| PrincesofTheUniverse 21.09.2004 06:27 |
Tracklisting, art work & bonus info available on QOL now. link |
| agneepath! 11994 21.09.2004 07:00 |
Thanks for the link.... not too sure what to make of the cover of the DVD... still deciding if I like it or not. |
| PrincesofTheUniverse 21.09.2004 07:01 |
Drs Daja..I may be a newbie, but I won't ask dumbass questions that have been asked a thousand times, and questions where the answers can be found with a quick search of Google. Too much of that, and I can understand why people get a little miffed with newbies (though some of the abuse is a little strong!) I'll only post if I feel I can share info that may be of interest to others or if I have a valid point/contribution to make. That is my pledge to the good people of QueenZone! :o) |
| agneepath! 11994 21.09.2004 07:33 |
Ignore Drs daja... he s obssessed with newbies... he tends to forget that he himself hasn't been here long... |
| the-rock 4283 21.09.2004 08:43 |
Looks nice! Looking forward to it! ---- joined queenzone in december 2001! |
| Penis - Vagina 21.09.2004 09:15 |
Oh dear. The cover is awful. Good shot of Freddie but not the other guys, and you can't even see Roger. The photoshopping isn't very good.. you can see where the picture blends into the *cough* background colour they've chosen. And worst of all, 'Queen' needs to be by itself or larger than the rest of the title. (to match the previous three titles in the series) It looks like the name of the band is 'Queen On Fire'. God help us. |
| Green Banana 21.09.2004 11:12 |
That's horrible artwork. Could they honestly not find anything better than that? |
| Brian_Mays_Wig 21.09.2004 11:16 |
Green Banana wrote: That's horrible artwork. Could they honestly not find anything better than that?Im sorry, I have to dissagree, I think that looks great. |
| [ Wybren™ ] 21.09.2004 11:49 |
"Extras are to set to include backstage interviews with Freddie, Brian and Roger, a gallery and further concert performances and 'Tour Highlights' from the 1982 Hot Space tour in Japan and Austria." Austria? That's one of the Vienna concerts. I didn't know that show was filmed (I thought some of Frankfurt 82 was planned as bonus). Anyway the artwork looks ok, nothing special. Queen On Fire is a wrong title, it should be "Queen - Live at the Bowl" or "Queen - On Fire At The Bowl". |
| Green Banana 21.09.2004 12:16 |
Brian_Mays_Wig wrote: Im sorry, I have to dissagree, I think that looks great.I just think it's a really bad picture; I see more of the lighting rig than of the band, and that's a poor excuse for blending if ever I saw one. |
| Brianmay1975 21.09.2004 12:17 |
<font color=#6495ED>Cold <font color=#A0522D>Earth wrote: Oh dear. The cover is awful. Good shot of Freddie but not the other guys, and you can't even see Roger. The photoshopping isn't very good.. you can see where the picture blends into the *cough* background colour they've chosen.Yeah, perhaps it's not fair you can't see Roger, but the pic itself is not very bad, Jeffrey... I mean I think it's somehow better than, say, the Live Killers cover: you can't see any of the band members in it! And worst of all, 'Queen' needs to be by itself or larger than the rest of the title. (to match the previous three titles in the series) It looks like the name of the band is 'Queen On Fire'. God help us.Heehee! Indeed... We're greeting the birth of a new band: Queen On Fire. Isn't that a cute name? :) |
| Plengel 21.09.2004 12:20 |
[ Wybren™ ] wrote: "Extras are to set to include backstage interviews with Freddie, Brian and Roger, a gallery and further concert performances and 'Tour Highlights' from the 1982 Hot Space tour in Japan and Austria." Austria? That's one of the Vienna concerts. I didn't know that show was filmedI believe some footage of the 12.5.1982 Concert in Vienna can be seen on the Rare Live VHS. One of my favorite concerts. |
| Mayboy 21.09.2004 15:15 |
Looks great getting excited already :D Im hoping QOL with open a little mini site with tasters on aswell like they they did with the others :) |
| Daburcor? 21.09.2004 15:22 |
I agree! That would be cool! |
| Brian_Mays_Wig 21.09.2004 15:22 |
PrincesofTheUniverse wrote: Drs Daja..I may be a newbie, but I won't ask dumbass questions that have been asked a thousand times, and questions where the answers can be found with a quick search of Google. Too much of that, and I can understand why people get a little miffed with newbies (though some of the abuse is a little strong!) I'll only post if I feel I can share info that may be of interest to others or if I have a valid point/contribution to make. That is my pledge to the good people of QueenZone! :o)This is exactly what QZ needs, welcome. *likes this guy already* |
| deleted user 21.09.2004 15:26 |
if that is the original, then what is this? link anybody care to shed some light on this? |
| Penis - Vagina 21.09.2004 15:55 |
That's a DVD-R. For very little money, you can get a DVD burner or recorder, a labeler and create these wonderful little DVDs to sell on Ebay. Amazing isn't it? |
| Adam Baboolal 21.09.2004 15:56 |
link Nice cover. It's not that bad. Anyway, can't wait to see and hear it. Roll on November... And yeah, it's a lot nicer looking than LK! Peace, Adam. |
| deleted user 21.09.2004 16:34 |
anything is possible... |
| musicalprostitute 21.09.2004 18:01 |
I like the cover, although it could be better. |
| Penis - Vagina 21.09.2004 18:15 |
I'm shocked that anyone likes the cover, but I'll buy it anyway :-P And I forgot to welcome Princes of the Universe to the forum. I like what you wrote :) |
| The Real Wizard 22.09.2004 02:59 |
<font color=#6495ED>Cold <font color=#A0522D>Earth wrote: And I forgot to welcome Princes of the Universe to the forum. I like what you wrote :)Yeah, I'll definitely second that! We need more members like this one, and less childish newbies. |
| Wiley 22.09.2004 03:01 |
I hated this new cover at first sight but I think it'll grow on me. The second and third time I saw it, it didn't look so crappy. A great picture of Freddie but I think that it makes no justice to the other band members. The style and the way it blends (or it should) doesn't look very good but I think the concept is good. Maybe a better band shot would've been better. Something like the one used to promote GH3 in the old QueenOnline site where Freedie seems to be jumping from the drumkit to the front of the stage. Such an energic shot! Does anyone know which one I'm talking about??? And... Just wanted to say that I like the cover of the Live Killers album!!... well, the picture used there, I don't really like the black bar on top and the way the name of the album is written. I think the band look mysteriously interesting, you can't really tell who they are but the cover is a classic in the Queen catalog. A million times better than the one for The Works, IMO. Sincerely, Wiley |
| onevsion 22.09.2004 03:52 |
<font color=#6495ED>Cold <font color=#A0522D>Earth wrote: Oh dear. The cover is awful. Good shot of Freddie but not the other guys, and you can't even see Roger. The photoshopping isn't very good.. you can see where the picture blends into the *cough* background colour they've chosen. And worst of all, 'Queen' needs to be by itself or larger than the rest of the title. (to match the previous three titles in the series) It looks like the name of the band is 'Queen On Fire'. God help us.My thougts about the cover artwork were almost exactely the same... bad photoshopping..The blending is ugly..also an ugly title and a not so nice shot of the band... But the content of the dvd is wonderful! |
| Shadysenator RHYE 22.09.2004 07:58 |
Wiley : I know which photo your talking about, fred jumps of the druk kit whith his hands spread I do love that photo... QUEEN ON FIRE ?? Hmmmmm.................. No!!! No !! No!! QUEEN "on fire at the Bowl" |
| KevMull 22.09.2004 10:56 |
Still not letting on what AR it's in. Anybody know? |
| Rick 22.09.2004 11:08 |
For some pictures of the DVD, check this: link Then, click on 'here' for the pictures, enjoy it! I think it's damn good quality! |
| PrincesofTheUniverse 22.09.2004 11:09 |
Cheers Rick - great pics!! :o) |
| KevMull 22.09.2004 11:45 |
"I think it's damn good quality!" That's cos they're PHOTOGRAPHS from the Gallery and not 'DVD stills' taken from the recording the B&W one is the giveaway) Even the square shape doesn't look 4:3, more 1:1 |
| Roger_in_Tigerskin_Trousers 22.09.2004 12:12 |
That truly is horrible artwork Brian looks fat John looks like an escaped mental patient Freddie looks bored and Roger is nowhere to be seen! |
| deleted user 22.09.2004 13:11 |
Roger_in_Tigerskin_Trousers wrote: That truly is horrible artwork Brian looks fat John looks like an escaped mental patient Freddie looks bored and Roger is nowhere to be seen!Nobody is forcing you to buy it, you fucking piece of scum! Shut your piehole or i'll cut off your dick and stick it there, understand? |
| agneepath! 11994 22.09.2004 13:30 |
donbosco_03 wrote:so, no one is allowed to express an opinion anymore?Roger_in_Tigerskin_Trousers wrote: That truly is horrible artwork Brian looks fat John looks like an escaped mental patient Freddie looks bored and Roger is nowhere to be seen!Nobody is forcing you to buy it, you fucking piece of scum! Shut your piehole or i'll cut off your dick and stick it there, understand? |
| deleted user 23.09.2004 00:59 |
Agneepath! wrote:I just did!donbosco_03 wrote:so, no one is allowed to express an opinion anymore?Roger_in_Tigerskin_Trousers wrote: That truly is horrible artwork Brian looks fat John looks like an escaped mental patient Freddie looks bored and Roger is nowhere to be seen!Nobody is forcing you to buy it, you fucking piece of scum! Shut your piehole or i'll cut off your dick and stick it there, understand? |
| [StArMaN] 23.09.2004 06:55 |
what's wrong being an escaped mental patient, fat, bored and invisible ? |
| brENsKi 23.09.2004 07:39 |
at least the "ebay" boot dvd used the correct typeface for the cover the "on fire" dvd cover - if this is the finished article uses a font from a later album and tour - they should be ashamed....anyhow...what's the point in rehashing product that's been on tv dozens of times? |
| Adam Baboolal 23.09.2004 09:21 |
Brenski, it's UNCUT. The full concert. One that many really like. That's why it's being released. Peace, Adam. |
| the-rock 4283 23.09.2004 09:28 |
it hasn't been on tv in germany as far as i know. so i am actually looking forward to it. following the argumentation of "using the wron fonts" they made a mistake there too.. btw: did you ever hear of continuity? hey wake up! were gonna get a brand new live-dvd! and there's talking like it is a collaboration with god-knows-who... : |
| KevMull 23.09.2004 10:44 |
<font color ="green">brenski wrote: at least the "ebay" boot dvd used the correct typeface for the cover the "on fire" dvd cover - if this is the finished article uses a font from a later album and tour - they should be ashamed....anyhow...what's the point in rehashing product that's been on tv dozens of times?OH DEAR! You obviously missed the uniform style and typeface of the previous DVD covers then and you've never seen the diff in pic quality of legit DVDs and crappy, artefacty DTV esp VH1 or superb DTS 5.1 sound or UNCUT...What more do you want?? |
| [ Wybren™ ] 23.09.2004 14:38 |
Source BrianMay.com: " **Thu 23 Sep 04** QUEEN ON FIRE AT THE BOWL PRESS RELEASE Queen On Fire Live At The Bowl Hot Space Tour ‘82 New Live DVD – CD from Queen EMI/Parlophone. Release 25 October 2004 “We hadn’t seen the footage for years, but when we looked at it we couldn’t believe how good it was, we were on fire”. Roger Taylor talking about the band’s 1982 concert at M K Bowl which is released in its full version for the first time – on DVD and CD, October 25. Says Brian May: “This is the first time the Milton Keynes night has been shown in its entirety, and I have to say we all get a kick out of it – all the more amazing because we came off stage that night thinking we hadn’t done ourselves justice!!! I’m proud to say It Rocks!!” By 1982 Queen were at a peak in terms of touring and recording. They were coming off the back of two of their biggest singles – Another One Bites The Dust and Under Pressure – and by now they were playing more than 60 sell-out concerts a year in the biggest stadiums of the world. They were also basking in the glory of having been the first foreign band to have toured and conquered Latin America. 1981 had seen the band play football stadiums throughout Argentina and Brazil, including two sell-out concerts at Sao Paulo’s historic Morumbi Stadium. Such was the demand on the band to play arenas and stadiums throughout the world that they managed to play only 4 dates in the UK between 1981 – 1983. The M K Bowl concert was one of these and the closest they came to playing London in these 3 years. The date was originally to have been played at Arsenal football ground, but when permission was turned down, the date was switched to the M K Bowl. It is little wonder then that by the time they reached the gig in June 1982 that the Queen touring machine was in prime condition. “We just stormed through that concert,” says Taylor. “I’d forgotten just how tight the band was by then.” “Queen On Fire – Live At The Bowl” is Queen at its electric best, with the band charging through 25 numbers drawn from the biggest hits and best loved live songs – Dragon Attack, Now I’m Here, Tie Your Mother Down, Sheer Heart Attack, and two versions of We Will Rock You, including the much sought after ‘fast’ version, altogether 110 minutes of live classics. Filmed by Gavin Taylor, and only ever seen in an edited version on Channel 4’s The Tube, this release has the concert restored to its original full length, amounting to an additional 47 minutes of previously unseen footage. Not released on video, “Queen On Fire – Live At The Bowl”, marks the first time a recording of this concert has been available to own. “I think people will be surprised, as I was, all these years later, how different the show is from the well known Queen Wembley 86 Stadium performance,” says Brian May. “A large percentage of the songs are different… It kicks off with us blasting into “Flash” and gets very hot!” The set holds up very well, and Freddie’s ad-libs are something to behold… the other things I had forgotten was how much freedom we had to stretch and enjoy ourselves on the spur of the moment”. As to be expected from Queen, the release comes only after extensive restoration to the original footage and sound. Audio producers Justin Shirley-Smith and Kris Fredriksson returned to the original 24 track analogue recording and created brand new PCM stereo and DTS 5.1 surround sound mixes. “Unlike the Wembley DVD project, the only mixes available were mono, so we decided to start from scratch,” says Shirley-Smith. “We transferred the entire concert multi-track recordings onto Pro Tools HD. Then we’d listen to each track for any imperfections, distortions or crackles and meticulously remove them. For example, there’s one bit when Brian’s playing piano and it’s very soft – so soft that when we turned it up to the level it needed to be, we just got a load of hiss. Using Pro Tools you can get rid of things like t |
| Penis - Vagina 24.09.2004 00:18 |
When I first saw this press release for the DVD today, I misread and thought it said '3 hours of extras' but it actually said 'With over 3 hours of concert footage and extras'. Anyway, my mistake made me think it might have commentary, and I was thinking that might be fun to hear commentary on a live show. Do you guys think that would be cool, or does it sound like a bad idea? 110 minutes straight of commentary might become boring. I'm not familiar with the MK show, but unless Roger has a bunch of costume changes, he'd have to keep making fun of the same attire over and over. |
| pma 24.09.2004 08:26 |
[ Wybren™ ] wrote: Source BrianMay.com: Audio producers Justin Shirley-Smith and Kris Fredriksson returned to the original 24 track analogue recording and created brand new PCM stereo and DTS 5.1 surround sound mixes. “Unlike the Wembley DVD project, the only mixes available were mono, so we decided to start from scratch,” says Shirley-Smith. “We transferred the entire concert multi-track recordings onto Pro Tools HD. Then we’d listen to each track for any imperfections, distortions or crackles and meticulously remove them. For example, there’s one bit when Brian’s playing piano and it’s very soft – so soft that when we turned it up to the level it needed to be, we just got a load of hiss. Using Pro Tools you can get rid of things like that. The actual mixing, however, was done using vintage analogue.”Phew, relief. Now it's a must buy. I was fearing another Wembley-type upmix. |
| Fenderek 24.09.2004 08:58 |
So there will be CD as well- GREAT!!!! And the extras... Fuckin' hell- I'm proud of them, again!!! Haven't felt that since MIH... |
| KevMull 24.09.2004 09:18 |
They're still keepin hush about the aspect ratio though. Probably don't want to either upset the purists like me and those who like to 'fill the screen' on their WS TVs at this early stage! |
| Roger_in_Tigerskin_Trousers 24.09.2004 11:35 |
the extras seem second rate. We all want more freddie which is good , but no Queen cam to watch john deacon pick his nose! |
| agneepath! 11994 24.09.2004 15:10 |
nice extras but I would have liked a 2004 interview with Brian & roger looking back at that period in queen's history. |
| Penis - Vagina 24.09.2004 19:49 |
Brian's site has the CD cover now.. link LOL.. I love this new name for the group. "Queen On Fire". I can't wait to go into Best Buy and ask for the new DVD by 'Queen On Fire' I hereby suggest we relocate to link |
| Liquid Scream 24.09.2004 21:39 |
As for the multi-camera angles, I read on Brian's site that they don't have multi camera angles because of the recording device they used. The same thing as with Live Aid. So what is on the new DVD is all there is. |
| Michael Allred 01.10.2004 15:01 |
Kevo wrote; "Still not letting on what AR it's in. Anybody know?" I do, Justin Shirley-Smith e-mailed me and said the DVD will be 4:3 (full screen for those that don't know what 4:3 means.) |
| deleted user 01.10.2004 15:35 |
I've got a question: Does the 'Staying Power' footage from the GVH2 DVD camera angles the same as what we are getting on the complete concert? |
| inu-liger 01.10.2004 16:38 |
Yes. It will be in the same angle (or aspect ratio). The one on GVH2 is 4:3. The actual widescreen videos on Disc 1 are in 16:9. |
| The Real Wizard 01.10.2004 22:35 |
Michael Allred wrote: Justin Shirley-Smith e-mailed me and said the DVD will be 4:3Yeeeeeeeeeees! :D donbosco_03 wrote: I've got a question: Does the 'Staying Power' footage from the GVH2 DVD camera angles the same as what we are getting on the complete concert?I believe so. Apparently they don't have each camera angle in its entirety, so what they have is what they have. |
| deleted user 02.10.2004 02:28 |
I just cannot wait! 30 days to go before it is released here! |
| Fenderek 02.10.2004 09:01 |
I'm excited as hell!!!!! |
| KevMull 02.10.2004 10:40 |
Michael Allred wrote: Justin Shirley-Smith e-mailed me and said the DVD will be 4:3 (full screen for those that don't know what 4:3 means.)GREAT NEWS! He e-mailed you! Did he mention anything else? |
| Michael Allred 02.10.2004 15:12 |
Kevo, he didn't mention anything else about the DVD. We just continued our previous discussion about DTS. |
| agneepath! 11994 21.10.2004 16:11 |
Dvd popcorn are now selling it for £11.99 link Don't think we'll find it any cheaper than that. |
| Adam Baboolal 21.10.2004 20:30 |
I saw that price at dvdpopcorn too. Made an order as I remembered it's out on Monday. Get your order in today or tomorrow as they hope to get the dvd out to people for Monday. Peace, Adam. |
| Penis - Vagina 21.10.2004 21:34 |
Brian's site had a blurb today that Australia is gonna be a little late, like the U.S. - November 8th (9th for the U.S.) I'm hoping for something extra at Best Buy like they did for GH: WWRY Edition. |
| Gunpowder Gelatine 22.10.2004 00:07 |
Here are some clips of the DVD. They look great! link |
| Jjeroen 22.10.2004 07:58 |
Got it this morning. What can I say... great and worth the wait! No details, you'll find out for yourselves for it is a must-buy! Back to 'extra's'... ;-) |
| artist_nine 22.10.2004 08:22 |
Also got it today and I must say it sounds pretty good, although I am not very fond of Roger using those electronic drums. I still haven't decided which one I like better, We Will Rock You (Montreal) or Live At The Bowl. For obvious reasons We Will Rock you looks better (I believe it was shot on film as opposed Live At The Bowl was shot on video) and I like the fact that its just the 4 of them and no extra keyboard player, but then again, the Live At The Bowl setlist is more exciting... |
| Kickforce 22.10.2004 10:33 |
I also got it today! But i'm still at work:(...can't wait to go home and watch it! |
| deleted user 22.10.2004 12:50 |
I'm turning green with envy right now. The clips were cool. |
| Giacco 73 23.10.2004 07:52 |
I'm italian and yesterday morning I bought both the DVD and the CD and tooke a day off from work to watch/listen to them! :-) Wonderful concert,sound,images,photos and packaging. But the was one incredible mistake for an official release. On Disc 2,for the Freddie interview in Munich 1982 they spelled it "Intervista a Freddie!" WTF!? |
| Freddie May 23.10.2004 13:35 |
For those who want to see the COMPLETE "Somebody To Love" video, here it is : link |
| Pim Derks 23.10.2004 14:46 |
Bought the DVD yesterday and the CD this afternoon. Wanted to play the CD in my car, but the damn Copy Control thing wouldn't allow me..... |
| Over My Head 24.10.2004 03:12 |
I was at work yesterday, preparing up loads of copies of the DVD and the CD for release tomorrow. Had to resist the urge to pocket one there and then! I really can't wit for this release, Wembley was good but I think this is going to be even better. |
| Giacco 73 24.10.2004 07:27 |
Giacco 73 wrote: I'm italian and yesterday morning I bought both the DVD and the CD and tooke a day off from work to watch/listen to them! :-) Wonderful concert,sound,images,photos and packaging. But the was one incredible mistake for an official release. On Disc 2,for the Freddie interview in Munich 1982 they spelled it "Intervista a Freddie!" WTF!?In addition to what I have already told,during "Fat Bottomed Girls" they overdubbed the line "Ain't no beauty Queens in this locality" where Freddie originally sang a false note. |
| artist_nine 24.10.2004 08:48 |
Really? That's interesting, because on the official Queen page Justin Shirley Smith claims there are no overdubs. link |
| KevMull 24.10.2004 08:53 |
<font color ="steelblue">ThomasQuinn wrote: But what's with these annoying felt-tip lines on the lenses of two cameras?!! The same annoying thing was on the Wembley DVD!ROFL LOL! You mean the 'lens flare/streak' which was commonplace with electronic video cameras and broght lights in the 70s and 80s! 'felt tip marks'...:) |
| Adam Baboolal 24.10.2004 16:29 |
"In addition to what I have already told,during "Fat Bottomed Girls" they overdubbed the line "Ain't no beauty Queens in this locality" where Freddie originally sang a false note." Justin Shirley Smith:"Q27. How many overdubs are there on this release? JSS - No overdubs." Peace, Adam. |
| pma 24.10.2004 16:43 |
So, which is it? People with the dvd, who've heard the bootleg versions. Is the 'this LOOOOOCAlity' bit on FBG fixed ? Or does he still sound like a teenager who's voice just broke for a second. |
| deleted user 24.10.2004 17:00 |
|
| Fireplace 24.10.2004 18:10 |
They most certainly corrected the "locality" bit in Fat Bottomed Girls, but technically speaking Justin may not consider REPLACING something an overdub, as oppsoed to ADDING. That's all semantics, I know, and as far as I can tell it was not the only part they edited. makes me wonder where they got the replacement bit from though. It's very tough to spot on the video that they changed that bit, they did a good job whether you like it or not. |
| deleted user 24.10.2004 18:29 |
What about the old TV version ? Was the "locality"-bit fixed there ? I guess not, because they supposedly mixed it all from the scrath for the DVD, so it should have nothing in common with the Tyne Tees mix. I don't have the TV-version though. Any ideas ? |
| pma 24.10.2004 18:43 |
Fireplace wrote: They most certainly corrected the "locality" bit in Fat Bottomed Girls, but technically speaking Justin may not consider REPLACING something an overdub, as oppsoed to ADDING. That's all semantics, I know, and as far as I can tell it was not the only part they edited. makes me wonder where they got the replacement bit from though. It's very tough to spot on the video that they changed that bit, they did a good job whether you like it or not.Ahah, so it has been 'fixed' Is it surely 'replaced' with another bit off another show, I figure they could have just re-tuned the vocal bit with whatever tools they might use(Celemony Melodyne for example). Then again none of this matters... :-P |
| Libor2 24.10.2004 19:15 |
Pim Derks wrote: Bought the DVD yesterday and the CD this afternoon. Wanted to play the CD in my car, but the damn Copy Control thing wouldn't allow me.....Pim, has CD really some kind of copy control on it ? Which one - Cactus? I had big problem with Cactus some time ago and from that time I don't buy any CD with any CopyControl. Unfortunately, I won't buy this one too :-( I really ask myself, why they do this. Usually it's really no problem to copy it anyway, but almost always it could be the big problem for ordinary people, who bought it. So, after all, the only one punished is the customer who bought it in the end. Sad. |
| Fireplace 24.10.2004 19:42 |
Ahah, so it has been 'fixed' Is it surely 'replaced' with another bit off another show, I figure they could have just re-tuned the vocal bit with whatever tools they might use(Celemony Melodyne for example). Then again none of this matters... :-PBelieve me, the way Freddie royally screwed up the original CANNOT be repaired with any known software in the world! He was, as he himself used to say, "the bigger the better, in everything". That included screwing up :-) All in all the few repairs i've spotted so far (most notably including the Fat Bottomed Girls choruses and intro)have been very well done. They might not do the truth justice, but they sure do the band and the concert justice. I'm still contemplating which one is more important to me. |
| Pim Derks 24.10.2004 20:44 |
Libor - no idea which Copy Control it uses. It doesn't mention anything on the case. |
| Adam Baboolal 24.10.2004 22:04 |
The only thing I can think of is a "donor" from another concert. Of course, then it gets specific as they have to find bits that fit well. But again, they could just manipulate it to fit. It's quite hard to realise exactly what it is they did, other than that. I checked my MK vcd and there is a bad slip on the locality bit. Peace, Adam. |
| pma 25.10.2004 03:17 |
Fireplace wrote:Well, I have to disagree with that. The error on FBG was still very minor and short in proportion and could probably be "covered up" enough with Melodyne etc or similar. IMHO. (admittedly it would be harder than just replacing it)Ahah, so it has been 'fixed' Is it surely 'replaced' with another bit off another show, I figure they could have just re-tuned the vocal bit with whatever tools they might use(Celemony Melodyne for example). Then again none of this matters... :-PBelieve me, the way Freddie royally screwed up the original CANNOT be repaired with any known software in the world! |
