| behind blue eyes 03.12.2003 22:15 |
I do. And maybe thats why i felt it the need to give a few a taste of there own medicine and they did not like it. Sometimes what comes around from what goes around is "hard" to "swallow". I hope you can find it in yourself to understand that everybody has dreams and if someone tried to squelsh yours you would probably be a little pissed off, too. I am an avenger. Don't ask me why. I don't really know. I just hate it when people pick on people because they are different than what they are used to or hang with or whatever. So for what it is worth, I'm sorry for stooping. Sincerely, rosanna |
| Abby Mouser 03.12.2003 22:49 |
You go girl, I'm glad we're on the same page! |
| behind blue eyes 03.12.2003 22:50 |
thanks. that means allot to me. |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 01:14 |
They’re gonna put you out in the streets Lorena They’re gonna dance upon your grave They’re gonna lock up your heart and throw away the key So you better watch out honey how you behave Now you can run around forever Inside that big ole head of yours But your gonna find the answers aren’t easy But you ain’t ever gonna know for sure They’re gonna put you out in the streets Lorena One day they’re gonna come after you They’re gonna tie you right down to the table They’re gonna make all your nightmares come true Cause you can’t get away with nothing Your conscience gonna give you away You can’t play with fire forever Yeah and not get burnt they say They’re gonna put you out in the streets Lorena Those demons you keep locked away All them shiny skeletons in your closet Gonna break free and get you one day Oh and I’d like to be there when it happens Oh I’ve got my own demons too you know Oh I’d like to be their baby Cause mine got me a long time ago They’re gonna put you out in the streets Lorena They’re gonna sing and dance upon your grave They’re gonna lock up your heart and throw away the key You better watch it believe you me Lorena believe me Lorena goodnight all, rosanna lorena |
| Daburcor? 04.12.2003 03:34 |
I hate when people mess with those close to me, It makes me angy and sometimes violent. |
| Penetration_Guru 04.12.2003 05:12 |
I assume you mean charles - any plans to go and defend him on all the rap, surfing, britney spears, etc forums that he has relentlessly spammed with shit? |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 06:53 |
possibly |
| siljeoen 04.12.2003 06:55 |
OMG.... |
| Dances With Freddie 04.12.2003 06:55 |
........... |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 06:56 |
what? |
| siljeoen 04.12.2003 06:57 |
....... |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 06:59 |
if you think i will get a notice in my e box every time you do that ..... you are sadly mistaken |
| siljeoen 04.12.2003 07:00 |
no i don't think that. |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 07:02 |
so whats up? I'm licking my wounds here. I hate to quarrel |
| siljeoen 04.12.2003 07:10 |
so do i... |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 07:12 |
so lets not do that anymore it sucks |
| siljeoen 04.12.2003 07:14 |
yes it sure does.. |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 07:22 |
sorry if I pissed you off too yesterday, siljeoen. |
| siljeoen 04.12.2003 07:25 |
hmm..i can't remember anything about that.... |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 07:26 |
it must have been jeoroen or something like that |
| siljeoen 04.12.2003 07:27 |
probably... |
| Jjeroen 04.12.2003 07:32 |
Sure, put the blame on me! I am not the one in here that is starting campaigns on the board posting all kinds of things you find on the internet by just entering MY name or mailadress in Google. And since you are doing so 'in defence' of that twat Charles Baer, it's pretty obvious you're just as bonkers as he is. Especially for a 41-year old! You should be wiser then that. |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 07:33 |
thanks for chatting. I've got to go to work now. but I'll be back in a few. I work a split shift. peace, rosanna |
| Jjeroen 04.12.2003 07:37 |
Anytime! Drive safely! |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 13:16 |
not yet charles. we're still on page one. was that your addition to help this page along? well ok then. and I am keeping it real. Rosanna |
| behind blue eyes 04.12.2003 13:17 |
oops my apoligies Charles. here we are on page 2.= ) |
| YourValentine 04.12.2003 15:32 |
"And since you are doing so 'in defence' of that twat Charles Baer, it's pretty obvious you're just as bonkers as he is. Especially for a 41-year old! You should be wiser then that." I could not agree more. You have the nerve to blame other people for "picking" on people when all you do here is spamming this board with your useless posts to support this guy whose existence I've been ignoring so far. |
| Flashman 04.12.2003 18:04 |
You tell 'em YourValentine. Duck! *Throws pile of dog turds at the board's spammers* Lucky I've got my gloves on! Oh bollocks. |
| ~Silje~ 05.12.2003 14:51 |
41 years old? Well then, what sort of medication are you on? I can't help but question a person's intelligence when she spams a noticeboard at the age of 41. At that age I assumed most people would find more mature ways of presenting their case. Especially when the spamming is so completely useless, it doesn't even contain one bit of entertainment that might have made it worth it! |
| behind blue eyes 05.12.2003 15:23 |
Hey everybody, Just popped by my house for a min and low and behold I see we have judgmentals in here. um hmmm I ask myself why all the panties in wads about my age. Yes I am 41. Does that mean society dictates what a 41 year old woman is supposed to act like? Society also says men are supposed to be masculine and women are to be feminine. Shawl we allow society to dictate our lives our standards even if we know that what society says, would not be right for we as individuals. WWFD = what would Freddie do? You know he wasn't exactly what society claimed as the norm. So just you think about that before you get on your righteous thrown. I can see where you would disagree with dear Charles. Maybe his plan still needs a little tweaking. However, running him into the ground and judging those who befriend him is not what I call mature. Just something to ponder on and Reflect. Rosanna |
| Penetration_Guru 05.12.2003 17:25 |
I tried discussing his plan, but both he and you declined that. |
| ~Silje~ 05.12.2003 17:59 |
Well, look! There you even had a serious respond. And it was for once interesting to read. I just disagree with the ways you "sell your case", that's all. No one will ever take it seriously the way you two go about, and it is simply impossible to actually discuss your plan, as PG said. I don't say that a 41 year old has to be like this and this, but I honestly expect them to be a bit more mature than a 12 year old. |
| behind blue eyes 05.12.2003 20:56 |
Dear Penetration_Guru & ~Silje~ , I apreciate your input. P_G the last thing I remembered about that dialog was me asking you what you wanted to know. I waited. You posted no reply before I had to go back to work and I forgot what thread it was on so I haven't even seen your reply. Latey, I've been working more and have not kept up with EveryThing. But I'll try to find it tonight or tomorrow and get back to you. Now for ~S~, It would do you good to let go of your expectations. Note back to my previous post, People are individuals and not pegs to be placed in a peg board world inwhich our society has become. People who live with rules such as that are generally disapointed and rejects in almost every person whose personality does not meet their idiological definition of the peg holes in their peg board world. This is what I call a form of narrow mindedness. And something I do believe you are missing about Charles is that his ah yeah and lets get it on is just to let you know he is around to discuss his idea on saving the planet by lessening all the crap that we as humans polute it with and if there were less humans, there would be less polution. His solution is to bring the awareness level and the freedom to choose birth control and have it readily available for every woman in the world. He and I don't even see eye to eye completely on this but the base line is what we have in common. I do think that if we could be so driven to bring all women and men for that matter to a higher awareness of accountablity and bring the active responsiblity up to a higher platue for their sexual appetites would be a good start. However, going about task at hand is allot of work. I'm not sure what the rest of his plan is. I haven't read it in a week or so and I am really tired right now and I am not even sure what I am diolonging right now even makes any sense. And about being childish. I see it as playfullness. Childish is when you gang up on some one because you don't like them. That is childish. |
| Margo 06.12.2003 12:14 |
rosanna- I understand that you think that charles's idea of GIG is a good idea. It could be, I don't know because I haven't bothered to find out. However, you seem to be missing the main issue here. Charles is spamming out board. It would take a complete idiot not to figure that out. As interesting as his GIG consept may be, the way to spread it is not to post useless topics with sexual names that have a stupid messages such as "ah yeah" or "get it on". If he truly beleives in this gig concept, he should make an intelligent post stating his proposals and reasons. I understand that you are getting defensive and whatnot, because people keep picking on charles. you don't seem to understand that theres a REASON that they don't like him, and that this board doesn't tolorate spammers. maybe instead of getting all mad at us, you can talk charles into not spamming the board, because if it wasn't for his spamming, no one would be mad at him. |
| deleted user 06.12.2003 12:33 |
Bravo Mel! |
| -fatty- 2850 06.12.2003 13:41 |
If you are looking for peace, harmony and understanding then you might be better off at link. This board has a proud tradition of being cynical, sarcastic and downright unpleasant to fellow fans. I don't know if you were around when Jake was posting on Queenzone, but if you look back on a few of the posts that weren't deleted you will see that this was a clearly disturbed young man who on a number of occasions threatened to commit suicide. Not only did we mock him, we actually encouraged him to take his own life. We even went so far as to suggest methods that would prolong his agony and prove entertaining. That's just the way it is around here and if you don't like it then feel free to fuck off. fatty. |
| siljeoen 06.12.2003 14:23 |
hehe..-well said fatty!:) |
| ~Silje~ 06.12.2003 17:29 |
*applauds meluvbooks* There you have it! :-) Edit: What she said was what I meant. Now obviously it seems like I was wrong about you, rosanna. Apparently you can make serious responds after all, and you can actually explain what GIG is all about. Therefore I want to appologise for judging you too soon, and instead I will join meluvbooks who just had a wonderful explanation as to why I can't stand Charles. Uhm... I also want to point out that even know we are all on different maturity levels despite our ages, that doesn't mean I have to like you as a person. And quite honestly, the spamming makes me dislike your person, although I like you more now that I've realised you can be serious as well. |
| behind blue eyes 06.12.2003 17:51 |
Well I wasn't around for the Jake thing but I will try to find some archive on it. And I'm not angry. I think you're misinterpreting my energy or mood. I do however feel sad about the whole pathetic situation. And truthfully I guess I am an idiot because I am under the understanding that spam is the 25 e'fliers of shit I get in my e'mail box each day. As far as I can tell, they all want me to spend money on they're wonder product. I thought that is what spam is. But you're saying that anyone who posts their own thread (and not on other peoples' threads) about what ever topic they choose but do the same topic almost every time is spam? Is that what you are saying? Really I am very new at this posting thing. I have found it to be an outlet for me and I guess I don't understand the unofficial rules. So really I am sorry if I have offended you. I really thought we had a freedom of speech thing but maybe it’s not that way at all. And no I do not agree with his entire gig but I think his heart is in the right place and at least he is one that is thinking about solutions to our global problems. So please don't shut me out just because a care for the man. He really is a nice guy but some of you seem to have some sort of criteria for how people are supposed to be and act. I just think that is narrow minded that's all. Plus I have tried to get him to talk dirty to me on an instant messenger but he's not into it. And I really miss that. That was fun! sincerely, rosanna is missing your warm sides and has tired of the coldness in this forum. |
| ~Silje~ 06.12.2003 17:59 |
Well, yes. Spamming a noticeboard would be to flood the board with topics which make no sense at all, all of them containing a line such as "ah yeah". It makes it difficult to get to the more interesting topics, you see. One topic for each subject would be just wonderful, now I have to search inbetween 5 "ah yeah" topics before I find 1 which contains something else. It gets rather annoying. |
| wstüssyb 06.12.2003 18:12 |
So please don't shut me out just because a care for the man. He really is a nice guy but some of you seem to have some sort of criteria for how people are supposed to be and act. I just think that is narrow minded that's all. Plus I have tried to get him to talk dirty to me on an instant messenger but he's not into it. And I really miss that. That was fun! sincerely, rosanna is missing your warm sides and has tired of the coldness in this forum Ok he's a nice guy, but we have asked him before to stop starting 10 topics a day about his penis, vagina and this is his last post. As you see most people are getting fed up with some of this shit that has been happening for some time, come to think of it, he's banned from Queenonline, yes, nice people get banned from public boards huh? |
| behind blue eyes 06.12.2003 18:45 |
O i c and people would much rather look at your hairy ass. hehe actually I love a nice hairy ass. I thought he was only posting on the threads his posts. Are you saying you have to search all the threads to find something of substance because on my screne I can clearly see who starts what post so his are easy to spot and you can easily avoid them. simple. |
| Penetration_Guru 06.12.2003 19:55 |
And something I do believe you are missing about Charles is that his ah yeah and lets get it on is just to let you know he is around to discuss his idea on saving the planet - OK, now we've established he's around. You'll struggle to convince me he's here to discuss anything because he refuses to do so. All you've done is summarise his single webpage. I see no arguments developed, backed up by evidence, research, or any support from anyone (check his guestbook for lots of "playful" disagreement...) ...lessening all the crap that we as humans polute it with.... - You are kidding? he pollutes a family site about Britney Spears with appalling rubbish about genitalia and intercourse and you have the sheer brass neck to accuse others of pollution. ...and if there were less humans, there would be less polution. - This is the thinking of a five year old. Then again, I see nothing contradicting that in his "messages". Would a better solution not be to concede that population control is probably the hardest thing to achieve on this planet and look for a more practical solution like better education, giving our own children the knowledge with which to start to give the planet back to itself... His solution is to bring the awareness level and the freedom to choose birth control and have it readily available for every woman in the world. - How is birth control related to pollution? Anyway, birth control remains something that the Catholic Church has some fairly strong and surprisingly popular views on. I can't see posting "penis weenis" on a few Internet Discussion Boards changing the Pope's views on birth control. I do think that if we could be so driven to bring all women and men for that matter to a higher awareness of accountablity and bring the active responsiblity up to a higher platue for their sexual appetites would be a good start. - Sorry, I'll need that translating into legible English, as opposed to a series of buzzwords nailed together at random. However, going about task at hand is allot of work. - Do you mean posting "playfully" on here is the task at hand, or enforcing birth control/reeducating the world/getting elected President? Either way I think more than "work" is needed. Psychiatric help would be top of th elist.... I'm not sure what the rest of his plan is. - I'm not sure anyone is. Including himself. I haven't read it in a week or so and I am really tired right now and I am not even sure what I am diolonging right now even makes any sense. - I think now you're entering into the spirit of the original manifesto... |
| wstüssyb 06.12.2003 21:15 |
and people would much rather look at your hairy ass. hehe do you see me starting 10 topics a day telling this to every one? |
| behind blue eyes 06.12.2003 23:54 |
Oh I give up. You anti Charles' are all so full of your selves you could never get the point. Why am I wasting my time to get you to open your eyes. And dude, I was talking about tangible polution. And you p_g are one to talk. Family web site? give me a break you judgemental pr---. Barf. Post script. penatration yeah thats good and clean. No nastiness there. I told you I don't agree hole heartedly with his ideas. But the connection between family planning (which I am for being that I am pro life you doe doe) and polution is when there are less people to polute the likely scenerio will be less polution. Thus the connection. Duh and you can not think that through. Now I am tired of arguing with a pig head. reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection reflection |
| Lester Burnham 07.12.2003 01:30 |
Well said, P_G. And wstussyb's ass isn't THAT hairy... *crickets* um...not that I looked... |
| Matti 07.12.2003 01:36 |
Yeah, me neither. ;) |
| ~Silje~ 07.12.2003 08:52 |
I think PG had some good points there, Rosanna. You had serious and explaining responds earlier, howcome you won't give any to PG's questions? Perhaps you don't know what to answer? |
| behind blue eyes 07.12.2003 08:55 |
yes perhaps because I'm not charles. Duh. Look you people have known him longer that I have. And I have gotten responses from him because I don't attack him or his ideas. I smell a bullies in here. |
| Banquo 07.12.2003 09:02 |
I smell a rat in here. |
| ~Silje~ 07.12.2003 12:02 |
Why, I believe PG is serious enough about his questions, yet they are not answered. As you support Charles' case, I thought you would be able to answer these questions about it. Obviously I was wrong. And as for the spamming: Yes, it is annoying to have to look through 5 or more "ah yeah" topics before I find one containing something else. It disturbs the entire board, it floods it with the same thing over and over. And as earlier mentioned, Charles has made himself noticed now. It should be enough. We're fully aware of his existance, but we show no interest in his case as long as he presents it the way he does. Running for president? A nice campaign there... Surely you realise that he doesn't get votes by posting over and over about his genitalia and never once a serious post explaining his case? |
| Margo 07.12.2003 15:55 |
more then one person noticed my existance! yes! *dances around the room* *calms down* rosanna- I don't think that anyone here is trying to pick on you. I know that, being that you are not charles, you don't know the answers to P_G's questions. however, you obviously know charles better than the rest of us. why don't you try to get him to answer the questions? If the answers were intelligent and reasonable enough, I might even buy into them. (actually, no I probably wouldn't as I am a very dedicated democrat. and if I did, I wouldn't count either as I am not allowed to vote. nonetheless, maybe someone who votes would) anyhow, my point is that no one will buy into his ideas unless he actually talks about them and explain himself. he isn't going to win any popularity contest with all of these annoying posts. (he won't even get the highest post count, as william and mex are too far ahead of him). try to convince him to take a diffetent direction with his campaign, as this one is obviously not working. |
| behind blue eyes 08.12.2003 00:51 |
Thank you Mel That's the most sincere dialog I have read involving this topic since it began. I appreciate it and I will talk to Charles. He really is a nice guy who happens (in my opinion) to get off by being vulgar and to tell you the truth, so do I. I also don't understand that just because he happens to be winning out on the vulgar contest, all of the sudden, other vulgars are ousting him. I see it as very hypocritical. I do also see your point on Charles answering a few questions about his ideas and campaign as you put it. After all, that is the traditional format. However, I do not believe that Charles is a traditionalist. Thank you again for your civilness and compassion. I feel better now. Except for the fact that Matt (Lucy) now hates me and that makes me sad. He set me up and then dropped me. Ouch. **starting to cry** Well I think I've said enough and I will talk to Charles. Sincerely, Rosanna |
| ~Silje~ 08.12.2003 12:32 |
He is indeed not a traditionalist, that is for sure. I wish you luck, Rosanna. It'd be nice if you could make him change his campaign a bit. Not necessarily to fit the traditional ways, just so that one can get some answers and take him the least bit seriously. I suspect it's just a nice little game to Charles, apparently he didn't actually think his ideas through (or it seems like he didn't, and as long as people have that impression, they won't listen to him). |
| behind blue eyes 09.12.2003 01:27 |
I know what you mean. Sometimes it’s hard to comprehend that you are not communicating in a language style easily understood, because you understand what you mean. However, others may have a different style and the interpretation gets lost between the two thus creating frustration. About thinking his plan through, I think he is beginning to better strategize and focus but he plans to pursue this for a long time so he has long term expectations. But there really is a method to his madness and I think he is thinking about mending some fences. We will just have to wait and see. |
| ~Silje~ 10.12.2003 07:20 |
Well, we won't wait and see around here, apparently. Rumours say he's deleted already. |
| behind blue eyes 10.12.2003 07:30 |
point taken |
| Spiderleg Synthia 10.12.2003 08:42 |
I always thought rosadanna ras-whatever and charles baer were the same person. Huh On an unrelated note, I just went to queenforever: it's up for sale. Lol! |
| ~Silje~ 10.12.2003 11:25 |
"He spammed the board Silje. Richard doesn't tolerate that and he was banned." Realised that. I just wasn't sure it could really be true that he was deleted already. :-) Took longer with Jake, you know. |
| behind blue eyes 10.12.2003 11:27 |
How long was he in here? |
| iron eagle 10.12.2003 16:56 |
and because a few people didnt like it, a few others would reply and egg him on he gets removed pity really..... esp. since the goaders were not treated in the same fashion welcome to police state -thought control central- stepford board land-- we are now becoming like the rest of em careful folks-- say something wrong or something not liked or bothersome to someone -- there will be a call for your banning too |
| iron eagle 10.12.2003 17:47 |
thanks for your opinion there PS in the meantime i will stick with mine thanks |
| iron eagle 10.12.2003 20:44 |
peace |
| ~Silje~ 11.12.2003 12:50 |
Oh, spammed us in that manner? Good thing he's deleted, then! |