musicland munich 06.04.2018 06:53 |
I try to bring this to you raw and unfiltered. In my opinion Freddie was like an aging athlete at least since "The Works Tour". Of course he was still very good and occasionally even superb ( Live Aid ) but he had lost "something" wich is hard to explain. Maybe just three percent energy, a fingertip of power or whatever you want to call it. I am not slagging the Works or Magic tour in general. Is someone with me ? |
Chief Mouse 06.04.2018 07:26 |
I agree. He was fairly old by then and probably wasn't as hungry for touring anymore. |
scottmax 06.04.2018 08:16 |
Is 38-40 classed as a fairly old man?? |
dudeofqueen 06.04.2018 09:21 |
>Is 38-40 classed as a fairly old man?? Yep - even when that dude ISN'T wearing a leotard and a jock-strap. Honestly, the lack of advice he was receiving is, truly, staggering. Still, it if gave Paul Prenter a hard-on, I guess it was "job done", eh? |
Dr Magus 06.04.2018 09:38 |
Freddie was getting a bit wide around the waist by '85. |
Chief Mouse 06.04.2018 09:48 |
scottmax wrote: Is 38-40 classed as a fairly old man??In general no. But I think it's past his physical prime as far as fitness and performing. |
thomasquinn 32989 06.04.2018 09:54 |
If you're going to classify Freddie as an athlete (and I'm not saying you should or shouldn't), then yes, pushing 40 would be "fairly old". Personally, I don't think "aging athlete" is the right metaphor for this situation - it seems to me that by the mid-80s, touring had become a bit of a chore. The guys were so used to it, and probably worn down by it, that I think it was just "a job". All the perks were things they'd gotten used to years ago, and the downsides were starting to grate. I think you see this kind of thing with most artists/groups whose career lasts long enough. So, IMHO, not physical wear, but mental boredom and routine. |
Invisible Woman 06.04.2018 10:27 |
He wasn't "old man". He was probably tired of touring. Also, he had been in relationship with Jim from '85, he probably wanted to spend more time with him than going on a tour. Later, he probably would have liked to go on a tour again but he got sick, and sadly that never happened again. |
on my way up 06.04.2018 10:31 |
Any person is at its peak at 30. From then onwards the body slowly starts to decline. Of course, performing may not be considered topsport but in Freddie's case I think the physical effort may be equal to what a athlete does. Singing AND moving around like he did was a hell of an effort. In Freddie's case - sadly - there was also a virus in his body and I think it's no too far stretched to say that as early as 1984 some effects were showing. And if you take into account that he didn't adjust his behaviour (still sleeping little etc.) yet, then it's no surprise that some effect is seen in his performances. Phoebe has commented on how tired he felt during the Magic tour. In my mind there's no doubt the Hiv-virus was responsable to that. He was in denial until the Kaposi Sarcoma showed up in the (early) spring of 1987. By then his immune system had already taken a HUGE beating (this was probably already going on for about 2 or 3 years). |
scottmax 06.04.2018 15:54 |
I turn 40 this year, looks like I’m fucked then..... |
mike hunt 06.04.2018 16:20 |
Yup, you're fucked my friend!.....once you hit 40 It's all downhill. In all honesty when we turn 40 we think we're old because of comparing ourselves with our younger days, but in reality 40 is still young. Freddie looked young for live Aid, lots of energy for sure. The things that ages you faster will be the things you put in your body, in Freddie's case he did lots of drugs and partying up to 1986....smoking ages you faster, he was a big smoker as Well, Of course he had his illness that made him fatigued by 86 . I should add that he looked tired for the magic tour by his standards, but still had more energy than most 25 year olds. He still did plenty of running around on that tour. Never a stage big enough for Freddie Mercury as Mick Jagger said. Athletes are different, just a regular person who enjoys working out will notice a difference in the gym once they hit 40. Body breaks down more. A singer, if you take care of yourself age shouldn't be a factor. |
Sheldon 06.04.2018 16:32 |
Funny, I've always found the Magic Tour shows the most energetic by Freddie. Just check out him singing TYMD at Wembley. He looks like he will explode any minute :D |
Biggus Dickus 06.04.2018 16:54 |
|
ANAGRAMER 06.04.2018 18:26 |
Interesting topic Would Freddie still want to tour at 70; probably no His performance was high energy; always switched on and in the moment, even on The Magic Tour but, if you look closely, you can see he is visibly out of breath even early in the set (Tear it Up at Wembley) He was also past his prime vocally (doesn't a man's singing voice peak around 30?). This was clearly seen on The Works tour where in every recorded performance, he was clearly struggling compared to Hot Space tour only two years earlier I seem to recall a postponement of an interview with Simon Bates on BBC radio1 in 1985 due to health issues; and Simon Bates indiscreet comment about 'fur on Freddie's tongue' - there was obviously something going on health wise and voice wise at that point For some unknown reason, he absolutely peaked at Live Aid but that was a 20 minute slot compared to the regular 2 hour Queeen show and I don't believe for one second that any of the Queen songs were an easy sing, never mind doing it every other night for four months in a row I saw him on the Magic Tour and distinctly remember thinking that he looked thinner (than The Works tour) and at a particular moment (Radio Gaga) he looked decidedly gaunt :-( As a lifelong fan, it was heartbreaking to see his decline and, if he was still around, he would be outperforming every wanna be from Justin Hawkins to Robbie Williams then eating them for breakfast |
Kacio 06.04.2018 19:19 |
Freddie may have had the first effects of HIV in this period, that's why he lost this "something" |
Apocalipsis_Darko 06.04.2018 20:08 |
Never a stage big enough for Freddie Mercury as Mick Jagger said Where do you find the quote? |
mike hunt 06.04.2018 21:53 |
I Had a Documentry on Queen called the Magic Years 1986. All the Celebrities like Phil Collins and Mick jagger were all commenting on Freddie. That's where I saw the Jagger comment. I'm sure you could find it on YouTube. You could find anything on there. |
musicland munich 07.04.2018 04:46 |
ANAGRAMER wrote: Interesting topic Would Freddie still want to tour at 70; probably no His performance was high energy; always switched on and in the moment, even on The Magic Tour but, if you look closely, you can see he is visibly out of breath even early in the set (Tear it Up at Wembley)True ! I can't see him touring with Queen nowadays in his typical manner doing his signature moves on stage. |
musicland munich 07.04.2018 05:07 |
on my way up wrote: In Freddie's case - sadly - there was also a virus in his body and I think it's no too far stretched to say that as early as 1984 some effects were showing. And if you take into account that he didn't adjust his behaviour (still sleeping little etc.) yet, then it's no surprise that some effect is seen in his performances.I doubt that his infection was a factor during The Works Tour but I am not a doctor... Things surly changed during the Magic Tour for sure.It was their first Stadium only Tour ( with a few exceptions). That should keep the motivation to perform outstanding night after night to a maximum level imo. Aside of that they played lots their 70's material like their own tribute band. leaves me with a bland taste wich makes my impression even worse . |
Martin Packer 07.04.2018 09:12 |
I suspect the difference between The Works tour and AKOM Tour is PSYCHOLOGICAL. Meaning, he was in a bad place. Probably because of what he suspected of his PHYSICAL health. All the footage of AKOM shows him looking less happy - at least to my eyes. |
scottmax 07.04.2018 14:55 |
So because they played their 70’s material, which is only 7 years previous, they became their own tribute band? That statement absolutely baffles me.... |
Holly2003 07.04.2018 16:17 |
Maybe as he got older Fred would've returned to his roots and spent most of his time onstage at the piano. Back to a time when he was primarily a musician rather than a "front man". Although Joe Public mostly prefers the latter. |
scottmax 07.04.2018 21:48 |
I totally agree with you Holly |
Biggest Band On The Planet 07.04.2018 21:53 |
Another thing to take into account is that the magic tour had a far bigger stage than any pervious Queen tour. |
mike hunt 07.04.2018 23:54 |
musicland munich wrote:Can you explain how the original band playing their classic era material along with the new songs at the time is considered a tribute band?....That doesn't even make sense. I personally like the Magic tour, but Freddie did look tired. Like age was catching up to him. If you watch him on the Hot Space Tour you see a clear difference. It's only 4 years.on my way up wrote: In Freddie's case - sadly - there was also a virus in his body and I think it's no too far stretched to say that as early as 1984 some effects were showing. And if you take into account that he didn't adjust his behaviour (still sleeping little etc.) yet, then it's no surprise that some effect is seen in his performances.I doubt that his infection was a factor during The Works Tour but I am not a doctor... Things surly changed during the Magic Tour for sure.It was their first Stadium only Tour ( with a few exceptions). That should keep the motivation to perform outstanding night after night to a maximum level imo. Aside of that they played lots their 70's material like their own tribute band. leaves me with a bland taste wich makes my impression even worse . |
Supersonic_Man89 08.04.2018 09:32 |
Try singing a bunch of Queen songs in a row with the same volume, energy, movement and power as Freddie during the magic tour....and see if you get out of breath. Combined with the lights and little to no breaks, Freddie imo was a superb athelete. It's only when you try to recreate what he does even in your own home that you realise - blimey, he was good. |
thomasquinn 32989 08.04.2018 10:23 |
scottmax wrote: So because they played their 70’s material, which is only 7 years previous, they became their own tribute band? That statement absolutely baffles me....I read it as "they played their '70s material *in such a way* that it sounded like they were a Queen-tribute band". And I tend to agree with that: most of the older material was played in a lazy and casual manner. |
musicland munich 08.04.2018 12:01 |
Quote not possible in this device. TQ is correct :) |
Martin Packer 08.04.2018 16:45 |
"Another thing to take into account is that the magic tour had a far bigger stage than any pervious Queen tour." And that was by choice. It could, however, be that they had something to prove - rather than a genuine desire to have a bigger stage. |
Biggest Band On The Planet 10.04.2018 02:22 |
I don't think its out of the question that Freddie would still be touring today if he was still alive. Just look at Mick Jagger hes even older than Freddie and is still going still strong. |
cmsdrums 10.04.2018 07:56 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:As a general rule I think the Magic Tour setlist gets a lot of unfair flack after the event, really only because we are so familiar with it and a bit blasé, following years of multiple releases and broadcasts of it. Broken down however, it is really a great set, and my own view is that the old stuff is performed really well.scottmax wrote: So because they played their 70’s material, which is only 7 years previous, they became their own tribute band? That statement absolutely baffles me....I read it as "they played their '70s material *in such a way* that it sounded like they were a Queen-tribute band". And I tend to agree with that: most of the older material was played in a lazy and casual manner. There's a good measure of brand new material (which we now deem 'old hat') but not too much to bore the crowd: One Vision, A Kind of Magic, Who Wants to Live Forever, Friends Will Be Friends. About right for the album the tour was supporting. There's the best of their previous album (The Works): Radio Ga Ga, I Want To Break Free, Hammer To Fall, non single track Tear It Up - and I'd say all sounding better than on The Works Tour. There's some interesting takes on older material: In The Lap of the Gods Revisited with a fresh new guitar intro, a snippet of Liar before Tear It up, Tie Your Mother Down brought right forward in the setlist, Seven Seas of Rhye, Bo Rhap and WWRY/Champions all performed really well, and the surprise of the latter two being split with Friends Will Be Friends in between. Now I'm Here still in too. Jazz through to Hot Space are perhaps under represented, with only Another One Bites The Dust and Under Pressure present...AOBTD given a harder edge and an elongated interactive crowd call and response interlude. Covers: A surprise return to some of the rock n roll covers from their early years...not seen a few strung together like that for many years. Plus also retaining the 'Impromptu' section from The Works Tour. Perhaps maybe one song each from AKOM and The Works could have given way to Somebody To Love, Killer Queen, Play The Game, Keep Yourself Alive or Save Me, but even then people would have complained that those tracks had pretty much ALWAYS been performed live so bringing in The Works tracks (which had all been hit singles) and the AKOM tracks from the current album are reasonable moves. Perhaps the main issue is that Freddie is seen to be not as vocally good as before - however even then this is only on a few gigs, and is highlighted by the widely seen Wembley 2nd night) - overall, his performance on the Magic Tour compares very favourably against some previous tours where he lost his voice completely, though clearly not at his 82 peak. Certainly the Magic Tour sound mix and balance of Spike's keys and other sounds was a massive improvement on The Works tour. Sorry this seems like a bit of an essay, but thought perhaps stepping back and taking a fresh look at what we now deem to be a 'stale' tour because everything they have done since has been based on the same basic skeleton setlist, was a helpful exercise. Cheers all. |
Dim 10.04.2018 13:10 |
If I remember correctly Freddie injured his leg in a bar fight early 1984, during the works interviews he said that some of his moves will be slower or something like that. Also in a German concert during hammer to fall he injured his knee. Along with gaining with, drinking, smoking, clubbing etc , the result was to reduced his stamina, vocal ability. |
Dim 10.04.2018 13:12 |
If I remember correctly Freddie injured his leg in a bar fight early 1984, during the works interviews he said that some of his moves will be slower or something like that. Also in a German concert during hammer to fall he injured his knee. Along with gaining weight , drinking, smoking, clubbing etc , the result was to reduced his stamina, vocal ability. |
miraclesteinway 11.05.2018 21:10 |
I don't think that 38 is old, and in fact these days 38 year olds are a lot younger in mindset and in body than 38 years olds of the 1980s. But you're talking about touring rock stars. There is no doubt that Freddie was unwell by the time he was 38, but add to that the gruelling touring, which must have involved eating at odd times, sleeping at bad times, and they had also gone through years of excessive drinking and drug taking that, even if they'd stopped a lot of that by then, causes damage that takes a long time to repair. It was known that Freddie drank heavily in the late 70s and early 80s, and I'm pretty certain the only way he stayed so trim was through not eating as much as he needed to. In some ways Freddie looked better on the Miracle videos than he did in the Magic and the Works tour clips. Yeah, he was more frail, but he looked fresher. I understand there was make up used, and all that, but he had an alertness about him, and also he had a visible hunger for wanting to get the work done. Even on Slightly Mad where he is visibly not well, there is an enthusiasm about him which was less apparent in some of the earlier work. We know that he looked after himself much better in the last 4 years of his life. Even on Barcelona, he is like a tornado again, compared to some of the magic videos where he looks kind of heavy hearted. I'm quite sure had Freddie lived into the era of combination therapy then the care that he was taking of his body would have resulted in him regaining much of his youthful energy, and looking much better than he did on the works tour. Of course, he didn't live and so it's only hot air speculation. Anyway my point is, it's not age that is the problem, but the levels of abuse they all subjected their bodies to during the peak of their fame. Even look at the Q plus AL tour - Brian takes care of himself. He doesn't drink excessively (I don't know if he even drinks at all these days), he eats a plant-based diet, he takes regular exercise, and he looks very fit and healthy considering he's about to turn 71. He's probably fitter than a lot of 30 year olds who are still going out on the piss and smoking truck loads. Roger on the other hand is more the bon viveur. He likes to get plastered, he doesn't have a healthy diet, and he still lives a rock star life. He looks old, and he looks ill. Roger is younger than Brian by 2 years. You are what you eat and drink. It is known now that ageing can be reversed through diet and exercise. Obviously you can't stop some things, but wrinkles will reduce in appearance, hair will maintain its colour for longer, collagen will increase in your bones and muscles, and if you eat a diet which is anti-inflammatory you will stay fitter and healthier for longer. Drink a lot of alcohol, eat a diet full of rich foods, and don't exercise, and you'll find at any age that your energy is low. Especially if you add some hard drugs to the mix and don't sleep properly. |
jrd1951 12.05.2018 10:34 |
Interesting that as reading this, a friend is badgering me to go and see the Stones this year on yet another tour! A different world now,as huge sponsorship deals and the fact the bands earn most of their income from touring now has changed everything.The first massively sponsorship based gig I saw was Michael Jackson's Bad tour,ironically the year after Queen stopped touring.I don't thick Mick Jagger would be getting flack for not hitting a C5 during a performance,though the musicianship is still on a top level.So yes,Freddie himself saw himself as aging way back then.I have seem probably 500 or more shows since then,but,on a reflective day,stick on the 'Rock Montreal' DVD on at full blast and watch the greatest performer that I,and everyone alive today,will ever see in our lifetime...X |
Chopin1995 13.05.2018 17:30 |
miraclesteinway wrote: I don't think that 38 is old, and in fact these days 38 year olds are a lot younger in mindset and in body than 38 years olds of the 1980s. But you're talking about touring rock stars. There is no doubt that Freddie was unwell by the time he was 38, but add to that the gruelling touring, which must have involved eating at odd times, sleeping at bad times, and they had also gone through years of excessive drinking and drug taking that, even if they'd stopped a lot of that by then, causes damage that takes a long time to repair. It was known that Freddie drank heavily in the late 70s and early 80s, and I'm pretty certain the only way he stayed so trim was through not eating as much as he needed to. In some ways Freddie looked better on the Miracle videos than he did in the Magic and the Works tour clips. Yeah, he was more frail, but he looked fresher. I understand there was make up used, and all that, but he had an alertness about him, and also he had a visible hunger for wanting to get the work done. Even on Slightly Mad where he is visibly not well, there is an enthusiasm about him which was less apparent in some of the earlier work. We know that he looked after himself much better in the last 4 years of his life. Even on Barcelona, he is like a tornado again, compared to some of the magic videos where he looks kind of heavy hearted. I'm quite sure had Freddie lived into the era of combination therapy then the care that he was taking of his body would have resulted in him regaining much of his youthful energy, and looking much better than he did on the works tour. Of course, he didn't live and so it's only hot air speculation. Anyway my point is, it's not age that is the problem, but the levels of abuse they all subjected their bodies to during the peak of their fame. Even look at the Q plus AL tour - Brian takes care of himself. He doesn't drink excessively (I don't know if he even drinks at all these days), he eats a plant-based diet, he takes regular exercise, and he looks very fit and healthy considering he's about to turn 71. He's probably fitter than a lot of 30 year olds who are still going out on the piss and smoking truck loads. Roger on the other hand is more the bon viveur. He likes to get plastered, he doesn't have a healthy diet, and he still lives a rock star life. He looks old, and he looks ill. Roger is younger than Brian by 2 years. You are what you eat and drink. It is known now that ageing can be reversed through diet and exercise. Obviously you can't stop some things, but wrinkles will reduce in appearance, hair will maintain its colour for longer, collagen will increase in your bones and muscles, and if you eat a diet which is anti-inflammatory you will stay fitter and healthier for longer. Drink a lot of alcohol, eat a diet full of rich foods, and don't exercise, and you'll find at any age that your energy is low. Especially if you add some hard drugs to the mix and don't sleep properly.Excellent post. Nothing to add. |
miraclesteinway 14.05.2018 15:10 |
Thanks! |
Chopin1995 15.05.2018 08:02 |
My pleasure :) |
The Real Wizard 16.05.2018 14:48 |
miraclesteinway wrote: Freddie drank heavily in the late 70s and early 80s, and I'm pretty certain the only way he stayed so trim was through not eating as much as he needed to.If by "drank" you mean "snorted coke", then you're absolutely right. Otherwise - great post. |
miraclesteinway 19.05.2018 15:36 |
I read in one of the books about Queen, that Freddie drank excessively as well. However, snorting coke isn't going to do much for the old vocal chords either.... (or folds as they're called now). Thanks! |
people on streets 20.05.2018 20:52 |
miraclesteinway wrote: I read in one of the books about Queen, that Freddie drank excessively as well. However, snorting coke isn't going to do much for the old vocal chords either.... (or folds as they're called now). Thanks!Excellent post (the long one). Phoebe once told me, at some convention, that Freddie and his group of friends had these long binges in wich loads of alcohol (vodka) and coke was used. Binge drinking/drug taking is terrible bad for your body. |
MisterCosmicc 21.05.2018 06:16 |
“Any person is at its peak at 30. From then onwards the body slowly starts to decline.” Wrong. |