Jake12 28.03.2020 23:14 |
Not sure if this has been posted before but this article talks about the remastering and remixing of Queens Live Aid performance for the BR movie. link |
Freddie Jupiter 28.03.2020 23:29 |
Live aid performance -- one of the few scenes in the movie that actually resembles reality. And it sounds really good too, I think. Thanks for posting; should be an interesting read. |
The Real Wizard 29.03.2020 07:07 |
Wow - to even see the tape is amazing. |
The Real Wizard 29.03.2020 07:08 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: one of the few scenes in the movie that actually resembles realityDo you have Tourette's for everything Queen related from the last 20 years that you don't personally agree with? It's almost as if your fingers are physically incapable of not typing out something negative at every given opportunity. This is curiously similar behaviour to other characters on this forum. Hmm. |
Freddie Jupiter 29.03.2020 08:31 |
I have a love of truth, and lies upset me immensely -- especially when those lies are about people who are deceased and can no longer defend themselves and set things straight. That alright with you, or do I need to seek your permission to express my feelings in the future? |
brENsKi 29.03.2020 09:11 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote:I have a love of truth, and lies upset me immensely -- especially when those lies are about people who are deceased and can no longer defend themselves and set things straight.don't see you rushing to defend Elvis, Michael Jackson or others. weird that. again, i believe you're not being completely honest here. ironic, considering your alleged "beef" is with lies. Freddie Jupiter Glossary of Terms: bluetruths or unverified comments i don't agree with blue = person (singular) - Freddie blue = love of arguments blue = anything that doesn't make Freddie look like a plaster saint genius, upsets me immensely |
Freddie Jupiter 29.03.2020 10:51 |
Nice try there Brenski.......except in the movie there is a cringeworthy and tiresome scene where Freddie begs on his knees to be allowed back into queen. Now, that never happened, did it? Which makes it a lie. And it's a lie by any objective standard of what defines a lie and has nothing to do with Freddie Jupiter's glossary of terms, does it? But that was a nice attempt at trying to deflect from the truth -- yet again. Unfortunately for you Brenski I can see through your dishonest tactics and can call you out on them every time, and for all to see. If you had any remnant of integrity left you would have quit long ago and stopped making a fool of yourself - an intellectually dishonest fool to boot. By the way, I'm not Gerry or runner, so shut up. |
dastard 29.03.2020 13:31 |
Interesting read, thanks Jake12 |
brENsKi 29.03.2020 13:40 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Nice try there Brenski.......except in the movie there is a cringeworthy and tiresome scene where Freddie begs on his knees to be allowed back into queen. Now, that never happened, did it? Which makes it a lie. And it's a lie by any objective standard of what defines a lie and has nothing to do with Freddie Jupiter's glossary of terms, does it? But that was a nice attempt at trying to deflect from the truth -- yet again. Unfortunately for you Brenski I can see through your dishonest tactics and can call you out on them every time, and for all to see. If you had any remnant of integrity left you would have quit long ago and stopped making a fool of yourself - an intellectually dishonest fool to boot. By the way, I'm not Gerry or runner, so shut up.it wasn't a lie. it's just unverified. we know this. it may be a lie in yours and (other Freddie Stepford's minds) but you can't verify it's mendacity in much the same way I can't prove its accuracy. as someone else said - everything becomes a lie when it doesn't fit in with your skewed view of events. unfortunately, that isn't and never actually will be reality - regardless of how you cook it. also, as i said - i unaware of any of the MJ or Elvis lies you've railed against. now stop talking sh*t. |
mooghead 29.03.2020 14:24 |
Well I was actually going to comment on the article in the OP but what's the point? Yet again another thread ending up with petty, childish squabbling. Fuck this place, no one would miss it if it disappeared from the net forever. |
kosimodo 29.03.2020 15:10 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: one of the few scenes in the movie that actually Yeah! Specially the singalong Hammer to Fall.. |
Freddie Jupiter 29.03.2020 21:13 |
@brenski, it never happened, it is a lie. Be a man and accept reality for a change, instead of forever trying to make excuses. |
Freddie Jupiter 29.03.2020 22:30 |
@Mr Bean, nobody is forcing you to be here. I happen to think this forum is great. It's one of the the few remaining places where you are able to speak your mind without being censored, except by a few other forum members who can't handle the truth. So if you find that truth offends you, feel free to retreat to your safe space, snowflake. |
AlbaNo1 29.03.2020 22:38 |
Who has ever claimed Freddie to be a saint. Nobody. The underlying feeling of critics of recent trends is that while Brian has been the main driver in raising Queen’s profile he has also repositioned himself within the bands history to his advantage. Maybe even subconsciously - to give him the benefit of the doubt. As far the portrayal of inter band dynamics in the movie goes its fair to assume that Brian is the single most important source the film makers had. Back to the OP the music and performances in the film are great , and much like the We Will Rock You musical , the music seems undamaged by the horrendous vehicle it’s been given. |
Freddie Jupiter 29.03.2020 23:00 |
@Alba, I agree 100%. Good to see that there are people who can think for themselves, and who have the balls to accept reality, no matter how unpleasant it may be. |
Kamenliter 30.03.2020 00:04 |
'It wasn't a lie. it's just unverified. we know this. it may be a lie in yours and (other Freddie Stepford's minds) but you can't verify it's mendacity in much the same way I can't prove its accuracy.' Not to really stir things up too much, but just going on a sort of scientfic basis...there are many moments in the film which we know for sure did not happen as they are depicted, so going on those, we might assume that some of the other scenes, which stretch the limits of believablity, are, as well, likely created for the fiction of the movie. Not saying there's anything wrong with that, for a film, but some Queen fans (myself included) cringe at those moments. |
Jake12 30.03.2020 01:16 |
Can we please talk about the article!! |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 02:01 |
@jake, feel free to kick things off. |
matt z 30.03.2020 02:55 |
Old married couple |
The Real Wizard 30.03.2020 03:41 |
double post |
The Real Wizard 30.03.2020 03:42 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: @brenski, it never happened, it is a lie.You know this because you were there? Or people who were there told you all about it? |
The Real Wizard 30.03.2020 03:42 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: I have a love of truth, and lies upset me immensely -- especially when those lies are about people who are deceased and can no longer defend themselves and set things straight. That alright with you, or do I need to seek your permission to express my feelings in the future?Obviously not from me. But rather for the sake of public decency and not creating yet another thread that becomes a flame war. Why not try being the bigger person for once? The world is full of things we don't like, and complaining about them for the umpteenth time on the internet (especially in an environment where just about nobody wants to hear it) isn't going to change a thing. If you're so perplexed by such things beyond your control, why not put that energy to good use and choose a problem that actually has a chance of being solved? |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 03:44 |
@The Real Wizard, so not complaining about things is going to change things? Interesting approach. |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 03:49 |
@The real wizard, I didn't have to be there to know it didn't happen. Why the fuck would Freddie beg Brian to let him back into his band like a fucking employee of Brian? What sin did Freddie commit to be excommunicated in the first place? The whole scene is insulting to Freddie and besides being tedious and boring with zero entertainment value is also a lie and an insult. By even suggesting that it happened you are being direspectful to Freddie, just like Brian was for including it in the first place. |
Makka 30.03.2020 03:54 |
This is a great article. Thanks for sharing this. |
Makka 30.03.2020 03:57 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: @The real wizard, I didn't have to be there to know it didn't happen. Why the fuck would Freddie beg Brian to let him back into his band like a fucking employee of Brian? What sin did Freddie commit to be excommunicated in the first place? The whole scene is insulting to Freddie and besides being tedious and boring with zero entertainment value is also a lie and an insult. By even suggesting that it happened you are being direspectful to Freddie, just like Brian was for including it in the first place.This shit has been talked about numerous times on other threads. Why is this crap even being discussed here. It's nice to have some great posts with interesting content and as usual for this site the crap just appears again. Fuck off with it! Give it a fucken rest! |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 04:04 |
I would have given it a rest ages ago, if some members here didn't try to tell me that that which isn't true is true. Accept the facts and let's move on, instead of challenged me for telling the truth. If you don't like the truth take it up with Brian. |
Saint Jiub 30.03.2020 04:51 |
Kamenliter wrote: 'It wasn't a lie. it's just unverified. we know this. it may be a lie in yours and (other Freddie Stepford's minds) but you can't verify it's mendacity in much the same way I can't prove its accuracy.' Not to really stir things up too much, but just going on a sort of scientfic basis...there are many moments in the film which we know for sure did not happen as they are depicted, so going on those, we might assume that some of the other scenes, which stretch the limits of believablity, are, as well, likely created for the fiction of the movie. Not saying there's anything wrong with that, for a film, but some Queen fans (myself included) cringe at those moments.^ This |
Makka 30.03.2020 06:52 |
You people are like fucken children!! "He did this" or "She said that"! Fucken listen to yourselves. How fucken old are you? You're all fucken obsessed with each others opinions differing from your own! Insane, the lot of you!! |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 07:07 |
Take it easy there, Macca. This is a discussion forum and people are discussing things. No need to give yourself an aneurism over it. |
Makka 30.03.2020 07:46 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Take it easy there, Macca. This is a discussion forum and people are discussing things. No need to give yourself an aneurism over it.You're discussing the same fucken shit you discuss on every fucken thread! You and the same group of imbeciles going over the same shit abusing each other over the same fucken crap! It's boring and fucken childish and you all just need to fuck off! This thread was a classic example of something interesting being brought to the table and then within 2 posts it's back to the same shit! Fuck all of you for continuing with all of this bullshit! |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 07:56 |
Ok Macca, feel free to kick things off by bringing something interesting to the table. It's all yours. |
Makka 30.03.2020 08:26 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Ok Macca, feel free to kick things off by bringing something interesting to the table. It's all yours.Don't be an obnoxious cunt face! There was something interesting at the start of this post until you and the like once again turned it to the same old drivel! |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 08:30 |
That interesting thing at the start is still there. So feel free to continue. |
Makka 30.03.2020 08:40 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: That interesting thing at the start is still there. So feel free to continue.Unfortunately so are you! |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 08:56 |
I'm afraid I can't be interesting enough to satisfy you. But if you'd like to show me how to keep bringing interesting things to the table all the time I will appreciate the lesson. |
Makka 30.03.2020 09:03 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: I'm afraid I can't be interesting enough to satisfy you. But if you'd like to show me how to keep bringing interesting things to the table all the time I will appreciate the lesson.You're right, you aren't interesting at all. If you became a virus statistic, that would then perk my interest in you, and my amusement. |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 09:10 |
Makka, I wish you well too. |
The Real Wizard 30.03.2020 19:18 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: @The Real Wizard, so not complaining about things is going to change things? Interesting approach.Yet minutes later you said you're in the top 0.1 percentile of IQ. You just can't make this stuff up. Good luck on your crusade. |
The Real Wizard 30.03.2020 19:19 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Take it easy there, Macca. This is a discussion forum and people are discussing things. No need to give yourself an aneurism over it.Top 0.1 percentile of IQ, but can't locate the spell checker. After you've sorted that out, google "Dunning Kruger effect." |
The Real Wizard 30.03.2020 19:21 |
Makka wrote: Don't be an obnoxious cunt face!ha ! But then what else would he do? |
MercurialFreddie 30.03.2020 19:50 |
There is a bit about the alleged break-up in the fantastic interview with Spike Edney, so enjoy it: Interview (made clickable for Moog) The 4 men who could have told us if the break-up in question really happen are either: keeping their mouth shut (BM, RT, JD) or dead (FM). Yes, there was some ultimatum presented to Freddie about Prenter and Phoebe discussed it but he gave little details and not the whole story and we only have his words for it. Nobody else have spoken out about this ultimatum, It is vital to remember that in no official documentary about Queen the break-up or Freddie begging to be brought back to the band again has ever been discussed. The only thing we officially ever got was from Brian in Days of Our Lives Docu when he was talking about The Works era: "There was a feeling that maybe that was it" When Brian and Roger took part in a TV show, one week after he had died, discussing and defending Freddie, Brian really took a stand. He was saying that Freddie was not consumed by drugs, that he didn't live a promiscuous life (even though Freddie admitted it himself, talking with David Wigg and we got the recording, we can listen to it ourselves), that he was a kind and generous man and highly respected those that he loved. It is not the same image that we can see in the movie. In the movie Freddie is clearly lost and all his "diva" presence and confidence that we see in the sections referring to the 70's is gone in those sections of the movie taking place in the 80's. Clearly he is presented as the bad guy and coming late to recording sessions (Hot Space era) and the only one leading the rock'n'roll life while BM and RT detest it. Both Peter Hince and Mack have stated that alcohol and drugs really were present during Hot Space era. None of these guys were a saint, ditto. |
mooghead 30.03.2020 20:54 |
Nah, gave up on this thread ages ago... |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 21:21 |
Even if queen did break up at one point, why the fuck would Freddie beg Brian to be allowed back into queen like a chastised employee of Brian's. Freddie wasn't Brian's employee, and if anything, in the event of a break up Freddie would have been the one who mobilised the troops back into action. This is all bullshit. I can't believe how determined some people are to swallow Brian's bullshit. It's outrageous. |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 21:22 |
@Mr Bean, why are you still here then? |
mooghead 30.03.2020 22:04 |
Checked in.. still you talking shit...... Anything to add? |
Freddie Jupiter 30.03.2020 22:21 |
And what shit am I talking? The last thing I said about Freddie being most likely the person to mobilise the troops into action is corroborated by many different sources, including Deacy and Roger, if I remember correctly. Why doesn't the movie feature Freddie doing exactly that, instead of begging Brian to be let back into queen like a chastised employee. I mean wouldn't that be more interesting and better for Freddie's reputation? |
Jake12 30.03.2020 23:15 |
Jupiter! SHUT THE FUCK UP! Go away! No one gives a shit about your problems! NO ONE!! Go on reddit where you belong and go have a cry fest over there. |
Freddie Jupiter 31.03.2020 00:08 |
I will go away when I decide to go away. Thank you very much. |
Makka 31.03.2020 03:24 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: And what shit am I talking? The last thing I said about Freddie being most likely the person to mobilise the troops into action is corroborated by many different sources, including Deacy and Roger, if I remember correctly. Why doesn't the movie feature Freddie doing exactly that, instead of begging Brian to be let back into queen like a chastised employee. I mean wouldn't that be more interesting and better for Freddie's reputation?And what does any of that shit have to do with the topic? Take your shit conversations somewhere where that topic has been discussed at length before. This subject was about the Live Aid multi tracks. Can you not see why we're all getting so fucken annoyed? |
Freddie Jupiter 31.03.2020 03:32 |
Really? Where were you when Brenski was clogging all of my threads with his accusations that I'm Gerry? Did that have anything to do with the topic? Besides, the thread is still wide open, so feel free to go ahead and discuss the topic. I shall be waiting impatiently to read your gem of a contribution. |
Makka 31.03.2020 04:25 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Really? Where were you when Brenski was clogging all of my threads with his accusations that I'm Gerry? Did that have anything to do with the topic? Besides, the thread is still wide open, so feel free to go ahead and discuss the topic. I shall be waiting impatiently to read your gem of a contribution.And on it goes!! "He did this", "She did that"! You're a fuckwit! In case you didn't notice this isn't your thread, it's not Brenski's thread so take your shit elsewhere! Please just fuck off with this shit! Grow some balls, suck it up and move on! |
Freddie Jupiter 31.03.2020 04:29 |
@macca, this isn't your thread either, and yet your comment has nothing to do with the topic either. So either post something on the topic, or piss off and quit being a hypocrite. |
Freddie Jupiter 31.03.2020 04:35 |
@macca, I'm still waiting for you to grab this thread by the balls and put it back on track. |
Makka 31.03.2020 05:10 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: @macca, I'm still waiting for you to grab this thread by the balls and put it back on track.Seriously, whoever salvaged you by scraping you off the side of an abortion bucket needs a bullet! Will you just fuck off!! |
Freddie Jupiter 31.03.2020 05:25 |
@Big Mac, yet again, nothing to do with the topic. Are you going to post something on the topic or not? I'm getting very impatient. |
Makka 31.03.2020 05:42 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: @Big Mac, yet again, nothing to do with the topic. Are you going to post something on the topic or not? I'm getting very impatient.I'd like to take all 730 metres of that multi track tape and wrap it around you're fucken neck! Is that on topic enough for you? Now piss off! |
Freddie Jupiter 31.03.2020 06:08 |
Bravo, that is so much better than the stuff I've been posting. And not to mention less childish. The very guy who criticised me for posting childish and off topic posts has resorted to posting childish and off topic posts himself! How ironic. And no, I will not pisss off until I see a gem of a post from you that is both on topic and not childish. |
Makka 31.03.2020 06:39 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Bravo, that is so much better than the stuff I've been posting. And not to mention less childish. The very guy who criticised me for posting childish and off topic posts has resorted to posting childish and off topic posts himself! How ironic. And no, I will not pisss off until I see a gem of a post from you that is both on topic and not childish.My previous post was on topic, I spoke about the 2 inch tape being of a length of 730 metres. Now seriously mate, you have to move on and just stop with this shit. Everyone that is constantly doing the same shit just has to stop. Every thread is just turned into the same tedious shit. It's tiresome and boring and those that want to use the forum for what it's purpose is are just giving up. Shit even Reddit is better than here lately and that's saying something. Now come on mate, give it a break! |
Freddie Jupiter 31.03.2020 06:59 |
@Big Mac, no your post was off topic. Threats of physical violence are not the topic of this thread. But I see Brian May has taught you well. So once again, I await your gem of a response that both contributes to the topic of this thread, is not childish, and is not a threat of physical violence. |
Freddie Jupiter 01.04.2020 21:05 |
Still no discussion about the topic? I find that very strange given the hard time I recieved for allegedly derailing the topic by posting off topic and childish things. I left it alone for nearly two days and let's face it it's been far from lively here. What's wrong guys? |
Penetration_Guru 01.04.2020 22:52 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Still no discussion about the topic? I find that very strange given the hard time I recieved for allegedly derailing the topic by posting off topic and childish things. I left it alone for nearly two days and let's face it it's been far from lively here. What's wrong guys?It's hard to isolate any valid points within the playground taunting, so hardly surprising that nobody tries. Once you've fucked up the thread, it doesn't un-fuck up. |
Freddie Jupiter 01.04.2020 23:02 |
It does un-fuck very easily. All you have to do is grab it by the balls and post a gem of a post that will make it irresistible for people not to respond to and contribute. That's all that's required. So quit making excuses and just do it. Or are you yet another intellectually dishonest poster here? Because if you are I will very quickly expose your intellectual dishonesty for all to see, since I despise intellectual dishonesty in all its forms. |
thomasquinn 32989 02.04.2020 08:28 |
You have given several examples of intellectual dishonesty *in this thread alone*. You 'knowing' that a certain scene in the movie "didn't happen" (despite the fact that you have no way of knowing that one way or the other) and going on a crazy spree about that, posting repeated personal attacks against various people, then claiming you're not derailing the topic, claiming that your beliefs are "the truth" despite being unable to back them up with ANY reliable sources. And YOU feel the need to use the term "intellectual dishonesty" three times in a four-line post? You must be extremely irony-impaired. |
Freddie Jupiter 02.04.2020 08:33 |
I know it didn't happen and I didn't have to be there to know that. And even if it had happened, there is no way that I would have included it in what was supposed to be a biopic about Freddie Mercury because it would be extremely demeaning to Freddie Mercury. End of story. |
thomasquinn 32989 02.04.2020 08:45 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: I know it didn't happen and I didn't have to be there to know that.How do you know? I'm pretty sure Hideki Tojo didn't wear a tutu on his night off, but I cannot say with certainty "Tojo never wore a tutu". And even if it had happened, there is no way that I would have included it in what was supposed to be a biopic about Freddie Mercury because it would be extremely demeaning to Freddie Mercury.Ah, now it was a biopic about Freddie Mercury and not a biopic about Queen; not only that, it is meant to be a hagiography, because no event, even if it did happen, should be included if it was "demeaning to Freddie Mercury" (with you, obviously, being the judge of what is and isn't demeaning to Freddie Mercury) End of story.And, of course, a statement of self-appointed authority from the man with the top 0.1% IQ but little if any knowledge of how to establish historical facts or understanding of the simple fact that you cannot speak with authority when no one recognizes your authority, no matter how high your own opinion of yourself is. |
Freddie Jupiter 02.04.2020 08:57 |
Ok let's make a movie about Thomas Quinn begging Freddie Jupiter to be allowed to post his usual intellectually dishonest bullshit on the queenzone forum like a chastised worm. Would that be demeaning to Thomas Quinn? Actually, don't answer that as I really don't give a shit given the amount of intellectual dishonesty you're prepared to spew forth to justify to yourself your swallowing of Brian's bullshit wholesale. |
thomasquinn 32989 02.04.2020 10:15 |
There is a term for what you just wrote: non sequitur. |
Freddie Jupiter 02.04.2020 10:23 |
So it doesn't follow that it's reasonable to assume that any normal, mentally healthy human being would find it demeaning to be depicted in a subordinate role where they have to beg for something like a chastised schoolboy? Stop consuming Brian's bullshit and stop being an intellectually dishonest dick. |
thomasquinn 32989 02.04.2020 11:29 |
More non-sequitur. The fact that you have no evidence that a given scene did not take place does not mean that I accept "Brian's bullshit" as the gospel truth - the only intellectual dishonesty here is yours, in stacking false assumption upon false assumption and making deductions from that. Whether or not something is "demeaning" is not now, nor was it ever, the subject of our discussion - more intellectual dishonesty on your part, and more indication that you desire a hagiography, not a biography. Now, as for the psychological implications of your utter obsession with "be[ing] depicted in a subordinate role", especially given the fact that you so frequently express a rather high opinion of yourself in both direct and indirect ways, *that* is a subject you might do well to consider. Of course, that would require the ability to look at your behaviour, personality and mental state in an analytical and self-critical fashion, which, purely on the basis of your posts, I am not sure you are capable of. Still, I think there's something to be gained for you there. |
brENsKi 02.04.2020 11:59 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: More non-sequitur. The fact that you have no evidence that a given scene did not take place does not mean that I accept "Brian's bullshit" as the gospel truth - the only intellectual dishonesty here is yours, in stacking false assumption upon false assumption and making deductions from that. Whether or not something is "demeaning" is not now, nor was it ever, the subject of our discussion - more intellectual dishonesty on your part, and more indication that you desire a hagiography, not a biography. Now, as for the psychological implications of your utter obsession with "be[ing] depicted in a subordinate role", especially given the fact that you so frequently express a rather high opinion of yourself in both direct and indirect ways, *that* is a subject you might do well to consider. Of course, that would require the ability to look at your behaviour, personality and mental state in an analytical and self-critical fashion, which, purely on the basis of your posts, I am not sure you are capable of. Still, I think there's something to be gained for you there.https://i.imgur.com/2rErG5ym.png" title="source: imgur.com" /> |
Freddie Jupiter 02.04.2020 21:13 |
@thomas Quinn, you intellectually deficient and intellectually dishonest moron, I didn't not commit any non sequitur. Why the fuck you even bright that up is beyond me, except to further obfuscate and confuse so that you may win an argument no matter how intellectually dishonest. Keep swallowing Brian's bullshit and keep living in a world of deceptions and falsehoods, just like all those economic corona virus victims who instead of listening to me listened to the lies from big daddy government and the media about the economy being bullet proof and how they should borrow more money, which they now can't pay back and require cash payer funded payouts from big daddy government. The amount of corruption lies, deceptions and bullshit in the world astounds me. Enjoy the decline dipshit. |
thomasquinn 32989 03.04.2020 07:41 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: @thomas Quinn, you intellectually deficient and intellectually dishonest moron, I didn't not commit any non sequitur. Why the fuck you even bright that up is beyond me, except to further obfuscate and confuse so that you may win an argument no matter how intellectually dishonest. Keep swallowing Brian's bullshit and keep living in a world of deceptions and falsehoods, just like all those economic corona virus victims who instead of listening to me listened to the lies from big daddy government and the media about the economy being bullet proof and how they should borrow more money, which they now can't pay back and require cash payer funded payouts from big daddy government. The amount of corruption lies, deceptions and bullshit in the world astounds me. Enjoy the decline dipshit.Wow. There is so much wrong with that post. I'll just take the most disturbing part: ...just like all those economic corona virus victims who instead of listening to me listened to the lies...That is a whole lot of crazy going on there, Mr. Egomaniac a.k.a. "I'm in the top 0.1% IQ". |
Freddie Jupiter 03.04.2020 08:35 |
Enjoy the decline you intellectually dishonest half-wit, with all the other intellectually dishonest half-wit sheeple. Keep making ad hominem attacks, keep lying, keep obfuscating, keep higlighting irrelevant part of quotes and await the inevitable outcome. |
Freddie Jupiter 03.04.2020 08:39 |
@Thomsd Quinn, BTW have you managed to grasp what a non sequitur is, or would you like me to explain it to you, you dumbass. |
Freddie Jupiter 03.04.2020 09:30 |
@Thomad Quinn, where is the non sequitur you clown? Are you going to point it out to me, or are you going to finally concede that you're an intellectually deficient schmuck who is only intersted in winning his intellectually dishonest arguments instead of learning the truth? |
thomasquinn 32989 03.04.2020 13:04 |
Non sequitur, literally "[it] does not follow", a conclusion or reply that does not follow logically from the previous statement. For instance, your 'conclusion' "Stop consuming Brian's bullshit" as a reply to the statement that you cannot say for certain that you know a given thing did not happen if you don't have any evidence for it not having happened. It strikes me that there is a direct connection between the amount of profanity you spew and the degree to which you left without a leg to stand on in a discussion. Lashing out wildly when challenged is another symptom of what is quickly starting to look a whole lot like narcissistic personality disorder on your part. You might want to have that looked into in the future. |
Jake12 03.04.2020 14:00 |
Are we really still talking about nobodies/trolls!? This is seriously so fucking ridiculous! EVERYONE just ignore them! The more you talk to these idiots the more they will keep opening their mouths with bullshit that no one cares about! |
Freddie Jupiter 03.04.2020 21:23 |
Thomas Quinn you intellectually dishonest halfwit, what does a non sequitur have to do with absolute certainty? Neither does intellectual honesty have anything to do with absolute certainty. For a statement to be intellectually honest it just has to be the most likely conclusion given the available evidence. If your conclusion is not the most likely given the available evidence then you are intellectually dishonest. If I kick my friend in the balls and he doesn't like it, and then I kick my other 2 friends in the balls and they don't like it, I can safely conclude that Freddie Mercury wouldn't like it if I kicked him in the balls. That is the most likely conclusion based on the evidence and it is not a non sequitur. And to claim the opposite would be intellectually dishonest, no absolute certainty needed. In fact, science is based on exactly this kind of reasoning and methodology. So why did you accuse me of making non sequiturs and of being intellectually dishonest you clown, other than to confuse, obfuscate and win your intellectually dishonest argument? |
brENsKi 03.04.2020 21:28 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote:If I kick my friend in the balls and he doesn't like it, and then I kick my other 2 friends in the balls and they don't like it, I can safely conclude that Freddie Mercury wouldn't like it if I kicked him in the balls.has someone kicked you (very hard) in the balls? because you talk like you've had a brain trauma. |
Freddie Jupiter 03.04.2020 21:53 |
Brenski you half-wit, either point out the non sequitur that your intellectually dishonest, fascist friend Thomas Quinn accused me of making, or piss off and stop being an intellectually deficient, intellectually dishonest prick. |
brENsKi 03.04.2020 21:56 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote:Brenski you half-wit, either point out the non sequitur that your intellectually dishonest, fascist friend Thomas Quinn accused me of making, or piss off and stop being an intellectually deficient, intellectually dishonest prick.so make up your mind, Mr Jupiter. do you want to be Gerry or Mr Weckwerth? because one minute you behave exactly like Gerry, and the next you could be runner_70's identical twin. |
Freddie Jupiter 03.04.2020 22:08 |
I don't give a shit who you think I am because it's irrelevant to the discussion. Either point out the non sequitur your fascist friend Thomas Quinn accused me of making, or concede that you're an intellectually deficient, intellectually dishonest idiot. Those are your only options. You don't get a get-out-of-jail-free card just because you accuse me of being Gerry. Besides, I've opened a thread for that you ass, so use it. Or is that too hard for you? |
brENsKi 04.04.2020 08:40 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote:I don't give a shit who you think I am because it's irrelevant to the discussion.wrong again. it's 100% relevant to the discussion. it goes toward arming us with the knowledge as to which of your many *characters* we're dealing with on any given day. |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 08:59 |
Wrong! It's completely irrelevant. Finally learn what an ad hominem is and stop making a jackass out of yourself, you jackass. It really isn't that difficult a concert to grasp. In fact, even a primary school student with an average IQ is able to grasp what an ad hominem is, so I really don't understand why you're having so much difficulty with it. Unless of course you're an intellectually deficient moron. Are you an intellectually deficient moron? |
thomasquinn 32989 04.04.2020 09:04 |
So 1) you don't know what a non sequitur is 2) you don't know what fascism means 3) you don't know what intellectual integrity means 4) your epistemology skills are frankly terrible. |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 09:16 |
@ Thomas Quinn, quit stalling already. Point out my non sequitur or concede that you're an intellectually deficient, intellectually dishonest clown. |
thomasquinn 32989 04.04.2020 09:28 |
Perhaps you should re-read my second to last post, as I already did. No amount of self-obsessed chest thumping on your part is going to change anything. Also, you should realize that your own high opinion of yourself is not widely shared. Therefore, you shouldn't expect your half-witted attempts at orders to be obeyed. |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 09:35 |
There is no chest thumping at all. I'm just really curious as to why you guys are prepared to talk about everything under the sun, except the issue at the centre of the argument, which is your accusation that I was intellectually dishonest and that I employed a non sequitur, and your subsequent failure to point those out, as requested. Could it be that your failure to point those out is due to the fact that you dug yourself into a hole by being intellectually dishonest? I think yes. |
thomasquinn 32989 04.04.2020 09:41 |
Again, I already pointed it out. If you're too stupid to be able to re-read earlier posts, I'll spell it out for you - you claimed that a certain scene in the biopic did not happen. I stated that you cannot know whether or not it happened because you have no evidence one way or the other (basic epistemology), to which you replied by accusing me of the "swallowing of Brian's bullshit wholesale.", which does not in any way follow from what I wrote, making it a non sequitur. It really isn't that difficult. I'd like to point out the hysterical irony of you saying "your accusation that I was intellectually dishonest", when you are seemingly incapable of writing a single post without accusing people of "intellectual dishonesty", the two most frequently used words in your vocabulary. Interestingly, the way in which you use the term strongly suggests that you have a very deficient grasp of its meaning. Similar to how you are incapable of understanding the basics of epistemology. |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 09:46 |
I've already explained how that is neither a non sequitur, nor an example of intellectual dishonesty on my part. Or are you too stupid to understand it. Because if you are, I will explain it to you again. Would you like me to do that? |
thomasquinn 32989 04.04.2020 09:56 |
Actually, you have attempted to claim that it isn't a non sequitur, you have accidentally written that it is, and you have not offered any explanation or argument to support your position.
Here's what you, hilariously, wrote:
I didn't not commit any non sequitur.No explanation or argument there. Nothing of any substance in the rest of the post either, just a further hissy fit about Brian May and a deranged rant about how "all those economic corona virus victims who instead of listening to me listened to the lies from big daddy government and the media", combining your predilection for ultra right wing politics with your extremely inflated sense of self. Please note that I am not accusing you of intellectual dishonesty - I believe that you simply aren't capable of understanding why what you're writing is completely fallacious. |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 10:02 |
Would you like me to explain to you why what you pointed out is neither an example of intellectual dishonesty on my part, nor a non sequitur, or are you going to point out my typos now? Because so far we've gone from ad hominems, to epistomolgy, to other's opinion of me, to typos. What's next, are we going to discuss whether my grandmother was a virgin when she married my grandfather or what? |
thomasquinn 32989 04.04.2020 10:11 |
Look, you can keep insisting that a non sequitur is a non sequitur as much as you like, but it's not going to convince anyone who isn't you. Also, you're very repetitive and whiny, so I'm going to leave it at this. If you still don't understand, maybe you can get someone to read it out to you slowly and, if necessary, explain it to you in simple English. "epistomolgy". LOL. |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 10:32 |
No we are not going to leave it at this. You were intellectually dishonest by accusing me of intellectual dishonesty by claiming that I can't know for certain because I wasn't there. The point I tried to get through your thick skull is that intellectual honesty does not depend on absolute certainty. As long as one makes a conclusion that is supported by the available evidence he is intellectually honest. That's all that's required. Nobody has literally witness macro evolution for example. Nobody sat there and witnessed simple organisms evolving into fish, mammals, then primates humans etc. But based on the available evidence we can conclude that evolution is most likely true. And until such time as somebody presents strong evidence to the contrary, the theory of evolution is the intellectually honest position to take. Same with the queen movie. Based on all available evidence that scene in the movie did not take place. And until you can present some compelling evidence that it did, the intellectually honest position is that it did not happen, and to challenge that position without evidence is therefore the intellectually dishonest position. |
thomasquinn 32989 04.04.2020 11:18 |
Incredible. After failing pathetically not only in persuasively making your argument or even reproducing accurately what has been written right here, within the confines of this thread, you are now also, apparently, under the deluded impression that you have a say in whether or not I am going to further discuss the subject with you. Utterly bizarre. |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 11:28 |
I'm not asking to say or write anything. I've exposed your intellectual dishonesty like I said I would when you first tried your luck with me. Now you can piss off and stop wasting my time. |
brENsKi 04.04.2020 11:53 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote:It really isn't that difficult a concert to grasp. In fact, even a primary school student with an average IQ is able to Freddie Jupiter wrote:It really isn't that difficult a conceredt to grasp. In fact, even a primary school student with an average IQ is able to spell "concept"FIFY |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 21:03 |
@ Brenski, I told you before; I don't need an intellectually deficient halfwit who can't grasp a single primary school concept to fix anything for me. By the way Brenski, if you're such a spelling champion how come you've got capital letters in the middle of a word. Even a primary school kid knows that you can't have capitals in the middle of a word. |
brENsKi 04.04.2020 21:09 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote:@ Brenski, I told you before; I don't need an intellectually deficient halfwit who can't grasp a single primary school concept to fix anything for me. By the way Brenski, if you're such a spelling champion how come you've got capital letters in the middle of a word. Even a primary school kid knows that you can't have capitals in the middle of a word.well i t looks like you did. an absolute pleasure to help you. what word has captials in the middle? |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 21:35 |
Your name BrENsKi. The E, N and K are capitals, are they not? |
brENsKi 04.04.2020 21:54 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Your name BrENsKi. The E, N and K are capitals, are they not?you let yourself down. for someone who claims to be so "intelligent", even by your standards - it's a pretty piss-poor showing. brENsKi is a name. (oh yeah - try typing it correctly). somehow - idiot that you are - you were not aware that this is a perfectly acceptable practice for names: eBay, iPod, QuarkXPress aRMadillo online, CompuServe to name a few. with names - anything goes - there's whole ranges of conventions created for this express purpose: (included - but not limited to) bicapitlatization, camelCase, embedded caps, midcaps, incaps and - in the instance of my username - intercaps (internal capitalization) again, you are found wanting. it's not just ThomasQuinn who runs rings around you. you got this so wrong. but rather than admit it, you'll (very predictably) divert off into some other unrelated cul-de-sac. |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 22:08 |
You should not use capital letters in the middle if words. All those examples are just stupid inventions made by idiots for other idiots. Are you an idiot BrENski? Or are you a brand name -- a brand name for stupidity perhaps? |
Freddie Jupiter 04.04.2020 22:34 |
HoNeStly BrENsKi, I dOnT uNderStanD WhY yOu KeEp coMiNG baCk foR mORe AsS KiCkings? are YoU sOMe KinD of MaSoChist? I kNoW tHiS CoronViruS ThiNG mUst bE hARd oN YOu now tHat yOu cAnt MaKe yOur DaiLy ApPoiNtmeNts with youR DoMiNatRiX. |
brENsKi 05.04.2020 08:12 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote:You should not use capital letters in the middle if words. All those examples are just stupid inventions made by idiots for other idiots.maybe in your world, Mr Weckwerth! |
Freddie Jupiter 05.04.2020 08:20 |
Good come back -- not. |
The Circle of Eidolon 05.04.2020 08:48 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: You should not use capital letters in the middle if words. All those examples are just stupid inventions made by idiots for other idiots. Are you an idiot BrENski? Or are you a brand name -- a brand name for stupidity perhaps?The Circle of Eidolon has viewed your posts and arguments Freddie Jupiter. Rather than casting everyone, with intelligence, in your hateful shadows maybe you should look at your own reflection. You call someone an idiot, but the truth is you are an idiot, a pure creation an idiot who fuels his own idiocy. A simple lesson for a simple mind. When you're dead you don't know you're dead. When you're an idiot the same rule applies Learn from this Freddie Jupiter. The Circle of Eidolon has spoken, there is no argument. |
Freddie Jupiter 05.04.2020 09:00 |
Oh look, another intellectually deficient, intellectually dishonest moron. Why are you attacking me you hateful moron, when Brenski and Thomas Quinn have demonstrated a level of intellectual dishonesty the likes of which I have never seen before? Why are you choosing the side of intellectual dishonesty you prick, why are you resorting to ad hominems? Piss off with your pseudo intellectual bullshit, and quit wasting my time. |
The Circle of Eidolon 05.04.2020 09:58 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Oh look, another intellectually deficient, intellectually dishonest moron. Why are you attacking me you hateful moron, when Brenski and Thomas Quinn have demonstrated a level of intellectual dishonesty the likes of which I have never seen before? Why are you choosing the side of intellectual dishonesty you prick, why are you resorting to ad hominems? Piss off with your pseudo intellectual bullshit, and quit wasting my time.We The Circle of Eidolon explained your position in our original post. You Freddie Jupiter, in your attempt at a reply, simply proved what The Circle of Eidolon has already said. We also told you we had spoken and there is no argument. You in your world of idiocy seem unable to understand this, again demonstrating to the world that in which you are swamped you do not see. Unable to learn, and continue to insult. Let the world see the real you. We The Circle of Eidolon are aware you will learn nothing from this, but know that we have spoken and you are drifting in an endless sea with no sail and no compass, without the knowledge to find yourself. The Circle of Eidolon has spoken. |
Freddie Jupiter 05.04.2020 10:35 |
@jackass, why don't you learn how to be stop being a pretentious, intellectually dishonest, pseudo-intellectual prick. Maybe then you'll have my attention, and maybe, just maybe, I'll read your pointless drivel. Also if you have a point to make, make it now. And finally, look in the mirror at the stupid face staring back at you and ask it why it chose to side with intellectual dishonesty, instead of choosing integrity and honesty. |
The Circle of Eidolon 05.04.2020 11:12 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: . . . . . Maybe then you'll have my attention, and maybe, just maybe, I'll read your pointless drivel. Also if you have a point to make, make it now. . . .We The Circle of Eidolon already have your attention. You Freddie Jupiter have already read what we say We The Circle of Eidolon made our point in our first post. The contents of which seem to have already escaped your capacity to retain. Yet again given the facts that there is no argument, following our teaching, you have persisted showing yourself to be shallow, shallow of understanding and acceptance. If you stand next to a running stream you can not touch the same water repeatedly, once it has past it is past. Stop trying to reach for the water that's gone. Yet again we The Circle of Eidolon have spoken to someone who's understands even less than he is aware of. Say what you will, yet again there is no argument. We The Circle of Eidolon are secure in what we say, that which is understood needs no further discussion. Freddie Jupiter, you have said everything, it amounts to nothing. |
Freddie Jupiter 05.04.2020 11:20 |
What the fuck are you talking about man? This is complete drivel. And why the fuck should I listen to some prick who when given a clear choice between siding with intellectual dishonesty on one side and integrity on the other, has deliberately chosen to side with intellectual dishonesty. I have zero respect for pricks like you. |
brENsKi 05.04.2020 15:21 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: What the fuck are you talking about man? This is complete drivel. And why the fuck should I listen to some prick who when given a clear choice between siding with intellectual dishonesty on one side and integrity on the other, has deliberately chosen to side with intellectual dishonesty. I have zero respect for pricks like you.on the face of it, you have zero respect for anyone here. so why don't you do yourself a huge favour - fuck off, form your own forum and see how many followers of your Shit Gospel imbibe your Kool-Aid? |
Vocal harmony 05.04.2020 18:58 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: What the fuck are you talking about man? This is complete drivel. And why the fuck should I listen to some prick who when given a clear choice between siding with intellectual dishonesty on one side and integrity on the other, has deliberately chosen to side with intellectual dishonesty. I have zero respect for pricks like you.This is brilliant, The circle of edelon has just pissed all over you and, put bluntly in language you understand, you're too much of a dick to see it, you carry on replying even though you keep saying you're not reading what is posted. Carry on fool, you're like a cross between Gerry and Weckwerth! |
The Real Wizard 05.04.2020 20:30 |
The Circle of Eidolon wrote: you are drifting in an endless sea with no sail and no compass, without the knowledge to find yourself. The Circle of Eidolon has spoken.This is pure gold. |
Freddie Jupiter 05.04.2020 21:12 |
The circle of onion has pissed all over me. Yeah right, nobody with more than half a brain cell is buying his pretentious, pseudo- intellectual bullshit except intellectually deficient and intellectually dishonest idiots like you and The Real Idiot. Nice try though. |
Freddie Jupiter 05.04.2020 21:20 |
And one more thing: if you guys don't enjoy being called out on your intelluctually dishonest bullshit, don't adopt intellectually dishonest positions. It's that simple. It will save you having to write boring, pseudo-intellectual gibberish about seas and sails and compasses and fuck knows what else. |
Saint Jiub 05.04.2020 21:28 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: The circle of onion has pissed all over me. Yeah right, nobody with more than half a brain cell is buying his pretentious, pseudo- intellectual bullshit except intellectually deficient and intellectually dishonest idiots like you and The Real Idiot. Nice try though.woosh |
brENsKi 05.04.2020 21:31 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote:It will save you having to write boring, pseudo-intellectual gibberish about seas and sails and compasses and fuck knows what else.says the guy so far up his own colon. he's witnessing his own water extraction process - leaving just the sh*t that he ejects verbally into an unsuspecting world. |
Freddie Jupiter 05.04.2020 21:53 |
WhAt's wrOnG BrENsKi, Do yOu FeEl iNfErioR In mY pReSencE?tHat's JusT ThE uNiVeRse tELinG yoU SomEtHinG. I ThinK You'd bEtTeR liStEn. |
Freddie Jupiter 05.04.2020 21:57 |
At this point it just looks like you guys are trying to win an argument for the sake of winning an argument. And it's gotten to a point where "whoosh" is your argument. I have a tip for you: if you want to win an argument you have to start by taking up the intellectually honest position. It really is the only way. You can't begin with an intellectually dishonest argument and then expect to win in with "whoosh" or by writing boring, pseudo intellectual bullshit about seas, sails and compasses. It just doesn't work that way. |
Makka 06.04.2020 03:51 |
Anyway, back to the topic, I wonder what other unreleased Smile recordings there are that got mentioned? |
Saint Jiub 06.04.2020 04:29 |
Saint Jiub wrote:woosh ...Freddie Jupiter wrote: The circle of onion has pissed all over me. Yeah right, nobody with more than half a brain cell is buying his pretentious, pseudo- intellectual bullshit except intellectually deficient and intellectually dishonest idiots like you and The Real Idiot. Nice try though.woosh link "Unable to learn, and continue to insult. Let the world see the real you." |
Freddie Jupiter 06.04.2020 05:06 |
What am I unable to learn? Intellectual dishonesty? |
Freddie Jupiter 06.04.2020 06:00 |
@goo goo jiub, there is something I've been thinking about a lot and i was wondering if you could help me with it. How come you pull me up on insulting people but Brenski has been insulting people left, right and centre and you always let it slide? Could it be because you are intellectually dishonest, and it's not the insults you have a problem with per Se, but something else? I mean isn't that the logical conclusion, that you would reprimand Brenski for insulting people if you really had a problem with it? Help me out here. |
Makka 06.04.2020 06:54 |
Makka wrote: Anyway, back to the topic, I wonder what other unreleased Smile recordings there are that got mentioned?And again, back to the topic. Anyone aware of these unreleased recordings and what they may be? |
brENsKi 06.04.2020 08:03 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote:And one more thing: if you guys don't enjoy being called out on your intelluctually dishonest bullshit, don't adopt intellectually dishonest positions. It's that simple.says the guy who has hijacked this thread. 58 posts of the 136 (so far) are yours. and of those 58 - only ONE (your opening post) actually refers to the thread itself, and even then it's still on your own preset agenda. your sole purpose is to derail. BTW - you still haven't denied that you could be runner_70. Makka wrote:Anyway, back to the topic, I wonder what other unreleased Smile recordings there are that got mentioned?can't think there was much to be honest, do you have a reference for this? Staffell's "Silver Salmon" was never recorded by Smile, was it? i wonder if any of their "live covers" were ever rcorded in the studio? they used to perform "If I were a Carpenter", "Mony Mony", "Can’t Be So Bad", "Rollin' Over" and "See What A Fool I've Been" |
Freddie Jupiter 06.04.2020 08:15 |
|
Freddie Jupiter 06.04.2020 08:16 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Brenski, have you forgotten already how you hijacked every one of my threads with your insane accusations that I'm Gerry. If you have a problem with threads being hijacked, quit hijacking threads. It's that simple. |
Freddie Jupiter 06.04.2020 08:16 |
|
Freddie Jupiter 06.04.2020 08:18 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: Brenski, have you forgotten already how you hijacked every one of my threads with your insane accusations that I'm Gerry. If you have a problem with threads being hijacked, quit hijacking threads. It's that simple. |
Freddie Jupiter 06.04.2020 08:28 |
|
Makka 06.04.2020 08:30 |
brENsKi wrote:It was just mentioned in the article referring the the new version of Doin' Alright they did for the movie. Just states they took the middle section from an unreleased Smile recording.with Mercury Records.Makka wrote:Anyway, back to the topic, I wonder what other unreleased Smile recordings there are that got mentioned?can't think there was much to be honest, do you have a reference for this? Staffell's "Silver Salmon" was never recorded by Smile, was it? |
brENsKi 06.04.2020 13:07 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote:You should not use capital letters in the middle if words. All those examples are just stupid inventions made by idiots for other idiots. Are you an idiot BrENski? Or are you a brand name -- a brand name for stupidity perhaps?so in order to maintain a wholly consistent approach, are you now calling your dear "friend" Gerry an idiot, too? vANllLa vANllLa Deity: 3325 posts |
Freddie Jupiter 06.04.2020 22:31 |
vANIILa is allowed to write how he wants, as long as he doesn't correct my writing. It's not my my prerogative to tell people how to write, even though I don't like capital letters in the middle of the words. However, as soon as somebody corrects my writing, most of which is simple typos, I will very quickly point out the instances in which their writing doesn't conform to the accepted standards. I didn't come here to correct people's writing and to abuse and disrespect anyone, I have merely reciprcocated the abuse and the disrespect I have recieved from other people. That's all. |
The Real Wizard 07.04.2020 01:34 |
Freddie Jupiter wrote: I have merely reciprcocated the abuse and the disrespect I have recieved from other people.And there is your character in a nutshell - instead of addressing the root of the problem, you break down instead of building up. Classic bullying. Please don't breed. |
Freddie Jupiter 07.04.2020 01:57 |
@The Real Idiot, The root of the problem is your intellectual dishonesty and your constant personal attacks instead of responding to and addressing the argument in hand. Once again you had a chance to respond to the topic being discussed like an adult, but you chose a personal attack instead, like the real idiot. Your personality in a nutshell. |
runner_70 07.04.2020 21:03 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Well he is spot on and no May Sheep like youFreddie Jupiter wrote: one of the few scenes in the movie that actually resembles realityDo you have Tourette's for everything Queen related from the last 20 years that you don't personally agree with? It's almost as if your fingers are physically incapable of not typing out something negative at every given opportunity. This is curiously similar behaviour to other characters on this forum. Hmm. |