| Marlamir 29.06.2019 22:41 |
Band: Queen Title: Definitive Sun City 1984 Released: December 2018 Labeled: Wardour 306 Venue: Super Bowl, sun City, Bophuthatswana, South Africa Source: SBD > CDs > EAC > WAV > jetAudio > FLAC 44:09 / 62:37 Sound quality: A Hello everyone, i'm not sure if this was shared here in lossles format or at all yet so i'm introducing to you quite new wardour rellease from sun city concert in 1984. As wardour said this version have better sound quality and to this date this is the best version so far yet. Disc 1 1.Machines Intro. 2.Tear It Up 3.Tie Your Mother Down 4.Under Pressure 5.Somebody To Love 6.The March Of The Black Queen (improvisation) 7.My Fairy King (improvisation) 8.Killer Queen 9.Seven Seas Of Rhye 10.Keep Yourself Alive 11.Liar 12.Impromptu 13.It's A Hard Life 14.Dragon Attack 15.Now I'm Here Disc 2 1.Is This The World We Created? 2.Love Of My Life 3.Another One Bites The Dust 4.We Will Rock You (improvisation) 5.Hammer To Fall 6.Crazy Little Thing Called Love 7.Bohemian Rhapsody 8.Radio Ga Ga 9.I Want To Break Free 10.Jailhouse Rock 11.We Will Rock You 12.We Are The Champions 13.Interview with Brian and Roger about sun city Download: https://drive.google.com/uc?id=17MFkR5U0EMaqBkizxogrj42tyEnqddq3&export=download |
| akan 29.06.2019 22:47 |
thank you so much! |
| Randy Butternubs 30.06.2019 00:56 |
Definitely overall an improvement, thank you for getting this out into the wild. I do hear some phasing during Liar I dont think was on the MP3 version though |
| Randy Butternubs 30.06.2019 01:00 |
sorry for the double post |
| NastyQueenie74 30.06.2019 03:33 |
The vocals are definitely clearer |
| MemeOverlord69 30.06.2019 07:10 |
It definitely sounds better, but whether it was just a good EQ job or actually a better transfer (or even a lower gen copy) is what I'm wondering. |
| pmatsynot 30.06.2019 09:10 |
Thank you for the share |
| onedunpark 30.06.2019 09:58 |
Thanks for sharing! |
| aristide1 30.06.2019 10:57 |
You need more than a MP3 EQ'ed bootleg and a fictional lineage (you still don't understand what lineage means) to grab our attention Marlamir. I am aware that you are a real person and negative comments have an impact on you (as has recently pointed out to me), but we don't have to acknowledge every single bootleg, especially those originated on queenzone or other sites. It's like buying back your watch from the guy who stole it, while trying to convince everyone that runs better than before. |
| pittrek 30.06.2019 11:35 |
So... this is a bizarre bootleg. The first disc has exactly the same tracks with the exact same lengths as the version I shared here a few years ago. But the sound quality is worse, and better at the same time - it has lots of hiss (which my version doesn't), but it has the backing vocals more notable in the mix. So I assumed they took "my" version and equalized it. But then I noticed that the second disc is DIFFERENT from MY second disc. So they used the first disc from my share, but not the second one? To make it even more confusing, their second disc has the same bonus track as my second disc, the 1986 interview. "The same" means identical, I know it because I corrected the speed and improved the voices very slightly. The speed and sound quality is identical to my share. I checked even Ale Solan's old share of just the first mp3 file, he also shared the interview, but his copy ran too fast. So now I'm pretty confused :) And no, it's absolutely NOT FM sourced. We know exactly how it was recorded |
| Marlamir 30.06.2019 12:21 |
Aristide you really need to calm down and stop writing bullshit. it was requested here few times so when i found it here (link i shared it here to make it easier to found, simple as that. i don't carre about internet attention, i have much more important things to do than bullshiting. Pittrek i was hoping about this being new source but as i thought and from what you wrote they just stole it and even want it money from that? im glad i didn't buy it but download, not gonna support this. Yes pittrek i know its not fm sourced i just kept sources the same as on txt but yeah i could change to the correct one instead. |
| Queenman!! 30.06.2019 19:48 |
true pittrek. It's one big scam. |
| Ale Solan 30.06.2019 22:32 |
pittrek wrote: So... this is a bizarre bootleg. The first disc has exactly the same tracks with the exact same lengths as the version I shared here a few years ago. But the sound quality is worse, and better at the same time - it has lots of hiss (which my version doesn't), but it has the backing vocals more notable in the mix. So I assumed they took "my" version and equalized it. But then I noticed that the second disc is DIFFERENT from MY second disc. So they used the first disc from my share, but not the second one? To make it even more confusing, their second disc has the same bonus track as my second disc, the 1986 interview. "The same" means identical, I know it because I corrected the speed and improved the voices very slightly. The speed and sound quality is identical to my share. I checked even Ale Solan's old share of just the first mp3 file, he also shared the interview, but his copy ran too fast. So now I'm pretty confused :) And no, it's absolutely NOT FM sourced. We know exactly how it was recordedActually, I've shared two versions, the first one without disc 2, second share was complete and speed corrected by me, also included the same bonuses I included on the first share ;) I'm not really aware of your share, I'll look for it right now. |
| Ale Solan 30.06.2019 22:33 |
And yes, this is not really an improvement and still MP3 sourced, the lossless version never emerged so far. |
| Ale Solan 30.06.2019 22:36 |
Jus found your post Pete. Nice work! if I remember correctly I've also corrected the speed on the second disc. |
| tassilo 01.07.2019 09:48 |
Thanks. |
| rhapsody8 01.07.2019 15:20 |
Thanks |
| dysan 01.07.2019 15:41 |
Interesting Pittrek - I saw the interview and assumed it to be the same. So you'd suggest grabbing this one to compliment yours? |
| The Real Wizard 15.07.2019 16:11 |
This is just an EQ job. A pretty good one, but it brings out the digital noise in the top end. One can only polish an mp3 so much. |
| pittrek 16.07.2019 11:03 |
dysan wrote: Interesting Pittrek - I saw the interview and assumed it to be the same. So you'd suggest grabbing this one to compliment yours?The vocals sound better in this version in my humble opinion, but also it has more noise |
| The Real Wizard 16.07.2019 16:57 |
pittrek wrote:Yep, that's the top end - usually the same frequencies where tape hiss will reside.dysan wrote: Interesting Pittrek - I saw the interview and assumed it to be the same. So you'd suggest grabbing this one to compliment yours?The vocals sound better in this version in my humble opinion, but also it has more noise |
| Seed_Of_Rhy 23.09.2019 08:39 |
Somebody knows, why there's is no video of that one? It has not been shot because of the apartheid and government restrictions in South Africa? |
| Holly2003 23.09.2019 15:45 |
Seed_Of_Rhy wrote: Somebody knows, why there's is no video of that one? It has not been shot because of the apartheid and government restrictions in South Africa?Ha! The SA Govt would've loved it if this was released. The reason it wasn't -- well, you don't want to appear on security cameras if you've just committed a 'crime'. |