Here's a better link... link
OK, so there's...
No Pink Floyd, No AC/DC, No Aerosmith, No Metallica, No Billy Joel, No Guns N' Roses
and NO QUEEN!
Even a constant favorite of Rolling Stone like Eric Clapton failed to make the list.
That's about more than enough to tell you why Rolling Stone SUCKS!
deleted user 31.03.2004 21:52
Mr.Jingles79 wrote:
OK, so there's...
No Pink Floyd, No AC/DC, No Aerosmith, No Metallica, No Billy Joel, No Guns N' Roses
and NO QUEEN!
Even a constant favorite of Rolling Stone like Eric Clapton failed to make the list.
Queen should have been on there for sure. No doubt. But you know me Mr. Jingles ;) We are talking about the best of all time. Not those who sucked of all time. Just my opinion, no barbs intended :) Billy Joel should have been there. Any day of the week!
ya know what, i feel i need to start listening to billy joel...i love a wide range of singers/bands/music, but have never listened to billy joela dn loads of you on here love him, so yeh...i'm gonna start listening to billy joel *that is of course when i can go an hour without needing a Queen Song..i'll start then!*
Well everyone knows rolling stone sucks. It has no style.
I much prefer Q or MOJO. Anyone read MOJO's 50 greatest epic rock tracks in this issue, guess what came no.1? alright I'll tell u BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY! As you probably already know, plus included some gorgeous photos. This magazine I like. I wont even go near rolling stone magazine knowing how crap it really is.
I also wrote a letter to the editors. Ooops, I hope I wasn't too rude :P