| Zizzu 12.12.2004 18:22 |
It's talking a lot about P.Rodgers but... what's the name of the bassist of the "new" Queen? and also, they have got some second-guitarist and keyboardman? In other words, how it's composed the group? |
| John S Stuart 12.12.2004 18:24 |
Not John Entwistle. |
| Serry... 12.12.2004 18:30 |
Neil Murray and Spike Edney, I suppose... And Jaime Moises... And back-vocal girls... And Justin Shirley-Smith would mix the live sounds... And maybe some guys from local WWRY cast... |
| Whatinthewhatthe? 12.12.2004 18:59 |
Paul McCartney guest-starring? Naah -- he's got enough money to start another country! |
| deleted user 12.12.2004 19:01 |
|
| Whatinthewhatthe? 12.12.2004 19:06 |
Ooh, please let Geddy Lee make a guest appearance! (He and Roger could trade sunglasses!!) |
| Lester Burnham 12.12.2004 19:42 |
Philipp Nothaft wrote: Pino Palladino is most likely going to play bass, not Neil Murray.I wouldn't be too sure about that. Rumor has it that The Who are going on the road next year, and Palladino is The Who's choice of bassist for now. Unless you've heard something I haven't, of course... And why not John Entwistle, John? ;) |
| deleted user 12.12.2004 19:45 |
Only rumours, as well. I simply thought it was likely though, because he did the HOF-gig with them. |
| Serry... 12.12.2004 19:54 |
Lester Burnham wrote:It's a little bit hard to play on tour if you're dead...Philipp Nothaft wrote: Pino Palladino is most likely going to play bass, not Neil Murray.And why not John Entwistle, John? ;) |
| Lester Burnham 12.12.2004 20:20 |
Hence the ";)". |
| Brian_Mays_Wig 12.12.2004 20:37 |
I heard it was Pino too. |
| iGSM 12.12.2004 21:51 |
Ox would rox. |
| The Real Wizard 12.12.2004 23:38 |
Lester Burnham wrote: And why not John Entwistle, John? ;)Cuz he's busy touring with Hendrix. In fact, my grandpa saw them last night, and he said they were awesome. |
| Lester Burnham 12.12.2004 23:40 |
Is that with Moon or Bonham on drums? |
| deleted user 13.12.2004 05:07 |
There is no new Queen bass-player. Because Queen is dead since 1991. And Brian + Roger would probably never have made it without meeting Freddie in 1970 |
| Borhap80 13.12.2004 05:17 |
Gail Ann Dorsey maybe ??? |
| deleted user 13.12.2004 07:01 |
Oh, the teenager is replying again .... use your language properly! |
| Lisser 13.12.2004 09:42 |
<b><font color=red>HeM Gordon</b></font> wrote:Geez Hem..calm down. Everyone on this notice board is entitled to their opinions without being cursed at by you. You are really showing your immaturity by using such horrible language ecspecially at your age. The language and attitude you are using shouldn't be used by anyone of any age really. There are more effective ways of disagreeing with someone other than telling them to fuck off in every thread.Peter Cetera wrote: Oh, the teenager is replying again .... use your language properly!Neeh... Hang yourself, doc. |
| deleted user 13.12.2004 10:22 |
All the fun we have ............... |
| Lisser 13.12.2004 12:47 |
<b><font color=red>HeM Gordon</b></font> wrote:Turd boy may not be very mature but I'm trying to speak a language here you might understand young man, I am entitled to refer to you as young man right? Bc I am so old??Lisser wrote:"Oh, the teenager is replying again ...." does not sound realy mature... Like "You still are a turd boy".<b><font color=red>HeM Gordon</b></font> wrote:Geez Hem..calm down. Everyone on this notice board is entitled to their opinions without being cursed at by you. You are really showing your immaturity by using such horrible language ecspecially at your age. The language and attitude you are using shouldn't be used by anyone of any age really. There are more effective ways of disagreeing with someone other than telling them to fuck off in every thread.Peter Cetera wrote: Oh, the teenager is replying again .... use your language properly!Neeh... Hang yourself, doc. Telling someone to fuck off in every thread you post in bc you don't share their opinion is not an effective means of communication nor does it add to any interesting representation of your opinions on Queen brought up on this topic (run on sentence). We are all on this notice board to display our opinons and knowledge of Queen. Is that why you are here? Turd boy is my nicest way to tell you that you are being a shit. I know English is not your first language but if you go back and read your posts you might think a little more before you post such crap and offensive things. You don't add much of anything interesting on this board in my opinion, but I am an old bat so what does my opinion matter to you. Like I said if you don't agree with something someone posts on here, fine..express yourself but might I suggest something other that fuck off if you want people on this board to take you serious and not treat you like the 4 yr old you act like. Ahem. |
| gabriel79 13.12.2004 13:14 |
sting |
| dennis 15767 13.12.2004 15:27 |
<b><font color=red>HeM Gordon</b></font> wrote:Rafael, calm down, Ying-Yang, think of beautful things: "Sunn, sea, mountains,beautiful women"Peter Cetera wrote: Oh, the teenager is replying again .... use your language properly!Neeh... Hang yourself, doc. Calm down Rafael, your a very nice lad but you should respect her (and since I agree her, also mine) oppinion. I respect it that you are not a very big John fan, come on. It's not right, playing with the half of Queen is one thing, but trying to replace the half of Queen is another. |
| Serry... 13.12.2004 17:56 |
<font color=black>HeM - The Hero wrote:Are you 'bad tempored blondie'?Lisser wrote:"Oh, the teenager is replying again ...." does not sound realy mature... Like "You still are a turd boy".<b><font color=red>HeM Gordon</b></font> wrote:Geez Hem..calm down. Everyone on this notice board is entitled to their opinions without being cursed at by you. You are really showing your immaturity by using such horrible language ecspecially at your age. The language and attitude you are using shouldn't be used by anyone of any age really. There are more effective ways of disagreeing with someone other than telling them to fuck off in every thread.Peter Cetera wrote: Oh, the teenager is replying again .... use your language properly!Neeh... Hang yourself, doc. |
| mike hunt 13.12.2004 18:14 |
i'm praying for MR. Deacon to show his face for this tour. |
| NOTWMEDDLE 13.12.2004 18:21 |
Thomas Tønnesen wrote: Gail Ann Dorsey maybe ???She will be back with David Bowie shortly. I pray the bass player will be Greg Lake or Guy Pratt. Guy would work well. Gail Ann Dorsey sucks as a bass player(she I hear is in the studio with David Bowie on his next record now). |
| Want To Live Forever 13.12.2004 18:24 |
ask Brian... Neil Murray, Spike and Myriam |
| Serry... 13.12.2004 18:44 |
"We're gonna stay together untill we fucking well die..." Fred, 1986 |
| deleted user 13.12.2004 18:52 |
It's so clear that Freddie, Roger, Brian and John often said that Queen was only alive with its four original members .... but some fans seem to ignore all these talk still. |
| mike hunt 13.12.2004 19:05 |
brian never said they would never work as queen again, he said queen will never be as we new it, paul will never take freds place, it's queen + paul rodgers, like how it was queen + david bowie or queen + goerge michael, their not in queen, their just working with them, there's a difference. |
| Serry... 13.12.2004 19:13 |
Difference is that Bowie worked with four members of Queen, George with three, and Paul would work with two... I can imagine how in 2008 John Deacon would play with his 6 kids under 'Queen' name then... |
| mike hunt 13.12.2004 19:26 |
the bottom line for me is, john is a big part of this, if he doesn't return i might have to agree with some of the critics. |
| Daburcor? 14.12.2004 04:28 |
Sir GH<br><font size=1>ah yeah</font> wrote:Dude! MY grandpa was at that show too! Small world, Eh? ;)Lester Burnham wrote: And why not John Entwistle, John? ;)Cuz he's busy touring with Hendrix. In fact, my grandpa saw them last night, and he said they were awesome. |
| Benn 14.12.2004 09:55 |
It's unlikely to be Pino Palladind, because, if recording goes well for The Who this week and they can formulate some good new material, they will be touring in the Spring and Pino is contracted to them. Having just had a tribute from Pete Townshend on his receipt of an award at the weekend, he's unlikely to try to buy himself out of the contarct either. My favourite would be Andy Fraser. That would then make 50% Queen and 50% Free - the set will not be exclusively Queen and to lend it a shred of credibility, having another member of Free woudl balance things out. Sad fact is that we will have to put up with 3 or 4 backing singers, the hopeless Jamie Moses and the hapless Spike Edney - as opposed to Brian, Roger, Paul and A N Other bass player |
| Want To Live Forever 14.12.2004 14:13 |
mike hunt wrote: brian never said they would never work as queen again, he said queen will never be as we new it, paul will never take freds place, it's queen + paul rodgers, like how it was queen + david bowie or queen + goerge michael, their not in queen, their just working with them, there's a difference.I'll tell you what the difference is. Queen + George michael was: Brian May Roger Taylor JOHN DEACON! and George Michael There's a bunch of people asking if they can use Queen's name WITHOUT John. I guess we all agree if brian roger and john were on tour wit P.Rodgers to use the name Queen The Difference is that John is NOT on tour with them as in every Queen + Somebody |
| the oppositionist 14.12.2004 15:35 |
Part of me still begs John each night to wake up and smell the money and come back one last time... |
| JDL2nd 14.12.2004 17:07 |
I think John Deacon is replaceable. I think he was a great bassplayer but he didn't show everything he got. His playing was far too simple. I hope for a new great bassplayer with more volume. Conclusion : I don't miss him |
| 7Innuendo7 14.12.2004 17:46 |
Thomas T, great idea -- Gail Dorsey rocks! |
| AllDeadAllDead 14.12.2004 18:34 |
i doubt john needs much more money, considering he penned the groups only number 1 hit in the US. i have to agree with the pessimists here. queen without freddie, well, that's too bad, but there is no getting around it. without john, when john is alive, thats just not queen in my opinion. you’ve heard them say it in a million ways a million times, one of their greatest strengths as a group was that they were the original lineup (save for some small period in the beginning stages). during the tribute concert brian emphatically stated there is no queen without freddie, and i held that statement with the utmost respect. |
| deleted user 14.12.2004 19:07 |
AOBTD wasn't their only no.1 in the States. CLTCL went to no.1 as well. |
| Brian_Mays_Wig 14.12.2004 19:17 |
the oppositionist wrote: Part of me still begs John each night to wake up and smell the money and come back one last time...yep. |
| Brianmay1975 15.12.2004 07:28 |
The Artist Formerly Known As Dan Corson wrote:Did they have Freddie on vocals? I can't believe Freddie would miss the opportunity to tour with Jimi Hendrix! :)Sir GH<br><font size=1>ah yeah</font> wrote:Dude! MY grandpa was at that show too! Small world, Eh? ;)Lester Burnham wrote: And why not John Entwistle, John? ;)Cuz he's busy touring with Hendrix. In fact, my grandpa saw them last night, and he said they were awesome. |
| Queenman!! 15.12.2004 07:56 |
For every gig Brian and Roger take part of, John gets a part of it I believe. So.... earn money for doing nothing! Also for every DVD Queen sells, John strikes some bucks or pounds. |
| The Mir@cle 15.12.2004 08:18 |
John's not interested in money, neither are Brian and Rog.... |
| Benn 15.12.2004 11:52 |
Roger, Brian and john not interested in money? So that would account for them putting on a musical that is netting them a nice hefty cash balance at the bank every month and allowing the use of material like WWRY for the Pepsi ad and the re-issueing of the back catalogue every christmas? Of course they are interested in money - they live lifestyles that demand their attention to money. The houses they live in and the cars they drive; the people they employ and the families they support. I never fail to be amazed by Queen fans you know - it's the only band that have people behind them that believe their heroes can do absolutely no wrong and that the love of the music is their only motivator. Professional people at this level are greedy buy nature, simply because in order to maintain their standard of living, they have to continue to make the kind of money that keeps them there. |
| BentRabbit 15.12.2004 16:24 |
MourningElektra wrote: Ooh, please let Geddy Lee make a guest appearance! (He and Roger could trade sunglasses!!)hahahahahahahaha *snort* hahahahahahaha THAT ws funny |
| The Real Wizard 07.02.2005 23:43 |
Benn wrote: Roger, Brian and john not interested in money? So that would account for them putting on a musical that is netting them a nice hefty cash balance at the bank every month and allowing the use of material like WWRY for the Pepsi ad and the re-issueing of the back catalogue every christmas? Of course they are interested in money - they live lifestyles that demand their attention to money. The houses they live in and the cars they drive; the people they employ and the families they support. I never fail to be amazed by Queen fans you know - it's the only band that have people behind them that believe their heroes can do absolutely no wrong and that the love of the music is their only motivator. Professional people at this level are greedy buy nature, simply because in order to maintain their standard of living, they have to continue to make the kind of money that keeps them there.When you're talking to a bunch of teenagers, they're not going to understand this even remotely. Good post. |
| Serry... 08.02.2005 08:22 |
Benn wrote: Roger, Brian and john not interested in money? So that would account for them putting on a musical that is netting them a nice hefty cash balance at the bank every month and allowing the use of material like WWRY for the Pepsi ad and the re-issueing of the back catalogue every christmas? Of course they are interested in money - they live lifestyles that demand their attention to money. The houses they live in and the cars they drive; the people they employ and the families they support. I never fail to be amazed by Queen fans you know - it's the only band that have people behind them that believe their heroes can do absolutely no wrong and that the love of the music is their only motivator. Professional people at this level are greedy buy nature, simply because in order to maintain their standard of living, they have to continue to make the kind of money that keeps them there.So what? You're right, but I can't understand reasons of such posts! It's like say - "the sun is shining, night is dark etc. etc. etc.". Don't think about other Queen fans like they're naive fools! |