Yep my band which is personal to me!
A lot of Queen fans feel a personal attachment to the band especially if you have worshipped them as long as i have (46 years)
millionaire_waltz wrote:
Yep my band which is personal to me!
A lot of Queen fans feel a personal attachment to the band especially if you have worshipped them as long as i have (46 years)
I do feel a huge connection to them and I have been a massive fan for 32 years, but I wouldn't refer to them as my band. My favourite band yes, but they are are not your band.
I’m surprised at the results so far. Hope each individual has only voted once to keep it real. I voted option 2.
I can’t hate it because they put on a good show and you still get Brian and Roger. But I can’t love it. Just don’t like ALs voice .
i myself do not support May & Taylor because they have surely lost the good old Queen spirit now its gone.
Queen technically do not exist its just a name to make money and that is the problem, fans buying tickets and not getting the full product.
I voted for the middle option as it is Brian and Roger's band ... not Gerry's band. However, I do not approve of the collaboration.
That does not mean that I approve of the majority of QPL's 21st recent decisions:
I do not approve of Bohemian Rhapsody showing Brian in a good light and implying that Freddie had to beg to rejoin a band after supposedly quitting the band for an extended period of time.
I do not approve releasing the overpriced NotW box set with only one good disc, and not offering any options to buy the discs separately.
Freddie Jupiter wrote:
Surprise, surprise. The majority of fans don't like crapbert. The people have spoken.
Can you prove that no one stuffed the ballot box?
I hope this poll is representative of QZ opinion, but I do not believe that the voting is reliable.
This poll is about as reliable as a Chicago election where the dead vote.
Just goes to show many fans are not bothered by the lack of quality Queen is presenting with the awful AL these days.
Some people lack decent taste in music !
No idea because the options are skewered. I did not vote and thusly cannot see the totals.
Where's the "Ehh, I'm not a big fan of it but whatever.... At least it's got Brian and Roger touring. What the hell's the point of this opinion poll? Isn't it realistically something like at least 10 years later? "
matt z wrote:No idea because the options are skewered. I did not vote and thusly cannot see the totals.
@matt z this is what it's currently showing:
[color=blue]I love his performing and support B&R's decisions with him (59 votes) 54.6%
I don't like his performing but still respect B&R's decisions with him = IMO a sign of a good fan (28 votes) 25.9%
I hate everything about it (incl. no respect for B&R) = IMO not SMTH a fan would do (21 votes) 19.4%
108 total votes... [/color]
Up to date results are:
I love his performing and support B&R's decisions with him (59 votes) 53.2%
I don't like his performing but still respect B&R's decisions with him = IMO a sign of a good fan (29 votes) 26.1%
I hate everything about it (incl. no respect for B&R) = IMO not SMTH a fan would do (23 votes) 20.7%
Ah. Yeah. Considering the amount of people coming through here is prob < 30 ENGAGING, and maybe 10-20 lurkers plus 5-10 "Gerry" identities it's hardly conclusive even among those 30-50...with some likely "voting twice" or more
Still... it's the same damn topic.
I just voted and here's the updated results:
I love his performing and support B&R's decisions with him (62 votes) 51.2%
I don't like his performing but still respect B&R's decisions with him = IMO a sign of a good fan (35 votes) 28.9%
I hate everything about it (incl. no respect for B&R) = IMO not SMTH a fan would do (24 votes) 19.8%
Brenski My name is mentioned and that is stirring the shit (see below)
Ah. Yeah. Considering the amount of people coming through here is prob < 30 ENGAGING, and maybe 10-20 lurkers plus 5-10 "Gerry" identities it's hardly conclusive even among those 30-50...with some likely "voting twice" or more
Enigma wrote:
Brenski My name is mentioned and that is stirring the shit (see below)
Gerry, please re-read my post, carefully.
i didn't say it wasn't mentioned.
i was pointing out that you may prefer to use the correct word: libel - instead of slander
red a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a red defamation.
blue the action or crime of making a false blue statement damaging to a person's reputation.