I sent him a few emails before.
Of course what he replied I already knew, and he added no new information whatsoever that I needed to know.
I would give you his email addy, but I'm not gonna post it on a forum, as I figure he had enough hell of having to deal with the questions at QOL.
Jesus! Greg's email was posted several time on the Internet, incl. front page of queenworld.com (I think), I would be surprised if google returned zero results.
Well, with the current circumstances, I think he would rather his e-mail not be posted, as I'm thinking he may not want to have dumbasses here e-mailing him the same stupid questions that appeared on the old Q&A section of QOL.
But that's just me thinking
No- he definitely prefers ass kissing...
I think I even have his mail address (never used) which means simply- it's not so rare or difficult to find... For f**k's sake, dark- stop making a twat of yourself, it's nothing THAT special, not worth it...
He CHOSE to answer the dumbass questions... it would seem he doesn't have the authority to comment on what he did for QP. I'm sure he got many questions regarding the archives but simply didn't answer them. If he's posted his address online before, it is rather childish not to forward it on to someone or direct them to it.
Negative Creep: "He CHOSE to answer the dumbass questions... it would seem he doesn't have the AUTHORITY to comment on what he did for QP. I'm sure he got many questions regarding the archives but simply didn't answer them."
Your comment regarding authority is a very valid and well made point. However, this is the SAME person who e-mailed Dark an MP3 copy of the (still) unreleased BBC version of "March Of The Black Queen"). So where did the AUTHORITY for THAT come from?
Greg is in a very priviledged position, and I would love for him to reply to this mail (or any other internet forum) and provide some SERIOUS insight into some new and meaningful discussion, rather than the inane banter which even "Queenonline" have become fed up with.
Greg's Q & A link
Surely answering a couple of interesting questions from time to time is not as "serious a breech of confidentiality" as passing unreleased tracks over the internet?
We all know that if Greg WANTED to engage seriously with other fans - he could.
Even if he REFUSED to engage with other fans - I would still find that position respectful.
However; (and I make no bones about it - this is where we do cross swords) the sad thing is the way HOW he flippantly enagages with other fans which gets my heckles up.
(Hey, at least I am honest!)
sorry for this.
trust me I dont intend to ask him a stupid question,anyone who has read my posts on queenzone will understand that. I apologise for causing any "tiff" between qz members...but I know half the time you dont need a reason;)