claiming that John Deacon is the decent one for not doing Queen + thing... Suddenly it'd be good to do it with wannabe Williams... Yeah sure- I still remember what John said about Blobbie... That was the moment when he decided it's time to retire... :S When they did WATC with him... BPP- you're a wanker- you cannot even be consistent with what you say... You claim Queen RIP 1991 and than want them to do it with Robbie... Yes, mate- you're a true fan... |
| Fenderek 05.07.2005 03:41 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Drop the Queen name Brian and Roger and employ Mr Williams and I might just go to your gig.And do you think anyone gives a f**k wether you're there or not? |
| deleted user 05.07.2005 08:43 |
I indeed think it would have been a better option. Robbie's style is way more similar to Queen's one. And he is charismatic wich Paul isn't. BUT there would be a fucking lot of Robbie Williams fans coming up and it would make the tickets even harder to get. (they could play 3,4 night at a venue). |
| Fenderek 05.07.2005 09:19 |
<font color=black>The Lord Of Darkness wrote: Robbie's style is way more similar to Queen's one.I think our idea of Queen is soooo different :) IMO it's more Paul than Robbie BECAUSE for me Queen was always about live ROCK'N'ROLL- raw and considerbly heavy. If Robbie's style suits Queen for you- the queentesnece of their style for you must be radio hits and 80s... I prefer raw Brians songs and there's no way Robbie could sing TYMD properly. AND I repeat one thing- do we REALLY wanna hear Angels and som eother Robbie's tracks on the Queen tour? I def wouldn't... In fact- I probably would give those shows a miss... So there you go- one ticket a bit easier to get ;) |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 05.07.2005 11:48 |
7Innuendo7 wrote: BPP are you aware of John Deacon's comments re: Robbie Williams &amp;amp; WATC? Or does an informed opinion like JRD's mean anything to you?JD isNot exactly praising the new new tour or lead singer either is he ? |
| Fenderek 05.07.2005 12:31 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: JD isNot exactly praising the new new tour or lead singer either is he ?As far as I know he didn't say a fucking word about it... Publicaly anyway. |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 05.07.2005 13:02 |
Fenderek wrote:Not really an endorsement then.Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: JD isNot exactly praising the new new tour or lead singer either is he ?As far as I know he didn't say a fucking word about it... Publicaly anyway. |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 05.07.2005 13:10 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote:If you pay attention dickhead JD was talking about Robbie's version of one Queen song. He never commented about what he thought of Robbie going on tour with Brian and Roger. two completly different things.Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:Ok, even someone with the intellect of a pea, such as yourself, should be able to understand this: - John Deacon publically announced that he thought Robbie Williams' WATC sucked - John Deacon never commented on Paul Rodgers Which of the two would he think was worse? You must be able to understand that it's the first one.7Innuendo7 wrote: BPP are you aware of John Deacon's comments re: Robbie Williams &amp;amp;amp;amp; WATC? Or does an informed opinion like JRD's mean anything to you?JD isNot exactly praising the new new tour or lead singer either is he ? I find it a bit strange that if JD thought Rodgers was a decent replacement for Freddie why he has not released a simple statement showing his approval. Retired or not. |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 05.07.2005 13:12 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: Oh, and by the way: BPP, you are a bleeding hypocrit, you know that? First, you go round proclaiming &quot;Queen died in 1991&quot;, now you claim Queen + Robbie Williams IS a good way to start anew. Bloody hypocricy. Do yourself (and us) a favour, and shut up! You're only making yourself look more pathetic than you already are, and believe me, reality is pathetic enough in your case.Read my original post first you gimp. ONLY IF THEY DROPPED THE QUEEN NAME. |
| August R. 05.07.2005 13:37 |
<font color=black>The Lord Of Darkness wrote: I indeed think it would have been a better option. Robbie's style is way more similar to Queen's one. And he is charismatic wich Paul isn't. |
| kingogre 05.07.2005 13:49 |
I think Brian said somewhere that John had written a later to them saying that he supported whatever they did he just didn't want to take an active part in it because he was tired of the public life. Freddies mother actually did approve of Rodgers as vocalist for the tour. Also, dont know what its worth but Brian has also stated several times that Freddie also would have. |
| kingogre 05.07.2005 14:02 |
Paul is a much better choice because queen are, at the bottom line, a hard-rock/heavy metal-band. Just listen to their seventies albums, they are full of Led Zeppelin, Black sabbath, the Who and the Kinks influences. Or better still, listen one of their concerts, from any of their eras and what you hear is not a pop band but a hard-rock band, even if it is a very camp one. Robbie would work, but paul is much more closer to the original spirit of Queen IMHO. |
| deleted user 05.07.2005 14:52 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:According to Brian, John supports the current tour, AND the singer, but didn't support the other things with 5ive and pink/britney etc.7Innuendo7 wrote: BPP are you aware of John Deacon's comments re: Robbie Williams &amp;amp;amp; WATC? Or does an informed opinion like JRD's mean anything to you?JD isNot exactly praising the new new tour or lead singer either is he ? |
| kingogre 05.07.2005 15:20 |
john isnt exactly famous for commenting on what brian and roger does at all. But according brian he has approved of the tour |
| NOTWMEDDLE 05.07.2005 20:19 |
John is not STUPID! He knows Robbie, Britney and such all SUCK SHIT! |
| englishyob 06.07.2005 09:18 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: I find it a bit strange that if JD thought Rodgers was a decent replacement for Freddie why he has not released a simple statement showing his approval. Retired or not.OY dickhead BPP how many times do we stay this to you PAUL ROGERS ISNT FREDDIE'S REPLACEMENT GET THAT INTO YOU FUCKING THICK HEAD GROW UP SADO |
| Smitty 06.07.2005 10:03 |
Everyone's entitled to their own opinion, hypocrit or not. I support the 2005 tour and I haven't heard much of Robbie. But I have heard Paul Rodgers, not just the tour, but his old hits, and I am impressed. But BPP, we know how you feel, you wish that Queen would have died in 1991 when Freddie did but you feel that Robbie would have been a better singer for the tour than Paul. You like a different stage of Queen, not quite the Rock and Roll but more the 80's, but please, you have expressed your opinion a long time and we know exactly what you would post about Rodgers. My point is, you could have said that you thought Robbie Williams did good at Live 8 and that you prefer him to Paul Rodgers Politely, but you go around saying that Rodgers is crap and we are tired of it, we have been tired of it also. It is alright to oppose Paul Rodgers but not to constantly attack him every other day (not literally). On another note, you said in a previous post that you designated a space where you would not discuss Paul Rodgers but about Queen in the old days, Queen when Freddie was alive, the Queen you preferred, but you have never posted anything about Queen in the old days on Queenzone. I'm sure you are a fan of Queen and have been for a while, SO POST ABOUT QUEEN AND NOT PAUL! On yet another note, if you oppose Poodle's opinion, do it in a polite way. Many people have a different opinion than you and calling someone a ****ing ******* *** *** ****** ***** becouse you disagree with them is not very polite. In my opinion EVERYONE HERE NEEDS TO GROW UP, NOT JUST POODLE! I hope you read this BPP and think about what I wrote, and maybe search your previous posts to see what you have posted. I hope these people who reply in the most rude way possible think about this too. |
| Fenderek 07.07.2005 04:16 |
I was replying nicely for about 10-20 threads. After 30-1000 (somewhere in between Iguess) EXACTLY THE SAME posts I'm not bothered with being polite anymore... |
| Smitty 07.07.2005 09:47 |
Fenderek wrote: I was replying nicely for about 10-20 threads. After 30-1000 (somewhere in between Iguess) EXACTLY THE SAME posts I'm not bothered with being polite anymore...Good Point. |
| deleted user 19.08.2005 22:55 |
DOWN WITH THE TOUR |
| David Lee Rocks 20.08.2005 11:35 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Robbie stormed Live8 London yesterday and did justice to WWRY. Okay Freddie cannot be replaced but Robbie would be the second best thing. Whether you like his songs or not he has an excellent way of getting a crowd going and has that bit of arrogance (which Freddie did as well)needed on a stage like that. I'm sure Robbie would have been a much better option than that gimp Rodgers. Drop the Queen name Brian and Roger and employ Mr Williams and I might just go to your gig. RODGERS OUT ROBBIE IN.BOLLOCKS |
| Penis - Vagina 20.08.2005 13:03 |
You mean Robbie "Peed my juice" Williams? Surely you're mad! |
| Sirk 20.08.2005 13:42 |
No offence but i think Robbie totally fucked up wwry at live 8. I was waiting for it all day in front of the tv like the loser i am and when it came on i was like wtf is this shite? |
| M@rius 20.08.2005 14:10 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Robbie stormed Live8 London yesterday and did justice to WWRY. Okay Freddie cannot be replaced but Robbie would be the second best thing. Whether you like his songs or not he has an excellent way of getting a crowd going and has that bit of arrogance (which Freddie did as well)needed on a stage like that. I'm sure Robbie would have been a much better option than that gimp Rodgers. Drop the Queen name Brian and Roger and employ Mr Williams and I might just go to your gig. RODGERS OUT ROBBIE IN.You are a fu**ing LOSER, DUDE |
| shanemcd 20.08.2005 16:57 |
Williams is a good singer, but would not be a good choice for a Queen tour. He did a good version of "We are the Champions", but would be too much of a personality clash for use on a tour. Thats just my opinion ... Queen themselves said they didn't want somebody to be another Freddie - I fear Williams could try to be exactly that ! |
| bryans permed poodle 15069 22.08.2005 17:25 |
|
| bryans permed poodle 15069 23.08.2005 12:35 |
|
| bryans permed poodle 15069 23.08.2005 12:35 |
I agree |
| Localboy80 23.08.2005 13:04 |
Now if I had to guess, I would have this BPP down as roughly 8 to 15 years old (sincere apologies to the fans on this site of that age but trust me, you are a lot more mature). But if I recall from an old thread, I am sure he is in his 40's! For God's sake, what an arsehole! As Freddie would say 'He is talking from here'. And yes, you know where 'here' is! Basically, everybody is entitled to their own opinion, no matter how pathetic it may seem to some people but when that person keeps on and on and especially about something that is so shit and also when it involves trying to convince people that he has a valid point, then it is time for that person to be banned! As it has been said for about a zazillion amount of times, there will never be another Freddie Mercury and nobody but nobody will ever replace him. They are not trying to do that!!! I can respect if you don't like Paul Rodgers but you really have not got a clue if you don't think Paul Rodgers has an excellent voice! At the end of the day, if a 'mature' adult acts the way you do, then God help your children (if you have any). Then again, I cannot see you being married or have any children, as you are such a narrow minded, stuck in your ways prick! So Queen died in 1991??? Funny that, I thought it was Freddie Mercury who sadly passed away! So I take it you disagree with not only this fantastic tour but also the tribute concert, the 'Made In Heaven' album, the 'No-One But You (Only The Good Die Young)' single, the 'Queen Rocks' album and the 'We Will Rock You' show? I mean, Heaven forbid, it just isn't Queen, because there is no Freddie Mercury!!! I would love nothing more, than for Freddie to be alive and still BE A PART OF QUEEN. But he is dead! You are one of the most stubborn idiots if you will not even try going to one of the concerts and see for yourself what it would be like. I was fortunate enough to see Queen and Paul Rodgers at Cardiff C.I.A and at Hyde Park. The two concerts were fantastic! You had Brian May and Roger Taylor playing as if age had not caught up with them and Paul Rodgers voice was excellent. After both concerts, I said to my girlfriend that seeing as it was so good, just imagine what it would have been like with Freddie. Of course it would be better but this is the closest thing we will ever get. Yes, we have memories of Freddie and his performances/concerts and they will never go away. But is your brain capacity that small that you cannot create new memories and that you are so far up your own arse that you act like a spoilt child and will not even give the concert a chance???!!! Brian May and Roger Taylor was part of a band called Queen, just like Freddie Mercury. Freddie Mercury was not Queen but a part of a fantastic group called Queen. I also believe Freddie quoted that they would be together until they died. Does the song 'The Show Must Go On' mean anything to you? Brian and Roger are musicians, so why shouldn't they go out there under the name of Queen, when that was their name in the first place? I know you will probably come back with a pathetic response like, 'Queen is not Queen without Freddie Mercury' and to an extent, yes, I agree but in the context of that Queen will never be as good without Freddie Mercury but as a true fan, of course you would recognise that but how can you justify that Queen died in 1991, when it was just one person who actually died? That is like saying every time a football club, say Manchester United, loses a player, then that football club can no longer and is no longer Manchester United? I mean, I love Wayne Rooney as a player and I would hate to see Manchester United lose him but would that stop me supporting Manchester United or them changing their name? No, of course it wouldn't. Did I ever want Freddie to die? Of course not but do I want Queen to exist in any shape or form? Of course I do! I mean, come on, get a grip on reality here and bloody grow up!!! I will end by sayin |
| its_a_hard_life 23.08.2005 14:56 |
I understand where your coming from now Mr poodle is it Mr Paul Rodgers you hate? because it seems like it to me, and if he wasnt performing on stage with BRIAN AND ROGER then you would want robbie, so if robbie did perform instead of Mr Paul Rodgers would you go and see the new tour? Please answer my question, Thank you. |
| deleted user 23.08.2005 15:27 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Robbie stormed Live8 London yesterday and did justice to WWRY. Okay Freddie cannot be replaced but Robbie would be the second best thing. Whether you like his songs or not he has an excellent way of getting a crowd going and has that bit of arrogance (which Freddie did as well)needed on a stage like that. I'm sure Robbie would have been a much better option than that gimp Rodgers. Drop the Queen name Brian and Roger and employ Mr Williams and I might just go to your gig. RODGERS OUT ROBBIE IN.what a hypocrite you keep saying that it can't be Queen without one of them, now youre saying that they should get robbie to replace him? |
| its_a_hard_life 23.08.2005 19:02 |
In no thats what hes been saying all along so really he has the PROBLEM with PAUL RODGERS he just dislikes him and i dont no for what reason but to take it out on Brian and Roger is just sick and to then say employ Robbie Williams is just double sick after he gos that no one can replace Queen hes confussed and stupid. |
| Knute 25.08.2005 19:05 |
Surprise, surprise...he hasn't answered. So how about it, how can you say this Q+PR tour has draged the Queen name thru the mud, yet sit there and endorse RW to tour with the boys under the Queen name? Hmm? Isn't that incongruent and inconsistant with your supposedly strong convictions? Ohhh I get it, you really don't have any strong convictions concerning all of this, you just like to get people rilled up. |