QueenZone discussion #351927

The_Witch_King wrote: I think he abused a customer, something like this; could i have a big mac and some fries? no fuck off! The customer complained and Inu Yasha gets fired, he then says he didn't say it or cannot remember.He then brings up his "condition" hence the law-suit that follows. Failing that he got caught with his pecker between a large Sesame Seed topped bun.

iron eagle wrote: another attempt at revising history???

The Buffalo Chicken Conspiracy wrote: - I only make fun of Dark in a loving manner. I believe if someone is goofy, they have to accept the consequences of it.

The Buffalo Chicken Conspiracy wrote: inhumorate someone

For some reason Dark got plenty of congratulations and support. Seems many like treating the legal system as a lottery system.

So, for $500 Canadian, McDonalds doesn't have to admit any wrong doing? This whole topic seems overblown for a 500 dollar settlement.

Inu Yasha wrote:

For some reason Dark got plenty of congratulations and support. Seems many like treating the legal system as a lottery system.

Only thing is, I was not in it for the money, originally. I was in it to get my name cleared, and to get my job back... I will tell you what the result is now, regardless of whether I am supposed to legally keep shut about it or not. The original reason for the complaint I filed against them was that I felt I had been wrongfully dismissed based on a false report by a 'mystery shop customer' (the ones who do the surveys for certain intelligence companies) who I had served. I wanted to get my name cleared, which is not the end result as it is now. I had written about the abuse relating to my condition as part of the letter I had submitted to the Alberta Human Rights Commission that started this whole case, which was a big part but not necessarily the only thing about this case (although my earlier posts may suggest otherwise). And to give you more details about the multitasking bits and more, what I had done in the beginning when I got hired was tell my managers I started out with that I had Asperger's Syndrome and that I would be needing instructions in a simple order rather than in a 'complicated' order, and that I would probably need some help with the orders during peak customer periods. I had a little help for the first while, but then they started getting lazy and stopped giving me help, because they naturally assumed I could do it on my own, which was not true. Eventually, I started becoming stressed out, and had a hard time trying to keep up with customers. Then I was fired after they had read the mystery customer's report online (btw. which is not available to the public - even I don't have access to that report), and they did not even give me a chance to explain what was really the case. I had asked McD's for my job to be re-instated, only at a location in a new where I moved recently (Dec '03), when I was asked by them and by my conciliator for a way I thought we could settle this claim, and they said no. So I did not have much choices for what I wanted to ask of McDonald's in order to settle the claim. I wanted to prove that they were wrong in firing me, and that I deserved some sort of settlement that would be fair to me. So I made a counter-offer to McDonald's for them to give me 2-6 month's worth of pay and a letter of reference for future employers (reason for the letter is that because I had not been allowing people I've been handing in applications to to contact McDonald's for a reference, and I have not had success in even getting calls back for job interviews!), and so they offered me $500 minus taxes and the letter of reference, and so I accepted, and that's what I am getting.

NoOneButYou1975 wrote:

Inu Yasha wrote:

For some reason Dark got plenty of congratulations and support. Seems many like treating the legal system as a lottery system.

Only thing is, I was not in it for the money, originally. I was in it to get my name cleared, and to get my job back... I will tell you what the result is now, regardless of whether I am supposed to legally keep shut about it or not. The original reason for the complaint I filed against them was that I felt I had been wrongfully dismissed based on a false report by a 'mystery shop customer' (the ones who do the surveys for certain intelligence companies) who I had served. I wanted to get my name cleared, which is not the end result as it is now. I had written about the abuse relating to my condition as part of the letter I had submitted to the Alberta Human Rights Commission that started this whole case, which was a big part but not necessarily the only thing about this case (although my earlier posts may suggest otherwise). And to give you more details about the multitasking bits and more, what I had done in the beginning when I got hired was tell my managers I started out with that I had Asperger's Syndrome and that I would be needing instructions in a simple order rather than in a 'complicated' order, and that I would probably need some help with the orders during peak customer periods. I had a little help for the first while, but then they started getting lazy and stopped giving me help, because they naturally assumed I could do it on my own, which was not true. Eventually, I started becoming stressed out, and had a hard time trying to keep up with customers. Then I was fired after they had read the mystery customer's report online (btw. which is not available to the public - even I don't have access to that report), and they did not even give me a chance to explain what was really the case. I had asked McD's for my job to be re-instated, only at a location in a new where I moved recently (Dec '03), when I was asked by them and by my conciliator for a way I thought we could settle this claim, and they said no. So I did not have much choices for what I wanted to ask of McDonald's in order to settle the claim. I wanted to prove that they were wrong in firing me, and that I deserved some sort of settlement that would be fair to me. So I made a counter-offer to McDonald's for them to give me 2-6 month's worth of pay and a letter of reference for future employers (reason for the letter is that because I had not been allowing people I've been handing in applications to to contact McDonald's for a reference, and I have not had success in even getting calls back for job interviews!), and so they offered me $500 minus taxes and the letter of reference, and so I accepted, and that's what I am getting.

you want fries with that isnt too hard to ask :)

If you haven't seen the Mystery Shopper Report (and each McDOnald's & Burger King in this country has each report sent to them, so that they can be celebrated/appealed/learnt from as necessary), how do you know it was false? Furthermore, if this report highlights an inability to perform the job as specified, aren't they correct to discipline you?

On a sort of related note....... How bad must it be to not be able to get it together enough to keep a job at McDonalds?

<font color=000000>Music Man</font> wrote: Oh, man, I love McDonalds. I don't care what they put in there, because from what I can tell, it is a whole lot of delicious with a side of tasty. As for the case, it seems (from his side of the story) that the management was given a clear overview of his situation before he was hired, and thus did hired him with the judgement that he could perform the essential functions of the job in question. I am not familiar with Canadian law, but in America it is illegal for an employer such as McDonalds to discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities in any terms of his employment, such as his firing. Since he was already deemed qualified for the job with his disability, any complications due to this disability should not be grounds for which his employer may fire him.