well im not one for judging straight away but ive been following jacko's case for a while and watched some shocking documenterys here in the uk,
read the jordy chandler statements etc which were shocking, and listened to people for and against, and imo i think he's guilty as hell, when you here some say "oh he's innocent because his music is great or whatever" nobodys judging his 9 to 5 job as it were but his private life behind closed doors! and im not anti-jacko b/c i loved his stuff from the 80's, you never see jacko wi little girls tho always boys of a certain age and colouring soon as they reach puberty there gone and he has a new little friend....
oj just frightens me lol...
HE is not as innocent as he claims, but not as guilty as the idiot prosecutor, who has had a literal hard-on for jackson since the '93 case, makes him to be.
Never a true word said 'flash'.....
MJ was and probaly renouned (did i spell that right) for his singing and dancing which leads me to think can people with this power get away with what ever they want (if found innocent of course)?
I was reading up on this case when i came across the latest were the prosecution gave video footage of jacksons home ...
In a one-hour excerpt from some 15 hours of video, sheriff's detectives trudged ahead of a videographer as they opened doors on scenes from Jackson's life behind the gates of his Tudor-style mansion with its dark wood paneling and glittery chandeliers.
The detectives from the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Department swept into the entertainer's "toy room," where his children often played with life-sized "Star Wars" figures and a larger-than-life Superman figure.
Also videotaped was Jackson's wine cellar, business office and the "classroom," with its child-sized desks, where he had his children home-schooled.
this deeply scares me to think of what goes on in his head.
well i think jacko did have that power you mention but that was years ago thats what got him off the hook the 1st time, but now its a diffo matter jacko is really worried this time, california has changed the law so he cant pay any kid off so they wont testify against him, you know the police know a hell of lot more than we the public know about jacko and i dont think for one minute they would publicly put there head on the block if they thought he was innocent, i mean jacko has a book of naked kids but not sexual and cops(i mean experts in peod'os) who have busted peodo's over the years said they found the same book in loads of there homes and it was considered child erotica, i wonder what mine and your neighbours would think if we owned such a book? cant he own a book with children fully clothed? and yea if it were a non famous guy he'd be doin 10yrs now!
I am undecided as to whether he is actually guilty or not at this point HOWEVER unfortunately I don't think MJ is normal and as a parent myself I don't think he should be raising those children - they won't turn out normal either. In fact I saw on the news last night that his two older children are on the defence witness list - I mean what sort of parent would subject their children to that??