QueenZone discussion #1592062

SweetCaroline wrote: Adam doesn’t sing falsetto. When he hits those high notes he does it with his head voice which is why it if so remarkable!

someone above wrote: What is wrong with way better than average? Am I supposed to say the best there ever was, is, or will ever be? Are you people never satisfied? Freddie was a person, not some kind of a demigod, which seems to be how most of you think.

snifflese wrote: What is wrong with way better than average? Am I supposed to say the best there ever was, is, or will ever be? Are you people never satisfied? Freddie was a person, not some kind of a demigod, which seems to be how most of you think.

Holly2003 wrote: Freddie's "way better than average" falsetto ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBBne8R66xo

Iron Butterfly wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: Freddie's "way better than average" falsetto ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBBne8R66xo

Effective and brilliant. He did that so well. SweetCaroline and snifflese won't watch that, because omg Freddie's chest is showing. ;-)

Holly2003 wrote: Freddie's "way better than average" falsetto ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBBne8R66xo

SweetCaroline wrote: Adam doesn’t sing falsetto. When he hits those high notes he does it with his head voice which is why it if so remarkable!

rockchic65 wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Adam doesn’t sing falsetto. When he hits those high notes he does it with his head voice which is why it if so remarkable!

It's true when he's singing with Queen he virtually never uses falsetto except for a couple of parts of In The Lap Of The Gods and maybe Play The Game but he is using quite a lot of falsetto on his new album and has used bits on odd songs in the past.

Holly2003 wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: Freddie's "way better than average" falsetto ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBBne8R66xo

Effective and brilliant. He did that so well. SweetCaroline and snifflese won't watch that, because omg Freddie's chest is showing. ;-)

And not only that, Fred was singing a song that he wrote and accompanying himself on piano in front of an audience of 500,000 people. Wearing a unitard! The man is a legend.

snifflese wrote: Only Runner babbles on about muppets, so I am guessing MW is Runner in Disguise. You are the one that is a very sad joke. You are also extremely mistaken yourself and so are many of the other boorish haters on here. You mentioned Freddie being the greatest rock singer of all time. Who on here that enjoys Adam and QAL has every said any differently? I think you all get your panties in a wad over nothing. I have seen no Glambert on this forum say anything like that. We can enjoy QAL and what Queen has going on now without constantly referring to and praising Freddie. That is not the purpose of this section of the forum. There are plenty of other places on here to do that. That is not to say that any of us disagree with that statement, but why would we have to constantly state that? So we are supposed to say," Yep, concert was great and Adam did a really nice job, but you know Freddie is still the king and does it best and he plays instruments and he wrote the music!!" Why would we have to include all that when we are talking about something quite unrelated at this point? It is a given and should just be accepted that people who post on here think that and it shouldn't have to be constantly reiterated.

snifflese wrote: Wow, Icy, you take the cake. I just said there is no Adam fan on here who wouldn't attest to the fact that Freddie is the greatest rock singer of all time. Yet that is not good enough for you. Somehow I am bitter and it bothers me. Really the person who seems to be most bothered by this section of the forum is YOU! You are bitter and don't want anyone but Freddie to be discussed, but I find that kind of ridiculous, since you do no posting about Freddie. I have not seen one post in all these years where you are doing something other than complaining, whining or giving crap to people who like QAL and Adam. Why don't you have a think about that since you seem determined that Freddie should and will be discussed on a Queen board no less (even though some particularly thick people can't get it thought their fat heads that this is not A Queen part of the forum, but a QAL section which you people always say is not Queen). Where are all your brilliant posts? Right, you don't and probably can't write any. So my question is why you would want to post here on a section that is not Queen, concerning a singer you pretty much hate and a band that you really dislike. That to me is the 64,000 dollar question and it is also pertains to all your like minded (thick) buddies! So, just in case you didn't get it, I have 3 questions for you, Icy. What more do we have to say about the great Freddie other than the above statement? #2 Why do you post here since this is not about Queen and you only like things related to Queen? 3) Where are all your scintillating posts for us so that we can glean things from your vast knowledge of Queen and particularly Freddie? Even on here in all your bitching you never say anything really about Freddie. I don't understand the situation here at all. Maybe you could enlighten me as to your thoughts.

snifflese wrote: Ivy, you sound like a nut job. I had several longer posts today with info about Adam's voice and why I like it, why I think some of you are misinformed and I also acknowledged Freddie is the greatest. I also stated what things I am less impressed with about Adam and shared that I am perhaps not as crazy a Glambert as some of you think. There are a number of things I disagree with in his career and some of his choices. I am not a fawning Glambert, but I still prefer his voice to any other I have heard, not necessarily rock, as Freddie is the master there. But for other types of music he can't be beat. That is my opinion, doesn't have to be yours. I also explained why I think he is the best LIVE singer and not going to go into that again. All you do is pick apart posts, no matter how long ago and pick out a few words and then you attack. You say nothing about Freddie really. He deserves respect, no one disagrees, but that is not anything earth shattering or informative. All you do is call out other posters, you are even on RC's case now., Your post above is garbage. You mention bigging up, promoting, crying foul, chest hair. Grow up Icy. You sound like a gosh darned 5 year old repeating the same old crap. In case your brain is too thick,I will repeat for the 100th time,This is the QAL SECTION of the Queen forum and unless I am missing something, Freddie is not an active performer in that group. Do you understand that concept? It seems to be really hard to you to grasp and it should not be that tough. As to your last statement, I am glad Adam gets no credit from you and your cohorts, since I would not want to be supported by such a nasty, close minded, mean little group of people and I doubt Queen would want to include you either. Brian and Roger don;t seem like mean, spiteful people and I doubt very much Freddie was either, Normal people are appalled by your pettiness and nastiness.

snifflese wrote: Freddie doesn't get me going, it is YOU and your absolute refusal to see that other people have opinions that don't have to include Freddie. You are the most close minded, judgmental, mean person I have ever seen. The other guys are annoying and are pretty dumb acting for the most part, but you are just mean and cold through and through. You also are totally deluded with your Freddie obsession. I can see what Adam is, appreciate him and still recognize things that IMP should be different. I think I see him pretty clearly and I also realize other people like other things, but you aren't like that. It is all Freddie for you, all the time and to hell with anyone who doesn't think he is as important as you do. You cannot expect that level of hero worship in most people. Other people are allowed to have other heroes, that is not for you to dictate.

snifflese wrote: No, dear, I have lived in every part of the US, in Asia and in two European countries. The last thing I am is sheltered. That is a real hoot. I have come into more contact with people than 95% of the population due to constant moving. My father and husband had jobs that required a move every 2-3 years in different part of the US and the rest of the world. I have visited most every country in Europe and two countries in Asia, one of which I lived in for almost three years. I have lived in the Northeast, south, Southwest, Calif and visited over half of the states. You are totally wrong on that front! So when I say that I have never met anyone like you, that includes a lot of people and it is not flattering to you at all. Keep on with your delusions as I can see what a happy camper you are! For the last time how I feel about Adam has nothing to do with Freddie. They are different people in different times. Why you always equate the two, I don't understand. I am too much of a lady to tell you what I think you are, but (Hint Hint) it is not flattering!

snifflese wrote:No, dear, I have lived in every part of the US, in Asia and in red. The last thing I am is sheltered. That is a real hoot. I have come into more contact with people than 95% of the population due to constant moving. My father and husband had jobs that required a move every 2-3 years in different part of the US and the rest of the world. I have visited most red and two countries in Asia, one of which I lived in for almost three years.

brENsKi wrote: I'm thinking there's a more important question being overlooked here: kijk naar de thread titel blue Was the OP - Papa Lazarou, the result of a breeding programme using Yoda's ova and Gerry's sperm?

PAPA EMERITUS VI wrote: Freddie should ne praised EVERYWHERE! As a singer, musician, and entertainer Lambert is amazing and brings his own fabulous shoes to the party

brENsKi wrote:

snifflese wrote:No, dear, I have lived in every part of the US, in Asia and in red. The last thing I am is sheltered. That is a real hoot. I have come into more contact with people than 95% of the population due to constant moving. My father and husband had jobs that required a move every 2-3 years in different part of the US and the rest of the world. I have visited most red and two countries in Asia, one of which I lived in for almost three years.

so which is it? red European Countries? - or red European Countries? or do you even know?

I have come into more contact with people than 95% of the population due to constant moving.

no you haven't. your statement doesn't say/measure anything. EVERYONE (who isn't a hermit) has come into the same amount of contact with people as yourself, ie - either 100% contact with other people - or 0% contact with other people.

My father and husband had jobs that required a move every 2-3 years

why is your father also your husband? what a tight-knit family arrangement you have going on there.

PAPA EMERITUS VI wrote: TOPIC WAS STARTED JUST TO TROLL BUT ALL OF YOU ARE GOING INTO A SERIOUS DISCUSSION... WHOEHAHAHAHAHA...FUCKIN LOSERS..... YOU'RE ALL SO FUCKIN' PATHETIC!! PAPA EMERITUS VI from The Clergy has spoken !! Now silence you miserable infidels !!!

SaddleBrownSaddleBrown

purplepurplered

SaddleBrown[color=SaddleBrown]Just do not speak to me on here because you are a complete waste of time, all you do is hurl insults and to be honest i am better than that. Go and find your breed on here because i am better than you Mr. Bully boy.[/color]

SaddleBrownSaddleBrown.

snifflese wrote: Trying to be cute, Brenski, but never contributing to the conversation. Well, if you can't understand what I wrote, then I must assume you are not an English speaker or you are not very literate. In either case try parsing your own little statements or take a look at Icy's. She certainly displays a wonderful grasp of English, but you only pick on certain people. When people do try to answer and dispel remarks made about them, you people go into overdrive with the uncalled for nastiness and sarcasm Your critiques are stupid and just trying to show how smart you are, but you come across as a rude, uneducated boorish individual.

snifflese wrote:blue

SaddleBrownSaddleBrown

snifflese wrote: I am not sure what you don't understand. I have visited almost every country in Europe other than behind the Iron Curtain (or what used to be). I have lived in 2 European countries, one for 3 years and the other for about 10 in the course of three different tours. I have visited 2 Asian countries and lived in one for 3 years. I have visited every geographical area of the US, taken vacations, driven through and stopped. I have lived in 6 states all in different areas (at least 3 years in each state) and visited another 20 for longer vacations and stopped in a lot of them just visiting on our way through to somewhere else. I don't think there is a state other than Alaska that I haven't at least driven through on one of our moves' Of course I would have met a lot more people than someone who lives in a small place for their entire life. Every place we moved to was a different group of people and large groups due to my husband's job. So your second point is stupid and absolutely false. I am not even sure what your point was, but I didn't sit on the computer in some crappy room and just fight with people online. Trust me I have truly met 10's of thousands of people, if you add them all up over the years. I am not saying I was friends with that many, or even a close aquaintance, but I have met a ton of people through my husband's job, my teaching, and my son's activities. If you go to one very large cocktail party you can speak to a good 50 people in one night. I spent a good part of my life doing things like that. You don't know me or what I have experienced in my life so you have a hell of a lot of nerve telling me I am not telling you the truth, but that is what you people do. There are people out there who live interesting lives that include lots of moves and have more going on in their lives than posting here. At this point in my life things are quiet and I thought it might be fun to meet some nice people here with a similar interest, but boy was that mistaken idea. For all you people bad mouth Adamtopia, those gals are close and meet up for different events and just support one another. Not like on here where you people want to eat one another alive and call everyone out. Think what you want Brenski but you are full of it. Big deal, I should have typed "my" twice but I think any reasonable person would realize the two are not the same person. Geez Louise, that is just downright stupid and shows you are just trying to be disruptive. If you were dumb enough to think that, it isn't my problem. All you are is a boorish, nasty, nit picking person that I am never going to answer again.

PAPA EMERITUS VI wrote: ***Taking a shit*** (for real)

snifflese wrote:Trust me I have truly met 10's of thousands of people, if you add them all up over the years. I am not saying I was friends with that many, or even a close aquaintance, but I have met a ton of people through my husband's job, my teaching, and my son's activities.

brENsKi wrote:

snifflese wrote:Trust me I have truly met 10's of thousands of people, if you add them all up over the years. I am not saying I was friends with that many, or even a close aquaintance, but I have met a ton of people through my husband's job, my teaching, and my son's activities.

how does that equate to anything meaningful? I worked in the Prison Service, for 33 years. I've worked in 120 of the UK's prisons - with face-to-face contact with different prisoners on an almost daily basis. even a conservative estimate puts that at 80,000 prisoners. and then there's the staff - most UK jails have at least 50 staff - that another 10,000. I've travelled to most countries in Europe as well as Turkey, Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Mexico, Colombia, Panama, Venezuela, Jamaica, Barbados, St Lucia, Grand Cayman, Cuba and more besides. the point being - it's all meaningless rubbish. meeting people counts for nothing. and your pissing contest is rather silly.

snifflese wrote: I wrote that because you, Icy, said that I must have led a very sheltered life which to means being in one place and never getting out, never interacting with people. That was the point. I wrote that in response to your false assumption about me and you have said that several times in various posts. That was the point, Brenski about living in different places and meeting lots of different people. I didn't just randomly throw that into the conversation. I would like to know what your fascination with shit is, Icy? Is shit all you ever think about, because it sure seems to be all you ever post about. The shittiest thing of all is having to read your crap.

snifflese wrote: Freddie doesn't get me going, it is YOU and your absolute refusal to see that other people have opinions that don't have to include Freddie. You are the most close minded, judgmental, mean person I have ever seen. The other guys are annoying and are pretty dumb acting for the most part, but you are just mean and cold through and through. You also are totally deluded with your Freddie obsession. I can see what Adam is, appreciate him and still recognize things that IMP should be different. I think I see him pretty clearly and I also realize other people like other things, but you aren't like that. It is all Freddie for you, all the time and to hell with anyone who doesn't think he is as important as you do. You cannot expect that level of hero worship in most people. Other people are allowed to have other heroes, that is not for you to dictate.

snifflese wrote: That was the point, Brenski about living in different places and meeting lots of different people. I didn't just randomly throw that into the conversation.

brENsKi wrote:

snifflese wrote: That was the point, Brenski about living in different places and meeting lots of different people. I didn't just randomly throw that into the conversation.

but it's irrelevant and meaningless. what does it prove? unless you forged meaningful relationships with EVERY SINGLE person you've met, then 1,000,000 or 100 - it's all the same. the only number that actually counts in relation to life experience, is the "meaningful relationship" element.

snifflese wrote: Icy, you are a true idiot. I did not say I have met 95% of the world's population!!! You can group people according to their interactions, how many folks they have been exposed to during the course of their lives, etc. I am not talking about friends or meaningful relationships. I am sure I would be at the very upper end of individuals who have met many, many different people during their life because of our lifestyle. It was simply to point out to you that I have not been "sheltered" which you have accused me of numerous time. I am sure I am much more worldly than you,due to my different experiences in many parts of the world. no matter how you want to phrase that. I am not sheltered, end of story. Sorry I told you anything at all and I won't do that again. I have shared a few things now and again and you always respond the same way. it is useless to try to answer anything that you post. The only thing you are well versed in is your favorite topic "shit" and I don't know anything about that, so it is useless to respond to you.

snifflese wrote: No, dear, I have lived in every part of the US, in Asia and in two European countries. The last thing I am is sheltered. That is a real hoot. I have come into more contact with people than 95% of the population due to constant moving. My father and husband had jobs that required a move every 2-3 years in different part of the US and the rest of the world. I have visited most every country in Europe and two countries in Asia, one of which I lived in for almost three years. I have lived in the Northeast, south, Southwest, Calif and visited over half of the states. You are totally wrong on that front! So when I say that I have never met anyone like you, that includes a lot of people and it is not flattering to you at all. Keep on with your delusions as I can see what a happy camper you are! For the last time how I feel about Adam has nothing to do with Freddie. They are different people in different times. Why you always equate the two, I don't understand. I am too much of a lady to tell you what I think you are, but (Hint Hint) it is not flattering!

Iron Butterfly wrote:

snifflese wrote: No, dear, I have lived in every part of the US, in Asia and in two European countries. The last thing I am is sheltered. That is a real hoot. I have come into more contact with people than 95% of the population due to constant moving. My father and husband had jobs that required a move every 2-3 years in different part of the US and the rest of the world. I have visited most every country in Europe and two countries in Asia, one of which I lived in for almost three years. I have lived in the Northeast, south, Southwest, Calif and visited over half of the states. You are totally wrong on that front! So when I say that I have never met anyone like you, that includes a lot of people and it is not flattering to you at all. Keep on with your delusions as I can see what a happy camper you are! For the last time how I feel about Adam has nothing to do with Freddie. They are different people in different times. Why you always equate the two, I don't understand. I am too much of a lady to tell you what I think you are, but (Hint Hint) it is not flattering!

Oh wait a second, you have said you have come into contact 95% of the population. This is in your post here.

brENsKi wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote:

snifflese wrote: No, dear, I have lived in every part of the US, in Asia and in two European countries. The last thing I am is sheltered. That is a real hoot. I have come into more contact with people than 95% of the population due to constant moving. My father and husband had jobs that required a move every 2-3 years in different part of the US and the rest of the world. I have visited most every country in Europe and two countries in Asia, one of which I lived in for almost three years. I have lived in the Northeast, south, Southwest, Calif and visited over half of the states. You are totally wrong on that front! So when I say that I have never met anyone like you, that includes a lot of people and it is not flattering to you at all. Keep on with your delusions as I can see what a happy camper you are! For the last time how I feel about Adam has nothing to do with Freddie. They are different people in different times. Why you always equate the two, I don't understand. I am too much of a lady to tell you what I think you are, but (Hint Hint) it is not flattering!

Oh wait a second, you have said you have come into contact 95% of the population. This is in your post here.

no. in fairness - she hasn't said that. she was trying to say that she has "come into contact with more people than 95% of the population have". just not very well worded.

snifflese wrote: I am not sure what you don't understand. I have visited almost every country in Europe other than behind the Iron Curtain (or what used to be). I have lived in 2 European countries, one for 3 years and the other for about 10 in the course of three different tours. I have visited 2 Asian countries and lived in one for 3 years. I have visited every geographical area of the US, taken vacations, driven through and stopped. I have lived in 6 states all in different areas (at least 3 years in each state) and visited another 20 for longer vacations and stopped in a lot of them just visiting on our way through to somewhere else. I don't think there is a state other than Alaska that I haven't at least driven through on one of our moves' Of course I would have met a lot more people than someone who lives in a small place for their entire life. Every place we moved to was a different group of people and large groups due to my husband's job. So your second point is stupid and absolutely false. I am not even sure what your point was, but I didn't sit on the computer in some crappy room and just fight with people online. Trust me I have truly met 10's of thousands of people, if you add them all up over the years. I am not saying I was friends with that many, or even a close aquaintance, but I have met a ton of people through my husband's job, my teaching, and my son's activities. If you go to one very large cocktail party you can speak to a good 50 people in one night. I spent a good part of my life doing things like that. You don't know me or what I have experienced in my life so you have a hell of a lot of nerve telling me I am not telling you the truth, but that is what you people do. There are people out there who live interesting lives that include lots of moves and have more going on in their lives than posting here. At this point in my life things are quiet and I thought it might be fun to meet some nice people here with a similar interest, but boy was that mistaken idea. For all you people bad mouth Adamtopia, those gals are close and meet up for different events and just support one another. Not like on here where you people want to eat one another alive and call everyone out. Think what you want Brenski but you are full of it. Big deal, I should have typed "my" twice but I think any reasonable person would realize the two are not the same person. Geez Louise, that is just downright stupid and shows you are just trying to be disruptive. If you were dumb enough to think that, it isn't my problem. All you are is a boorish, nasty, nit picking person that I am never going to answer again.

snifflese wrote: Now that I know the grammar patrol is out in full force, I will read and edit my posts instead of just dashing them off between doing other things! As far as paragraphs, sometimes putting just a few sentences into its own paragraph doesn't make much sense when it takes so much room on the screen. I didn't know these things were quite so critical after having read the garbage that passes for proper English on this site. Note taken! You better make sure you get after some of the other offenders, otherwise it makes it seem as if you just go after certain people and we can't have that now, can we?

Saint Jiub wrote:

snifflese wrote: I am not sure what you don't understand. I have visited almost every country in Europe other than behind the Iron Curtain (or what used to be). I have lived in 2 European countries, one for 3 years and the other for about 10 in the course of three different tours. I have visited 2 Asian countries and lived in one for 3 years. I have visited every geographical area of the US, taken vacations, driven through and stopped. I have lived in 6 states all in different areas (at least 3 years in each state) and visited another 20 for longer vacations and stopped in a lot of them just visiting on our way through to somewhere else. I don't think there is a state other than Alaska that I haven't at least driven through on one of our moves' Of course I would have met a lot more people than someone who lives in a small place for their entire life. Every place we moved to was a different group of people and large groups due to my husband's job. So your second point is stupid and absolutely false. I am not even sure what your point was, but I didn't sit on the computer in some crappy room and just fight with people online. Trust me I have truly met 10's of thousands of people, if you add them all up over the years. I am not saying I was friends with that many, or even a close aquaintance, but I have met a ton of people through my husband's job, my teaching, and my son's activities. If you go to one very large cocktail party you can speak to a good 50 people in one night. I spent a good part of my life doing things like that. You don't know me or what I have experienced in my life so you have a hell of a lot of nerve telling me I am not telling you the truth, but that is what you people do. There are people out there who live interesting lives that include lots of moves and have more going on in their lives than posting here. At this point in my life things are quiet and I thought it might be fun to meet some nice people here with a similar interest, but boy was that mistaken idea. For all you people bad mouth Adamtopia, those gals are close and meet up for different events and just support one another. Not like on here where you people want to eat one another alive and call everyone out. Think what you want Brenski but you are full of it. Big deal, I should have typed "my" twice but I think any reasonable person would realize the two are not the same person. Geez Louise, that is just downright stupid and shows you are just trying to be disruptive. If you were dumb enough to think that, it isn't my problem. All you are is a boorish, nasty, nit picking person that I am never going to answer again.

Wow ... longer than an IB post ... but less substance ... and an inability to understand the concept of paragraphs.

snifflese wrote: Trying to be cute, Brenski, but never contributing to the conversation. Well, if you can't understand what I wrote, then I must assume you are not an English speaker or you are not very literate. In either case try parsing your own little statements or take a look at Icy's. She certainly displays a wonderful grasp of English, but you only pick on certain people. When people do try to answer and dispel remarks made about them, you people go into overdrive with the uncalled for nastiness and sarcasm Your critiques are stupid and just trying to show how smart you are, but you come across as a rude, uneducated boorish individual.

snifflese wrote: Now that I know the grammar patrol is out in full force, I will read and edit my posts instead of just dashing them off between doing other things! You better make sure you get after some of the other offenders, otherwise it makes it seem as if you just go after certain people and we can't have that now, can we?

Saint Jiub wrote:

Stick wrote: A topic title without a subject and a post consisting of an image without context. There is no obvious meaning to be distilled so what exactly is the use of this? At least try to let us know what the deal is?

link Based on the "Gerry" grammar of the title, my guess is that the "intent" is to install malware. For those who downloaded, performing an antivirus scan might be a good idea.

Saint Jiub wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

Jazz+ wrote: because your becoming

YOU'RE. Learn to write.

"Circle" saying that Jazz has learned nothing is spot on. Jazz repeatedly misuses "your" despite repeatedly being given helpful grammar hints which he never appreciates. Hees a ungreatful basturd.

Saint Jiub wrote:

Jazz+ wrote: No one gives a fig about your pathetic put downs so toddle off and go fuck your Mrs m8 you might make yourself look even more of a cunt there !

Jazz makes himself look like a cunt by using his incredible punctuation "skills".

Saint Jiub wrote: They're coming to take Gerry away ... and please note who is wearing the white coats: link

Saint Jiub wrote: Gerry, runner, and SC - the 3 Stooges of trolls.

snifflese wrote:Now that I know the grammar patrol is out in full force, I will read and edit my posts instead of just dashing them off between doing other things! As far as paragraphs, sometimes putting just a few sentences into its own paragraph doesn't make much sense when it takes so much room on the screen. I didn't know these things were quite so critical after having read the garbage that passes for proper English on this site. Note taken! You better make sure you get after some of the other offenders, otherwise it makes it seem as if you just go after certain people and we can't have that now, can we?

brENsKi wrote:

snifflese wrote:Now that I know the grammar patrol is out in full force, I will read and edit my posts instead of just dashing them off between doing other things! As far as paragraphs, sometimes putting just a few sentences into its own paragraph doesn't make much sense when it takes so much room on the screen. I didn't know these things were quite so critical after having read the garbage that passes for proper English on this site. Note taken! You better make sure you get after some of the other offenders, otherwise it makes it seem as if you just go after certain people and we can't have that now, can we?

and that's your response? you wording and grammar in your original post were lacking enough to cause ambiguity - ie where something meant to say one thing, actually says another. another thing, before you attack me like i'm somehow impartial, why don't you ask Gerry and one or two others about how their grammar/spelling and lack of command of English is addressed? finally, check just a few posts earlier...i actually, pointed out to IB his/her mistake in reading your post incorrectly - which shows true objectivity. so this isn't some witch hunt, ok.

PAPA EMERITUS VI wrote: You're all so fuckin' LAME...you got your faces in your own asses...so much that it's getting ridiculous… WHOEHAHAHAHAHA

SaddleBrownSaddleBrown

SaddleBrown[color=SaddleBrown] Everywhere you go you get aggressive and start fighting with everyone on here and so i am collecting your little masterpieces and will present them to the guy on here who owns this site. I hope you get wiped away from this site as it would be a much nicer place without infidels like you on it.[/color]

snifflese wrote: I guess this forum is about grammar now. What a waste of time. I am never going to answer a question again or try to explain anything.

snifflese wrote: I don't think there is anything wrong with the live IG video. It is a nice gesture that he made it. He is thinking of his fans and it is boring to sit with nothing to do right now, so it gets his mind and his fan's minds off of the virus for a while. Artists are a bit eccentric and he is wearing velvet, the theme of the album, and he is paying homage to New Eyes with the pics of the eyes behind him and the glasses. Everyone from way back until now wears wear shades. They are kind of cool and match the vibe of the red velvet. You can't reinvent the wheel as far as things to wear and hair anymore. I find it interesting that people criticize his looks and his outfits (not today specifically, but in general), when Elton John and Gaga and others never get the same criticism. I also don't understand the fat business. Who cares? Pictures are deceiving and the camera adds 10lbs they always say. He also tends to wear big floppy clothes for whatever reason. The pants are the only tighter piece of clothing otherwise he tends to layer and it is hard to see anything. I do know that I did a photo with him a few years back and was astounded how thin he was in real life. After the hug you could tell there wasn't much meat on the old bones, although on the stage in all his finery, he didn't look skinny. I don't know if he has gained since then, but I doubt he is fat like some of you love saying. The music live was really good at my concert in Dec, so I will probably buy this album and maybe it will grow on me. Hearing it track by track was a lot of fun and I appreciate it a little more and the thought that went into the album. We will see what happens with it. He isn't afraid to go down different paths and I admire him for that. He can do what he likes and it either works or it doesn't.

SaddleBrown SaddleBrown

snifflese wrote: I wasn't talking about a general question or topic. I was talking about when someone specifically, as in usually Icy, says something about me or asks one of her questions. Every time I have tried to explain why I felt something or why she wasn't correct in her assertion about me, it has gone South. So I will really try hard to not answer her or anyone like her when it is specific aimed at me. The above post had nothing to do with me, so I felt I could comment. Apologies to the Grammar Patrol for not making that more clear!!

SaddleBrownSaddleBrown

SaddleBrown

SaddleBrown

SaddleBrown

SaddleBrown