bryans permed poodle 15069 19.05.2005 18:47 |
Can this be done ? I'm sure Elvis's old band did this a few years ago. The band played live whilst archive footage of Elvis was seen on screen singing along with the band. We would have the Queen sound and Freddie singing at the same time. Great!! Surely this would be better than the useless idiot Rogers on vocals. |
Hitman 19.05.2005 19:12 |
YEAH!why don't let the original crowd of Wembley sing along the show!?!?....instead of those idiots clapping a singing (mostly out of tune...) that sold out almost each concerts till now...like me for example please... |
Smitty 19.05.2005 20:43 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Surely this would be better than the useless idiot Rogers on vocals.I'd have to disagree with you on that one buddy. I've heard a recording of RoDgers and Queen in Hamburg and I think although that Rodgers isn't Freddie and will never have that type of voice, I felt he added a more bluesy way of playing Queen songs and I find that quite interesting. By the way, quit insulting Rodgers, he brought (most of) Queen back together and started an amazing tour that keeps getting better every concert, he deserves some credit and kudos for that. Besides I didn't insult you and call you Bitchy Persistent Prick now did I... P.S. Learn to spell the last names of great musicians because it would be very embarassing if you sent a letter to a classical music convention hailing Moazart now would it... |
Mr Drowse 20.05.2005 03:16 |
Well said, Smittygecko! |
RohemianBapsody 20.05.2005 03:17 |
Mr Drowse wrote: Well said, Smittygecko!Go for it Smitty. BPP unless you actually go to one of the concerts you will never know. |
musicalprostitute 20.05.2005 03:31 |
LMFAO!! :) why talk your anti-Queen shit here? lol it makes no sense. |
bryans permed poodle 15069 20.05.2005 05:17 |
RohemianBapsody wrote:I refused to go for 3 reasons.Mr Drowse wrote: Well said, Smittygecko!Go for it Smitty. BPP unless you actually go to one of the concerts you will never know. 1. It's not Queen in any shape or form. Mind you I would have gone if Brian and Roger had dropped the band name. 2. Secondly having seen the REAL AND ONLY Queen at Wembley in 86 I would rather remember them as the original four and at their peak. 3. Lastly £50.00 - £55.00 a ticket is too expensive to see 50% of a once great band and a singer no ones ever heard of. |
Lord Blackadder 20.05.2005 05:55 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:How old are you? About 5? Because you that's how you sound.RohemianBapsody wrote:I refused to go for 3 reasons. 1. It's not Queen in any shape or form. Mind you I would have gone if Brian and Roger had dropped the band name. 2. Secondly having seen the REAL AND ONLY Queen at Wembley in 86 I would rather remember them as the original four and at their peak. 3. Lastly £50.00 - £55.00 a ticket is too expensive to see 50% of a once great band and a singer no ones ever heard of.Mr Drowse wrote: Well said, Smittygecko!Go for it Smitty. BPP unless you actually go to one of the concerts you will never know. 1. We've all heard of Paul Rodgers (most of us). 2. Tickets were not all that price. 3. It is Queen because technically Brian and Roger were the first two members (Smile into Queen) and also being obsessed with Freddie Mercury isn't a good thing to be. Infact being obsessed with anybody that you don't actually know isn't good. So just stop repeating yourself. We know you don't agree with the tour and we don't care. You saying you don't wanna go isnt gonna stop anything. |
i'm going slight mad... 20.05.2005 06:25 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:i know who paul rodgers is, he's the singer from queen isn't he? ;)RohemianBapsody wrote:I refused to go for 3 reasons. 1. It's not Queen in any shape or form. Mind you I would have gone if Brian and Roger had dropped the band name. 2. Secondly having seen the REAL AND ONLY Queen at Wembley in 86 I would rather remember them as the original four and at their peak. 3. Lastly £50.00 - £55.00 a ticket is too expensive to see 50% of a once great band and a singer no ones ever heard of.Mr Drowse wrote: Well said, Smittygecko!Go for it Smitty. BPP unless you actually go to one of the concerts you will never know. but seriously, just because you haven't heard of him doesn't mean everybody else hasn't. i grew up listening to his songs. i think it's a bit, well, stupid of you, not to go and see what they can pull out of the hat. they've always delivered before, and no before you say it, it wasn't all down to freddie. i also think it's a bit petty of you to say you would have gone if they had dropped the name. seriously. what the hell? the who still tour under the name of the who and they have only two of its original members left. |
djaef 20.05.2005 08:01 |
Bryans SPermed Poodle wrote: I refused to go for 3 reasons. 1. It's not Queen in any shape or form. Mind you I would have gone if Brian and Roger had dropped the band name. 2. Secondly having seen the REAL AND ONLY Queen at Wembley in 86 I would rather remember them as the original four and at their peak. 3. Lastly £50.00 - £55.00 a ticket is too expensive to see 50% of a once great band and a singer no ones ever heard of.You refused to go because you are a closed minded dickhead. No other reasons are valid or neccesary. |
Fenderek 20.05.2005 08:12 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Can this be done ? I'm sure Elvis's old band did this a few years ago. The band played live whilst archive footage of Elvis was seen on screen singing along with the band. We would have the Queen sound and Freddie singing at the same time. Great!! Surely this would be better than the useless idiot Rogers on vocals.Have you seen those Elvis shows? I did. They were pathetic. Just like dragging a dead body with you 10 years after its death... Groze, man. It was corny as hell. PS Do you have a life? |
Fenderek 20.05.2005 08:13 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: 1. It's not Queen in any shape or form. Mind you I would have gone if Brian and Roger had dropped the band name. 2. Secondly having seen the REAL AND ONLY Queen at Wembley in 86 I would rather remember them as the original four and at their peak. 3. Lastly £50.00 - £55.00 a ticket is too expensive to see 50% of a once great band and a singer no ones ever heard of.1. Get a life 2. Get a life 3. Get a life Guess what's number 4... |
Serry... 20.05.2005 08:36 |
How about Brian, Roger and Freddie playing on film with John playing live? |
Sharon G. 20.05.2005 09:41 |
I agreee with BPP on this one. Would love to hear Freddie's voice instead of PR. Freddie 1991 you AND only you! |
bohemian 11513 20.05.2005 10:23 |
@Serry... "How about Brian, Roger and Freddie playing on film with John playing live?" What do you think is John doing at home right now? :-) But to get more serious now... well, I realy enjoyed their concert in Basle, but in my opinion all of their videos during the show were "Schmonz"... Did they ever need any videos during the shows? So... do you realy think they need them now? What´s the use of a video accompanying Brian on playing "Last Horizon" or playing "These are the days of our Lives"? "Kitsch as Kitsch can be"... "Bo Rhap" was ok... but they should all have left the stage and stopped the video when the operatic section began... just like they did all "those years before"... |
john bodega 20.05.2005 11:59 |
A rose by any other name, Poodle. Of course, you'd be too uncultured (like the average toddler) to get the reference. |
Rafael Macedo 20.05.2005 13:12 |
there should be an anti-queen zone specially designed for this morons that are talkin all this SHIT... Rodgers has a really great voice... I think he was at Woodstock 94, and also, there was a plan to play with May at that show... Im not sure if that materialized... I became a fan when they released Innuendo, so i never had a chence to see them... and know , thanks to the awesome Rodgers and the new Queen tour, a lot of young people will have the chance to see the best band ever (even without freddie and john) playing the best music ever writen... FREDDIE IS DEAD... GET OVER IT... THE SHOW MUST GO ON... |
Joker 20.05.2005 14:48 |
I agree with Rafael Macedo i mean there are hundreds of young people who have only heard Queen from their cd's or records. i think its a good idea that they are touring with paul rodgers and that they are still using the name Queen. if you say that they should just play along with a video then people won't go and see them,they will just go out and buy live at wembly or something because it would just be the same and alot cheaper. im going to try and sum this up in two words You Suck! stop spreading your anti Queen shit around these forums. no one wants to hear it and just fuck off in general! |
BHM1775 20.05.2005 15:02 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote: Can this be done ? I'm sure Elvis's old band did this a few years ago. The band played live whilst archive footage of Elvis was seen on screen singing along with the band. We would have the Queen sound and Freddie singing at the same time. Great!! Surely this would be better than the useless idiot Rogers on vocals.BPP, If you had graced one of the recent gigs with your presence you would have seen exactly that!!! The first part of Bo Rhap was done with Spike playing piano, Roger on Drums, Bri and Jamie on Red Specials and Danny playing Bass. |
NOTWMEDDLE 20.05.2005 15:02 |
Many Queen fans are complaining about Rodgers. Paul Rodgers is a great singer and is better than that loser George Michael. I changed the lyric of I Want Your Sex to George Michael's gay in January of 1991 and girls complained I WAS JEALOUS. Seven years later, my parody lyric came true. Also Rob Williams is a boy-band defect whom luckily is hated by Americans. |
hoop-didi-didi 21.05.2005 04:13 |
I have to agree partially with BPP, it is great to hear Freddies voice. This does NOT mean that I hate Paul Rogers(i grew up listening to old Free and Bad Company stuff and he rocks!) or am against the tour(I'm actually going to Hyde Park, hurrah!) so please don't yell at me. |
The King Of Rhye 21.05.2005 05:25 |
Rafael Macedo wrote: there should be an anti-queen zone specially designed for this morons that are talkin all this SHIT... Rodgers has a really great voice... I think he was at Woodstock 94, and also, there was a plan to play with May at that show... Im not sure if that materialized... I became a fan when they released Innuendo, so i never had a chence to see them... and know , thanks to the awesome Rodgers and the new Queen tour, a lot of young people will have the chance to see the best band ever (even without freddie and john) playing the best music ever writen... FREDDIE IS DEAD... GET OVER IT... THE SHOW MUST GO ON...I wholeheartedly agree with all of that.....and, by the way I remember hoping to hear Brian on the radio broadcast of Woodstock 94....I think he didnt make it because he was sick or something....anyone know the story behind that? |
Knute 21.05.2005 06:02 |
It just wouldn't work because it wouldn't be truly live music. There would be no room for organic musical interaction because Bri and Rog would be slaves to a pre-recorded track. Bri, Rog, and Paul are all good improvisers. they are sensitive to little fluctuations in the flow or the feel of the particular song that evening. It would be a shame to see that process sterilized. I love Freddie as well and he was the best, but we can never have him back. |
RohemianBapsody 21.05.2005 07:07 |
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:1. What dose the f^*&ing name matter .... eh eh ehhhh. Once you get to the venue and listen to the sound you don't think "Oh they have used the name Queen - Bast^&%ds"RohemianBapsody wrote:I refused to go for 3 reasons. 1. It's not Queen in any shape or form. Mind you I would have gone if Brian and Roger had dropped the band name. 2. Secondly having seen the REAL AND ONLY Queen at Wembley in 86 I would rather remember them as the original four and at their peak. 3. Lastly £50.00 - £55.00 a ticket is too expensive to see 50% of a once great band and a singer no ones ever heard of.Mr Drowse wrote: Well said, Smittygecko!Go for it Smitty. BPP unless you actually go to one of the concerts you will never know. 2. I saw Queen live from '78 - 86 and it is the enjoyment of still being able to hear the songs LIVE by at least 2 of the band. 3. Yes it is quite expensive, but concerts have gone up in price. Not because it is only 50% of Queen. |
Ale_Pisa 21.05.2005 20:50 |
Sorry for my english... The voice of Freddie is a great voice, and who hear Queen songs for many years is hard to hear another singer play this song. In 1992 at the FM Tribute we can see many great singers in trouble with queen/freddie songs, but Paul Rodgers do a great and good job. I know Paul and his ex band (Free and Bad Company) and I don't like, but this tour is great and not so expensive, 50/60 Euro is a good price to see Queen And Paul Rodgers (a part of music history...), in Italy there's many italian group that play only 1 hour and the price of the ticket is 45/50 Euro... many of this group make 1 album and then... stop to do music! Queen Will Rock You Again!!!! |