OhioMustapha wrote: I knew that he wasn't actually on fire. I was just exaggerating. And I know there is no way he could be.
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: OhioMustapha wrote: I knew that he wasn't actually on fire. I was just exaggerating. And I know there is no way he could be. So why misuse the word "literally"? Were you afraid you might come off looking too intelligent otherwise?
Biggus Dickus wrote: thomasquinn 32989 wrote: OhioMustapha wrote: I knew that he wasn't actually on fire. I was just exaggerating. And I know there is no way he could be. So why misuse the word "literally"? Were you afraid you might come off looking too intelligent otherwise? Why be so anal about something that was clearly intended as a joke?