fras444 28.07.2018 01:15 |
With old acts still performing and writing new albums. Rolling stones, Deff Leppard...( a great example of a band that has some wonderful albums but has essentially become a "one album wonder" band) Elton to name the key examples.... Acts such as these. No-one really goes to these shows to listen to their latest album songs to be honest.... Did Queen last long enough where their... well... their last album to result in a tour... where fans were just going to see them for the songs of yesteryear and not really giving two shits for the new album or were their last few albums still relevant enough to leave fans excited to hear how or what songs they were going to play off their latest album. On that note... Was QUEEN ever to become that group.. where, they would tour or play 40 nights in Vegas.... exclusively playing one album in its entirety I.e ANATO or.... Where....releasing an album was just an excuse of going through the emotions of studio time knowing that they were never going to ever consider playing a track and just focus on their past hits? Or... Where Queen the masters of keeping with the times, making good relevant hits music, worthy of the stage and still have a hardcore following to justify and to beable to pull off a blast from the past to play a number from Q2 or the Jazz album or perform a medley of old numbers.... |
fras444 28.07.2018 01:27 |
Another good example to add.. more relevant bands Megadeth, Metallica and Iron Maiden.... consistent with writing new material... whether it's worthy of the live stage and taking it's place over a classic song is up for debate but.... those three bands tend to almost exclusively perform a setlist containing everything but songs from the last five albums I.e countdown to extinction/Black album/Somewhere back in time... ACDC though!!!!! This is a great example of a band an "old/1970s" classic band that manages to make new music sound so fresh new and relavant today... well fair to say their run is over but... the last album managed to produce hits and good stage anthems. I think ACDC at the masters of reinventing the same basic sound and doing it well. Don't think there is one album where one song is not stage material. Some weak ones but non that they can't pull off. A band that pulls only stadium filling crowds and nothing less.... possibly the only "70s" band that Queen would have rivaled in the 90s and today on the charts for new music??? |
mooghead 28.07.2018 06:23 |
Shut up. |
Qubus 28.07.2018 06:55 |
We can only speculate. I have the feeling that in pop music, most bands tend to peak in terms of creative output and musical relevance when the singers-songwriters are in their 20s to early 40s. I see no special reason why Queen could not have gone the same way as so many of the great acts from the 60s and 70s from the mid-1990s onward. |
dysan 28.07.2018 07:20 |
By the time they hit Jazz they were firmly in the bracket of clearing out the new songs from the setlist to make way for newer songs off the latest release. Standard form considering the size of the catalogue by that point - Queen's job was to promote the new stuff and please the casual punters. Fair dos they would put in some treats now and then but even that might have been misguided and much safer than it could've been. This is of course contradicted by having the preposterous wig outs of the guitar solo and GDML in the set, but I think by that point they had become notable items in the set, and necessary to allow what was essentially a breather for the rest of the band. Having such a perfect set closer as WATC is a no brainer. That said, Bowie soon grew weary of Rock N Roll Suicide (his own tailor made set climax) but he sailed a slightly more dangerous course live - and seemed to prefer just playing something dancy at the end of his sets post '74 |
andres_clip 28.07.2018 12:06 |
I do think that Queen followed the flow thrue the years except from the start. It would have been an awesome band in the 90's. |
cmsdrums 28.07.2018 15:41 |
In answer to the post title question....no. The Magic Tour debuted A Kind of Magic and I Want To Break Free, and the live versions of both converted the bland sounding pop records to a harder edged edition. Who Wants To Live Forever also worked line for me, and Radio Ga Ga and Hammee To Fall - both recent tracks - both have their definitive live versions on that tour. |
philip storey 28.07.2018 20:02 |
Is this really worth discussing ? |
NastyQueenie74 28.07.2018 21:40 |
cmsdrums wrote: In answer to the post title question....no. The Magic Tour debuted A Kind of Magic and I Want To Break Free, and the live versions of both converted the bland sounding pop records to a harder edged edition. Who Wants To Live Forever also worked line for me, and Radio Ga Ga and Hammee To Fall - both recent tracks - both have their definitive live versions on that tour.I Want To Break Free was played on the Works tour |
Raf 29.07.2018 02:52 |
fras444 wrote: Another good example to add.. more relevant bands Megadeth, Metallica and Iron Maiden.... consistent with writing new material... whether it's worthy of the live stage and taking it's place over a classic song is up for debate but.... those three bands tend to almost exclusively perform a setlist containing everything but songs from the last five albums I.e countdown to extinction/Black album/Somewhere back in time... ACDC though!!!!! This is a great example of a band an "old/1970s" classic band that manages to make new music sound so fresh new and relavant today... well fair to say their run is over but... the last album managed to produce hits and good stage anthems. I think ACDC at the masters of reinventing the same basic sound and doing it well. Don't think there is one album where one song is not stage material. Some weak ones but non that they can't pull off. A band that pulls only stadium filling crowds and nothing less.... possibly the only "70s" band that Queen would have rivaled in the 90s and today on the charts for new music???Megadeth indeed usually plays very little new stuff. But Metallica? 1/3 of their current setlist comes from the new album. link |
dysan 29.07.2018 06:38 |
Why are they comparable with Megadeth, Metallica and Iron Maiden? I think your Bowies, Eltons and Stones are a better comparison. |
SillyGoose 29.07.2018 12:54 |
@mooghead At 4087 posts, I believe you're the one who needs to shut up at once. You're taking the deity status thing too far with that attitude, remember it doesn't mean anything. @ philip Probably, probably not. What's the criteria for a worthwhile topic? (hint: maybe ask one of your deities ^ like your friend up there.) As for me: I've read the stupidest things on here about Freddie's chest wig and nobody seems to have a problem with that. So, who knows? Maybe I see more value in the OP's question about this band's music. This place needs an enema, you bunch of divas. |
Star* 29.07.2018 14:24 |
Queen were just a band but a band that was very strict with what it did so basically it was album tour album tour etc.... and the set lists did get adjusted and if Freddie was in a very good mood one would get a treat with the set list of a nice surprise be it jailhouse rock or Big Spender. |
cmsdrums 29.07.2018 16:05 |
NastyQueenie74 wrote:I had brain freeze there - of course! I think I meant One Vision!cmsdrums wrote: In answer to the post title question....no. The Magic Tour debuted A Kind of Magic and I Want To Break Free, and the live versions of both converted the bland sounding pop records to a harder edged edition. Who Wants To Live Forever also worked line for me, and Radio Ga Ga and Hammer To Fall - both recent tracks - both have their definitive live versions on that tour.I Want To Break Free was played on the Works tour |
mooghead 29.07.2018 16:06 |
SillyGoose wrote: @mooghead At 4087 posts, I believe you're the one who needs to shut up at once. You're taking the deity status thing too far with that attitude, remember it doesn't mean anything. @ philip Probably, probably not. What's the criteria for a worthwhile topic? (hint: maybe ask one of your deities ^ like your friend up there.) As for me: I've read the stupidest things on here about Freddie's chest wig and nobody seems to have a problem with that. So, who knows? Maybe I see more value in the OP's question about this band's music. This place needs an enema, you bunch of divas.Erm.... Who the fuck are you? |
Chopin1995 29.07.2018 22:26 |
andres_clip wrote: I do think that Queen followed the flow thrue the years except from the start. It would have been an awesome band in the 90's.Agreed! Looking at the music they created for the band or solo projects from 1987 to 1998 they still got it IMO. |
Saint Jiub 30.07.2018 01:18 |
oops |
Saint Jiub 30.07.2018 01:18 |
mooghead wrote: Shut up.Your efforts at censorship are pathetic ... |
Saint Jiub 30.07.2018 01:22 |
philip storey wrote: Is this really worth discussing ?Yes |
Saint Jiub 30.07.2018 01:24 |
mooghead wrote:Another pathetic attempt at censorship ...SillyGoose wrote: @mooghead At 4087 posts, I believe you're the one who needs to shut up at once. You're taking the deity status thing too far with that attitude, remember it doesn't mean anything. @ philip Probably, probably not. What's the criteria for a worthwhile topic? (hint: maybe ask one of your deities ^ like your friend up there.) As for me: I've read the stupidest things on here about Freddie's chest wig and nobody seems to have a problem with that. So, who knows? Maybe I see more value in the OP's question about this band's music. This place needs an enema, you bunch of divas.Erm.... Who the fuck are you? |
mooghead 30.07.2018 20:58 |
In what way am I trying to censor? Who gives a fuck what I say? I am just sick of stupid questions after years and years of them.. |
princetom 31.07.2018 20:25 |
despite getting the popcorn out... . back to topic... . kind of. . well, i think even the new songs of the 2008 tour didn't sound that crappy. wish they had done more performances of "warboys" (yes, yes, penned by paul rodgers... anyway) ! |