Well, I think that the second one was made to teach young girls with down syndrome how their bodies are changing. They have to keep repeating themselves to clarify everything. I don't think it was intended to be offensive.
SergeantPepperDG wrote: Well, I think that the second one was made to teach young girls with down syndrome how their bodies are changing. They have to keep repeating themselves to clarify everything. I don't think it was intended to be offensive.
But the only reason they need to repeat themselves is because the girl has down syndrome. Therefore, whoever posted this onto a "humour" website is taking advantage of the girl's condition and trying to use it in humourous ways.
When you break a leg and you can't walk to work in a straight line, I'll be sure to laugh at you.
The 'period piece' went way too far. That information could have been given without such graphic demonstrations. You know, a doll or something could be used. I have to admit that the repetitive dialogue was quite amusing though.