Day dop 07.09.2019 05:58 |
Sold separately to the "Never Boring" set. Here... link |
stevelondon20 07.09.2019 08:00 |
Really looking forward to hearing the new mixes. |
Chief Mouse 07.09.2019 13:11 |
Pre-ordered it from the Queen official website a couple days ago. To be honest, I'm quite excited for the new mix :) |
cmi 07.09.2019 13:35 |
I didn't like this phrase from press-release: "They went back not to previously remastered and mixed tapes, but to the original source multi-track tapes, so that they could build a new mix true to Freddie’s original versions". I hoped that they will make this new mix more natural and live sounding with less drum machines and synths... As a lot of music was recorded live with real drums and bass guitar during those sessions. We'll see... |
vonkeil 07.09.2019 13:54 |
Not sure if this has been mentioned before, but I just noticed this interesting little detail in the video description for the new LMLTNT clip on YouTube: "Associated Performer, Vocals, Piano, Background Vocalist, Keyboards, Producer: Freddie Mercury Associated Performer, Drums: Curt Cress Associated Performer, Bass Guitar: Neil Fairclough ..." As far as I know a German guy named Stephan Wissnet played bass on the original 1985 recording. So apparently Neil Fairclough has put down a completely new bass track for the song - if not for the whole MBG album!? |
cmsdrums 07.09.2019 14:15 |
Can you provide a link to that Neil Fairclough credit please? I can’t see it on the official ‘Freddie Mercury Solo’ page for the video on YouTube? Thanks. |
vonkeil 07.09.2019 14:42 |
link |
cmi 07.09.2019 15:12 |
Nice catch indeed... And Stephan Wissnet is also there as the synth player: Associated Performer, Vocals, Piano, Background Vocalist, Keyboards, Producer: Freddie Mercury Associated Performer, Drums: Curt Cress Associated Performer, Bass Guitar: Neil Fairclough Associated Performer, Piano, Synthesizer: Fred Mandel Associated Performer, Kurzweil, Synthesizer, Studio Personnel, Asst. Recording Engineer: Stephan Wissnet Associated Performer, Kurzweil, Synthesizer, Studio Personnel, Engineer, Producer: Mack Studio Personnel, Engineer: Justin Shirley-Smith Studio Personnel, Engineer, Mixer, Producer: Joshua J Macrae Producer: Justin Shirley-Smith Studio Personnel, Mixer: Justin Shirley-Smith Studio Personnel, Mastering Engineer: Adam Ayan As I understand Neil Fairclough is current Q+AL bass player. |
vonkeil 07.09.2019 15:18 |
I couldn't make out any significant difference though between the 1985 and the new version, except that the bass seems to be a lot more prominent in the new mix. |
matt z 07.09.2019 15:31 |
Sounds very interesting "indeed". Might actually have to pick this one up (*for a third time fffs) Let's just hope they didn't re-record the orchestral bits with that same orchestra used on BARCELONA: Mired Edition |
runner_70 07.09.2019 15:39 |
vonkeil wrote: I couldn't make out any significant difference though between the 1985 and the new version, except that the bass seems to be a lot more prominent in the new mix.Check you ears mate seriously. It sounds completely different and the voice is much clearer than on the original version |
vonkeil 07.09.2019 15:45 |
@runner_70 I was referring to the bass line. The vocals sound totally different, sure. ;-) |
Negative Creep 07.09.2019 16:09 |
runner_70 wrote: Check you ears mate seriously. It sounds completely different and the voice is much clearer than on the original versionNonsense! Obviously it is a different mix, but to most people they simply won't hear any difference. The biggest difference is that the vocals are clearer with less reverb. Sonically barely different to the original mix. |
inu-liger 07.09.2019 16:38 |
Yes, they re-recoded the bass parts because the original parts were sloppy and faulty |
silver_salmon 07.09.2019 16:44 |
Not all the song were taken from the 24 tracks, LMLTNT has the same awful sudden fade out. And Also “Special Edition” without any bonus track?? Thank God exists Spotify |
matt z 07.09.2019 17:25 |
Yes, I agree. They should've enlisted remixers to create a new BONUS techno song LOVE ME LIKE THERE'S MR DANGEROUS I'm just upset that they've effectively put the original BARCELONA out of print. Guess they technically created a new work from the redo and wish to reap in better percentages. It's the only thing that'd explain how they'd release a VERY inferior version of his DUET album with MONTSERRAT CABALLE |
matt z 07.09.2019 17:26 |
....or as the Brits called her "Montserrat Kabali " |
dudeofqueen 07.09.2019 19:38 |
Chief Mouse, re: >Pre-ordered it from the Queen official website a couple days ago. To be honest, I'm quite excited for the new mix :) Wishing you all the very best with it, but, remember, you're free to return the disc(s) as faulty if they are as I believe they will turn out to be - highly polished turds. Have to ask what actually is the point of this release? Fred gave up on it once the mix was completed and returned to Queen after getting over his hissy fit. Is this just an attempt to give a bit of legitimacy to a release that was botched from the very start or, will the new "mix" just be making it sound more "Queen". Would love for it to be **BETTER** but, unless it's taken over by John and Roger with guitar parts added by Brian "off piste", there's very little chance it will have any value. |
Day dop 07.09.2019 19:54 |
dudeofqueen wrote: Chief Mouse, re: >Pre-ordered it from the Queen official website a couple days ago. To be honest, I'm quite excited for the new mix :) Wishing you all the very best with it, but, remember, you're free to return the disc(s) as faulty if they are as I believe they will turn out to be - highly polished turds. Have to ask what actually is the point of this release? Fred gave up on it once the mix was completed and returned to Queen after getting over his hissy fit. Is this just an attempt to give a bit of legitimacy to a release that was botched from the very start or, will the new "mix" just be making it sound more "Queen". Would love for it to be **BETTER** but, unless it's taken over by John and Roger with guitar parts added by Brian "off piste", there's very little chance it will have any value.There's some decent tracks on Mr Bad Guy. I've always quite liked the alum. If the production is improved / updated, I don't see that as a bad thing at all. Tbh, after Brian and Roger's version of IWBTLY, I'd rather they kept away from it. Taking the last couple of decades or so into consideration, I really don't have much faith left in Roger and Brian's creative abilities anymore. |
Day dop 07.09.2019 19:57 |
I already have the original version in the Freddie Mercury Solo Collection, and the original Mr Bad guy on vinyl as well. So I pre-ordered it on CD. |
cmsdrums 07.09.2019 22:12 |
Really surprising that the whole bass track has been re-recorded; bizarre that the original take has been deemed not good enough - I wonder how the original player feels about that? (I assume he’s still alive??) I also wonder if that is the case for the whole album and not just this track? Does anyone know if Mack is aware - and is so - whether he has commented - on the Mr Bad Guy treatment? |
ggo1 07.09.2019 23:27 |
A guy called Jo Burt played bass on the original Man Made Paradise. He was one of, if not the best bass player I ever saw live. He was in a band called Sector 27 with Tom Robinson and led the band after Tom left. Anyhow, he was freaking awesome on his fretless bass. Bouncing around the stage playing these awesome runs and slides. Anyhow, I'd be surprised if they replaced his bass work. Unless the tapes were shot. Not sure what happened to him after. Think I'll throw on my 12" of Excalibur, give his fingers a listen. |
matt z 08.09.2019 00:36 |
Maybe it's got something to do with releases and copyright. Maybe this new edition sees Fairclough in for some major percentage residuals Unless the tapes were poorly recorded....who really knows. I WISH i wasted time investigating just this kind of stuff |
runner_70 08.09.2019 10:25 |
Day dop wrote: Taking the last couple of decades or so into consideration, I really don't have much faith left in Roger and Brian's creative abilities anymore.True Roger's solo albums were so-so but Brian did absolutely NOTHING apart from a few collaborations and The ELlis ALbums which were mainly covers. Sad as he was a prolific songwriter-where has the passion for creating gone? |
Chief Mouse 08.09.2019 10:44 |
dudeofqueen wrote: Chief Mouse, re: >Pre-ordered it from the Queen official website a couple days ago. To be honest, I'm quite excited for the new mix :) Wishing you all the very best with it, but, remember, you're free to return the disc(s) as faulty if they are as I believe they will turn out to be - highly polished turds. Have to ask what actually is the point of this release? Fred gave up on it once the mix was completed and returned to Queen after getting over his hissy fit. Is this just an attempt to give a bit of legitimacy to a release that was botched from the very start or, will the new "mix" just be making it sound more "Queen". Would love for it to be **BETTER** but, unless it's taken over by John and Roger with guitar parts added by Brian "off piste", there's very little chance it will have any value.Since I don't own the album in any form, I figured this might be worth getting on vinyl. Why not, I like a couple songs on it and I think they should sound a bit better than the originals. Your opinion is valid but so are my choices. |
thomasquinn 32989 08.09.2019 11:14 |
I personally consider Mr. Bad Guy the worst of all the guys' solo efforts, so I won't be buying this. However, since I'm occasionally, and inexplicably, able to view things with some detachment, it does seem to me that Mr. Bad Guy suffered from almost inconceivably sloppy production, so a return to the multitracks and a completely new mix and, if the vague hints are true, some re-recorded parts, might well improve the record considerably. I still don't think it'll be a great record, because most of the songs just aren't that great IMHO, and because it's aged poorly (riding a this-year's-model trend for a club audience was never likely to age well). But if you disagree with me on this and do like Mr. Bad Guy, then I think you have a good chance of getting a marked improvement here. |
runner_70 08.09.2019 12:09 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: I personally consider Mr. Bad Guy the worst of all the guys' solo efforts, so I won't be buying this. However, since I'm occasionally, and inexplicably, able to view things with some detachment, it does seem to me that Mr. Bad Guy suffered from almost inconceivably sloppy production, so a return to the multitracks and a completely new mix and, if the vague hints are true, some re-recorded parts, might well improve the record considerably. I still don't think it'll be a great record, because most of the songs just aren't that great IMHO, and because it's aged poorly (riding a this-year's-model trend for a club audience was never likely to age well). But if you disagree with me on this and do like Mr. Bad Guy, then I think you have a good chance of getting a marked improvement here.Cmon you really think Fun In Space or Fun On Earth are better albums? MBG was a disposable pop album that had some great tunes. And the voice alone makes it worth purchasing |
runner_70 08.09.2019 12:10 |
MACK was asked what he thinks of it on FB. His answer: "I have no idea what they are up to". There is friction between Queen(Productions) and especially Maylor and MACK wonder what happened?!? He wasnt even invited to the BR premiere |
cmsdrums 08.09.2019 12:13 |
I asked Mack on Facebook if he had been involved/consulted/what he thought of the remix and replacement of bass parts...his reply is: “No idea what they are up to” ! Two schools of thought: 1) he was a hired hand as engineer/producer/mixer and would have been paid accordingly at the time so it’s nothing to do with him, or 2) knowing his closeness to Freddie (and the band for a long period) and that he was so involved with Me Bad Guy, courtesy would suggest they at least let him know this was happening and what their reasons are. Still, Mike Moran has been excluded from Barcelona and that’s pretty much as much his product as Freddie’s, so on those grounds Jim Beach is clearly not bothered who he upsets. Incidentally, I still think Brian doesn’t have much regard for Mack - he put him out of his comfort zone with different recording methods and clearly formed a close bond with Freddie, and didn’t pander to some of Brian’s ways in the studio. Brian also publicly disparaged him when ‘Rock Montreal’ came out, suggesting the original audio mix left a lot to be desired and had now been sorted ....totally unjust when it was probably their best sounding live audio at the time...Rio and Japan 85 were/are FAR worse! |
Golden Salmon 08.09.2019 12:14 |
Wow, amazing if they redid any of the MBG tracks, even subtly. I bet that if it got a similar treatment to Barcelona 2012, the result could be a lot more pleasing. MBG has aged poorly and its brilliance was marred by unworthy production. |
Holly2003 08.09.2019 13:37 |
cmsdrums wrote: I asked Mack on Facebook if he had been involved/consulted/what he thought of the remix and replacement of bass parts...his reply is: “No idea what they are up to” ! Two schools of thought: 1) he was a hired hand as engineer/producer/mixer and would have been paid accordingly at the time so it’s nothing to do with him, or 2) knowing his closeness to Freddie (and the band for a long period) and that he was so involved with Me Bad Guy, courtesy would suggest they at least let him know this was happening and what their reasons are. Still, Mike Moran has been excluded from Barcelona and that’s pretty much as much his product as Freddie’s, so on those grounds Jim Beach is clearly not bothered who he upsets. Incidentally, I still think Brian doesn’t have much regard for Mack - he put him out of his comfort zone with different recording methods and clearly formed a close bond with Freddie, and didn’t pander to some of Brian’s ways in the studio. Brian also publicly disparaged him when ‘Rock Montreal’ came out, suggesting the original audio mix left a lot to be desired and had now been sorted ....totally unjust when it was probably their best sounding live audio at the time...Rio and Japan 85 were/are FAR worse!If Brian didn't have much regard for Mack, why did he ask him to mix the Star Fleet Project? |
runner_70 08.09.2019 14:30 |
Holly2003 wrote:Starfleet was in 1983 - The QUeen work with Mack ended in 1986cmsdrums wrote: I asked Mack on Facebook if he had been involved/consulted/what he thought of the remix and replacement of bass parts...his reply is: “No idea what they are up to” ! Two schools of thought: 1) he was a hired hand as engineer/producer/mixer and would have been paid accordingly at the time so it’s nothing to do with him, or 2) knowing his closeness to Freddie (and the band for a long period) and that he was so involved with Me Bad Guy, courtesy would suggest they at least let him know this was happening and what their reasons are. Still, Mike Moran has been excluded from Barcelona and that’s pretty much as much his product as Freddie’s, so on those grounds Jim Beach is clearly not bothered who he upsets. Incidentally, I still think Brian doesn’t have much regard for Mack - he put him out of his comfort zone with different recording methods and clearly formed a close bond with Freddie, and didn’t pander to some of Brian’s ways in the studio. Brian also publicly disparaged him when ‘Rock Montreal’ came out, suggesting the original audio mix left a lot to be desired and had now been sorted ....totally unjust when it was probably their best sounding live audio at the time...Rio and Japan 85 were/are FAR worse!If Brian didn't have much regard for Mack, why did he ask him to mix the Star Fleet Project? |
Holly2003 08.09.2019 14:52 |
It began with The Game. Read Mack's comments about Brian May's discomfort with Mack's style, and his collaboration with Fred in excluding Brian from the initial recording session of CLTCL. If Brian was that uncomfortable though, it seems unlikely he would choose to use Mack for his solo album 3 years later, and not raise any issues he had for the next 3 years while he worked alongside with Mack and the rest of the band. |
runner_70 08.09.2019 18:22 |
Holly2003 wrote: It began with The Game. Read Mack's comments about Brian May's discomfort with Mack's style, and his collaboration with Fred in excluding Brian from the initial recording session of CLTCL. If Brian was that uncomfortable though, it seems unlikely he would choose to use Mack for his solo album 3 years later, and not raise any issues he had for the next 3 years while he worked alongside with Mack and the rest of the band.Seems the REAL issues started only later on. THe last MACK interview on German radio was less than flattering for Brian. He clearly has a problem with him and obviously vice versa |
Day dop 08.09.2019 21:22 |
I've been hoping they'd do something like this for years with Mr Bad Guy. That Love Me Like There's No Tomorrow only had subtle improvements is a good sign. |
Day dop 08.09.2019 21:33 |
runner_70 wrote:Brian and Roger have done an excellent job of marketing Queen's music, but creatively speaking, since No One But You, for me, it's ranged from indifference to cringe.Day dop wrote: Taking the last couple of decades or so into consideration, I really don't have much faith left in Roger and Brian's creative abilities anymore.True Roger's solo albums were so-so but Brian did absolutely NOTHING apart from a few collaborations and The ELlis ALbums which were mainly covers. Sad as he was a prolific songwriter-where has the passion for creating gone? |
matt z 08.09.2019 23:39 |
Whoever claimed the BRILLIANCE of MBG has to be a sycophant, newbie or fucking INSANE. It is none of that |
Day dop 09.09.2019 00:18 |
Mr Bad Guy ain't brilliant. But Freddie's vocals are. A lot of the songs are quite catchy. With decent production, it'd be alright. |
cmi 09.09.2019 06:26 |
Mr Bad Guy is a very good pop album featuring several excellent songs. |
dysan 09.09.2019 12:38 |
I agree with CMI - it's a good fun mid 80s pop album. I'm not massively defensive of it, but they really shouldn't be changing it. |
Sam99 09.09.2019 13:51 |
Has anyone with a good ear listened to the old and new LMLTNT to identify the difference, I have listened to the new mix and sounds great. Opinions are always subjective, in my opinion Freddie’s voice excelled on Mr Bad Guy, he was obviously having a good time. |
dudeofqueen 09.09.2019 14:25 |
>Sad as he was a prolific songwriter-where has the passion for creating gone? The same dark place it went when he burdened us with "We Believe" and "Cosmos Rockin'" There's absolutely no coming back from there. |
Holly2003 09.09.2019 15:08 |
46664 was an epic arrangement and a great idea, marred by terrible terrible lyrics. |
cmsdrums 09.09.2019 15:45 |
It doesn't look as if they're adding in the William Orbit version of 'There Must Be More To Life Than This' into this pack. It would seem that it obviously belongs here....thought I'm almost glad it's not included as it is possibly the horrendously mixed track I've ever heard, and makes the original Mr Bad Guy sound like a fucking masterpiece of production and mixing. |
runner_70 09.09.2019 16:33 |
dudeofqueen wrote: >Sad as he was a prolific songwriter-where has the passion for creating gone? The same dark place it went when he burdened us with "We Believe" and "Cosmos Rockin'" There's absolutely no coming back from there.To be Fair "We Believe" was one of the better TCR songs |
thomasquinn 32989 09.09.2019 17:33 |
runner_70 wrote:I'm sorry, were you under the impression that I give a damn about the drivel that you post? Not so.thomasquinn 32989 wrote: I personally consider Mr. Bad Guy the worst of all the guys' solo efforts, so I won't be buying this. However, since I'm occasionally, and inexplicably, able to view things with some detachment, it does seem to me that Mr. Bad Guy suffered from almost inconceivably sloppy production, so a return to the multitracks and a completely new mix and, if the vague hints are true, some re-recorded parts, might well improve the record considerably. I still don't think it'll be a great record, because most of the songs just aren't that great IMHO, and because it's aged poorly (riding a this-year's-model trend for a club audience was never likely to age well). But if you disagree with me on this and do like Mr. Bad Guy, then I think you have a good chance of getting a marked improvement here.Cmon you really think Fun In Space or Fun On Earth are better albums? MBG was a disposable pop album that had some great tunes. And the voice alone makes it worth purchasing |
cmi 10.09.2019 06:28 |
Love Me Like There's No Tomorrow L: 1985 mix R: 2019 mix |
Apocalipsis_Darko 10.09.2019 07:10 |
Stephan Wissnet is alive. I don't think he is happy about that. Another insult to a live person. I don't think also Mack is happy about that fact. Jo Burt is also alive...Hope they don't destroy his parts. Great bass player. The only person not alive is Paul Vincent. A great guitarist and an even better person. |
runner_70 10.09.2019 07:31 |
What sense does it make to re record the bass note for note when you have the multitracks? |
cmi 10.09.2019 10:18 |
For me it's the same original bass track. Probably just a mistake in linear notes made big buzz. |
thomasquinn 32989 10.09.2019 10:26 |
It might be. But if it is a new bass track, there are plenty of good reasons to re-record. There might be damage or degradation to the bass track on the multitrack. It could be (and is in fact far from unlikely) that destructive editing has been performed on the bass track. The sound quality might not be up to par. Certain parts of the frequency spectrum might be too weak to use in the way the producers want. I'm sure there are plenty more possible scenarios imaginable. |
cmi 10.09.2019 10:39 |
Bass guitar or kick drum are probably the easiest intruments to restore from any spectral imperfctions. |
thomasquinn 32989 10.09.2019 10:46 |
It depends entirely on how they have been recorded and what has been done to the tracks after recording. Yes, bass guitar is easier to fix than, say, piano, but that doesn't mean it can still cause trouble (noise...) if it needs large changes. Considering some of the IMHO bizarre approaches to recording in the 1980s, I would not be at all surprised to find an unusuable bass guitar track if you want to get a more modern, more balanced sound. Personally, I think that destructive editing is the most likely scenario that could cause trouble, but I was merely listing a number of, hypothetical, possibilities for wanting to re-record. So I'm not saying any of them are actually the case. |
cmsdrums 10.09.2019 15:37 |
Neil Fairclough has already confirmed (on Instagram I think?) that he has re-recorded the bass parts on some tracks, and interestingly references replicating Jo Burt's parts too...Burt only plays on 'Man Made Paradise' so even if it's not the whole album it seems that track has also been done. What a shame as there's likely already a John Deacon version of it they could have used!! |
cmi 10.09.2019 17:57 |
If it's indeed re-recorded by Neil, he must be learnt it from the original isolated bass track to catch all the nuances as it's not so high in the original mix. And what's the reason to re-record bass parts for 1983-4 recordings? BTW, the instrumental version of this song was mixed in 2000 for Solo Collection and there was no problem with the bass part. |
runner_70 10.09.2019 18:12 |
cmi wrote: If it's indeed re-recorded by Neil, he must be learnt it from the original isolated bass track to catch all the nuances as it's not so high in the original mix. And what's the reason to re-record bass parts for 1983-4 recordings? BTW, the instrumental version of this song was mixed in 2000 for Solo Collection and there was no problem with the bass part.the only reason I can imagine is that there are some masters missing to be able to remix it properly. Neal said he re recorded it note for note... |
dysan 10.09.2019 19:48 |
I hope we get answers. Such a weird thing to do. |
Apocalipsis_Darko 10.09.2019 23:05 |
They insult again Mack, and Stephan saying is recorded by this other person. This other person is not the villain. He is only a worker from QP. We know what are the villains on that. |
runner_70 11.09.2019 05:38 |
Guess Maylor had some input why would Neal play on it then? I guess it is only a matter of time before they rerecord Queensongs with some certain person. It all leads to this. |
The Fairy King 11.09.2019 06:10 |
dysan wrote: I hope we get answers. Such a weird thing to do.Remember the Barcelona symphony re-recording? They invited Neil to redo the bassparts for the Mr. Bad Guy album, cuz Freddie didn't have the balls to do it the first time around... |
cmsdrums 11.09.2019 08:18 |
It could be that the bass track is degraded and so from a technical point of view cannot be used...though then again if that is the case then being on the same tape as the other parts would mean they were not usable too. Unfortunately it is pointing to it being an artistic decision based on how the original parts were executed, and once they started mixing and brought the bass up to a level that they wanted, the 'sloppiness' or accuracy of the parts may have been untenable (though with modern technology I'd much rather they fixed the original players' takes rather than totally re-recording with another bassist). This is perhaps no reflection on the original players, but more on Freddie and Mack as producers, accepting run-through takes or not patching up parts at the time because their attention and commitment to Mr Bad Guy was already waning? |
dysan 11.09.2019 08:27 |
The Fairy King wrote:I don't get what you meandysan wrote: I hope we get answers. Such a weird thing to do.Remember the Barcelona symphony re-recording? They invited Neil to redo the bassparts for the Mr. Bad Guy album, cuz Freddie didn't have the balls to do it the first time around... |
dysan 11.09.2019 08:35 |
cmsdrums wrote: ..accepting run-through takes or not patching up parts at the time because their attention and commitment to Mr Bad Guy was already waning?It's totally a subjective view. It was good enough to release at the time, and reissue etc why suddenly now has someone along the line (someone I dare say not involved in anything to do with the original) and decided to fracture the nature, the essence of the recording? It's such a 2010s view that everything must be totally spot on text book 'well recorded' and mixed. Much to the detriment of actually recording. Have they heard the Queen multitracks? Some sloppy AF stuff on there but they wouldn't DREAM of replacing it. I'm so het up about them dicking around with an album I've listened to about 4 times. It's the principle. |
Seed_Of_Rhy 11.09.2019 10:41 |
So, we're not to get Queen version of Man Made Paradise on this one?...sad news |
Toozeup 11.09.2019 15:28 |
The album sounds especially crap, I really don't have a problem with them dicking around with it. Even some minor changes would make a big improvement. |
MisterCosmicc 11.09.2019 16:03 |
I love Mr. Bad Guy more than Queen’s 70’s albums =) |
Nathan H 11.09.2019 18:29 |
The songs I like best (or even tolerate) on Mr Bad Guy are Made In Heaven, I Was Born To Love You, There Must Be More To Life Than This and Love Me Like There's No Tomorrow. However, I really like the Steve Brown remix of Foolin' Around and the No More Brothers remix of Living On My Own. Majority of these songs actually sound better remixed or reworked. |
dysan 11.09.2019 18:33 |
Depends what you like. Let's Turn It On has got more people I know into listening to more Queen than playing them MOTBQ. Cheesy AF 80s is also excellent. |
Apocalipsis_Darko 11.09.2019 18:43 |
I know Steven Brown, a good guy. Producer of Wham!, Love by The Cult, or the debut of Manic Street Preachers. Freddie never would like to remix these original songs, He liked what he published. In Mr. Bad Guy and in Barcelona. If Freddie was alive, never would permit this...NEVER. |
dysan 11.09.2019 19:21 |
Yes I worked with him briefly. Also made the tea at Wizzard sessions which I found most impressive! |
Holly2003 11.09.2019 19:29 |
It seems like everyone on this forum has been in the music business at some point. Damn your eyes! ;) |
dysan 11.09.2019 20:04 |
That's why we're all so jaded :( |
Toozeup 11.09.2019 20:42 |
Apocalipsis_Darko wrote: I know Steven Brown, a good guy. Producer of Wham!, Love by The Cult, or the debut of Manic Street Preachers. Freddie never would like to remix these original songs, He liked what he published. In Mr. Bad Guy and in Barcelona. If Freddie was alive, never would permit this...NEVER.Jim Beach and Freddie discussed remixes of his solo material, which turned into the Freddie Mercury album released in 1992. It was also Freddie's idea that Queen should use the best songs from Mr bad Guy for Made in Heaven. |
Apocalipsis_Darko 11.09.2019 20:47 |
Are you sure??? Freddie being so ill discussing about a fuckin horrible album with mixes from people never met Freddie in life??? Mike Moran and Mack have another opinion. |
Toozeup 11.09.2019 21:02 |
His music is his legacy, i think was pretty important to him, especially at the end. Discussion about it would have been unavoidable while getting his affairs in order. |
runner_70 11.09.2019 21:07 |
Toozeup wrote:Both is totally made up :) I think Freddie also said thAt they should carry on with AL as he is his fave singerApocalipsis_Darko wrote: I know Steven Brown, a good guy. Producer of Wham!, Love by The Cult, or the debut of Manic Street Preachers. Freddie never would like to remix these original songs, He liked what he published. In Mr. Bad Guy and in Barcelona. If Freddie was alive, never would permit this...NEVER.Jim Beach and Freddie discussed remixes of his solo material, which turned into the Freddie Mercury album released in 1992. It was also Freddie's idea that Queen should use the best songs from Mr bad Guy for Made in Heaven. |
Viper 11.09.2019 21:08 |
The Beatles's recent album new mixes are great! Althoug MBG isn't a great album, I'm hoping this new mix will be as great as the Beatles remixes were! |
Viper 11.09.2019 21:12 |
runner_70 wrote: «To be Fair "We Believe" was one of the better TCR songs» "We Believe" is by far the best track on the album! |
Apocalipsis_Darko 11.09.2019 21:23 |
Believe Freddie could discuss anything when he was blind and can't talking very well, is being a bad believer. A Justin Bieber believer. |
Toozeup 11.09.2019 22:12 |
We're not talking about the last couple of months of his life here. He knew he was dying for a long time and plenty of time to discuss Posthumous releases. |
Apocalipsis_Darko 11.09.2019 22:15 |
Yes, yes....do you believe more Jim Beach or Mike Moran and Mack? That's the question. If you want to believe Freddie said never boring or wrote what he supposedly wrote the previous day of his sad death...you are very innocent. |
Toozeup 11.09.2019 22:20 |
If Freddie expressed any unhappiness with his solo records, the last people he would confide in would be Mike Moran & Mack for fear of offending them. My money's on Jim Beach! |
Apocalipsis_Darko 11.09.2019 22:35 |
Unhappiness with Barcelona? His favorite album? When Freddie heard Montserrat Caballé vocals on Barcelona song, he cried. Barcelona was possible thanks to Mike Moran. Don't forget about it. |
matt z 12.09.2019 00:13 |
^Yeap. And that's what i find most offensive about it's subsequent release as a "SPECIAL EDITION" which is way inferior product. FFS they could've included BOTH. Probably even on the same CD as ENSURING was the only thing left alone Yes at 39:56, the two could've been combined on to one 80:00 disc or 78:00 |
IanR 12.09.2019 00:30 |
Do we know for sure that Freddie was indeed the one who gave Brian, Roger and John his blessing to re-work some of his solo material under the Queen banner? Or was it a posthumous decision made by Jim Beach before the release of the 'Freddie Mercury Album' (several MBG tracks are noticeable by their absence, especially the only real hit from the album: Born To Love You). What we do know is that Fred heard the various remixes included as bonus tracks on the 1991 Hollywood Records editions, and apparently his favourite remix was that of 'Seven Seas of Rhye'. Based on this alone, I feel the remixes of his solo work are more likely to have received his blessing. |
Apocalipsis_Darko 12.09.2019 01:16 |
I know the truth, and I can't say it because if I said tomorrow I will be in England in a court. And I'm very happy at home. Seven seas of rhye, yes, by Freddy Bastone. I know that guy. Do you know Freddy Bastone did a remix of New York, New York, he talked to QP, and they finally denied him to publish as an official remix? A better remix than all the creepy remixes included in the compilation Lover of life, singer of songs, or the tittle or the unnecessary compilation for Freddie. The special edition, with a second cd full of horrible remixes. What do you think about the poor distribution and artwork on cd or vinyl about Times waits for nobody? What do you think about not mention Mike Moran in the credits? Do you really know Freddie let QP do what they are doing with his solo albums? Mr. Bad Guy including all bass lines with a bass player he never met in life. An orchestration version of Barcelona played by persons he never met in life. |
Sheer Brass Neck 12.09.2019 01:29 |
Interesting discussion. Brian was quoted as saying that Queen gave "the song writer his head", meaning they had final say in how they wanted the song or mix to be. Not a Freddie fan boy in the sense MBG was pure shit and he needed the band as much as they needed him, but that was the album and sound he wanted at the time. It's like repainting any piece of art to make it select the time. Maybe Mona Lisa should have smiled more in the early 1700s, but be frowner today? It's manipulative and much like the embarrassing revisionism on MIH it's doing nothing but create a need for product. |
Sheer Brass Neck 12.09.2019 01:30 |
Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Interesting discussion. Brian was quoted as saying that Queen gave "the song writer his head", meaning they had final say in how they wanted the song or mix to be. Not a Freddie fan boy in the sense MBG was pure shit and he needed the band as much as they needed him, but that was the album and sound he wanted at the time. It's like repainting any piece of art to make it reflect the time. Maybe Mona Lisa should have smiled more in the early 1700s, but be frowner today? It's manipulative and much like the embarrassing revisionism on MIH it's doing nothing but create a need for product. |
cmsdrums 12.09.2019 07:18 |
Apocalipsis_Darko wrote: What do you think about the poor distribution and artwork on cd or vinyl about Times waits for nobody? What do you think about not mention Mike Moran in the credits? .That will likely be down to Dave Clark - he controls that material and how it's used very tightly. |
brians wig 13.09.2019 13:36 |
Since THIS edition of MBG has been remixed, not remastered, and the bass lines have been completely re-recorded, that's why they'll be classing it as a "special Edition" and including that awful 'special edition' Barcelona album: This boxset release is a "Special Edition" release. If nothing else, it leaves the original versions of the albums (both of which were remastered in 2015 and passed over in favour at the last minute for the "Messenger" releases instead), waiting in the wings for another "cash-in" opportunity sometime in the future.... |
cmsdrums 13.09.2019 13:50 |
brians wig wrote: Since THIS edition of MBG has been remixed, not remastered, and the bass lines have been completely re-recorded, that's why they'll be classing it as a "special Edition" and including that awful 'special edition' Barcelona album: This boxset release is a "Special Edition" release. If nothing else, it leaves the original versions of the albums (both of which were remastered in 2015 and passed over in favour at the last minute for the "Messenger" releases instead), waiting in the wings for another "cash-in" opportunity sometime in the future....That's sensible thinking. I must admit I didn't realise that the original Barcelona album had been remastered and then shelved - I hope we get that one day. My guess for Mr Bad Guy though is that they expect this new version to become 'the' go to version and the original mix will disappear. |
thomasquinn 32989 13.09.2019 17:07 |
I know this is slightly off topic, but the thing that really ticks me off about the re-recorded Barcelona is that, in principle, it was a really great idea - that was horribly, unforgivably and unaccountably fucked up. A pretty much exact replication of the synth parts with real orchestral instruments should not pose any technical difficulties when multitrack tapes of the original and modern digital multitrack recording options for the new version are available. In fact, it ought to have been comparatively simple! But somehow, somebody's ego needed stroking, so unaccountable 'creative licence' decisions were made to alter the sh*t out of the tracks, resulting in a lame, ill-fitting and unbecoming end product. I'm sure it could possibly been cocked up even worse, but that would have taken some serious effort of darkly perverted creativity that goes beyond the limits of musical horror! |
runner_70 14.09.2019 08:26 |
I have listened to it only once before it was stored. Was it really that different to the original? |
cmsdrums 14.09.2019 09:23 |
Yes - so clearly so that even when casually listening to the special edition after 30 years of the original, my ears automatically prick up to the changes. I totally agree with Thomas Quinn’s review - every change unnecessary and for the worse, and easily avoidable. I almost view it as an unwarranted adaptation or interpretation rather than a re-record...I cannot fathom what made them not copy the original arrangement, soundscape and balance. |
darcy-wright 17.09.2019 03:58 |
It needed it. I have the Mr bad Guy Cd and maybe have played it once 15 years ago..maybe longer... it doesnt sound good. the voice is there, but theres no oomph in the bottom. Ill wait to the release and listern and hopefully its great. the 1990s fm album suffers from a also dated 90s euro pop sound (i mean who loves the continual ding ding ding whoo haaa) |
IanR 17.09.2019 06:15 |
The Steve Brown mix of 'Foolin' Around' will always be superior to the original IMHO. |
Nathan H 17.09.2019 06:57 |
IanR wrote: The Steve Brown mix of 'Foolin' Around' will always be superior to the original IMHO.Agree, it still sounds really good today. If you heard the intro on the radio you'd think it would be a new song. |
Viper 17.09.2019 10:13 |
"Living On My Own (special edition)" is on spotify! |
cmi 17.09.2019 11:22 |
wow! But still not on YT and iTunes... |
Golden Salmon 17.09.2019 16:12 |
I can't listen to it at the moment. Any noticeable differences, mixing or otherwise? |
cmsdrums 17.09.2019 17:06 |
I’ve just had a listen and must say it is really well done. Nothing that isn’t original to the track but everything sounds modern - nice depth to the bass synth, piano is clear and bright, as are the vocals - but all still balanced in the same way and without sounding like a ‘remix’, but more just as though the original had been unearthed from under a cloth! The end sections of this song really bring out the piano now and make it almost sound like a jazz/blues jam rather than a disco/club track....I’m really impressed with the treatments on the two tracks released so far. |
cmi 17.09.2019 17:34 |
GREAT! Looking forward to listen to it. |
Nathan H 17.09.2019 18:19 |
I listened to the first minute before and it sounded fresh and modern. I think we can safely say that the full album will sound brilliant. |
lewisakkas 18.09.2019 20:39 |
I can't seem to find it on Spotify? |
Nathan H 19.09.2019 06:53 |
Living On My Own has been removed from Spotify! |
cmsdrums 19.09.2019 07:52 |
21st Century Music Fan wrote: Living On My Own has been removed from Spotify!Really annoyingly it went at the exact moment I was downloading it! It still showing in my searches and my list, but simply isn't playable! |
cmi 19.09.2019 12:03 |
So no-one downloaded it and have it on his HDD? |
Nathan H 19.09.2019 14:21 |
I didn't think the song's inclusion on Spotify would be temporary because it had its own album like Love Me Like There's No Tomorrow. |