I can't help but not really care. I suppose I'm happy for him for finally getting what he wanted but I don't think it'll be worth all the ridiculous amounts of media attention it's bound to get.
Big Spender wrote: I'm afraid more replies of 'boring' will come, hmm...it can't be helpd?
helped? do you really think this are interesting news?
Personally it doesn't matter he will marry anyone, but I saw some news reporting various reactions about it of overseas. So I'm interested in people's reactions and what people think about him...
Big Spender wrote: Recently Prince Charles married Camilla after all.
So what do you think of that? Do you think this news is boring or interesting?
They aren't married yet, it was just a preparation for the wedding day itself.To answer your question i think it's boring news, the wedding will be on the uk tv channels and all over the papers. I wont be looking at both.
Same here. What really gets me is that us tax payers will have to fork out for these two f**kers' wedding. Cant stand the Royal Family. There is only one true Queen....
Big Spender wrote: Recently Prince Charles married Camilla after all.
So what do you think of that? Do you think this news is boring or interesting?
They aren't married yet, it was just a preparation for the wedding day itself.To answer your question i think it's boring news, the wedding will be on the uk tv channels and all over the papers. I wont be looking at both.
Big Spender wrote: Recently Prince Charles married Camilla after all.
So what do you think of that? Do you think this news is boring or interesting?
They aren't married yet, it was just a preparation for the wedding day itself.To answer your question i think it's boring news, the wedding will be on the uk tv channels and all over the papers. I wont be looking at both.
Same here. What really gets me is that us tax payers will have to fork out for these two f**kers' wedding. Cant stand the Royal Family. There is only one true Queen....
Do you realise that the Royal Family is estimated to generate far more income through tourism than it costs the taxpayer to subsidise them (and lets not forget that the Queen pays millions in Income Tax personally).
I for one get fed up with seeing this great country's traditions and institutions diluted and eroded through petty jealousy and political correctness.
Anyway, that's my Monday morning rant out of the way !
deleted user 14.02.2005 10:07
Teo_torriate04 wrote:
Do you realise that the Royal Family is estimated to generate far more income through tourism than it costs the taxpayer to subsidise them (and lets not forget that the Queen pays millions in Income Tax personally).
If thats the case then let the tourists pay for their wedding then.
Barry_UK wrote: If he(charles)hadn't been messing about with bootface, Princess Di would of probably still been here.Me myself personally if the wedding cars were to pass my house i'd close the curtains.
c'mon Barry - a very poor attitude! i'm all for the wedding - providing they give us a day off work to celebrate it.
they should bring back that puppet show with the ugly royal characters...and make one for camilla!
I think the royal family is a waste...really, they're just a bunch of rich aristocrats...not really serving a purpose. As for tourism, if they royal family went away, all the beautiful castles would still be there...so i dont think that tourism would suffer...it would prolly improve...because we could fully open up all the castles up for total public viewing.
I think everyone in general has "gone off" the royalty after all the scandals in the last twenty years. I don't think Charles is quite right in the head either - I think the crown should pass directly over his head and placed on William's. Mind you, scandals and outrageous behaviour has always been prominent in royalty, its just that due to the paparazzi that we know what the current royalty are up to all the time.
I think that Prince Frederik and Princess Mary (hey she's a good Aussie girl!) are more genuine and regal than Charles and Camilla.