Just because John seldom sang doesn't automatically make him a worse vocalist that crapbert. In fact, his vocals on radio ga ga are infinitely more palatable than any vocal from crapbert -- ever.
And going by the poll results a huge number of people seem to agree with me.
Freddie Jupiter wrote:
Just because John seldom sang doesn't automatically make him a worse vocalist that crapbert. In fact, his vocals on radio ga ga are infinitely more palatable than any vocal from crapbert -- ever.
And going by the poll results a huge number of people seem to agree with me.
I didn't say in that he was a bad singer, but he certainly didn't like it. He could've sang on songs but he chose not to. Why? He can't sing (even he admitted that in several interviews). Solution? Singing lessons. Did he? No.
You're comparing Adam who has sang more than 200 full-length concerts to John whose singing barely exists on record (add it up probably about three or four minutes).
His singing is very mediocre and positively annoying. I've heard karaoke versions of queen songs done by nobodies who sounded more palatable than crapbert.
Deacy's vocals on radio ga go on the magic tour rock. Don't try to deny it.
Freddie Jupiter wrote:
His singing is very mediocre and positively annoying. I've heard karaoke versions of queen songs done by nobodies who sounded more palatable than crapbert.
Deacy's vocals on radio ga go on the magic tour rock. Don't try to deny it.
I'm not saying it's bad but hearing John's vocals is probably not something he would've wanted but had no say over.
I'm blown away that it's 70 percent in deacys favour. I would have been quite content with a 50/50 split, actually. It looks as though I've overestimated crapbert's vocal abilities. But that's just me; I tend to go too easy on people.