| deleted user 11.04.2005 15:38 |
I'm going to upload a concert every week on mp3. Write your ideas of concerts you think I'm going to upload, this is my list: 721220 London, UK 730913 London, UK 730929 Bristol, UK 731120 Oxford, UK 740320 Manchester, UK 740331 London, UK 740421 New Orleans, USA 740507 New York, USA 741106 Bradford, UK 741120 London, UK 741206 Cologne, Germany 750329 Los Angeles, USA 750419 Tokyo, Japan 750429 Shizuoka, Japan 750501 Tokyo, Japan 751115 Liverpool, UK 751116 Coventry, UK 751213 Dundee, UK 751224 London, UK 760326 Fukuoka (evening), Japan 760329 Osaka (afternoon), Japan 760329 Osaka (evening), Japan 760331 Tokyo, Japan 760401 Tokyo, Japan 760402 Sendai, Japan 760902 Edinburgh, UK 760918 London, UK 770123 Cleveland, USA 770204 Maryland, USA 770311 Vancouver, Canada 770508 Stockholm, Sweden 770510 Gothenburg, Sweden 770517 Rotterdam, Holland 770530 Glasgow, UK 770606 London, UK 771006 London, UK 771123 Philadelphia, USA 771201 New York, USA 771202 New York, USA 771211 Houston, USA 771216 San Diego, USA 780412 Stockholm, Sweden 780413 Copenhagen, Denmark 780420 Rotterdam, Holland 780423 Paris, France 780426 Dortmund, Germany 780502 Vienna, Austria 780511 London, UK 781028 Dallas, USA 781119 Uniondale, USA 781201 Montreal, Canada 781207 Chicago, USA 781216 Oakland, USA 790126 Brussels, Belgium 790129 Rotterdam, Holland 790130 Rotterdam, Holland 790201 Cologne, Germany 790202 Frankfurt, Germany 790228 Paris, France 790419 Osaka, Japan 790420 Osaka, Japan 790424 Tokyo, Japan 790501 Fukuoka, Japan 790506 Sapporo, Japan 790818 Saarbrücken, Germany 791130 Glasgow, UK 791203 Newcastle, UK 791204 Newcastle, UK 791226 London, UK 800820 Hartford, USA 800910 Milwaukee, USA 800919 Chicago, USA 800929 New York, USA 801125 Paris, France 801126 Cologne, Germany 801127 Leiden, Holland 801206 Birmingham, UK 801208 London, UK 801210 London, UK 801214 Frankfurt, Germany 810213 Tokyo, Japan 810216 Tokyo, Japan 810217 Tokyo, Japan 810218 Tokyo, Japan 810228 Buenos Aires, Argentina 810304 Mar del Plata, Argentina 810308 Buenos Aires, Argentina 810320 Sao Paulo, Brazil 811124 Montreal, Canada 811125 Montreal, Canada 820410 Stockholm, Sweden 820416 Zürich, Switzerland 820420 Lyon, France 820424 Leiden, Holland 820425 Leiden, Holland 820429 Frankfurt, Germany 820509 Würzburg, Germany 820512 Vienna, Austria 820513 Vienna, Austria 820515 Berlin, Germany 820516 Hamburg, Germany 820518 Kassel, Germany 820521 Munich, Germany 820529 Leeds, UK 820602 Edinburgh, UK 820605 Milton Keynes, UK 820721 Montreal, Canada 820724 Philadelphia, USA 820727 New York, USA 820809 Meadowsland, USA 820813 Chicago, USA 820907 Oakland, USA 820914 Los Angeles, USA 821019 Fukuoka, Japan 821024 Osaka, Japan 821026 Nagoya, Japan 821029 Sapporo, Japan 821103 Tokyo, Japan 840824 Brussels, Belgium 840901 Birmingham, UK 840904 London, UK 840907 London, UK 840908 London, UK 840912 Dortmund, Germany 840914 Milan, Italy 840915 Milan, Italy 840920 Leiden, Holland 840922 Hannover, Germany 840927 Stuttgart, Germany 840929 Vienna, Austria 850119 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 850420 Melbourne, Australia 850426 Sydney, Australia 850509 Tokyo, Japan 850511 Tokyo, Japan 850513 Nagoya, Japan 850515 Osaka, Japan 850713 London, UK 860607 Stockholm, Sweden 860611 Leiden, Holland 860612 Leiden, Holland 860614 Paris, France 860617 Brussels, Belgium 860621 Mannheim, Germany 860626 Berlin, Germany 860629 Munich, Germany 860705 Slane, County Meath, Ireland 860709 Newcastle, UK 860711 London, UK 860712 London, UK 860719 Cologne, Germany 860721 Vienna, Austria 860722 Vienna, Austria 860727 Budapest, Hungary 860803 Madrid, Spain 860809 Stevenage, UK 050328 Brixton, UK 050401 Madrid, Spain |
| Fat Lizzy 11.04.2005 15:41 |
One of these first would be my suggestion... 740421 New Orleans, USA 751116 Coventry, UK Good idea of this every week stuff, im doing it every day :P Mayb we can upload 2 a week... Ill upload one and youll upload another ;) |
| pcgenius9 11.04.2005 15:42 |
Ha, I don't mind providing they have awesome sound quality. |
| tano 11.04.2005 15:47 |
i would like...... 771211 Houston, USA 791226 London, UK 810320 Sao Paulo, Brazil and THANKS!!! its a great idea...you 2 are great guys! |
| Fat Lizzy 11.04.2005 15:53 |
Bye. |
| gk1998 11.04.2005 15:56 |
820416 Zürich, Switzerland would be awesome !! |
| deleted user 11.04.2005 18:40 |
Rev and KYA-- You are guys are awesome!!Your sharing is really appreciated. I would upload some of my stuff, but I haven't anything that you guys don't. Thanks for the fantastic uploads! |
| DrumBrother 11.04.2005 18:56 |
Real fans, thats what you two are, spreading the word, anything from '78 would be great, Saarbrucken also and how about Puebla '81 |
| Fat Lizzy 11.04.2005 18:57 |
gk1998 wrote: 820416 Zürich, Switzerland would be awesome !!That one's up :P Ms. Farenheit wrote: Rev and KYA-- You are guys are awesome!!Your sharing is really appreciated. I would upload some of my stuff, but I haven't anything that you guys don't. Thanks for the fantastic uploads!For what I can say... No problem, It's nice to be able to share a lot of concerts :D |
| DrumBrother 11.04.2005 18:58 |
in fact could someone reseed copenhagan '78 for me, I'm 99% done |
| Fat Lizzy 11.04.2005 19:03 |
I don't have any flac version left to seed to be honest, converted everything to 192, some 256 kbps mp3. |
| nibznik 11.04.2005 21:26 |
oh man someone to lift the load, you guys wanna set up a schedule, like i do it one week, and then rev or k.y.a. the next, and then whoever left the last week, and then for the fourth week of the month, each can upload a second concert, or its just a lax week? IMO, its much easier because i wanna share queen, but its just such a hassle to upload and once or twice a month is easy |
| ficodr 11.04.2005 23:29 |
Thank You KYA and Rev! I'm glad to download those bootlegs you've uploaded! they're awesome! I would want to have philadephia 1977 in order to hear one of the very first live versions of "we are the champions"... on of my favorites live songs! byee! |
| Fat Lizzy 12.04.2005 11:26 |
You have to thank Thijs aka The_Hero too, he gave me most of my bootlegs :D |
| deleted user 12.04.2005 15:03 |
<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: Great idea, but just one thing: both those '72-ers are fakes.Actually the Marquee gig from 1972 isn't fake. |
| truemetal 12.04.2005 15:34 |
ALL THE OLD ONES !! |
| deleted user 12.04.2005 15:55 |
Every Sunday I'm going to upload a concert, but this Sunday I can't, because I'm going to Tallinn, so I do it on Monday or Tuesday instead. |
| Jjeroen 12.04.2005 16:17 |
Keep Yourself Alive wrote:Well I am more than joyed to request that one, then!<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: Great idea, but just one thing: both those '72-ers are fakes.Actually the Marquee gig from 1972 isn't fake. |
| Jay Mantis 12.04.2005 16:43 |
So you are saying you actually own this concert: link If so I'd want to request that as well, hell I'll even trade anything from my own collection for it! |
| deleted user 12.04.2005 17:23 |
Jeroentjuh wrote: So you are saying you actually own this concert: link If so I'd want to request that as well, hell I'll even trade anything from my own collection for it!There's a lot of things that haven't been updated on that site. One thing that says on the site is that Tie Your Mother Down don't exist from the gig in Leiden 11.7.1986, but it does exist, I have even talked to the webmaster and he said that it does exist, but he haven't updated that thing. |
| Fat Lizzy 12.04.2005 17:26 |
Jeroentjuh wrote: So you are saying you actually own this concert: link If so I'd want to request that as well, hell I'll even trade anything from my own collection for it!He already posted it here... |
| boy of destiny 12.04.2005 20:03 |
HOLY CRAP!!! Before you do can someone PLEASE teach me to download? |
| wwotr 13.04.2005 00:10 |
I'm a newbie to the list. Is there anyway of trading with you directly for CD-R's? Roger wwotr@mchsi.com |
| Jay Mantis 13.04.2005 01:52 |
Rev wrote:I know but in the thread he posted it in everybody says the files are fake. And since I've already got Oxford and Birmingham, it would be futile to download the same files again.Jeroentjuh wrote: So you are saying you actually own this concert: link If so I'd want to request that as well, hell I'll even trade anything from my own collection for it!He already posted it here... |
| chemaxxx 13.04.2005 02:19 |
¿you have tue concert o f Madrid 1986??? oh i´m looking for it for a long time!!! are you gonna share it? i think you are going to be my idol!!! thanks thanks thanks!!! you know? i was there and... i need to see it again... thanks!!!! |
| onevsion 13.04.2005 07:04 |
perhaps it's better not to use the mp3 format. There are lossles formats (FLAC, APE) wich are much better i think. But, hey.. i'm not complaining it's just a suggestion.. it's great that you share your collection with us!! |
| Fat Lizzy 13.04.2005 09:23 |
Why would you convert mp3 to flac or ape? The "best possible" quality would be lost anyway then. Besides why uploading 700mb if you can do it in 170mb or something like that, I don't notice the differnce between a flac and a GOOD converted mp3 file. |
| Mcm 13.04.2005 09:34 |
Rev wrote: Why would you convert mp3 to flac or ape? The "best possible" quality would be lost anyway then. Besides why uploading 700mb if you can do it in 170mb or something like that, I don't notice the differnce between a flac and a GOOD converted mp3 file.Me neither. |
| ziggy811 13.04.2005 09:38 |
It's great that you're prepared to share all that Queen material. Thank You!! Whatever you upload is fine by me, but I would suggest sharing the boots with the best sound quality first. |
| death to ming! 13.04.2005 09:51 |
770311 Vancouver, Canada PLEASE! |
| Rick 13.04.2005 09:58 |
Are these mp3-sourced? Otherwise they are crap. Why do you, Rev and KYA, don't understand: Marquee 1972 is FAKE!!! Those are songs from Oxford 1973 (part of the concert, part of the soundcheck). The real recording is in hands of QueenProductions. But go on with fooling people if you guys want to... |
| Live Killer 13.04.2005 13:09 |
houston 77 and marquee 72 would be really great! Do you really have the whole houston gig? |
| Fat Lizzy 13.04.2005 14:03 |
Rick wrote: Are these mp3-sourced? Otherwise they are crap. Why do you, Rev and KYA, don't understand: Marquee 1972 is FAKE!!! Those are songs from Oxford 1973 (part of the concert, part of the soundcheck). The real recording is in hands of QueenProductions. But go on with fooling people if you guys want to...I dont have marquee 72... so dont blame me. |
| Rick 13.04.2005 14:17 |
Rev wrote:It's okay.Rick wrote: Are these mp3-sourced? Otherwise they are crap. Why do you, Rev and KYA, don't understand: Marquee 1972 is FAKE!!! Those are songs from Oxford 1973 (part of the concert, part of the soundcheck). The real recording is in hands of QueenProductions. But go on with fooling people if you guys want to...I dont have marquee 72... so dont blame me. |
| tilomagnet 13.04.2005 14:25 |
It´s really sad to see all those concerts end up here as mp3s. |
| Fat Lizzy 13.04.2005 14:51 |
tilomagnet wrote: It´s really sad to see all those concerts end up here as mp3s.As I said... I don't hear the difference between a flac or ape file and a -GOOD- converted mp3 files... Don't know how your ears are but mine are fine :P |
| onevsion 13.04.2005 19:01 |
tilomagnet wrote: It´s really sad to see all those concerts end up here as mp3s.too damn right! for rev: Convert your recordings (mothertapes or first gen copies) to flac and to mp3 and compare them: you WILL hear the difference! MP3 boots suck. Every bit of quality that can be saved must be saved. Most bootlegs need those tiny pieces of extra quality very very much... but.. hey rev if mp3 is your thing, than that's fine for me. No offence, really! I just don't like mp3. Not for bootlegs anyway. |
| Fat Lizzy 13.04.2005 19:17 |
I compare the flac and mp3 files every single time i convert a flac file, and I'm putting all of my time in editing and making the best conversion possible... I really don't notice the difference then. |
| PisnNapalm 13.04.2005 20:55 |
O..M..G! /me drops his jaw on the floor. |
| The Real Wizard 14.04.2005 00:03 |
If you have a $1000 stereo to compare them on, you'll notice the difference. Of course you won't notice on computer speakers. |
| deleted user 14.04.2005 05:51 |
A lot of people only wants mp3 files, 'cause they think it's easier to handle, then let us (me and Rev) share mp3 files and you that doesn't want mp3-files, don't download it then. You share FLAC we share mp3. OK?? |
| nasty_queenie 14.04.2005 06:26 |
I'd love to hear one of the Australian ones, they would be great :) |
| bigV 14.04.2005 06:42 |
Keep Yourself Alive wrote: A lot of people only wants mp3 files, 'cause they think it's easier to handle, then let us (me and Rev) share mp3 files and you that doesn't want mp3-files, don't download it then. You share FLAC we share mp3. OK??I agree. And with my Internet connection (12 K/sec) it would take me a week to download a FLAC. I'm sticking to mp3's for now. Perhaps Richard should think about splitting the forum into a FLAC section and an mp3 section. V. |
| tilomagnet 14.04.2005 12:01 |
vlad_bg_1999 wrote:Why is it so hard to understand that the quality of these recordings has to be preserved? That you don´t have a proper internet connection to dl flac files that´s your problem. And if some people think the quality of bootlegs was crappy anyway, so there was no need to preserve it, then please stay away from these recordings and listen to your studio albums. These rare recordings should be treasured by us fans, we have to do our best to preserve the quality and to make them available to other fans in the best quality possible. And that are lossless formats and not mp3. If you want to listen to mp3s for yourself, that´s ok of course, but when it comes to sharing/trading lossless formats must be used.Keep Yourself Alive wrote: A lot of people only wants mp3 files, 'cause they think it's easier to handle, then let us (me and Rev) share mp3 files and you that doesn't want mp3-files, don't download it then. You share FLAC we share mp3. OK??I agree. And with my Internet connection (12 K/sec) it would take me a week to download a FLAC. I'm sticking to mp3's for now. Perhaps Richard should think about splitting the forum into a FLAC section and an mp3 section. V. |
| juanvilla 14.04.2005 13:40 |
Hi...so when will you begin to upload these concerts...¿? |
| onevsion 14.04.2005 13:51 |
Keep Yourself Alive wrote: A lot of people only wants mp3 files, 'cause they think it's easier to handle, then let us (me and Rev) share mp3 files and you that doesn't want mp3-files, don't download it then. You share FLAC we share mp3. OK??ok...i don't care. |
| The Real Wizard 15.04.2005 01:31 |
tilomagnet wrote: Why is it so hard to understand that the quality of these recordings has to be preserved? That you don´t have a proper internet connection to dl flac files that´s your problem. And if some people think the quality of bootlegs was crappy anyway, so there was no need to preserve it, then please stay away from these recordings and listen to your studio albums. These rare recordings should be treasured by us fans, we have to do our best to preserve the quality and to make them available to other fans in the best quality possible. And that are lossless formats and not mp3. If you want to listen to mp3s for yourself, that´s ok of course, but when it comes to sharing/trading lossless formats must be used.Excellent post. |
| Saint Jiub 15.04.2005 23:33 |
Mp3 players are common in car stereos and home stereos. There is almost no reason to convert an mp3 file to wave format. There also seams to be an overblown fear that some seedy traders MIGHT try to pass off mp3 files as lossless. I have an idea. Maybe alcohol should be prohibited again (another Prohibition) because of the carnage on the highways caused by drunk drivers. Is that overreacting? Of course it is ... and trading of mp3's should also not be discontinued because there might be a few suspect traders. Besides, a small sample of the traded item can be e-mailed to the worried trader to confirm that the item is lossless and not mp3 sourced. |
| tilomagnet 16.04.2005 01:56 |
Rip Van Winkle wrote: There also seams to be an overblown fear that some seedy traders MIGHT try to pass off mp3 files as lossless.That´s not an overblown fear. I have been trading live music for a long time (I trade other artists as well, not only Queen) and I know there is a serous pollution of mp3 sourced audios in many trading scenes. I guess they come mostly from people who dled shows from p2ps, then reconverted them and put them in trading pool. Besides, a small sample of the traded item can be e-mailed to the worried trader to confirm that the item is lossless and not mp3 sourced.That´s not the problem IMO. If a show is mp3 sourced that´s very easy to find out, just open the file in a spectrum analyzer. People who have an mp3 sourced show should mark them as such or stop trading them. |
| alwaysfade 16.04.2005 02:22 |
please one of these, i search some magic tours from ages... thank you in advance: 860607 Stockholm, Sweden 860611 Leiden, Holland 860612 Leiden, Holland 860614 Paris, France 860617 Brussels, Belgium 860626 Berlin, Germany 860629 Munich, Germany 860705 Slane, County Meath, Ireland 860719 Cologne, Germany 860721 Vienna, Austria 860722 Vienna, Austria 860803 Madrid, Spain 860809 Stevenage, UK |
| bitesthedust 16.04.2005 14:36 |
760918 London, UK 860607 Stockholm, Sweden would be my suggestions... |
| Saint Jiub 16.04.2005 18:21 |
tilomagnet wrote:You are suggesting throwing the baby out with the bathwater. You are blaming all dl'ers for the pollution problem when it is really caused by a few seedy traders. Why should all the dl'ers be forced to use flac if all they really want is mp3.Rip Van Winkle wrote: There also seams to be an overblown fear that some seedy traders MIGHT try to pass off mp3 files as lossless.That´s not an overblown fear. I have been trading live music for a long time (I trade other artists as well, not only Queen) and I know there is a serous pollution of mp3 sourced audios in many trading scenes. I guess they come mostly from people who dled shows from p2ps, then reconverted them and put them in trading pool.Besides, a small sample of the traded item can be e-mailed to the worried trader to confirm that the item is lossless and not mp3 sourced.That´s not the problem IMO. If a show is mp3 sourced that´s very easy to find out, just open the file in a spectrum analyzer. People who have an mp3 sourced show should mark them as such or stop trading them. You indicated you can use a spectrum analyzer to detect mp3 sourced material. Perhaps the serious traders should use the spectrum analyzer on e-mailed samples before a trade is made. Repeat offenders who repeatedly try to pass off mp3 sourced material as lossless can then be blacklisted by the trading community. This should help clean up some of the pollution and eliminate many of the trading weasels. This way everybody wins, and the common mp3 downloader is not punished. |
| deleted user 16.04.2005 18:39 |
well said! |
| alexnvl 22.12.2007 19:10 |
Upload everything you've got from Sweden, I beg you! |
| pompon67 23.12.2007 02:08 |
810218 Tokyo, Japan <-- upload this :) |