QueenZone discussion #1588865

Saint Jiub wrote: Adam Lambert’s Sparkle Cows Piss on Queen Fans link

matt z wrote: 2012.... 7-8 year old blog. Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang. 8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts? Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical. Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose. Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"? "What's with all the typos in this article"? "Does anybody know the date of this article" etc. At least that'd be ironic. Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either.

matt z wrote: 2012.... 7-8 year old blog. Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang. 8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts? Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical. Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose. Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"? "What's with all the typos in this article"? "Does anybody know the date of this article" etc. At least that'd be ironic. Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either.

rockchic65 wrote:

matt z wrote: 2012.... 7-8 year old blog. Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang. 8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts? Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical. Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose. Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"? "What's with all the typos in this article"? "Does anybody know the date of this article" etc. At least that'd be ironic. Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either.

It's some random's blog back in 2012 after their very first shows together!!!

matt z wrote: Haha^ maybe so.... but have you seen the BM guitars shirt?

MisterCosmicc wrote: I heard Adam’s relationship came to an end after he walked into his (ex) boyfriend’s apartment, and the song “Smell Yo Dick” was playing.

snifflese wrote: Some voices only work with the harder rock (PR) and some with the ballads and some not at all with the quirky songs. .

ST16 wrote: i was chatting to one lady recently on social media and she went to her first Adam & Queen gig and ran out after 15 mins she said Adam was awful and never again!

rockchic65 wrote:

MisterCosmicc wrote: I heard Adam’s relationship came to an end after he walked into his (ex) boyfriend’s apartment, and the song “Smell Yo Dick” was playing.

Are you sure you're an older Queen fan? Your posts recently would suggest you're around 12 years old at most and that's being generous.

MisterCosmicc wrote:

rockchic65 wrote:

MisterCosmicc wrote: I heard Adam’s relationship came to an end after he walked into his (ex) boyfriend’s apartment, and the song “Smell Yo Dick” was playing.

Are you sure you're an older Queen fan? Your posts recently would suggest you're around 12 years old at most and that's being generous.

His ex could smell shit.

snifflese wrote: I agree with you totally, Music Fan! There are all sorts of voices and Adam's fits the bill for a voice that can credibly sing the whole vast catalog. Some voices only work with the harder rock (PR) and some with the ballads and some not at all with the quirky songs. Adam can sing them all and do justice to everything, even if his voice is most suited to the ballads and the ones with an operatic flair. I like the idea of respecting Brian and Roger, which isn't in much evidence around here most of the time. They also created the music and music is their life. They should not have to give up their career and their passion. It isn't their fault that Freddie isn't here to sing at this point in time. I am sure they do this for love, not for money, as some of you keep pointing out! Way too many comments about Adam's voice for him not be a huge draw for the concerts. The musical work is super, as Brian is still near the top of his game, but no one will listen to a singer they dislike for two hours. People are coming out for Brian, Roger and ADAM even if that idea does not fit the QZ agenda.