| Mr.Jingles 01.02.2004 21:29 |
Images can say more than a thousand words, so here you go guys... link link |
| Penis - Vagina 01.02.2004 22:47 |
I didn't see the event, so which was it? It came undone or Justin ripped it off? The captions are a bit conflicting. |
| Mr.Jingles 01.02.2004 22:51 |
Justin ripped it off. My guess is that he was supossed to rip off the vest, and instead the booby popped out. |
| Mr.Jingles 01.02.2004 23:07 |
They already have the file on Kazaa for download. Damn, that was fast. |
| Penis - Vagina 02.02.2004 03:34 |
Must have been rather exciting to witness live ;) I'm guessing from the short, slow-mo Kazaa clip, that it was all an act.. designed to get attention, like that Madonna-?? kiss awhile back. Was that Britney? Shows how much I cared :-P Ooh, here's a new story about it: link Quote: "I am sorry that anyone was offended by the wardrobe malfunction during the halftime performance of the Super Bowl," Timberlake said in a statement. "It was not intentional and is regrettable." LOL - No statement from Janet yet I guess. Strange to see a Jackson being molested.. usually it's the other way around. |
| siljeoen 02.02.2004 05:10 |
.....wellwell.... |
| Penetration_Guru 02.02.2004 05:51 |
Er, if this wasn't part of the show, that means that JJ had a star attached to her nipple AND NO PLANS TO SHOW IT? Riiiight |
| Penis - Vagina 02.02.2004 06:59 |
That's what I was thinking. "wardrobe malfunction" - When you grab an article of clothing and rip part of it off, and it actually rips off. I wonder what else it was supposed to do? ;) |
| sully5059 02.02.2004 07:39 |
"wardrobe malfunction" - the new defence for people who get caught exposing themselves in public. |
| Togg 02.02.2004 08:24 |
Of course she had the star attched but didn't plan to show it, doesn't everyone! |
| Janet 02.02.2004 10:04 |
I don't know why everyone is making such a fuss over it--I've seen more naked boob on the MTV and Grammy awards.... |
| Mr.Jingles 02.02.2004 11:05 |
No one's happier about the Janet Jackson incident than Howard Dean. It seems like now media will be focused on Janet's boobie, instead of Dean's... YYYeeeeeAARGHH!! |
| Hitman 02.02.2004 11:13 |
ahhh....everything was prepared...even the new language "wardrobe malfunction"....fools!!!! |
| Krizzy 02.02.2004 14:37 |
PLEASE!!! Wardrobe malfunction MORE BULL they want the public to swallow...PLEASE!!! Timberlake must think his fans are idiots and if you hear his music you have to admit he's a no-talent twat! Geez he makes me sick...brainless act desperate to shock for free publicity...sickening...really! Did they ever think that kids would be watching...I have a three year old and she asked me questions for two hours I was embarrassed and pissed off at MTV for their utter stupidity! Sorry but that's rant for today. Kriz ;o( |
| Saffron Caribou 02.02.2004 15:49 |
Big deal, its only a boob with a star pastie (or nipple piercing, can't make it out) on it. Geez, we all have nipples for Buddah's sake. Of course this was done on purpose. I don't buy the "wardrobe malfunction" malarkey. It takes a strong hand to rip off a piece of cloth if it was accidental. Look at it this way, this "accident" as far as I see it was a publicity stunt designed to shock, and horrorise the "puritanical" American society. I saw the half show, and it was in very poor taste overall. I think its Justin one upping Britney after the infamous (dont see the big deal) lesbian kiss with Madonna last year. Also Janet's new album is comming out, so this publicity stunt will certainly boost sales. I was watching CNN this morning, and the FCC is already launching an investigation on this boob show. link |
| Saffron Caribou 02.02.2004 15:51 |
Another thing, wardrobe malfunction lol as if the piece of cloth fell from her bustier. LOL |
| Maz 02.02.2004 16:06 |
I would like to thank you all for keeping me abreast of the situation. |
| NoOneButYou1975 02.02.2004 16:41 |
and the FCC is already launching an investigation on this boob show. the people that called Houston Police about a complaint are bigger boobs LOL...but the Houston police wont do anything |
| iron eagle 02.02.2004 17:10 |
wasnt enough to change me either *wink* |
| Mr.Jingles 02.02.2004 17:14 |
Great post Shoujo. Big deal about a 3 year old watching a bare breast, when a couple of years before that same kid was sucking from one of those. |
| deleted user 02.02.2004 17:16 |
LOL Zeni!! |
| Mrs.Taylor 02.02.2004 18:03 |
Hmmmm ... new single coming out. Coincidence? I think not. |
| Daburcor? 02.02.2004 18:15 |
Exactly. |
| Saint Jiub 02.02.2004 21:20 |
Based on all this melodrama, I geuss I am abad dad for letting the kids watch GVH I. |
| Antici...pation 02.02.2004 21:22 |
i think it was all set up somehow... just doesn't seem like an "accident" to me... |
| wstüssyb 03.02.2004 00:30 |
did any one really see it when watching it live? I watched and never knew till this morning. |
| Penetration_Guru 03.02.2004 06:18 |
I wasn't paying sufficiently close attention, but the UK commentators clearly all noticed. I think that's the most action John Barnes has had in years, from the way he reacted. |
| iGSM 03.02.2004 07:41 |
Well I'm interested to know from the female faculty on this board (or male, I guess) how easy it is to actually tear off the cup of a lace bra? I would imagine it would be quite difficult unless you used some sort of laser technology..which I believe Mr. Trousersnake has. |
| Krizzy 03.02.2004 08:48 |
Sorry but as a mother of a daughter I think it was deplorable and contrived...I used to have more respect for Ms. Jackson but now I have serious daoubts about her. How dare MTV use the superbowl for a most definite staged act of stupidity. I have nothing against the female body for its beautiful when tastefully displayed not used for shock value. Sorry folks this was plan bad taste pure and simple. AS far as Britney and Madonna that was shown in the evening on MTV not CBS during prime time viewing my daughter was unable to sleep and "saw" the whole thing (so to speak)...needless to say I am a little PO'ed. Kriz >:o/ |
| Penetration_Guru 03.02.2004 09:31 |
Janet Jackson's boob prevented your daughter sleeping? We should all be so lucky... |
| NoOneButYou1975 03.02.2004 10:04 |
Janet Jackson's boob prevented your daughter sleeping? We should all be so lucky... yeah i had a couple of sleepless nights LOL :P |
| Krizzy 03.02.2004 14:58 |
LOL! Thank heaven the Pat's won! |
| D.Blythe 03.02.2004 17:50 |
Seems like it was pre-planned to me. Why else would Janet have been wearing a star pastie over that breast otherwise? What woman wears one if she is NOT going to be baring a breast? Heard on the Jim Rome show, "Michael Jackson wants to perform at next year's halftime show in an act where he rips the pants off of Lil' Bow Wow" I also heard that Bono had volunteered to perform at halftime in a show designed to raise awareness of the AIDS crisis in Africa, ala 46664, but was turned down. |
| Saffron Caribou 03.02.2004 21:11 |
Krizzy I completetly understand your concern with your daughter. I agree, the half time show was done in really poor taste. However, CBS did made the mistake of choosing MTV to do the halftime show. They should've known (they are both owned by Viacom) that MTV thrives on the "shock and awe" factor. CBS had it comming. Now, MTV is blaming Janet Jackson now. Although, MTV stated that their half time show was going to be shocking. |
| Penis - Vagina 03.02.2004 21:38 |
They should know by now that anything like this should be on a slight delay. You can't have celebrities doing anything completely 'live'. Saturday Night Live adopted this policy years ago from what I understand, they're always on a slight delay. I think it was as a result of the Sinead O'Connor anti-Pope performance. |
| Mr Coolest Cat 04.02.2004 12:51 |
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
| Saffron Caribou 04.02.2004 23:39 |
Well Janet admitted her "mistake", and she got banned from the Grammys this Sunday. I don't know about Justin though. He should be banned as well. |
| Saint Jiub 05.02.2004 00:28 |
The woman is always at fault ... except when married |
| iGSM 05.02.2004 07:28 |
She looks like Michael when a giant crab attacked her. RARGH! |
| Carrots Of The Piratebean 05.02.2004 20:27 |
and just incase you missed it, here it is again link |
| NoOneButYou1975 05.02.2004 20:32 |
once and for all......... ITS A BOOB!!!!!! for goodness sake...sheesh GET OVER IT.... |
| deleted user 05.02.2004 21:45 |
What hypocrites the Grammys are in allowing Justin to go, but not Janet. Didn't he rip the clothing off? |
| Daburcor? 05.02.2004 22:16 |
I was just going to post the same EXACT thing! |
| Saffron Caribou 05.02.2004 22:28 |
Figures that Justin will get off the hook. Again, he was the one that ripped the fucking thing off. |
| Daburcor? 05.02.2004 22:40 |
LOL! |
| Ian R 06.02.2004 12:34 |
CORONA, CA (Corona Times) - A man is suing CBS, Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake for an on-air incident involving the exposure of one of Ms. Jackson's breasts. Steve Bosell of Corona, California has filed a lawsuit claiming that the incident left him physically ill, induced vomiting, psychologically scarred his children and has ruined sexual relations with his wife. "I just couldn't believe what I saw during the Superbowl Halftime Show. How could CBS allow Justin Timberlake to expose one of Janet Jackson's breasts on the air?" Bosell said. "I had just eaten two foot long sub sandwiches, which I bought at the local Subway sandwich shop. When Janet's breast appeared on TV I became physically ill and vomited before I could even make it to the restroom". According to the lawsuit, filed within an hour of the incident by Riverside attorney Delores Blasingame, Mr. Bosell claims his children were psychologically scarred because they were first frightened and then laughed at him. "My own children ran away from me screaming like I was some sort of puking boogeyman who was coming to get them. After I finished vomiting on the living room floor, the children realized I was in a weakened, pathetic state and began to laugh at me. I am now in the process of hiring psychiatrists for my children." Bosell said in a strained voice. "Later in the evening, my wife refused to be intimate with me after I had cleaned up. When she finally agreed to be intimate and took her top off in the dim light of our bedroom, all I could see was Janet Jackson's big ugly breast with a metal star covering the nipple staring back at me. Then to top it off, I swear that it morphed into Michael Jackson's face! I suddenly realized I was still aroused with Michael's face staring back at me. At this point my manhood totally stopped working" Bosell said while breaking down sobbing. "I don't think I'll ever be able to get it up again!" CBS and representatives for Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake did not return calls regarding Mr. Bosell's lawsuit. "I demand compensation because CBS, Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake went absolutely out of their way to make me look like a fool" Mr. Bosell said. "I am asking other people to come foward and join my lawsuit against CBS, Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake." |
| MexQueenFM 06.02.2004 12:36 |
LMAO! |
| Brandon 06.02.2004 13:00 |
LOL Ian!! I can't convince my grandpa it's not a joke! |
| Fenderek 07.02.2004 11:32 |
<<"I demand compensation because CBS, Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake went absolutely out of their way to make me look like a fool" Mr. Bosell said. "I am asking other people to come foward and join my lawsuit against CBS, Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake.">> LMAO It's only a fuckin' BUB!!! Gee, some ppl sholuld get a life, get laid and... wouldn't see the whole thing so offensive any more... I'm really surprised... On British TV we've got now show called "I'm a Celebrity (are they...?)- Get Me Out of Here" and they're showing sth like Jordan and some other girl eating some worms alive... Pretty tastless and disgusting yet seems like this is a SHOW, this is sth ppl watch (probably so bored...) and- the most ridiculous- it seems like this kind of stuff (or 1000 dead ppl on the screen in another Rambo/Commando/Natural-Born Killers kind of movie) is considered more normal and natural or less offensive than such a beautiful thing like sex!!! Or even ONE (NOT TOTALLY!) BARE BOOB!!! Don't you think this world is f**ked up right there....? |
| Dances With Freddie 07.02.2004 12:14 |
all the fuzz is pathetic... ppl ought to be cheering. or not... |
| iron eagle 07.02.2004 12:55 |
looks like this one isnt a joke-- NEW YORK — For Janet Jackson (search), it was the breast of times, but for one Tennessee woman it was so bad that she is filing a federal lawsuit demanding billions of dollars in damages. Bank worker Terri Carlin (search) wants compensation for herself and millions of viewers "injured" by the lewd behavior of Jackson and fellow performer Justin Timberlake (search) during Sunday's Super Bowl coverage. On Wednesday Carlin filed a proposed class-action lawsuit in federal court in Knoxville, Tenn., against Jackson, Timberlake, broadcasters MTV and CBS and their parent company, Viacom. The suit fails to specify what injuries Carlin suffered when she saw Timberlake rip off part of Jackson's costume, exposing her breast, saying only that: "As a direct and proximate result of the broadcast of the acts, [Carlin] and millions of others saw the acts and were caused to suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury." The lawsuit argues the broadcast companies and the singers breached an "implied" contract with viewers not to subject them to sexually explicit acts during what should have been family entertainment. "All of the defendants knew that the Super Bowl, the preeminent sports event in the United States, would be watched by millions of families and children," says the claim, filed by attorney Wayne Ritchie II. Jackson has apologized, saying a red lace garment was supposed to remain on her breast when an outer garment was ripped away. She denied that the NFL, CBS or MTV, which produced the halftime show, knew her plan. |
| deleted user 07.02.2004 13:13 |
What a lot of you are missing is the point. And the point is this: While TV shows are rated for content, sports programs however are not. Families gathered in front of the TV expecting to watch an entertaining football game. And it was. What they didn't expect was to see Timberlake dry-humping Jackson for several minutes before he purposly ripped off her bra cup. To say the least it was uncomfortable to see the humping. But when the boob was exposed, it went to a different level. And for him to say he didn't know what was happening is hogwash. Janet knew, and so did he. Look at the song title, and the words to the song. "I'll have you naked by the end of this song". Children watching this crap are being told 'it's ok to be like this' or 'this is normal'. It's not normal. It is whoreish and disgusting. This kind of thing should not be labled as acceptable. Morals are not as moral as they once were. Kids are kids. Not adults. |
| Fenderek 07.02.2004 14:54 |
<< It's not normal. It is whoreish and disgusting. >> One could argue with that... |
| Maz 07.02.2004 15:05 |
"Morals are not as moral as they once were." I'm sorry, Matt, but this really irritates me. You're lecturing us on morals, yet when it comes to the Bootleg Tree, you ignore them. There are other morals, like honesty and responsibility, that you disregarded. |
| Mr.Jingles 07.02.2004 15:18 |
How about Nelly grabbing his crotch on stage. Nobody said anything about that. How about all those Superbowl commercials full of bimbos wearing skimpy outfits and making suggestive moves? And else can we say about those ads with lots of sexual innuendo. I'm sure there will be lots of children far more affected in terms of morals and ethics by hearing their parents and other people curse constantly while watching the Super Bowl than by barely watching Janet Jackson's breast pop out for 1.5 seconds. Screw the NFL, and the FCC. This whole incident is making them look like a whole bunch of hypocrites. |
| NoOneButYou1975 07.02.2004 15:25 |
Screw the NFL, and the FCC. This whole incident is making them look like a whole bunch of hypocrites. AMEN!!!!!! |
| Fenderek 07.02.2004 15:27 |
< It's so simple, everytime... It's so easy to yell that some bloody BOOB on the TV is offensive and where are the morals, blah, blah, blah... Yet somehow in the real life ppl are not so concerned about morals, about being nice to each other, about being honest... It's just much easier to point at bare breast or a prostitute or a lap dancer and say- this is sluggish or immoral... Somehow lies and rudeness and all this kind of stuff we see aroud every f**king day seems all right... Somehow the fact that we're stealing or being rude to a neighbour, or we're cheating on our boyfriend/girlfriend is fine- it's the OTHER stuff that it's not (like someone's sexual freedom for instance)... But we hypocrits are OK- it's so freaking easy, isn't it...? |
| deleted user 07.02.2004 17:07 |
'I'm sorry, Matt, but this really irritates me. You're lecturing us on morals, yet when it comes to the Bootleg Tree, you ignore them. There are other morals, like honesty and responsibility, that you disregarded.' Well Zeni, I sent the cds to the person I was supposed to. Wether they arrived or not is not up to me. I didn't make copies because it was the same old crap that everyone on the planet has. Maybe they got lost in the holiday rush (November-ish mailing) or not. Who knows, and really who the fuck cares. You have been a persistant pain in the ass for as long as I have been posting here, thinking you are 'holier-than-thou' in your attitude, and i for one frankly am damn sick and tired of it. Post what you want after this resoponce. I'll likely not bother to check it. Your not worth my time. |
| Maz 07.02.2004 17:35 |
You disappoint me, Matt. You failed your responsibilities, you ignored emails, and now you claim I'm being "holier-than-thou." As for "who the fuck cares," I'm guessing the person you let down was disappointed. Glad you can casually dismiss him. So by all means, stop posting on QZ for awhile, then come back under an alias when you think things have settled down, My New Purple Shoes, I mean, Lucy was High. I'll still remember your behavior, since I'm just a persistent pain in the ass. That is, of course, assuming you have the guts to read this, instead of running away from your problems. |
| iGSM 07.02.2004 21:04 |
None of this would happen if you Americans didn't watch the game..stick to more conservative sports like table tennis, hopscotch, hookey and cricket...yep, good old cricket. Still back in my day black vocalists bearing their breasts was a God send. We used to sacrifice them to our local Catholic Reverend. The point is if we all stick on this subject for many a day people will think that we have some sort of contrafibulatories to share. |
| Ian R 09.02.2004 03:47 |
Adaptation : (C) 2004 Andrew Solkin, British Colombia, Canada On Super Bowl Sunday, a singer's right tit O billow, tit-billow, tit-billow! Gave folk in America one mighty fit, O billow, tit-billow, tit-billow! Each jaded New Yorker, each Arkansas rube, Unsuspectingly watching the game on the tube, Didn't know that at half-time, he'd see Janet's boob, O billow, tit-billow, tit-billow! A storm in a D-cup, a molehill indeed, O billow, tit-billow, tit-billow! That prompted the FCC's blustering screed, O billow, tit-billow, tit-billow! Each TV reporter, each pundit pronounced That the MTV moguls deserved to be bounced And the network executives all be denounced, O billow, tit-billow, tit-billow! Now I haven't the tiniest bit of a doubt O billow, tit-billow, tit-billow! 'Twas no "wardrobe malfunction" that made it pop out, O billow, tit-billow, tit-billow! Though her talents, though meagre, have won her some fame, Her silicon figure is what makes her name, Any "star" in a thousand would do just the same - O billow, tit-billow, tit-billow! Lyrics: Andrew Solkin. Original score: Gilbert & Sullivan |
| Freddie-B 09.02.2004 07:46 |
If that was an accident I'm Robbie Williams. I've never seen anything so obvious in my life, and to think they tried to cover it up. Shameless. I tell thee, I'm going off that Timberlake boy-he's off the rails these days innit! Oh, and as for morals and stuff, I dare say kids in America (and everywhere else for that matter) have got more to worry about than with whom and how Justin Timberlake dances to his songs. If people can't take a tit popping out on tele then they need to get out more and get a sense of humour. |
| Banquo 09.02.2004 13:24 |
The US who bought us Deep Throat, John Holmes, Ron Jeremy, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Basic Instinct, Pam and Tommy and (some) of them can't handle seeing a tit. I supoose we Brits are immune to it having page 3 and all that. Having said that after seeing Judy Finnigan's massive bra a few years back at the TV awards that knocked me sideways. |
| Saffron Caribou 09.02.2004 23:09 |
Wow, after reading that I cannot believe that a boob can cause that much damage. Perhaps if another boob is shown it will be the cause of WW3. |
| iron eagle 10.02.2004 18:28 |
KNOXVILLE, Tennessee (AP) -- Less than a week after filing a class-action lawsuit because of her outrage over Janet Jackson's Super Bowl stunt, Terri Carlin believes she's made her point. The Knoxville banker is withdrawing the suit filed last Wednesday in U.S. District Court against Jackson and Justin Timberlake, along with MTV, CBS and their parent company, Viacom. The lawsuit had sought billions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages. Carlin alleged that she and others who watched the show during the Super Bowl were injured by the performers' lewd actions when Timberlake tore off part of Jackson's costume, exposing her right breast. The notice of dismissal filed in federal court says Carlin wants to see if "remedial measures" announced by federal regulators and the companies involved succeed in preventing similar stunts. Carlin and attorney Wayne A. Ritchie II, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Carlin and has represented her for free, have received phone calls and mail from hundreds of supportive parents from across the country who wanted to be included in the suit, the notice states. In the lawsuit filed on behalf of "all Americans," Carlin charged that Jackson's exposure and "sexually explicit conduct" by other performers during the halftime show injured viewers. Jackson apologized for the incident, saying a red lace garment was supposed to remain over her breast when an outer garment was ripped away. dont cha just love it--for one week us yanks were all part of this suit and we didnt even know it-- maybe we should pool all our money together to send Ms Knoxville some flowers sumthin.... --other news today-- the racier mtv vids like *shock* britneys Toxic are being moved to late night... all this for a breast?? pluuuuueessse talk about going hog wash crazy over bull shit.... here you go |
| Freddie-B 11.02.2004 10:22 |
It's a disgrace. I think that the way people have reacted to this fucking nothing stunt should make us all sit back and just look at ourselves for a bit. What ACTUALLY happened? Nothing. Ok, it was a dance routine that went wrong, no "sexier" or "dirtier" than any other routine really, and Jackson's nipple wasn't even on show, so what the American public actually saw was a bit of fat with some skin over the top. If you want revealing, why has nobody censored the green dress that Jenifer Lopez wore to the Grammys? Why did nobody slap a ban on Christina Aguilera or Lil Kim, or Marilyn Manson's girlfriend for their various outfits? I've heard somebody say that this was "violence towards women and shouldn't be tolerated under any circumstances-Timberlake is sick"-What are they smoking? Jackson has clearly embroiled Timberlake in a publicity stunt, which both of them should have known better than to involve themselves in. It wasn't violent, it wasn't degrading, it wasn't even explicit. All it was was a fuck up that shouldn't have happened. How can you justify a lawsuit against it? Fair enough, this is a country in which a woman gets awarded $10 million because a cup of coffee doesn't point out that the contents are hot and so burns herself. Americans-what is wrong with your people? I had such a nice time in America and met so many great people-then I hear something like this...bringing a lawsuit is not for the good of the whole country, because everyone outside America, and no doubt a good few inside America, reads the story and thinks "What a load of bollocks, are they all tossers?" No country wants people thinking that about them (except maybe France) and yet what choice do we have? People need to get out of their shells a bit more. This is the 21st century now, and this sort of thing just shouldn't be shocking to sensible people. There are wars going on, there are innocent people dying, there is an increase in heroin trade, and people are actually giving a shit that Janet Jackson flashed a bit of her boob for 2 seconds during a song? Why? Why would that make any difference to anything? My advice to the people who think this is unholy and indecent-learn to love the skin you're in and you won't care when other people do it. Get your priorities straight, and laugh at it like the rest of us did. Phew. Off soapbox for now. |
| Janet 11.02.2004 11:08 |
"If you want revealing, why has nobody censored the green dress that Jenifer Lopez wore to the Grammys? Why did nobody slap a ban on Christina Aguilera or Lil Kim, or Marilyn Manson's girlfriend for their various outfits?" Exactly. And what about the sexual innuendo and nature of many of the advertisements during the game? I guess thats okay. I don't condone what Janet Jackson did, not at all. It was in very poor taste. But she did it, its over, she apologised. People are making an entirely too big a deal out of it. Excellent post, Freddie-B. |
| Freddie-B 12.02.2004 09:23 |
Thank you Janet, appreciate it. I just don't like the double standards of it all. |
