Holly2003 20.06.2018 10:47 |
So there used to be a lot of political/current affairs debate on QZ. There is though hardly any discussion about the present incumbent in the White House. I wonder why that is? Is he such an utter degenerate that it seems pointless to discuss him? He can't be parodied as he is beyond any human decency? No joke made about him can top the joke he's played on the American public? I've stayed away from Trump discussions as much as possible but this video really caught my attention and it;s hard not to respond. link I lived in the US on 2 separate occasions for a total of about 6 years. In that time I can count on the fingers of one hand people I didn't like. Almost everyone I met was open, generous, friendly and thoughtful. Now sadly I have to rethink my view of Americans. Large numbers voted this disgusting pig into office and he still has a lot of support. Even if he doesn't get reelected the damage is done. He has set new low standards for the value of human life, cheapened the political discourse (although I blame the rabid Obama haters for beginning that process) and undermined human rights. I don't think it's possible to come back from this. Things will get worse, not better. It saddens me that my formerly positive view of Americans has been changed, probably for good :( But thank you to people like Rachel Meddow for retaining your humanity when many others seem to have lost it. |
The Real Wizard 20.06.2018 14:31 |
Holly2003 wrote: So there used to be a lot of political/current affairs debate on QZ. There is though hardly any discussion about the present incumbent in the White House. I wonder why that is? Is he such an utter degenerate that it seems pointless to discuss him?Basically. It has become a fruitless task. We're realizing that it's pretty well impossible to educate adults and teach them how to think, unless you can demonstrate to them that their beliefs will literally kill them and their children. In some cases seeds can be planted, but more often than not, challenging beliefs actually reinforces them. It's called backfire effect. It's ingrained in our biology. Trying to educate people with backwards beliefs - beliefs that nonetheless bring them safety, reassurance, and stability - invokes the same part of the brain that thinks the other tribe with the funny hats is going to kill them. We are bred to evolve, not for rational thinking or even happiness. The combination of religious fundamentalism, the NRA propaganda machine, Fox news, local news (Sinclair is just as bad now), Breitbart, and right-wing hate radio has created about a hundred million people operating out of a completely different information universe than the rest of the civilized world. It has been systematic, all to line the pockets of the rich - and it will take generations to undo. I don't think it's possible to come back from this. Things will get worse, not better.Things will get worse before they get better. We're watching the fall of an empire. It will recover and civility will return, just like the UK did once upon a time. But in the case of the US, it's a whole different kind of war. It's a war on knowledge. Society has taken consistent steps forward for a couple hundred years since the industrial revolution, but until recently, most of the work involved hard labour, not necessarily intellect. Pretty much everyone could participate. But nowadays we're moving to science and technology, which requires education and critical thought - certainly a more specialized crowd. Technology has moved forward faster than people have become educated, so naturally there are plenty who will be left behind, creating tens of thousands of ghost towns that were once thriving factory/mining towns. Enter a right wing populist who is smart enough to exploit this, speaking with a grade 6 vocabulary to reach the "regular" folks, blaming the "intellectual elite" and promising to bring things back to the way they were. It shouldn't shock anyone that it works, and that the fear in these people will allow them both the cognitive dissonance and tolerance for even the worst of atrocities against others. After all, the "American dream" is the pursuit of individual wealth and success, not the pursuit of a better society for all. We're entering a dark period. But the world is two steps forward, one step back. People have always resisted change. Today's right is the Luddites of days of yore. They will kick and scream, and there may even be bloodshed - this group includes white supremacists and Incels who are blaming immigrants and women for their problems. But these things are always temporary. Give it 20 or 30 years, and the pendulum will swing back toward normalcy and decency. Coming to all this understanding has personally been pretty freeing. It's better to find something in common with people than to argue with them and tell them why they're wrong. It is an absolutely pointless exercise. |
The Real Wizard 20.06.2018 16:23 |
Holly2003 wrote: I lived in the US on 2 separate occasions for a total of about 6 years. In that time I can count on the fingers of one hand people I didn't like. Almost everyone I met was open, generous, friendly and thoughtful. Now sadly I have to rethink my view of Americans. Large numbers voted this disgusting pig into office and he still has a lot of support.I'm curious - where did you live? A considerable portion of people who voted for Trump are uneducated rural people, not educated city people. It's literally two distinct cultures and schools of thought. Chances are you didn't even come across them. That said - some of my American friends are no longer friends. Trump has exposed their true colours. People I've known and respected for years turned out to be racist xenophobes on a diet of Fox news. And they are not stupid people by any means. They have just drank the kool aid for their entire lives. And while this is anecdotal, they are all wealthy. Most political issues don't affect them, because they've had enough money to buy themselves out of their troubles. Spoiled rich kids who believe it's every man for themselves, and screw the rest of the society who deserve to die because they can't afford health care. It's sad that this is what the once great America has become. Children are being ripped away from their mothers, and nearly half the country thinks everything is just fine. Not my words, but I wish they were: "This is what happens when a country is not forced to reckon with its past. Fictions and mythology superficially plaster over the wounds to save face. Everything just ends up festering beneath." |
Holly2003 20.06.2018 17:29 |
The Real Wizard wrote:I lived for a year in a small town in a conservative and rural western state. Then I lived for 5 years in a liberal city in a liberal state.Holly2003 wrote: I lived in the US on 2 separate occasions for a total of about 6 years. In that time I can count on the fingers of one hand people I didn't like. Almost everyone I met was open, generous, friendly and thoughtful. Now sadly I have to rethink my view of Americans. Large numbers voted this disgusting pig into office and he still has a lot of support.I'm curious - where did you live? If anything, the rural conservatives I met were friendlier than the city liberals. That's what probably disappoints me the most now. Why has that good-natured conservatism turned into the vindictive mindset that allowed Trump to gain power. I mean, I know most of the story. Throw in 9/11 to the points you raised and we've probably got the full picture.* For me, as a non-American who genuinely loves America and what it's supposed to stand for, its profoundly sad. * plus, at the end of the day it all boils down to the fact we are -- to quote Kurt Vonnegut Jr. -- just "slightly evolved apes". |
The Real Wizard 20.06.2018 18:48 |
Holly2003 wrote: If anything, the rural conservatives I met were friendlier than the city liberals. That's what probably disappoints me the most now. Why has that good-natured conservatism turned into the vindictive mindset that allowed Trump to gain power.Good people have bad politics, and vice versa. I know wonderful people who are fully-fledged alt right. Like yourself, in my experience they are often better at letting bygones be bygones than left-leaning people. A tangled web we weave. |
john bodega 21.06.2018 10:40 |
I just know I haven't had to look at the Onion since 2015. News as fruity as it has been in the past three years barely needs a running commentary or analysis. |
The Real Wizard 22.06.2018 16:38 |
john bodega wrote: I just know I haven't had to look at the Onion since 2015. News as fruity as it has been in the past three years barely needs a running commentary or analysis.It's true. The best news sources are now comedians. John Oliver and Seth Meyers are brilliant and hilarious, and it's usually accomplished by literally reading the news. House of Cards is obsolete. The real thing is far more entertaining. |
john bodega 24.06.2018 05:58 |
At times Oliver pisses me off (the 'Drumpf' thing was toothless, at a time where the Don really needed much cleverer ridicule being aimed at him than he was receiving). But I liked how he handled Dustin Hoffman. He's definitely one of the last late night TV guys I can even remotely understand. |
Holly2003 25.06.2018 19:12 |
I like John Oliver but his humour works better in an American setting where his "can't believe what I'm seeing here" approach has the benefit of him being an outsider looking in. In the UK he made very little impact and he just comes across as being a bit of an annoying nerd. |
ParisNair 29.06.2018 09:17 |
The very lop-sided views expressed by Trump-haters is off-putting for me. You guys completely ignore the failures of Obama and the fraud carried out by Hillary et al under his watch. You guys make fun of Fox News by name, but don't make a single mention of the equally biased news coverage of other mainstream media. You over simplify things and call a large part of American electorate xenophobic, racist, uneducated, rural, white supremacists, etc. No mention of the violent left, antifa movements. You are silent about the illegal immigration, threat of extremists entering the country as refugees/immigrants etc. This kind of blind hatred with no balance in expression of views betrays dishonesty. |
john bodega 29.06.2018 12:53 |
"You guys completely ignore the failures of Obama" Says who?? Haha. What a muppet. |
john bodega 29.06.2018 12:55 |
"just comes across as being a bit of an annoying nerd" I get that from a lot of his 'bits'. I dunno if it's him or the format I dislike more though, it's frustrating because when he picks a good target he ain't so bad. |
ParisNair 29.06.2018 21:30 |
"You guys completely ignore the failures of Obama" Says who?? Haha. What a muppet.I must have missed the "8 years of Obama" thread. Can you point me to it please? That's what I thought. |
john bodega 30.06.2018 06:47 |
Thick as clotted cream, Barack's been gone long enough now - move on. Complaining about an old failed experiment is a lot less satisfying than a current and continual embarrassment. |
ParisNair 30.06.2018 20:09 |
I was not the one who brought it up by calling Trump votes "rabid Obama haters". |
john bodega 01.07.2018 08:27 |
Fair point then, I leave it to you two! |
pittrek 01.07.2018 12:54 |
Recommended viewing for people who for some reason can't understand why Trump won - this is one of the reasons : link |
Jeremy 01.07.2018 20:37 |
President Trump is shaping up to be the greatest US president in modern history. Our recovery (economic/defense/infrastructure/foreign affairs...etc) is happening at a pace that few thought possible. As President Obama asked, "What magic wand do you have?" (To improve the uncertain economy, low GDP, etc.) I've been really really impressed with him. |
The Real Wizard 02.07.2018 02:24 |
ParisNair wrote: The very lop-sided views expressed by Trump-haters is off-putting for me. You guys completely ignore the failures of Obama and the fraud carried out by Hillary et al under his watch.The thread was about Trump, so people spoke about Trump. If we want to start a thread about Obama, then we can talk about Obama. Saying shitty things about Trump doesn't mean people are unable to say shitty things about Obama. But let's just be clear that there isn't a single thing Obama did that can be equated with destroying the fabric of western democracy. Under Trump, the US has declared trade wars on their closest allies while cozying up to third world dictators (literally on the same day), left the Paris accord, and left the UN human rights council. But of course it's not really Trump who is to blame. Congress has almost entirely been complicit. The American empire is falling, and it's not because of Antifa or the mainstream media. |
john bodega 02.07.2018 04:40 |
"Our recovery (economic/defense/infrastructure/foreign affairs...etc) is happening at a pace that few thought possible" I want to know more about this because it's very rarely borne out in actual statistics. It's very difficult to get a clue these days though when people are fine with literally lying their asses off in every direction. |
john bodega 02.07.2018 04:43 |
'Recommended viewing for people who for some reason can't understand why Trump won' It might not be the whole story, or even a tenth of it, but that's a great video haha. |
pittrek 02.07.2018 06:16 |
Jeremy wrote: President Trump is shaping up to be the greatest US president in modern history. Our recovery (economic/defense/infrastructure/foreign affairs...etc) is happening at a pace that few thought possible. As President Obama asked, "What magic wand do you have?" (To improve the uncertain economy, low GDP, etc.) I've been really really impressed with him.The fact that I can't tell if this is a genuine comment or trolling makes me pretty nervous. |
Jeremy 02.07.2018 22:03 |
I'll address pittrek first (I'd use quotes if I saw a "quote" function...how do you quote, man?) I've gotten this response before, usually when I say "I support the president" I get "You cannot be serious GTFO troll." I don't believe in trolling. It's a huge waste of time. This president has an entire arm of propagandist media against him because their girl who favored them lost. We'll get into examples of this later. For john bodega: For starters: ECONOMIC The L.A. Times: "If Trump thinks he can get more than 3% economic growth, he's dreaming" link Reuters: "Atlanta Fed upgrades U.S. second quarter GDP view to 4.7 percent" link Not to mention Black and Latino unemployment are at the lowest levels they have been in American history, with overall unemployment the lowest in 17 years. link Consumer confidence is at an almost 18 year high. link DEFENSE Military leaders came to President Trump and said that they were sorely in need of new military equipment and technology, that in some cases they were still using decades-old equipment. link He recognized that if you don't have a formidable military, you don't have a country, so he signed into law the a 700 billion dollar military spending bill to completely renew and replenish the equipment and technology of the US military as well as give pay raises to the troops. link INFRASTRUCTURE President Trump is determined to repair, rebuild, and expand our United States roadways, seaports, airports, and municipal and governmental facilities. link FOREIGN AFFAIRS In a huge step towards world peace, President Trump held a summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un, which, in exchange for cutting back on joint US-South Korean military training exercises, President Trump secured the commitment of the North Korean leader to the complete denuclearization of the country, the dismantling of all missile testing facilities, as well as the return of the remains of US soldiers who had fallen in the Korean War. link link link Also, President Trump is massively popular in China, having been bestowed the honor of being the first foreign leader to dine in the Forbidden City since the founding of modern China. link link link Such is the case as well in South Korea, being introduced as "the leader of the world" during a state visit there. link This is really the tip of the iceberg and only time prevents me from listing many more accomplishments that would be proudly touted by any president. I'm sure we'll get into more as we discuss further. |
john bodega 03.07.2018 07:13 |
"only time prevents me" It's nice to have company. I just feel as though some of these statistics and numbers are being thrown around with a bit too much gusto. Slightly unrelated but here in Australia our government loves to trumpet its successes in reducing unemployment - but very cynically and with much slime, they're not specific about the kinds of 'jobs' being created. It's actually a very grim picture. To try and bring it back to Trump, it's all well and good to make positive claims about his achievements, but it always seems as though there's a "well actually ..." waiting to be penciled in after each one. Statistics and figures shouldn't be as open to interpretation as tea leaves, but unfortunately that seems to be the way it's going. (Which is why we have so many dingbats who can't seem to get their shit straight with climate change). "I'm sure we'll get into more" I'm not sure I want to at all haha. Y'all enjoy yourselves though. |
pittrek 03.07.2018 11:28 |
Jeremy wrote: I'll address pittrek first (I'd use quotes if I saw a "quote" function...how do you quote, man?) I've gotten this response before, usually when I say "I support the president" I get "You cannot be serious GTFO troll." I don't believe in trolling. It's a huge waste of time. This president has an entire arm of propagandist media against him because their girl who favored them lost. We'll get into examples of this later. For john bodega: For starters: ECONOMIC The L.A. Times: "If Trump thinks he can get more than 3% economic growth, he's dreaming" link Reuters: "Atlanta Fed upgrades U.S. second quarter GDP view to 4.7 percent" link Not to mention Black and Latino unemployment are at the lowest levels they have been in American history, with overall unemployment the lowest in 17 years. link Consumer confidence is at an almost 18 year high. link DEFENSE Military leaders came to President Trump and said that they were sorely in need of new military equipment and technology, that in some cases they were still using decades-old equipment. link He recognized that if you don't have a formidable military, you don't have a country, so he signed into law the a 700 billion dollar military spending bill to completely renew and replenish the equipment and technology of the US military as well as give pay raises to the troops. link INFRASTRUCTURE President Trump is determined to repair, rebuild, and expand our United States roadways, seaports, airports, and municipal and governmental facilities. link FOREIGN AFFAIRS In a huge step towards world peace, President Trump held a summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un, which, in exchange for cutting back on joint US-South Korean military training exercises, President Trump secured the commitment of the North Korean leader to the complete denuclearization of the country, the dismantling of all missile testing facilities, as well as the return of the remains of US soldiers who had fallen in the Korean War. link link link Also, President Trump is massively popular in China, having been bestowed the honor of being the first foreign leader to dine in the Forbidden City since the founding of modern China. link link link Such is the case as well in South Korea, being introduced as "the leader of the world" during a state visit there. link This is really the tip of the iceberg and only time prevents me from listing many more accomplishments that would be proudly touted by any president. I'm sure we'll get into more as we discuss further. |
pittrek 03.07.2018 11:29 |
Jeremy wrote: I'll address pittrek first (I'd use quotes if I saw a "quote" function...how do you quote, man?) I've gotten this response before, usually when I say "I support the president" I get "You cannot be serious GTFO troll." I don't believe in trolling. It's a huge waste of time. This president has an entire arm of propagandist media against him because their girl who favored them lost. We'll get into examples of this later. For john bodega: For starters: ECONOMIC The L.A. Times: "If Trump thinks he can get more than 3% economic growth, he's dreaming" link Reuters: "Atlanta Fed upgrades U.S. second quarter GDP view to 4.7 percent" link Not to mention Black and Latino unemployment are at the lowest levels they have been in American history, with overall unemployment the lowest in 17 years. link Consumer confidence is at an almost 18 year high. link DEFENSE Military leaders came to President Trump and said that they were sorely in need of new military equipment and technology, that in some cases they were still using decades-old equipment. link He recognized that if you don't have a formidable military, you don't have a country, so he signed into law the a 700 billion dollar military spending bill to completely renew and replenish the equipment and technology of the US military as well as give pay raises to the troops. link INFRASTRUCTURE President Trump is determined to repair, rebuild, and expand our United States roadways, seaports, airports, and municipal and governmental facilities. link FOREIGN AFFAIRS In a huge step towards world peace, President Trump held a summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un, which, in exchange for cutting back on joint US-South Korean military training exercises, President Trump secured the commitment of the North Korean leader to the complete denuclearization of the country, the dismantling of all missile testing facilities, as well as the return of the remains of US soldiers who had fallen in the Korean War. link link link Also, President Trump is massively popular in China, having been bestowed the honor of being the first foreign leader to dine in the Forbidden City since the founding of modern China. link link link Such is the case as well in South Korea, being introduced as "the leader of the world" during a state visit there. link This is really the tip of the iceberg and only time prevents me from listing many more accomplishments that would be proudly touted by any president. I'm sure we'll get into more as we discuss further. |
pittrek 03.07.2018 11:30 |
Jeremy wrote: I'll address pittrek first (I'd use quotes if I saw a "quote" function...how do you quote, man?) I've gotten this response before, usually when I say "I support the president" I get "You cannot be serious GTFO troll." I don't believe in trolling. It's a huge waste of time. This president has an entire arm of propagandist media against him because their girl who favored them lost. We'll get into examples of this later. For john bodega: For starters: ECONOMIC The L.A. Times: "If Trump thinks he can get more than 3% economic growth, he's dreaming" link Reuters: "Atlanta Fed upgrades U.S. second quarter GDP view to 4.7 percent" link Not to mention Black and Latino unemployment are at the lowest levels they have been in American history, with overall unemployment the lowest in 17 years. link Consumer confidence is at an almost 18 year high. link DEFENSE Military leaders came to President Trump and said that they were sorely in need of new military equipment and technology, that in some cases they were still using decades-old equipment. link He recognized that if you don't have a formidable military, you don't have a country, so he signed into law the a 700 billion dollar military spending bill to completely renew and replenish the equipment and technology of the US military as well as give pay raises to the troops. link INFRASTRUCTURE President Trump is determined to repair, rebuild, and expand our United States roadways, seaports, airports, and municipal and governmental facilities. link FOREIGN AFFAIRS In a huge step towards world peace, President Trump held a summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un, which, in exchange for cutting back on joint US-South Korean military training exercises, President Trump secured the commitment of the North Korean leader to the complete denuclearization of the country, the dismantling of all missile testing facilities, as well as the return of the remains of US soldiers who had fallen in the Korean War. link link link Also, President Trump is massively popular in China, having been bestowed the honor of being the first foreign leader to dine in the Forbidden City since the founding of modern China. link link link Such is the case as well in South Korea, being introduced as "the leader of the world" during a state visit there. link This is really the tip of the iceberg and only time prevents me from listing many more accomplishments that would be proudly touted by any president. I'm sure we'll get into more as we discuss further. |
pittrek 03.07.2018 11:33 |
I'm sorry, I tried to post a response but the forum is fucked :-( Sorry, but when editing an existing post causes a new post with the same content, I don't have the nerves for writing it again |
The Real Wizard 03.07.2018 18:07 |
pittrek wrote: I'm sorry, I tried to post a response but the forum is fucked :-( Sorry, but when editing an existing post causes a new post with the same content, I don't have the nerves for writing it againIf you spend more than 20 minutes, this is the result. When that happens, just click the back button the browser to return to the post you wrote. Copy the text, edit your new post, and paste the text in. It sucks that we need to take care of this workaround, but it is what it is. |
The Real Wizard 03.07.2018 18:09 |
pittrek wrote: Recommended viewing for people who for some reason can't understand why Trump won - this is one of the reasons : linkIndeed - that was excellent. Trump spent decades building up a brand, and millions drank the kool aid. He then perfected social media and reached millions more on an emotional level with 140 characters or less. He may be an idiot, but he sure does understand marketing. He's rich, loud mouthed, and uncompromising - basically the American dream. |
The Real Wizard 03.07.2018 18:12 |
I'll just leave this here: link Trump is creating global instability. If anyone reads an article like this and thinks things are fine, they either suffer from severe mental illness or are insulated to the point that they don't care about the fact that their bloviating flesh bag of a president is dismantling western democracy before our eyes. It is no longer left vs right. This is about the end of an empire and shifting global power balance. Trump's brand of isolationism and arrogance is pretty much a carbon copy of what every empire of the last 2000 years looked like shortly before they fell. But who needs to look to history and see it repeat itself when we can just blame the intellectual elite libtards, Mexicans, or Muslims? |
john bodega 04.07.2018 08:39 |
"blame the intellectual elite libtards, Mexicans, or Muslims" I'll take the last two and raise you a lesbian comedian! |
Dr Magus 09.07.2018 12:56 |
|
Dr Magus 09.07.2018 12:57 |
john bodega wrote: "blame the intellectual elite libtards, Mexicans, or Muslims"Libtards are anything but intellectual. |
The Real Wizard 09.07.2018 17:29 |
link And the Republicans are now attacking breast milking, because of political donations from companies who make formula - it's a $70 billion industry. Republicans listen to corporations and only corporations. It goes back to Reagan: link So you can't get an abortion, have to pay to deliver a baby, and you'll pay for formula because the Republicans are going to start trying to convince the public that breast milk is unsafe. And the poor continue to vote Republican. Americans are fucking dumb. 3/4 of them vote Republican or not at all. |
Saint Jiub 10.07.2018 01:23 |
The Real Wizard wrote: Americans are fucking dumb. 3/4 of them vote Republican or not at all.3/4? Really? LOL Then why did Trump get <50% of the popular vote? |
The Real Wizard 10.07.2018 05:08 |
Panchgani wrote:"or not at all"The Real Wizard wrote: Americans are fucking dumb. 3/4 of them vote Republican or not at all.3/4? Really? LOL Then why did Trump get <50% of the popular vote? If the voter turnout was a bit over half, that means only about a quarter voted for someone else. |
Saint Jiub 10.07.2018 18:04 |
I redacted my trolling hyperbole of my paraphrase of Real Wizard's statement:
The Real Wizard wrote: Americans are fucking dumb. 3/4 of them vote Republican or not at all. |
magicalfreddiemercury 16.07.2018 13:19 |
As a royally embarrassed American living in the heart of New York City, I say Americans are Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Independents, Communists, Socialists, and more. Above all, Americans are lazy and entitled. Americans are shortsighted and insular. Americans are arrogant and ignorant, believing politics are local, that raising a torch will get them what they want - and what they want is for their personal worldview to become law for everyone. Americans have no patience for another side's opinion or point of view; instead, Americans demand to have their side heard, understood and followed. Compromise? What? Why? Beyond all that, Trump is a pig and a traitor. He's always been a fraud and a liar. He's a narcissist and a cheat. New Yorkers have known this about him for decades - *anyone* paying attention has known this for decades. He's also angry and stupid and will do anything to benefit himself. Followers love everything about that animal because he's 'not like the others'. This moron promises chaos, and he always delivers. Americans who want what they want for themselves don't give a damn about how the world crumbles as long as they 'win'. They're of the Steve Bannon mind - the mind that longs to take down the establishment. The one that believes anyone in need is simply looking for a handout. The one that believes people who don't look like them, speak like them, worship like them or think like them are 'infesting' their world. I'm fortunate to live in a richly diverse community, yet, sadly, even here there are people who cheer the traitor occupying the White House. There's a reason Don the Con said he "loves the poorly educated". Americans have proven themselves to be just that - in great numbers and with greater pride. Trump alone is nothing. Trump with a complicit GOP, a base of ignorant tikki-torch bearing bigots, an opposition notorious for sitting out mid-term elections and waiting for a ‘perfect’ presidential candidate is a nightmare from which we're not likely to soon wake. |
The Real Wizard 16.07.2018 16:41 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote: As a royally embarrassed American living in the heart of New York City, I say Americans are Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Independents, Communists, Socialists, and more. Above all, Americans are lazy and entitled. Americans are shortsighted and insular. Americans are arrogant and ignorant, believing politics are local, that raising a torch will get them what they want - and what they want is for their personal worldview to become law for everyone. Americans have no patience for another side's opinion or point of view; instead, Americans demand to have their side heard, understood and followed. Compromise? What? Why?And it makes sense when you consider the tenets of the American Dream. This dream is one where you can pursue your own wealth and happiness on your terms, with minimal interference from the government. And if everyone works hard enough, they'll all achieve it. And if you don't work hard enough, you don't deserve what people who worked harder than you have earned. Obviously any thinking person can easily find countless flaws in this idea where everything is a zero sum game (and where everyone is assumed to have the same position at the starting gate). For one to win, others must lose. It's treating prosperity like sports. So much nuance is lost, particularly the idea of creating an equitable society for all, which is how literally every other civilized country works. As George Carlin said: "the American Dream - you have to be asleep to believe it." But for most Americans it's my way or the highway, because they have had a sense of personal and nationalistic superiority bred into them since they were six. Virtually every American classroom has a giant map of the USA, but not a globe humbly showing America's place amongst everyone else. This arrogant exceptionalism permeates so much of American life. Combine this insular worldview with the current protectionist politics, and the result is a country well on its way to isolating itself from the rest of the world. But its beginnings are humble and had the best of intentions. It's pre-French revolution, so Europeans saw it as a utopia and made the trip across the pond. But eventually greed will take over in unbridled capitalism, which is why over half of America is now living in third world conditions despite still being the biggest economy in the world. Something went desperately wrong these past 50 years, and most Americans are just too stupid to even know how to ask why, or to even know that anything is wrong. The rest of the world just doesn't exist to them (2/3 of them don't even have passports, after all). It's sad to watch a once great empire fall. |
Saint Jiub 17.07.2018 03:13 |
The Real Wizard wrote: over half of America is now living in third world conditionsReally??? Hyperbole perhaps?? Source?? The following source on "percent below the poverty line" might be closer to reality ... US is 15% (comparable to much of western europe (and a far cry from 50%) link |
Saint Jiub 17.07.2018 03:27 |
The Real Wizard wrote: Something went desperately wrong these past 50 years, and most Americans are just too stupid to even know how to ask why, or to even know that anything is wrong.Really??? According to the following source ... link "How high has the poverty rate in the U.S. been historically?Historically, the official poverty rate in the United States had ranged from a high of 22.4 percent when it was first estimated for 1959 to a low of 11.1 percent in 1973. Since its initial rapid decline after 1964 with the launch of major War on Poverty programs, the poverty rate has fluctuated between around 11 and 15 percent." |
magicalfreddiemercury 17.07.2018 12:33 |
The Real Wizard wrote: For one to win, others must lose.This is a theme I see in the average trump supporter. Their fear seems to be that when others gain freedoms, they lose theirs. The Real Wizard wrote: As George Carlin said: "the American Dream - you have to be asleep to believe it."I get the point of this but believe the opposite – to believe in the American Dream you have to keep your eyes open and work for it –and not just for yourself but for your community as well. Imagine if we all did that. The Real Wizard wrote: But for most Americans it's my way or the highway, because they have had a sense of personal and nationalistic superiority bred into them since they were six. Virtually every American classroom has a giant map of the USA, but not a globe humbly showing America's place amongst everyone else. This arrogant exceptionalism permeates so much of American life.And any reference to the fact that we are but a part of a whole rather than the roots, trunk and branches, is met with scorn. The Real Wizard wrote: Something went desperately wrong these past 50 years, and most Americans are just too stupid to even know how to ask why, or to even know that anything is wrong.Because Americans rush from bed to work to home to bed to work to home to bed to work. Some of the hardest working people I know, the ones with so much to lose as well as those barely hanging on despite holding multiple jobs are trump supporters. It’s easier to blame others for our own difficulties than to take a deeper look at our own choices and make a change. With someone else to blame, we’re able to redirect our fatigue and frustration thus making us feel better about ourselves. It’s US vs THEM. It’s disgusting but it’s true, and it works, and there’s no shaking common sense into those who buy into the idea. The Real Wizard wrote: It's sad to watch a once great empire fall.What's sad and shameful is not just watching it fall, but seeing how backs are deliberately turned to allow it to happen. |
magicalfreddiemercury 17.07.2018 12:35 |
I'm sorry there are no quotes attributing your words to you in my post above, Real Wizard. I tried to format it properly but didn't see the option to quote (or to edit my own post for that matter). EDIT: Fixed it thanks to tcc. :) |
tcc 17.07.2018 13:35 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote: I'm sorry there are no quotes attributing your words to you in my post above, Real Wizard. I tried to format it properly but didn't see the option to quote (or to edit my own post for that matter).The icons for Edit, Reply, and Reply with Quote are still next to the time line of the post. They are just invisible but if you place your cursor after the time of the post, you can see the words for the invisible icons for Edit, Reply and Reply with Quote |
magicalfreddiemercury 17.07.2018 14:47 |
tcc wrote:Thanks so much for this. I will try to go back and edit my post now.magicalfreddiemercury wrote: I'm sorry there are no quotes attributing your words to you in my post above, Real Wizard. I tried to format it properly but didn't see the option to quote (or to edit my own post for that matter).The icons for Edit, Reply, and Reply with Quote are still next to the time line of the post. They are just invisible but if you place your cursor after the time of the post, you can see the words for the invisible icons for Edit, Reply and Reply with Quote |
The Real Wizard 18.07.2018 15:49 |
Panchgani wrote:Right at the top it says - "rich nations generally employ more generous standards of poverty than poor nations." So if you call the US a rich nation, then you need to at least double that 15%. And note that "third world conditions" and "poverty" are not necessarily the same thing.The Real Wizard wrote: over half of America is now living in third world conditionsReally??? Hyperbole perhaps?? Source?? The following source on "percent below the poverty line" might be closer to reality ... US is 15% (comparable to much of western europe (and a far cry from 50%) link So instead of cherry picking statistics to ignore the reality of the majority of your countrymen, I invite you to give these a spin: link link "Every piece of the pie picked up by the 0.1 percent, in relative terms, had to come from the people below. But not everyone in the 99.9 percent gave up a slice. Only those in the bottom 90 percent did. At their peak, in the mid-1980s, people in this group held 35 percent of the nation’s wealth. Three decades later that had fallen 12 points—exactly as much as the wealth of the 0.1 percent rose." In other words - 10% of America has been able to maintain the lifestyle it had 50 years ago. That's a pretty good indication of where things are at. If you want to deny that the middle class has been steadily shrinking for the last several decades, that's your prerogative. Chances are you're in that 9.9% between the bottom 90 and the top 0.1, and you just aren't in a position to notice because you're one of the few lucky ones. |
The Real Wizard 18.07.2018 15:59 |
magicalfreddiemercury wrote:Then you'd be in Sweden !The Real Wizard wrote: As George Carlin said: "the American Dream - you have to be asleep to believe it."I get the point of this but believe the opposite – to believe in the American Dream you have to keep your eyes open and work for it –and not just for yourself but for your community as well. Imagine if we all did that. magicalfreddiemercury wrote: With someone else to blame, we’re able to redirect our fatigue and frustration thus making us feel better about ourselves. It’s US vs THEM. It’s disgusting but it’s true, and it works, and there’s no shaking common sense into those who buy into the idea.The right has long figured out how to exploit people's fears for political gain. They do it, and will continue to do it, because it works. Ask any first year marketing student what most people respond best to, and the answer is fear. |
Saint Jiub 20.07.2018 00:42 |
The Real Wizard wrote:I spent too much time last night reading your links and trying to justify my reasoning even though I am not a quick thinker or remotely close to a good debater.Panchgani wrote:Right at the top it says - "rich nations generally employ more generous standards of poverty than poor nations." So if you call the US a rich nation, then you need to at least double that 15%. And note that "third world conditions" and "poverty" are not necessarily the same thing. So instead of cherry picking statistics to ignore the reality of the majority of your countrymen, I invite you to give these a spin: link link "Every piece of the pie picked up by the 0.1 percent, in relative terms, had to come from the people below. But not everyone in the 99.9 percent gave up a slice. Only those in the bottom 90 percent did. At their peak, in the mid-1980s, people in this group held 35 percent of the nation’s wealth. Three decades later that had fallen 12 points—exactly as much as the wealth of the 0.1 percent rose." In other words - 10% of America has been able to maintain the lifestyle it had 50 years ago. That's a pretty good indication of where things are at. If you want to deny that the middle class has been steadily shrinking for the last several decades, that's your prerogative. Chances are you're in that 9.9% between the bottom 90 and the top 0.1, and you just aren't in a position to notice because you're one of the few lucky ones.The Real Wizard wrote: over half of America is now living in third world conditionsReally??? Hyperbole perhaps?? Source?? The following source on "percent below the poverty line" might be closer to reality ... US is 15% (comparable to much of western europe (and a far cry from 50%) link i agree that part of the problem is likely to be related to the top 0.1%, but I do not believe that money was stolen from the bottom 90%. I did try to call you out on your hyperbolic claim that "over half of America is now living in third world conditions", but i got nowhere. I still believe that this statement is NOT remotely close to the truth and inherently dishonest. I also agree with some things in your two links, but I feel that the much of these articles is hyperbole loaded with irrational emotion and less concerned about an honest discussion of facts. I believe that the comments in one of the links about the top 9.9% aristocracy were particularly emotionally irresponsible and dishonest. |
Saint Jiub 20.07.2018 01:30 |
I believe that most of the wealth shift to the top 0.1% is due to the unearned income (the sale and loaning of money such as the stock market) rather than income from work and services performed. I believe that the stock market demands of high profits every quarter are counter productive to "the common good". Too much emphasis is put on unsustainable high profits to satisfy the stockholders, and too little is done to benefit their customers (the real source of their earned and unearned income). An example of this would be the corporate shills of QPL only releasing the alternate versions of NOTW songs as an overpriced box set without any options to obtain these songs in a less expensive (less gouging) manner ... but Jim Beach must look out for the welfare of the child heirs of Queen. Another reason for the wealth shift is related to the technological boom of the last 40 years or so. The technology boom helped increase productivity and created an immense amount of "unearned" income that no one could legitimately claim entitlement. I believe most of this " free" money was claimed by the the top 0.1%. The so-called alternative to soak and tax the rich is not any better. On the other extreme, you have many government workers gorging at the community trough so that they can retire at age 50 with outlandish defined benefit pensions and exorbitant health care benefits. There are opportunities to earn a decent living out there, but many people are not interested because the work is too hard. One supplier of my employer is flying in Americans from outside the continental US, and providing housing, but still cannot find enough people that are willing to work. One other reason for this issue is arrogance. There is no shortage of arrogance in today's world irrespective of political beliefs. |
Saint Jiub 20.07.2018 01:43 |
Here is an editorial from today in my local newspaper that expresses many of my beliefs: I do not expect that anyone visiting Queenzone will read it. link |
pittrek 20.07.2018 07:54 |
Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries. We are engaged on the issue and committed to looking at options that support our full range of digital offerings to the EU market. We continue to identify technical compliance solutions that will provide all readers with our award-winning journalism.You were correct, I don't think many people will read it :-) |
Saint Jiub 20.07.2018 15:48 |
Pittrek -I have copied the text for the article if you are interested. Commentary: Sorry, Elon and Kylie. We're waking up to those of you in the world of 'stratospheric wealth.' Last week was a big one for billionaires. Kylie Jenner, kid sister of reality-television star Kim Kardashian, scored a Forbes magazine cover extolling her efforts at the helm of her makeup company, valued by the magazine at $800 million. The feature article suggested that the 20-year-old was on pace to become the youngest-ever "self-made" billionaire later this year. And Elon Musk, co-founder and chief executive of electric car company Tesla (estimated net worth: about $20 billion), made waves on social media by publicizing his newly invented kid-size submarine. The bullet-shaped tube was engineered over a weekend for the purpose of aiding in the Thai cave rescue, then was left in Thailand unused after the rescue was successfully undertaken the old-fashioned way — with actual divers. Musk's and Jenner's lives are as far from the average as one might imagine. But we're oddly keen to keep up — Americans have long had a fascination with the extremely wealthy. All too often, a high net worth is seen as a proxy for intelligence, success and even virtue. Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign was built in no small part on his supposed achievements as a real estate magnate and business leader, along with his billionaire status — although the exact details of his net worth were and remain oddly opaque. But it seems we may be getting more skeptical. That's a good thing. For all his bluster about selflessly helping the Thai government, Musk received more blowback than he bargained for. After Musk criticized Thai officials who pointed out that his invention was "not practical" and baselessly called one of the actual cave rescuers a pedophile, the market value of Tesla shares fell by millions. Observers accused the CEO of narcissism and self-aggrandizement and derided his incessant submarine-tweeting as a failed PR stunt. And when the New York Daily News tweeted, "19-year-old Kylie Jenner is worth $900 million and on pace to become the youngest self-made billionaire ever. What are you doing with your life?" the deadpan responses were an eye-opening tour through what regular citizens regard as actually valuable contributions. "I'm a priest," read one. Another came from a former refugee turned clinical neuroscience Ph.D. There were mothers raising special-needs children, and millennials just struggling to get by. Perhaps that's all because it has become increasingly obvious that the fortunes of the 1 percent haven't grown through work alone. A confluence of larger factors — globalization, the quick uptake of new technology, government regulations that favor large corporations and capital — have operated together to produce this blossoming of billionaires. It's a bloom that smells a bit rancid when compared with the downward-trending economic fortunes of almost everyone else. From 1984 to 2017, the wealth of the Forbes 400 richest Americans grew by nearly 2,000 percent. As of 2013, the median household had gotten about 20 percent poorer. Still — there are probably better ways to counter the well-insulated billionaire class than by grumbling online. We could lobby our government to close some of the egregious tax loopholes that have resulted in the staggering expansion of personal wealth over the past several decades (carried interest, anyone?). It might even be time to institute a more progressive tax code, one in which the wealthy pay appreciably more — something that some of the most famous billionaires themselves have asked for. Which makes this fact worth noting: Another update from the world of stratospheric wealth was a shake-up in the list of the world's richest people. While a new crowd of wealth-mongers are sprinting to the top (Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who also owns the The Washington Post, is now the richest person in modern history, with a $150 billion net worth), others, such as Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, have slipped down the ranks — because they are beginning to give their money away. That's a good thing, of course generosity is more admirable than wealth for wealth's sake, and these fortunes are so large that their owners couldn't spend them if they tried. Yet it's worth thinking harder about how these resources were amassed in the first place, and about whether the charitable endeavors they make possible — whether anti-malaria campaigns or tiny useless submarines — outweigh the inequality that brings them into being. Money isn't the only thing we value, after all. The Washington Post Christine Emba is an opinion columnist and editor for The Post. |
Dr Magus 21.07.2018 08:20 |
I have a far simpler solution. Kill all the poor people. |
Saint Jiub 21.07.2018 15:51 |
I redacted my trolling response regarding abortion (in response to the Magus post about poor people). |
pittrek 23.07.2018 06:56 |
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS! 5:24 - 23. 7. 2018See, this is one of the reasons why I don't like Trump. Not some nonsensical claims about his alleged racism, or misogyny, or other crap the media accuses him from without providing any evidence. Call me old-fashioned, but I don't like the idea of dying in a nuclear war |
The Real Wizard 23.07.2018 16:50 |
pittrek wrote: Not some nonsensical claims about his alleged racism, or misogyny, or other crap the media accuses him from without providing any evidence.You mean the video where he said he could sexually assault women because he's famous? You mean where he said he said white supremacists were equal to the people fighting white supremacists? You mean when he was endorsed by white supremacists, and didn't speak out against them? You mean when he just endorsed a white supremacist last month? link Trump doesn't need the media to look like a misogynist or a white supremacist. He's doing just fine all on his own. |
The Real Wizard 23.07.2018 16:53 |
Haemophilia Love wrote: The so-called alternative to soak and tax the rich is not any better.You're right. Because you can't take something away from anyone once they have it. Once you lower that corporate tax rate, it's there for good. If you raise it again, that money will end up in Swiss bank accounts. |
The Real Wizard 23.07.2018 16:56 |
Americans have long had a fascination with the extremely wealthy. All too often, a high net worth is seen as a proxy for intelligence, success and even virtue. Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign was built in no small part on his supposed achievements as a real estate magnate and business leader, along with his billionaire statusAnd this is pretty much everything that is wrong with America. Plenty of other countries have tabloid culture and all that, but the American Dream mentality compounds it by convincing people from birth that achieving wealth is more important than anything else, including improving society as a whole. Even the mere act of receiving help is stigmatized as weakness, hence the mass hysteria against anything that remotely resembles "socialism". American culture is so unbelievably backwards. Nobody should be surprised that Trump became president despite having zero qualification for the job. All he had to be was rich, uncompromising, and brutish. The end of the article touches on an important point - a ton of these rich folks are doing plenty of good with their money. Musicians, movie stars, and athletes are constantly giving their millions to any number of worthy causes. And countless others are part of grassroots organizations, building the world from the bottom up. The majority of good in this world is not because of politicians, but despite them. |
pittrek 23.07.2018 19:29 |
The Real Wizard wrote:No, he never said that. He said that if you're rich and famous you will find women who will LET YOU do anything.Why do people always ignore the "they let you" part? linkpittrek wrote: Not some nonsensical claims about his alleged racism, or misogyny, or other crap the media accuses him from without providing any evidence.You mean the video where he said he could sexually assault women because he's famous? You mean where he said he said white supremacists were equal to the people fighting white supremacists?No, if you're talking about the Charlottsville attack, he didn't say that. He said that there were good people on both sides and there were bad people on both sides. You mean when he was endorsed by white supremacists, and didn't speak out against them?Nobody is responsible for who endorses them. And I think he DID speak against them, unless I am confusing it with something else. But the truth is he did speak against them AFTER he was criticised by the media for not doing anything. link You mean when he just endorsed a white supremacist last month? linkNever heard about it until now, and I have never heard about that man until now, so I can't comment on it. Trump doesn't need the media to look like a misogynist or a white supremacist. He's doing just fine all on his own.That's not my point. My point is that this dumbass threatens to basically start a nuclear war, but people care more about some stupid shit he said in a private conversation a decade ago. |
pittrek 23.07.2018 19:44 |
The Real Wizard wrote:I don't agree, I think there is NOT ENOUGH hysteria about socialism. It makes me very sad that more and more Americans are saying PROUDLY that they are socialists. There is only one possible result of socialism - millions of dead people. It's not a bug, it's a feature.Americans have long had a fascination with the extremely wealthy. All too often, a high net worth is seen as a proxy for intelligence, success and even virtue. Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign was built in no small part on his supposed achievements as a real estate magnate and business leader, along with his billionaire statusAnd this is pretty much everything that is wrong with America. Plenty of other countries have tabloid culture and all that, but the American Dream mentality compounds it by convincing people from birth that achieving wealth is more important than anything else, including improving society as a whole. Even the mere act of receiving help is stigmatized as weakness, hence the mass hysteria against anything that remotely resembles "socialism". But maybe these people SHOULD try to live in a socialist country - and I mean a REAL socialist country, not a capitalist country with a strong social system, maybe living every day in fear that one of your neighbors or even your family members is a secret agent and will report you to the officials, or maybe the freedom to chose if you want to eat once or twice a day, or the freedom to chose if the day in the month that you can eat meat (unless you know the correct people, in that case you could have meat one day each week), or maybe not having not only their iphones and ipads, but things like toilet paper most of the year, maybe this would cure these people from socialist tendencies? But maybe they would be happy that everybody is equally poor (except for the politicians of course). |
Jeremy 23.07.2018 23:53 |
pittrek wrote: That's not my point. My point is that this dumbass threatens to basically start a nuclear war, but people care more about some stupid shit he said in a private conversation a decade ago.He's not a dumbass, he's the President of the United States and he's already accomplished so many things that any president would be proud to take credit for, for the rest of their lives. That said, I agree with you about the libs focusing on "hurt muh fees fees...gotta virtue signal" stuff. What was the deal with Whoopi? "I'm tired of people starting a conversation with 'Mexicans are liars and rapists'". He never said that. Where are people getting all of these fake quotes? It's fine not to like him for whatever policy he wants that you don't like, that's politics, but don't put words in the man's mouth. "The problem in Venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented, but that socialism has been faithfully implemented." - President Trump I'm glad this thread is still going. |
Saint Jiub 24.07.2018 02:03 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Definitely not true ...Haemophilia Love wrote: The so-called alternative to soak and tax the rich is not any better.You're right. Because you can't take something away from anyone once they have it. Once you lower that corporate tax rate, it's there for good. If you raise it again, that money will end up in Swiss bank accounts. link "At the heart of the deal are some of the biggest tax changes in years, including an increase in tax rates for couples with incomes over $450,000, to 39.6%. For those same households, capital-gains and dividend taxes would increase to 20%, from 15%. Estate taxes would increase from 35% to 40%." |
Saint Jiub 24.07.2018 02:20 |
I am not so concerned about nuclear war ... I am more concerned with world trade wars. "ANALYSTS SAY THEY’RE BECOMING MORE CONVINCED THAT TRUMP’S MULTI-FRONT TRADE FIGHTS AREN’T MERELY A SHORT-TERM NEGOTIATING PLOY. " Trump is not a "dumbass". However, his "my way or the highway" twitter crap is very misguided in my opinion. I do not think it is a good idea to alienate the whole world, when China is the primary enemy of "free trade". Fortunately, some Republicans are finally standing up against Trump. Hopefully Trump can be effectively counteracted before the world falls off a financial cliff. link "Analysts say they’re becoming more convinced that Trump’s multi-front trade fights aren’t merely a short-term negotiating ploy. Rather, he may be prepared to wait as long as he feels it necessary to force other countries to adopt trade rules more favorable to the United States. “People are underestimating what we’re headed for,” said Rod Hunter, a lawyer who served as a White House economic adviser under President George W. Bush. “He’s been saying since the ’80s that trade deals are bad and we should have more tariffs, and that’s what we’re getting.” Moody’s Analytics estimates that if the tariffs were imposed on autos and most Chinese imports and other countries retaliate as expected, annual U.S. growth would slow by 0.5 percentage point by mid-2019. It expects that 700,000 jobs would be lost. Global markets have remained generally calm despite the eruption of a full-blown U.S.-China trade war and the other conflicts Trump has ignited. On Friday, the Dow Jones industrial closed down slightly. “I’ve been surprised that up until now, markets seem overly sanguine about the risks” of a trade war between the world’s two biggest economies, said David Dollar, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former official at the World Bank and U.S. Treasury Department. Investors as a whole appear to accept the argument of Trump economic advisers, notably Larry Kudlow and Kevin Hassett, that the president’s threats will likely force China, the European Union, Canada, and Mexico to eventually negotiate better trade deals. But many analysts are skeptical that Trump’s tactics will produce such an outcome. Rufus Yerxa, president of the National Foreign Trade Council and formerly deputy director general of the World Trade Organization, said Trump appears to think that America’s trading partners will yield to pressure without securing any concessions in return. “That isn’t how trade negotiations work,” Yerxa said. China will likely retaliate if additional tariffs are imposed, economists note, rather than simply knuckle under. President Xi Jingping “cannot lose face with his own people by giving in to the United States,” Dollar said." |
Saint Jiub 24.07.2018 03:26 |
pittrek wrote:Pittrek -The Real Wizard wrote:I don't agree, I think there is NOT ENOUGH hysteria about socialism. It makes me very sad that more and more Americans are saying PROUDLY that they are socialists. There is only one possible result of socialism - millions of dead people. It's not a bug, it's a feature. But maybe these people SHOULD try to live in a socialist country - and I mean a REAL socialist country, not a capitalist country with a strong social system, maybe living every day in fear that one of your neighbors or even your family members is a secret agent and will report you to the officials, or maybe the freedom to chose if you want to eat once or twice a day, or the freedom to chose if the day in the month that you can eat meat (unless you know the correct people, in that case you could have meat one day each week), or maybe not having not only their iphones and ipads, but things like toilet paper most of the year, maybe this would cure these people from socialist tendencies? But maybe they would be happy that everybody is equally poor (except for the politicians of course).Americans have long had a fascination with the extremely wealthy. All too often, a high net worth is seen as a proxy for intelligence, success and even virtue. Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign was built in no small part on his supposed achievements as a real estate magnate and business leader, along with his billionaire statusAnd this is pretty much everything that is wrong with America. Plenty of other countries have tabloid culture and all that, but the American Dream mentality compounds it by convincing people from birth that achieving wealth is more important than anything else, including improving society as a whole. Even the mere act of receiving help is stigmatized as weakness, hence the mass hysteria against anything that remotely resembles "socialism". Thank you for your involvement in this Trump topic. I believe that you have the respect of most users of Queenzone, whereas I am just a lunatic troll that enjoys making fun of ultra-liberals. |
pittrek 24.07.2018 06:25 |
I am very sorry I got a bit more heated than usually, but as a person who lived his childhood in a socialistic "paradise" I belong to people who are 100% against communism or socialism. It's so frustrating that young people repeat the same mistakes which were done by the previous generations. I am also sorry if somebody took my anti-Trump "dumbass" comment personally, no, I wasn't insulting him because he is the president of the USA. I was insulting him, because he is a HORRIBLE diplomat and tactician, which are two of the most important trades every politicians needs to have. OK, he has good economic results, fine, I am seriously happy for you. But every single time he says something, he manages to insult somebody, make fun of somebody, or other people have to explain what he meant with it. He is very impulsive, he seems to believe that he is the only person on the planet who is correct and everybody else is wrong. He seems to see himself as a kind of a saviour. He has a lot to learn but he's not willing to, he doesn't seem to think that he NEEDS to. And the "best" thing is that I have no doubt that he will win the 2020 elections. And the media is helping him. |
Saint Jiub 24.07.2018 13:25 |
The comments about toilet paper remind of some lines from the movie "Moscow on the Hudson" "I have something for you. You certainly know how to get to a girl's heart. It's for your soft, rosy bottom, not your heart." link |
The Real Wizard 24.07.2018 17:19 |
pittrek wrote: No, if you're talking about the Charlottsville attack, he didn't say that. He said that there were good people on both sides and there were bad people on both sides.To say there are "good people" amongst Nazis, and to see them as equal opposites to "bad people" on the side fighting against Nazis - it's just unfathomable. And it essentially begins the process of normalizing Nazi ideology. They were tickled pink to have such approval from a sitting president. Yes, Trump spoke out against Nazis white supremacists the day after that, only because he was under political pressure to. He followed a script. But literally the next day after that he was off script again, giving the Nazis a free pass again. That's the part the right wing media didn't cover. But everyone heard the "both sides" story. And the fact that half of America has no problem with this is terrifying. They are absolutely fine with the fact that their president characterizes the people fighting Nazis as "the left". Once upon a time people who fought against Nazis were called "Americans". Now it's only half of them. |
The Real Wizard 24.07.2018 17:25 |
pittrek wrote: But maybe these people SHOULD try to live in a socialist country - and I mean a REAL socialist country, not a capitalist country with a strong social systemYou're right in pointing out the difference. But the problem is - at least half of Americans don't know the difference. There is a substantial portion of Americans who do not agree with the idea of universal health care, many of whom even believe poor people deserve to die if they can't afford health insurance (politicians have even been on the record saying that). In (especially rural) America, the idea of having a social safety net to help make society a better place for everyone is rejected because they think it's "socialism". Fox news has equated it with the worst socialist dictatorships of times past, and the people drink the kool aid. They don't know the difference between "socialism" and "social democracy". One is Venezuela, and the other is Denmark. It's a matter of basic education, and it isn't there. Most Americans can't even point out Denmark on a map. The US absolutely is not a "capitalist country with a strong social system". There is virtually no public sector, and there is little interest in helping it grow. Most Americans see their money as their own business and the well-being of society as irrelevant, even if it will help them, because they don't even recognize the very idea of society - they just see everyone as individuals responsible for themselves and nobody else. Bernie Sanders was branded as a socialist in the last election campaign for wanting to improve the social safety net to catch up to the rest of the civilized world. But from a European standpoint, his ideas were not revolutionary or radical - they were centre-right. But in American politics, the idea of government helping the average working person is so far left wing from what they're used to. And since the US is mostly poorly educated on world affairs, they ate up all the propaganda (largely thanks to Cambridge Analytica who were funded by the Republican party), and Democrats chose Hillary Clinton over him. The US is just so fucked, and there isn't enough time in a day to illustrate how and why. |
The Real Wizard 24.07.2018 17:39 |
Saint Jiub wrote:And just wait and see how many people take off with their money. There's a reason why the Panama Papers were a thing.The Real Wizard wrote:Definitely not true ... link "At the heart of the deal are some of the biggest tax changes in years, including an increase in tax rates for couples with incomes over $450,000, to 39.6%. For those same households, capital-gains and dividend taxes would increase to 20%, from 15%. Estate taxes would increase from 35% to 40%."Haemophilia Love wrote: The so-called alternative to soak and tax the rich is not any better.You're right. Because you can't take something away from anyone once they have it. Once you lower that corporate tax rate, it's there for good. If you raise it again, that money will end up in Swiss bank accounts. |
Saint Jiub 25.07.2018 01:29 |
I see Trump has links to the Panama Papers, but I am surprised that the Clintons were not named. Hillary did vote for the Panama Free Trade Agreement, and the Clintons have received three billion dollars of political donations (graft) over the years that might need laundering ... link |
Saint Jiub 25.07.2018 01:41 |
Trump will not be impeached because of "collusion", He will be impeached after the midterms by a landslide with Republican support because of a Playboy bunny ... after Trump destroys the economy with his stupid world trade tariff fiasco. link |
The Real Wizard 25.07.2018 18:23 |
pittrek wrote:I'd say people can be upset about both of those things, not just one or the other.Trump doesn't need the media to look like a misogynist or a white supremacist. He's doing just fine all on his own.That's not my point. My point is that this dumbass threatens to basically start a nuclear war, but people care more about some stupid shit he said in a private conversation a decade ago. But you're right - if people just focused on the bigger things, the dialog (especially on the left) would be much more coherent and to the point. |
The Real Wizard 25.07.2018 18:26 |
Saint Jiub wrote: Trump will not be impeached because of "collusion", He will be impeached after the midterms by a landslide with Republican support because of a Playboy bunny ... after Trump destroys the economy with his stupid world trade tariff fiasco. linkYep. And it's crazy that it had to go that far. That threatening nuclear war and committing treason by cozying up to third world dictators wasn't enough. And then we're left with Pence, who is terrifying in a whole other way. But if the Democrats clean up at midterms, there may be a whole lot of nothing happening in US politics until 2020. |
MisterCosmicc 09.08.2018 05:44 |
|
MisterCosmicc 09.08.2018 05:44 |