Star* 24.01.2019 14:55 |
When Queen released there fifth album " A Day at the Races" back in 1976 the first single to be cut was "Somebody to Love" which reached number 2 here in the UK then disaster happened for there second single they released "Tie your Mother Down" and although it is a great rock song it was not really "single" material for the general public at the time and only reached no 30 i think. That is where i suggest "You & I " should have been released instead of " Tie your Mother Down" it is very easy on the ears and makes for a great top five single and it is so underrated with Queen fans but in my opinion it is Queen gold. Easily recognisable as Queen with great vocals and guitar riffs, i am sure it would have become a smash back in 1976. What do you ardent fans think of that then? |
The Circle of Eidolon 24.01.2019 16:11 |
The Circle of Eidolon has read and broadly agree. However You and I, although a great song, features Brian May as vocalist and therefore wouldn't represent the whole band when listened to on the radio. Millionaire Waltz may have been a better choice and would have brought back memories, to the radio audiences of the time, of Bohemian Rhapsody with its changing styles and directions.. The Circle of Eidolon has spoken |
Star* 24.01.2019 16:16 |
You & I does NOT feature Brian on vocals. Freddie was on vocals, silly boy. You do not know your Queen history and for that you are a troll so fuck right off buddy. I bet your a stupid glambert who knows fuck all about Queen history. |
The Circle of Eidolon 24.01.2019 17:44 |
The Circle of Eidolon was going to apologise to you for mistaking You and I for Long Away. After reading your reply and thoughts we regard you and your comments as worthless, meaningless drival from someone who sees their life as being central to all existence. You should reflect on what you write and act on it if you believe civility is below you. Twice you have taken this path when replying. Take this, read it and learn what it teaches you. The Circle of Eidolon has spoken |
mooghead 24.01.2019 18:02 |
You & I is the best single Queen never released. |
Star* 24.01.2019 18:47 |
The circle of eidolon needs to learn some basic Queen History. The track you mentioned "long way" is actually "Long Away" so that is your second mistake in a day. As an Adam Lambert fan you need to snap out of this ridiculous obsession and buy a decent Queen book and discover the real Queen band and there incredible story because they are so much more enjoyable to listen too than any Queen+ trash that is around now. |
Jimmy Dean 24.01.2019 19:50 |
mooghead wrote: You & I is the best single Queen never released.Well put. I’ve always thought the same. It should have been released as a single in place of Long Away. And Long Away could have been a hit if Freddie did vocals. Brian’s voice suits the song but Freddie’s appeals to the masses. |
Dim 24.01.2019 19:56 |
It was very similar with You my best friend, so TYMD was right choice. The first EP Good old fashioned lover boy was also great choice. After 40 years seems that You and I could have been a great single but for its time it wouldn't have worked. |
Nathan H 24.01.2019 20:13 |
You And I should've been a single as it's a very good song and the perfect song for radio but I don't think it would've got a good reaction from the press because: Somebody To Love sounds like Bohemian Rhapsody and they are both written by Freddie You And I sounds like You're My Best Friend and they are both written by John I think if they repeated releasing a Freddie song then a John song like they did with A Night At The Opera, it would've been seen as a rip off by press because they saw it produce successful results with the ANATO singles. Plus it seems fair for Brian to have a single because arguably he seemed to work the hardest on that album especially the guitar orchestra on The Millionaire Waltz. But I think that on the EP instead of Good Old-Fashioned Lover Boy they should've had You And I so then it's one song each. |
mooghead 24.01.2019 20:36 |
"You And I sounds like You're My Best Friend" What? "and they are both written by John" The press give 2 shits about who wrote the song? "it seems fair for Brian to have a single" What? Roger didn't have a single until the 80's. How unfair!!!! |
bucsateflon 24.01.2019 21:17 |
"Long away" is a better song but still too weak for a single |
stevelondon20 24.01.2019 22:28 |
Another cracking thread!! Agree with Moog. Top song. |
The Circle of Eidolon 24.01.2019 22:52 |
mooghead wrote: "You And I sounds like You're My Best Friend" What? "and they are both written by John" The press give 2 shits about who wrote the song? "it seems fair for Brian to have a single" What? Roger didn't have a single until the 80's. How unfair!!!!The Circle of Eidolon read this and agrees with the points made The Circle of Eidolon has spoken |
FunLovinCriminal 24.01.2019 22:55 |
I love The Circle Of Eidolon! |
The Circle of Eidolon 24.01.2019 23:00 |
EMI2565 wrote: The circle of eidolon needs to learn some basic Queen History. The track you mentioned "long way" is actually "Long Away" so that is your second mistake in a day. As an Adam Lambert fan you need to snap out of this ridiculous obsession and buy a decent Queen book and discover the real Queen band and there incredible story because they are so much more enjoyable to listen too than any Queen+ trash that is around now.The Circle of Eidolon knows more than you and we can make assertions without resorting to childish comments as you have previously. You know not what or who you are commenting about. The Circle of Eidolon has spoken |
Jimmy Dean 25.01.2019 05:36 |
Farookh Bulsarsa of Mercury fought in the Old War. It was he who during Ogre Battle, fought, and ultimately defeated an enormous Sentient at the ancient battlefield in the shadow of the Orokin Tower of the Unum. May your circle go fucketh itself. :-) |
queenfan09 25.01.2019 05:41 |
Agreed, love You and I! |
Makka 25.01.2019 08:50 |
mooghead wrote: You & I is the best single Queen never released.Spot on the money Mooghead. This track deserved more recognition. |
cmsdrums 25.01.2019 09:05 |
MusicFan15 wrote: Somebody To Love sounds like Bohemian Rhapsody and they are both written by Freddie You And I sounds like You're My Best Friend and they are both written by John .Riiiiiighht............. |
dysan 25.01.2019 09:36 |
I'm not a massive fan of You And I. It's right on the corny end of John's songwriting - but looking at the album there's not really much of a choice once the you remove the big guns. Perhaps GOFLB should've been the next single, and it's place on the EP later taken by something else. Although I can see their reasoning with TYMD being a single, again, I'm not a big fan of it. |
Ale Solan 25.01.2019 10:04 |
What if... Every song on the Queen catalogue was released as a single? There wouldn't be topics like this. |
stevelondon20 25.01.2019 10:37 |
Haha!!! |
Vocal harmony 25.01.2019 12:43 |
EMI2565 wrote: When Queen released there fifth album " A Day at the Races" back in 1976 the first single to be cut was "Somebody to Love" which reached number 2 here in the UK then disaster happened for there second single they released "Tie your Mother Down" and although it is a great rock song it was not really "single" material for the general public at the time and only reached no 30 i think. That is where i suggest "You & I " should have been released instead of " Tie your Mother Down" it is very easy on the ears and makes for a great top five single and it is so underrated with Queen fans but in my opinion it is Queen gold. Easily recognisable as Queen with great vocals and guitar riffs, i am sure it would have become a smash back in 1976. What do you ardent fans think of that then?You and I is a great album track, but does it stand alone as a strong single song? Remember it had to hook people who hadn't already bought the album. Tie Your Mother Down as a single didn't work. At a time of top ten Quo songs on the UK chart it was probably expected to equal what Staus Quo could do. Good Old Fashioned Lover Boy maybe could have made a better second single. |
Star* 25.01.2019 17:12 |
Vocal Harmony @ "Good Old Fashioned Lover boy" was released as a single in 1977 for "Queen's First E.P" a wonderfully playful song very much in the vein of "You and I" but with a commercial chorus and staggeringly good vocal harmonies, The guitar solo has sophisticated arrangements with harmonised melodies across the stereo image. Highest chart position in the UK was no 21. "You and I" would have made a brilliant single at the time and more attractive to the general public than "Tie Your Mother Down" John Deacon in my opinion was the second best writer in Queen. |
BobbytheCat 26.01.2019 06:47 |
Shoulda, woulda, coulda... I have always loved You & I but it was NOT released as a single end of |
dysan 26.01.2019 09:16 |
Yeah I'm weary of alternate histories. We'd probably be having a thread about why was You and I was a single and not TYMD. TYMD works well as a minor hit and live fav. Some of Bowie's best know tracks were never even singles, or certainly under performed as singles. |
Star* 26.01.2019 10:23 |
"Tie your mother down" was not a minor hit it was a flop in the Uk. Quiet a disaster for Queen after the glory of Bo Rhap & Somebody to Love. Even John Deacon's "Your my best friend" made the top ten. Mays "Tie your mother down" only made no 30. "You and i" was Queen gold and forgotten about even when the band toured it got ignored. |
Martin Packer 26.01.2019 10:32 |
Right but by the time TYMD was released many people had already bought the album. Do we know if the single version of TYMD had the intro? While great that might've bemused the casual record buyer. |
dysan 26.01.2019 11:42 |
It charted in the top 40. That isn't a flop. Compared to their chart run it was a disappointment sure, but flop? Nah. |
bucsateflon 26.01.2019 12:35 |
passing time clearly settled this debate "Tie your mother down" > "You and I" |
Vocal harmony 26.01.2019 13:18 |
EMI2565 wrote: Vocal Harmony @ "Good Old Fashioned Lover boy" was released as a single in 1977 for "Queen's First E.P" a wonderfully playful song very much in the vein of "You and I" but with a commercial chorus and staggeringly good vocal harmonies, The guitar solo has sophisticated arrangements with harmonised melodies across the stereo image. Highest chart position in the UK was no 21. "You and I" would have made a brilliant single at the time and more attractive to the general public than "Tie Your Mother Down" John Deacon in my opinion was the second best writer in Queen.Please feel free to explain the sophisticated arrangements and harmonised melodies across the stereo spectrum. Without cutting and pasting or just posting what you've read somewhere. I'm fully aware of when that song was released. I was expressing an opinion that it may have worked (better) as the second single. |
Star* 26.01.2019 14:01 |
VH i should not have to explain all the sophisticated arrangements on "You & I" just use your ears and that will suffice. |
The Ghost of Lester Burnham 26.01.2019 16:17 |
INFUSE wrote: Vocal Harmony @ "Good Old Fashioned Lover boy" was released as a single in 1977 for "Queen's First E.P" a wonderfully playful song very much in the vein of "You and I" but with a commercial chorus and staggeringly good vocal harmonies, The guitar solo has sophisticated arrangements with harmonised melodies across the stereo image. Highest chart position in the UK was no 21. "You and I" would have made a brilliant single at the time and more attractive to the general public than "Tie Your Mother Down" John Deacon in my opinion was the second best writer in Queen.If you're going to give The Circle of Eidolon guff for mistaking 'Long Away' for 'You And I', it's only fair to give you guff for claiming that Queen's First EP hit #21 in the UK, when it actually hit #17 in the UK. Also, long live The Circle of Eidolon. |
Star* 26.01.2019 20:30 |
As far as i know to my knowledge "Good old fashioned lover boy" made no 21 in my charts were we live. If it did make no 17 then great! |
Ted Sallis 27.01.2019 00:32 |
I've always liked You & I. I think it would have made a pretty solid single. John Deacon's 1st 5 Queen songs are his best IMHO. Misfire is my favourite. Ted |
Star* 27.01.2019 08:47 |
Ted Sallis Thank you at last someone with common sense on here agrees ! "Misfire" was so underrated on the "Sheer Heart Attack" album too. John Deacon in my opinion was the second best songwriter in Queen, because many of his songs could easily have made singles. |
mooghead 27.01.2019 09:41 |
"What if... Every song on the Queen catalogue was released as a single? " This is a thing now though isn't it. You can buy/stream individual tracks and they count towards the charts.. |
Dr Magus 27.01.2019 13:58 |
What if every ALBUM in the Queen catalogue was released as a single? |
Ted Sallis 27.01.2019 16:28 |
^^ Explanation? Ted |
Ted Sallis 27.01.2019 16:35 |
INFUSE wrote: Ted Sallis Thank you at last someone with common sense on here agrees ! "Misfire" was so underrated on the "Sheer Heart Attack" album too. John Deacon in my opinion was the second best songwriter in Queen, because many of his songs could easily have made singles. You're welcome. Who Needs You from NOTW would have been good as a single too. Ted |
Star* 27.01.2019 16:51 |
Yes "Who needs you" never got played live as far as i know. That would have made a fab single. |
Holly2003 27.01.2019 17:19 |
Yes, a band noted for bombastic songs with multi-layered vocals definitely should have released a nice but trivial little salsa song as a single in 1977. A sure-fire hit! |
Ale Solan 27.01.2019 19:53 |
Dr Magus wrote: What if every ALBUM in the Queen catalogue was released as a single? Ted Sallis wrote: ^^ Explanation? Ted Ale Solan wrote: What if... Every song on the Queen catalogue was released as a single? There wouldn't be topics like this. |
The Circle of Eidolon 27.01.2019 22:54 |
Holly2003 wrote: Yes, a band noted for bombastic songs with multi-layered vocals definitely should have released a nice but trivial little salsa song as a single in 1977. A sure-fire hit!The Circle of Eidolon agrees with what this post offers in the way of opinion and humour The Circle of Eidolon has spoken |
bucsateflon 28.01.2019 08:11 |
Holly2003 wrote: Yes, a band noted for bombastic songs with multi-layered vocals definitely should have released a nice but trivial little salsa song as a single in 1977. A sure-fire hit!The Carpenters and ABBA would have shitted their pants in fear if "You and I" & "Who needs you" ended up as singles. |
Star* 28.01.2019 11:29 |
You may all mock "You and I" but it was as worthy as anything that was in the charts in 1976 and in my opinion it is a fantastic pop song and very radio friendly. |
Star* 28.01.2019 11:30 |
Before you all point out yeah i meant 1977 ! |
Nathan H 28.01.2019 14:05 |
It's a great song and could've made a great single but it's probably the most "forgotten" song on A Day At The Races because: - It was never performed live - Not mentioned in any interviews by the group after 1977 in my recollection - It doesn't appear on any compilation album (except The Singles Collection in 2009 as it was the B-Side for Tie Your Mother Down) All the other songs on the album agree to at least one of these criteria. You And I definitely deserves more recogniton. |
Star* 28.01.2019 15:01 |
Yes but lets not get "You & I" too popular cos we don't want that tool Lambert to start killing it, he has raped most of the Queen back catalogue as it is. Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. |
Thistle 29.01.2019 00:32 |
INFUSE wrote: As far as i know to my knowledge "Good old fashioned lover boy" made no 21 in my charts were we live. If it did make no 17 then great!Well your knowledge (or best of it) is wrong, unless you are now NOT from the UK. If you are from the UK (and still live there) then it was #17. You silly boy. Get some Queen books and learn your history. Stop addling your brains with Adam Lambert ;) :p |
The Circle of Eidolon 29.01.2019 00:48 |
Thistle wrote:The Circle of Eidolon agrees with this post. The facts speak for themselves.INFUSE wrote: As far as i know to my knowledge "Good old fashioned lover boy" made no 21 in my charts were we live. If it did make no 17 then great!Well your knowledge (or best of it) is wrong, unless you are now NOT from the UK. If you are from the UK (and still live there) then it was #17. You silly boy. Get some Queen books and learn your history. Stop addling your brains with Adam Lambert ;) :p INFUSE you should learn from what the post says. Your horizons await the chance of being broadened. The Circle of Eidolon has spoken |
Star* 29.01.2019 07:44 |
Thistle Wind your neck in cos you have not even seen Queen live with Freddie like i have 5 times! |
dysan 29.01.2019 09:14 |
I think we might be suffering from the obscure song is better than well known song thing. |
spiralstatic 29.01.2019 10:27 |
You & I could have been a success. Similar vein to yes You're my Best Friend and (I think) Killer Queen. Not quite as strong as either, but works perfectly on the album, In the end we'll never know the single-success any song might have had. The Millionaire Waltz is a sister to Bohemian Rhapsody. Not traditional single material, but had it been released, who is to say it might not have been big too? I also understand how with it's more classical and music hall influences it doesn't have the popular music appeal of Bo Rhap so would likely not have worked as a single, but you never know when it didn't happen. I think ADATR is the one album with no weak tracks, so for me any track might have worked (though that doesn't mean they'd all work as singles) and I'd love any track to be loved by more people. :) |
Star* 29.01.2019 12:50 |
Actually Freddie said "Somebody to Love" was a better constructed song than "Bohemian Rhapsody" But "You and I" is one of those classic sounding Queen songs that everybody adores, great harmonies and a very smart guitar slot in the middle making it a typical gem! I love it. |
Vocal harmony 29.01.2019 13:43 |
QUEEN3 wrote: Yes but lets not get "You & I" too popular cos we don't want that tool Lambert to start killing it, he has raped most of the Queen back catalogue as it is. Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.Another name change. . . , Yeah that makes sense, you created a thread about the song, now you're worried about making it popular. On top of that you've resorted to using one of that idiot runner _70's quotes. |
Nathan H 29.01.2019 14:26 |
spiralstatic wrote: I think ADATR is the one album with no weak tracks, so for me any track might have worked (though that doesn't mean they'd all work as singles) and I'd love any track to be loved by more people. :)Yes I completely agree with you, it's probably why I like the album so much - there's no weak songs at all. I can listen to the album whenever and enjoy every minute of it. I think I can only see half the album being released as a single as some don't sound as commercial successful though they are all worth bring publicised. |
dysan 29.01.2019 16:24 |
I'm not keen on ADATR tbh (and we've discussed this to death recently). It's a mid-tier album for me. |
aristide1 29.01.2019 16:33 |
Vocal harmony wrote: Another name change. . . , Yeah that makes sense, you created a thread about the song, now you're worried about making it popular. On top of that you've resorted to using one of that idiot runner _70's quotes.Vocal Harmony, you are always replying to people with allegedly multiple identities, and to posts from past threads, like a vengeful elephant with memory episodes. It's disrespectful to the rest of the participants. Aren't you tired to live the same miserable days over and over again? I'm talking about the days when some idiot made outrageous attacks, and you smartly replied "Ha ha funny" (or something like that), as you don't care. Apparently you care very much, considering the never ending reverberations. You became a certified stalker. |
Star* 29.01.2019 17:27 |
Vocal Harmony Get a life and stop causing arguments it is all you do. If you want to comment about the topic on this thread then do that, but if your gonna moan then jog on. |
bucsateflon 29.01.2019 17:33 |
aristide1 wrote: Vocal Harmony, you are always replying to people with allegedly multiple identities, and to posts from past threads, like a vengeful elephant with memory episodes. It's disrespectful to the rest of the participants. Aren't you tired to live the same miserable days over and over again? I'm talking about the days when some idiot made outrageous attacks, and you smartly replied "Ha ha funny" (or something like that), as you don't care. Apparently you care very much, considering the never ending reverberations. You became a certified stalker.haha well said, vocals is scum |
aristide1 29.01.2019 18:28 |
Your pathological menage a trois works so well that I'm already starting to regret my insensitive comment. |
bucsateflon 29.01.2019 20:04 |
too late, snowflake |
Thistle 30.01.2019 00:58 |
QUEEN3 wrote: Thistle Wind your neck in cos you have not even seen Queen live with Freddie like i have 5 times!1 - It was a fucking joke, you gimp 2 - Who gives a fuck how many times you've seen Queen? 3 - How is your comment relevant? 4 - You were still wrong 5 - Did I say you're a gimp? 6 - Pick a name and stick with it, or are you trying to fool people into thinking you're someone else and not a gimp? 7 - You're a gimp |
Star* 30.01.2019 10:12 |
Thistle i can change my name as many times as i wish, nothing to do with you. Please do not tell me to stick to a name you are not my keeper, you are a thirty something who knows quite little about the Queen life and Freddie all those years ago i have lived breathed Queen since 1974 and i have seen the very best side of them as to the very poor band they are now. I am a purist Queen fan and 100% proud of that! |
dysan 30.01.2019 10:25 |
Keep changing login on a close knit forum like this would only be done to confuse and deceive. So a neutral such as myself will only think you are doing it for reasons that are not conducive to keeping the forum fun and open. |
bucsateflon 30.01.2019 13:49 |
|
bucsateflon 30.01.2019 13:50 |
bucsateflon wrote: your "neutrality" might by perceived sometimes as cowardliness, to take a side or a stand in a controversial subject |
bucsateflon 30.01.2019 13:50 |
|
Thistle 30.01.2019 14:34 |
QUEEN3 wrote: Thistle i can change my name as many times as i wish, nothing to do with you. Please do not tell me to stick to a name you are not my keeper, you are a thirty something who knows quite little about the Queen life and Freddie all those years ago i have lived breathed Queen since 1974 and i have seen the very best side of them as to the very poor band they are now. I am a purist Queen fan and 100% proud of that!I couldn't give a fuck. You've been told before that your age, my age, how many times we've seen Queen combined etc is IRRELEVANT. Get that into your thick head. I'm glad you like Queen. I'm glad you're proud of it. And yes, you can change your name as many times as you want - but how do you expect people to maintain conversation with you if you can't make up your mind who or what you are? |
Vocal harmony 30.01.2019 15:25 |
bucsateflon wrote:Three posts over four pages plus this reply to the two of you is hardly stalking.aristide1 wrote: Vocal Harmony, you are always replying to people with allegedly multiple identities, and to posts from past threads, like a vengeful elephant with memory episodes. It's disrespectful to the rest of the participants. Aren't you tired to live the same miserable days over and over again? I'm talking about the days when some idiot made outrageous attacks, and you smartly replied "Ha ha funny" (or something like that), as you don't care. Apparently you care very much, considering the never ending reverberations. You became a certified stalker.haha well said, vocals is scum Bucsateflon, yeah whatever. |
Star* 30.01.2019 17:32 |
Thistle You seem to be losing the plot son, try and keep on track with the topic and keep your personal thoughts in check there there be a good boy. If you only want to come on here causing rows and trolling then get yourself on facebook, |
Thistle 30.01.2019 18:33 |
I see you're still a halfwit regardless of what name you choose to use this time. Give your face peace. |
Thistle 30.01.2019 18:35 |
The funny thing is that you think yore responses are genius. Re-read them when you're with your carer and see what they think. They don't even make sense and never follow a thread. |
Thistle 30.01.2019 18:35 |
The funny thing is that you think yore responses are genius. Re-read them when you're with your carer and see what they think. They don't even make sense and never follow a thread. |
Star* 30.01.2019 18:42 |
Thistle Actually i have had a lot of nice replies on this thread about the topic if you care to read, you can read? If you want to bitch and stamp your feet go else where or hook up with vocal harmony, that is if you are not vocal harmony to start with ???????? |
Thistle 31.01.2019 00:46 |
Mate, your "nice" replies are also irrelevant. You had a go at someone for making a mistake. I tried to have a joke with you when you then made a mistake, but you spat the dummy and gave responses that had absolutely nothing to do with the thread or what I said to you. You've continued to do the same, even when it was pointed out. As for my reading abilities - I'm replying to you, aren't I? Or do you not have the capacity to think about these things? Re-read your comments. Only you seem to be able to make sense of them, and if you think they qualify as cohesive debate, then it's you who's "lost the plot, boy". Just wind your neck in ;) |
mooghead 31.01.2019 07:35 |
Give it a rest ffs. Send private massages or something. |
Star* 31.01.2019 07:42 |
Thistle Once again i will ask you again, if you don want to join in with the topic that i set on here then please go away. I do not need your negativity on this board. You are obviously out for an argument but you are not getting one so go and nit pick at someone else, because to be honest you are like a little 3 year old. Jog on. |
Vocal harmony 31.01.2019 14:09 |
QUEEN3 wrote: Thistle Actually i have had a lot of nice replies on this thread about the topic if you care to read, you can read? If you want to bitch and stamp your feet go else where or hook up with vocal harmony, that is if you are not vocal harmony to start with ????????Nice replies are pointless where you're concerned. If someone doesn't agree whole heartedly with you, you seem to take it as a personel attack on you. There is a total lack of reasoning with you. You're so focused on winning the argument despite what some people actually say. Your constantly in search of the smallest thing you can retaliate against. |
Star* 31.01.2019 15:15 |
Vocal Harmony People in glass houses, so listen to your own advice love. |
Thistle 01.02.2019 00:35 |
Mate, you've been told before - I made a joke, you started your pish because you couldn't take it like a grown up. Using your own words, I'll say what I want. There was no negativity, unless you didn't like the fact I told you that you were wrong on something (which you were). So if you don't like it....maybe you should jog on. My comment WAS on topic, so grow a pair and get on with it. As for Moog....you absolute dick :p I like you, but you're an absolute walloper of the highest order. If you don't like my responses Gerry, you can jog on ;) |
Thistle 01.02.2019 00:37 |
QUEEN3 wrote: Vocal Harmony People in glass houses, so listen to your own advice love.Have you ever looked up the meaning of irony? |
Star* 01.02.2019 07:33 |
Thistle / Vocal Harmony Again please stop trolling my thread and grow up. i know you have two user names and you enjoy trolling as i have already been told by other guys on here, you are petulant obnoxious and have nothing more in your life other than to follow me around this site spouting your venom. You are spoiling this serious discussion yet again with your pettiness and jealousy because others are very interested in my topic. So do yourself a favour like go and shave your face. |
Thistle 01.02.2019 16:45 |
No-one is trolling your thread. You dished out garbage when it was pointed out you were wrong (but only in a jovial way. You've continued to dish out insults even when it was pointed out it was a joke. You don't like being wrong. You don't understand irony, asking us to "grow up" and "jog on" when you will neither a) grow up or b) jog on. If "shave your face" is an insult, you're a laughable tool. If you think I'm jealous of your thread or your patter, see the above comment. Tool. |
Star* 01.02.2019 18:21 |
Thistle / Vocal Harmony i have not insulted anyone on this thread but you and your alias Vocal Harmony have yet again come on here and started having a pop at me which is pathetic and uncalled for, You only come on Queenzone to start trouble, because that is how your pea size brain works. i have been reasonable the last few messages been polite to ask you to just comment on the topic above but you have just gone on and on insulting me, so now i will tell you quite frankly to quit while your ahead or you will be insulted and look like like a bigger wanker than you already are, so do one ! |
Thistle 01.02.2019 23:44 |
1 - I am not VH 2 - You have do not have the ability to read. If you do, you do not have the ability to understand what you just read. 3 - You made a mistake. You cannot accept this, and will not address it. You will not address that me pointing out your mistake was just jovial, and you were oversensitive. 4 - I did not have a pop at you. Your response to me was to tell me to wind my neck in because you had seen Freddie live - which isn't even relevant to the thread or my comment to you. You then don't see the irony in you asking people to stay on topic! (my response to you WAS on topic) 5 - I don't only come on to QZ to cause trouble. I've been here far longer than you and contributed much more in terms in discussion and shares. Sure, there's the odd disagreement (mostly with you, but that's partly to do with the points I made above) 6 - You say you've been polite, but starting your sentences "please" and ending them with an insult is far from polite. "Wind your neck in" (your first response, and the reason you were called out yet again fro your shitty attitude, is certainly not polite) 7 - You've ended your post with an insult. I'm a "wanker". Yeah, and you're jealous. 8 - Telling me to do one isn't going to make me go away. 9 - A simple apology for your attitude in the first place might help your cause. 10 - If number 9 doesn't happen, people will see who has the problem/ 11 - If I'm to "quit while I'm ahead", are you finally conceding you've been behind this whole time? |
Star* 02.02.2019 09:27 |
Thistle : your post was read, analysed then completely dismissed Jog on loser. I do not apologise to people on my thread who cause the trouble in the first place. |
Thistle 02.02.2019 17:44 |
Okay retard. You can't admit when you're wrong, and dance around the situation with insults. In most reasonable people's eyes, that is one of the traits that makes you the troll. Laughably, you're not very good at it because you're the one who wants me off your back. The thread (until you start deleting your idiotic responses) is here for all to see, so they'll know where the insults started. I accept there will be no apology, but you've made a fool of yourself consistently. I'll be here, not jogging on - because the further I jog, the more you'll be behind....and fuck knows, you're backwards enough. |
Thistle 02.02.2019 18:01 |
It's Deaky's magnum opus, btw |
Star* 02.02.2019 18:27 |
Thistle You are the troll nit picking to cause a fight as per usual. We were all happy until you and your sibling Vocal Harmony came on causing chew. So now you had your 15 mins of fame, move on and and try and be nice. |
Thistle 02.02.2019 18:40 |
If you think I'm nitpicking, are you finally admitting you're a nit? No, let me review this for you once more. I'll break it down in small chunks in the hope you digest it. You had a go at someone for making a wee mistake. I returned it to you, for a joke - and it clearly was a joke. You spat the dummy and started throwing insults, because you're a mong. Since that, neither of your responses have been a) relevant, b) cohesive. Like I say, I'll be right here, so you can tell me to jog on all you want. If it upsets you so much, maybe this ain't the place for you. |
Star* 02.02.2019 22:34 |
Thistle You are the snowflake not me, fuck off you cunt |
Thistle 02.02.2019 23:30 |
If I'm the snowflake, why are you the one in meltdown? Yet another example of you taking a word you don't understand and using it in the wrong context. The more you open your mouth, the bigger your target gets. |
Star* 03.02.2019 08:56 |
Thistle You and Vocal Harmony yet again spoilt a good thread when everyone was getting along very well, then you come on starting your tirades and slagging me off you just cannot help yourself can you? I do not want to know you and i dislike you because you have nothing constructive to say about the thread but instead start chewing up things i have written and nit picking over a silly chart position and turning that into a row. You are the one that does not understand and as i said a few posts back i have been polite to tell you to quit while you are ahead and your gormless enough to just carry on you spree of abuse at me. And just for the record everyone can agree that you and Vocal Harmony ( same Person) started this sabotage of my thread. DO NOTt start poking the finger at me when you started this. |
mooghead 03.02.2019 09:17 |
This whole fucking thread is just an embarrasment |
Star* 03.02.2019 09:36 |
Mooghead You are correct and guess who started making this thread an embarrassment? Thick Thistle aka Vocal Harmony. |
dysan 03.02.2019 09:54 |
3rd post in: You do not know your Queen history and for that you are a troll so fuck right off buddy. I bet your a stupid glambert who knows fuck all about Queen history. |
bucsateflon 03.02.2019 10:07 |
neutrality goes to shit |
Star* 03.02.2019 13:37 |
WELL THIS THREAD IS CLOSED THANKS TO VOCAL HARMONY & THISTLE. THANKS TO ALL THE GUYS THAT GAVE THERE OPINION ON THE QUESTION OF THIS THREAD, MUCH APPRECIATED. IF YOU ALL COME ACROSS "VOCAL HARMONY" OR "THISTLE" GIVE THEM GRIEF. BYE GUYS.XXXXXX |
Vocal harmony 03.02.2019 14:37 |
Vocal harmony wrote:This was my first post in this thread, on topic and in part agreeing with some of what you said.EMI2565 wrote: When Queen released there fifth album " A Day at the Races" back in 1976 the first single to be cut was "Somebody to Love" which reached number 2 here in the UK then disaster happened for there second single they released "Tie your Mother Down" and although it is a great rock song it was not really "single" material for the general public at the time and only reached no 30 i think. That is where i suggest "You & I " should have been released instead of " Tie your Mother Down" it is very easy on the ears and makes for a great top five single and it is so underrated with Queen fans but in my opinion it is Queen gold. Easily recognisable as Queen with great vocals and guitar riffs, i am sure it would have become a smash back in 1976. What do you ardent fans think of that then?You and I is a great album track, but does it stand alone as a strong single song? Remember it had to hook people who hadn't already bought the album. Tie Your Mother Down as a single didn't work. At a time of top ten Quo songs on the UK chart it was probably expected to equal what Staus Quo could do. Good Old Fashioned Lover Boy maybe could have made a better second single. You s usual misread part of it and tried to come back with a clever remark ( something your mental capacity doesn't really allow) you as usual derailed your own thread and not just in your reply to me. Read the rest of "your" thread and see if you can understand the route you took with your style of reply to perfectly normal posts One other thing, how many time do I have to tell you I don't have other user names, I am not Thistle, or anyone else on here. |
Star* 03.02.2019 15:44 |
ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz next combo pleeeeeeeeeeeese. |
bucsateflon 03.02.2019 16:53 |
when is it going to get closed and what happens to these two clone accounts, thistle and vocals? |
Thistle 03.02.2019 18:00 |
^ shut up you mixing waste of space. That goes to both Gerry and Bucsteflamoron. Yes, the entire thread is an embarrassment. That doesn't just include the interaction between me and the troll. The whole site is a pit. |
Thistle 03.02.2019 18:09 |
dysan wrote: 3rd post in: You do not know your Queen history and for that you are a troll so fuck right off buddy. I bet your a stupid glambert who knows fuck all about Queen history.Correct. So much for it being a "good thread" and "everyone getting along". Quite clearly, the first insult came from thick Gerry as you've pointed out, 3 posts in. He can't help himself. |
Star* 03.02.2019 19:43 |
Thistle You are the thick cunt on here cos you cant even read.. |
Thistle 03.02.2019 21:09 |
You moron. If I can't read, how am I responding? If that's your best attempt at a put-down or trolling, you're best just shutting up. "The thread is now closed" he says as he keeps on prattling on. Dumbass walloper. |
Star* 04.02.2019 13:05 |
Thistle You are like a fucking virus, you just go on and on with the drivel, for suck sake go away. |
Vocal harmony 04.02.2019 16:46 |
shoveit wrote: Thistle You are the thick cunt on here cos you cant even read..I see your thread is going really well and in an informative friendly manner. What's great is that you established a direction with the third post and stuck to it,. The rest of us not wanting to let you down and ruin what you were doing fell in line and joined in. |
Vocal harmony 04.02.2019 16:53 |
shoveit wrote: Thistle You are like a fucking virus, you just go on and on with the drivel, for suck sake go away.No your the fucking virus. You started out a few years back as Gerry then mutated and spread around this forum spewing hateful bile over anyone who didn't go along with what you say. You carried on mutating into happystar, mr right and so on. |
Thistle 04.02.2019 17:43 |
Gerry, I've told you. I'm right here, and always will be. Cos I've met Brian and you haven't so that makes me better than you. Also what VH says. Spot on. |
Star* 04.02.2019 20:06 |
Vocal Harmony & Thistle (same person) trying to put me down once again, how sad and pathetic. Take a look in the mirror and you are the one that stalks me around Queenzone just to slag my comments off because you know i tell the truth and you cant stand my opinions cos they are superior to the bile you print. As for meeting Brian so what he was not the best member in Queen cos Freddie was. Brian has lost a lot of my respect for what he has turned Queen into a band where anyone and his cat can join. You need to sort yourself out lady, because it is obvious you don't have very much in your life to be happy about so you come on here bitching. Oh and by the way i will change my user name as many times as i please, it has fuck all to do with you. Oh and by the way the name "Shove it" was a tribute to you sweetie. |
Thistle 04.02.2019 23:14 |
Mong the Merciless wrote: Vocal Harmony & Thistle (same person) trying to put me down once again, how sad and pathetic. Take a look in the mirror and you are the one that stalks me around Queenzone just to slag my comments off because you know i tell the truth and you cant stand my opinions cos they are superior to the bile you print. As for meeting Brian so what he was not the best member in Queen cos Freddie was. Brian has lost a lot of my respect for what he has turned Queen into a band where anyone and his cat can join. You need to sort yourself out lady, because it is obvious you don't have very much in your life to be happy about so you come on here bitching. Oh and by the way i will change my user name as many times as i please, it has fuck all to do with you. Oh and by the way the name "Shove it" was a tribute to you sweetie.It doesn't matter what you wrote, I couldn't be arsed reading it. I can see it's several lines long, so you obviously wasted a lot of time coming up with whatever pish it was. "Thread closed" you said. Still talking pish you are. |
Star* 05.02.2019 13:35 |
THICK THISTLE You could not be bothered to read my post because you cannot read, your a thick twat. Now thread closed. Missing you already ..........................................................NOT. |
Thistle 05.02.2019 14:03 |
LOL. Oh, I can read you moron - you just don't write anything interesting enough for me to read, mostly because you're a mong. Thread closed (until you have a hissyfit at this and come back with more drivel, you thick walloper). |
Star* 05.02.2019 15:22 |
Thick thistle: my thread and i decide when it is closed so wind your neck in cos you have the brains of a rocking horse! |
Thistle 05.02.2019 15:46 |
Mong The Merciless 2 wrote: Some sort of hissyfit drivel because I'm having a hissyfitNo, it's NOT thread and you CAN'T say when it's closed - why can't you can't get that in your mongified head?? It's an open forum. You can open a thread, but you can't close it. You can't stop replies. Once you've opened it, you're only the topic starter, not the "owner" of the thread. Ergo, it's not your thread. Only the admins can close it (well, technically on this forum, they can't - they can delete it). You keep saying the thread is closed, but you keep coming back with more shite. It's the second, or third time you've told me to shut up or wind my neck in....I'll remind you once more, I'll be right here, not jogging on. You slow, moronic cunt. |
Vocal harmony 05.02.2019 16:07 |
Delilah2 wrote: Vocal Harmony & Thistle (same person) trying to put me down once again, how sad and pathetic..Once again, we are two ( you do understand how numbers work?) different people. How long does it take you to understand. Why don't you go the whole nine yards and start claiming everyone on here who has expressed an opinion about you or argued with you is one person. Another name change. Well here another one for you Shit cannon. |
bucsateflon 05.02.2019 17:51 |
yes! you and yourself |
Thistle 05.02.2019 18:44 |
Shut up Bucsamoron. Can't believe this shit is in the serious discussion or that Gerry hasn't been banned yet. |
Star* 06.02.2019 12:17 |
THICK THISTLE You are the one that should be banned for destroying this thread with your accomplish VOCAL HARMONY Both of you are idiots and loonies on here. Between the pair of you there is not a single brain cell. |
dysan 06.02.2019 12:41 |
Oh do shut up. |
Thistle 06.02.2019 15:02 |
Delilah2 wrote: THICK THISTLE You are the one that should be banned for destroying this thread with your accomplish VOCAL HARMONY Both of you are idiots and loonies on here. Between the pair of you there is not a single brain cell.The rantings of an absolute wanker. What's an "accomplish"? What is that even meant to mean? You keep telling me I can't read - maybe if you spoke English, it would be a start. You've been banned here several times. You've had several threads and posts deleted under your current guise. The reason behind that is you are an abusive wee turd who cannot hold a conversation or form a cohesive debate - unless it's with that other retard bucsamoron or whatever the fuck the wee fanny is called. As many have told you here - shut up. |
Vocal harmony 06.02.2019 16:00 |
Delilah2 wrote: THICK THISTLE You are the one that should be banned for destroying this thread with your accomplish VOCAL HARMONY Both of you are idiots and loonies on here. Between the pair of you there is not a single brain cell.When you start your post with an insult you're reasoning is already open to question. No one ruined this thread other than you. Don't blame us, or anyone else for your inabilities when it comes to any form of discussion. Re read the whole thread the come back and tell us all where the insults started and where the derailment occurred. And if you want further proof read your post I've quoted. |
Thistle 06.02.2019 16:13 |
Vocal harmony wrote:You're asking too much of him. He doesn't have the mental capacity.Delilah2 wrote: THICK THISTLE You are the one that should be banned for destroying this thread with your accomplish VOCAL HARMONY Both of you are idiots and loonies on here. Between the pair of you there is not a single brain cell.When you start your post with an insult you're reasoning is already open to question. No one ruined this thread other than you. Don't blame us, or anyone else for your inabilities when it comes to any form of discussion. Re read the whole thread the come back and tell us all where the insults started and where the derailment occurred. And if you want further proof read your post I've quoted. The funny thing is he's trying his damnedest to troll, he's pretty poor at it considering he wants US of HIS back. |
Thistle 06.02.2019 16:13 |
Wouldn't be surprised if Fucktamoron wasn't his account, too. |
Star* 06.02.2019 17:46 |
THICK THISTLE Are you still waiting for that ambulance to take you to the mental health assessment ward? Never mind VOCAL HARMONY can mop your brow and keep you topped up with beef tea. lol |
Thistle 06.02.2019 18:04 |
MONG the Merciless II wrote: Duh, me a retard. Me Gerry. Me just say furst thing that comes into me head.Correct. Best thing you've said all thread. |
Rick 06.02.2019 18:18 |
John was a great song writer. You & I is a gem. |
Thistle 06.02.2019 18:49 |
I agree wiih that Rick, I've always loved ADATR - You and I is a big factor in that. Deaky is a very underrated song writer. |
Star* 06.02.2019 20:19 |
Thistle Bingo, your participating in the thread, give the dog a bone ! lol |
Donald Trump 06.02.2019 21:03 |
LET’S MAKE YOU AND I GREAT AGAIN! |
Thistle 06.02.2019 23:36 |
Delilah2 wrote: Thistle Bingo, your participating in the thread, give the dog a bone ! lolI already had been you thick cunt, you were just too interested in fighting to notice. All because you couldn't take a joke. Get stuffed, hope you choke on that bone...."sweetie" lol |
Thistle 06.02.2019 23:43 |
Donald Trump wrote: LET’S MAKE YOU AND I GREAT AGAIN!Here we go again. |
Donald Trump 07.02.2019 00:39 |
LET’S MAKE “Here we go again” GREAT AGAIN! |
Thistle 07.02.2019 01:15 |
Who was the user who kept telling you you were a spaz? I miss him. |
Star* 07.02.2019 16:13 |
THICK THISTLE Now play nicely and i will give you a treat, Vocal Harmony's dildo to suck ha ha ha ha See you wouldnt wanna be ya ! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Star* 07.02.2019 16:13 |
THICK THISTLE Now play nicely and i will give you a treat, Vocal Harmony's dildo to suck ha ha ha ha See you wouldnt wanna be ya ! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Vocal harmony 07.02.2019 16:42 |
Delilah2 wrote: Everybody play nicely and i will give you a treat, I'll stick my dildo up my hole and pirouette around this site singing I am a half wit to the tune of WATC ha ha ha ha See I know you wouldnt wanna be me! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIs it a free performance or do we have to pay. |
Thistle 07.02.2019 18:38 |
Gerry, your patter is getting worse. Did you hang about the playground for your material today? Wouldn't surprise me, heard you like it there. |
Thistle 07.02.2019 18:38 |
Vocal harmony wrote:LOLDelilah2 wrote: Everybody play nicely and i will give you a treat, I'll stick my dildo up my hole and pirouette around this site singing I am a half wit to the tune of WATC ha ha ha ha See I know you wouldnt wanna be me! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIs it a free performance or do we have to pay. |
Star* 08.02.2019 10:38 |
Vocal Harmony You do know how to be cheap and slutty and there you are again impersonating my user name just to get a cheap laugh You really are a twisted mindless little nobody. tut tut.......I pity your family,. |
Thistle 08.02.2019 11:37 |
Shut up, Meg. |
Vocal harmony 08.02.2019 16:18 |
Delilah2 wrote: Vocal Harmony You do know how to be cheap and slutty and there you are again impersonating my user name just to get a cheap laugh You really are a twisted mindless little nobody. tut tut.......I pity your family,.If you don't like it Gerry, go away. If you can be civil with everyone this wouldn't happen. |
. 08.02.2019 17:09 |
I was going to give my reply to the opening post, but now realise it's a lost cause. |
Star* 08.02.2019 18:44 |
Vocal Harmony : Save all this grief and stop nit picking at my every comment. Simples..... |
MarlspalQ 09.02.2019 06:16 |
i like this song, should of be a single on its own rights. Not best one of album though, somebody to love although i know this got to be a single anyway. i did not know it was John who writ it, you and i i mean. sorry for my english. |
MarlspalQ 09.02.2019 06:17 |
some talk not nice on this chapter, you should be nice each other. |
Star* 09.02.2019 10:05 |
MarlspalQ Thanks for contributing your opinions to the thread topic, much appreciated. The Topic was going fine until trolls Thistle & Vocal Harmony wrecked this great thread. We should ban these idiots spoiling our enjoyment and serious discussion on Queen as they feel they have to troll to get the limelight. |
mooghead 09.02.2019 12:15 |
Just get them a room so they can fuck each other senseless which is obviously what they want to do... |
MarlspalQ 09.02.2019 15:01 |
Aspire, no problems my contribute, don't want to upset anyone or argue but look like you started some fight in this chapter just few posts in. Not nice very comments from you too but i can't say you werent nice to me because you were. I hope i dint upset, just said what i see. we should all be nice each other with this page as very good queen site. |
Thistle 09.02.2019 15:11 |
@MarlspalQ - Well played. Good to see some heartfelt honesty, and welcome to QZ :) @Moog - for someone who complains about how this place "has turned to shit" and bemoans some of the inane and "embarrassing" posts, you don't half add to it all yourself. I've seen some real crap from you of late. Don't be a tosser. |
mooghead 09.02.2019 16:07 |
It is shit. This thread is the ultimate example. A perfectly good question - turned to shit. The people arguing here surely get a little kick to see that there is a response to their previous post. They get off on it, otherwise it would be a private message. Thats why you all want to fuck each other. Crack on. |
Thistle 09.02.2019 16:13 |
Aye, okay. Because every argument ever in the world was because all parties wanted to fuck each other. This must mean you want to fuck me, since you have some issue with what's being posted. The feeling is not mutual, and the same goes for Gerry. Crack on. |
Star* 09.02.2019 16:27 |
MarlspalQ The trouble started on this thread on page 2 and 3 by "Vocal Harmony" ranting that she wanted to know about the arrangements to "You & I " and bitching that i had pasted my comments from somewhere else and then before that "Thistle" was nit picking with the chart position i had stated for "Good old fashioned lover boy" which was just child like to make him look like his was some kind of Queen expert. I treated you decent as you treated the thread and topic decent so for that thank you and respect. Knobs on here who take the piss will get treated as one. |
MarlspalQ 09.02.2019 17:07 |
Thanks for kind words Aspire but please don't mind if I say looks like fight start just few writes in on this chapter when you told someone they were in wrong but don't like it when somebody told you you were wrong on somethings. Lots of silly commentaries here on this chapter from everyone, this should be heaven for everyone instead. |
MarlspalQ 09.02.2019 17:10 |
But don't wanna fight with you cos think you actually good guys. Just wanna see nice okay. Thanks Aspire. |
Rick 09.02.2019 17:19 |
The part starting at 'You know I never could foresee the future years' is one of the best moments in a Queen song, IMHO. It is so cleverly written. |
Thistle 09.02.2019 17:31 |
Gerry, again you've misquoted something and taken it the wrong way. I was trying to have a laugh with you about the GOFLB post, because you had pulled someone up for making a wee mistake. I was hoping you'd take it in the spirit intended, but you threw out insults. I was not trying to make myself look like an expert, as it doesn't take an expert to look up the official charts. Even when you were told you were wrong you still tried to maintain you were right and I just tried to make a joke with you. That was all. I've explained this numerous times. You're so serious. If I'd known you wouldn't take the joke, I'd have just posted a link to the charts. But MarlsPalQ is right. We shouldn't be spouting this shite. Im too busy and have too much stuff going on to constantly be here to make sure you haven't misinterpreted a comment, and to be Frank I can't be arsed either. I'm not apologising, but I don't expect apologies from you either. Things get said, that's life. But...we can agree to draw a line and try to avoid silly comments in future. If you don't like something I've said, or think I mean something that hasn't actually been said, just PM as moog says. I'll do likewise. We might not always agree, but we can avoid daft arguments. Thoughts? |
Star* 09.02.2019 19:53 |
Thistle It is so difficult on here to see what emotions people are displaying as there are no "smileys" to put next to comments. If that was intended as a joke then i got the wrong end of the stick and i apologise. |
Thistle 09.02.2019 20:34 |
That's true. It's easy to miss a vibe and things often get lost in translation when something is written on a forum and not said face to face. I hope we're all turning a corner here, and I hold my hands up I could have handled it all better too. Cheers :) |
Star* 09.02.2019 21:16 |
Yes we cannot see emotions over a keypad and most of the time things are taking for "negatives" Happy days then yeah? lol |
Thistle 09.02.2019 21:32 |
Happy days ;) |