huhnad 09.07.2017 16:36 |
SYW was dropped in favor of IWTBF at last night's show in Omaha. |
ActionThisDay 09.07.2017 17:13 |
Yep :-( |
Michael 09.07.2017 18:54 |
. . . And it likely will not return. You didn't think it was going to last, did you? Next to go: It's Late. |
Krypto_98 09.07.2017 19:20 |
We would have to wait till next show. Hopefully SYW is there when i see them in Toronto |
Jimmy Dean 09.07.2017 20:53 |
could have been due to the fact that Omaha was small market and not visited when they last toured? just a thought just saying.. maybe they put that much thought into it |
huhnad 09.07.2017 23:26 |
Michael wrote: . . . And it likely will not return. You didn't think it was going to last, did you? Next to go: It's Late.You're right. Both were dropped this evening in Kansas City. |
The Fairy King 10.07.2017 01:43 |
Fuck :( |
soxtalon 10.07.2017 02:06 |
Slim sliver of hope - tonight's show was delayed somewhat significantly from what I've heard due to some tech problems with Brian's guitar. That might be the explanation tonight. Crossing fingers. That would suck ass. |
Makka 10.07.2017 03:26 |
I will be mighty pissed off if they don't play SYW and It's Late when they come to Perth next year. 2 of my favourite songs. |
cmsdrums 10.07.2017 05:15 |
soxtalon wrote: Slim sliver of hope - tonight's show was delayed somewhat significantly from what I've heard due to some tech problems with Brian's guitar. That might be the explanation tonight. Crossing fingers. That would suck ass.Even so - why out of all of the tracks do they choose to drop the two genuinely interesting and new tracks? Hammer To Fall & Radio Ga Ga could easily make way. I really do fear the worst when this show hits the UK....Brian will be back to his 'safe' mode of rigidly sticking to the hits he thinks Joe Public wants to hear.....even with those there are plenty of other tracks from GHI and GHII that could/should be alternated around the set list. |
Vocal harmony 10.07.2017 05:32 |
^^^^ yeah I had hoped that this time round would be different but it seems to be slipping back to the usual. as you say there are a great deal of other hits they could play if that's the path they want to take, but they seem to ignore those too. having said that I think that the song choices with AL have been much wider and deeper than with PR we can hope. . . I guess! |
oliverd05 10.07.2017 06:03 |
The real answer will be on Thursday the 13th in Chicago!! If there's curfew problems or Brian's guitar is on the blink that's probably why SYW and IL were cut, im praying they're not totally gone as it makes he whole news of the world anniversary thing a bit pointless with only 1 song from the album being played |
MercurialFreddie 10.07.2017 08:51 |
I feared that it will come to this when SYW was first dropped due to the time issues on the third night of the tour. |
NickESB 10.07.2017 08:59 |
MercurialFreddie wrote: I feared that it will come to this when SYW was first dropped due to the time issues on the third night of the tour.SYY wasn't dropped because of time issues at Hollywood Bowl. It fell out the set because (a) Brian couldn't live without performing another tedious as **** guitar solo and (b) the band basically have little courage left when it comes to really testing the audience. This EU tour to end 2017 really could be a massive let down. But, hey, they're charging £200 for tickets that cost £80 two years ago, so kerching! |
NickESB 10.07.2017 08:59 |
MercurialFreddie wrote: I feared that it will come to this when SYW was first dropped due to the time issues on the third night of the tour.SYY wasn't dropped because of time issues at Hollywood Bowl. It fell out the set because (a) Brian couldn't live without performing another tedious as **** guitar solo and (b) the band basically have little courage left when it comes to really testing the audience. This EU tour to end 2017 really could be a massive let down. But, hey, they're charging £200 for tickets that cost £80 two years ago, so kerching! |
bucsateflon 10.07.2017 09:44 |
Is the guitar all right? |
GonnaUseMyPrisoners 10.07.2017 10:38 |
oliverd05 wrote: The real answer will be on Thursday the 13th in Chicago!! If there's curfew problems or Brian's guitar is on the blink that's probably why SYW and IL were cut, im praying they're not totally gone as it makes he whole news of the world anniversary thing a bit pointless with only 1 song from the album being playedI'll be CRUSHED if they're not back the the set on Thursday! I have been avoiding YouTube, deliberately to be surprised by the renditions, and if they're cut there too, I'll be just heartbroken!!!! Crossing fingers for a great Chicago show & maybe a live recording, now that they're all warmed up!!! |
oliverd05 10.07.2017 10:54 |
yeah I hear you guys! I'm flying over from the UK to do the Brooklyn show on the 27th and by god ill be disappointed if those 2 aren't in, as I've loved hearing them on youtube and wanna see them live! |
Vocal harmony 10.07.2017 11:19 |
NickESB wrote:you seem to have all the inside information re the set list. if what you say is true why was Al's stool put out before the Hollywood bowl encore and the glitter ball lowered to show trim?MercurialFreddie wrote: I feared that it will come to this when SYW was first dropped due to the time issues on the third night of the tour.SYY wasn't dropped because of time issues at Hollywood Bowl. It fell out the set because (a) Brian couldn't live without performing another tedious as **** guitar solo and (b) the band basically have little courage left when it comes to really testing the audience. |
ggo1 10.07.2017 11:29 |
I'm usually one to say it's up to them what they play, but I will truly be gutted if It's Late and SYW are not back for the Toronto show. I have been looking forward to them so much. Seems crazy to have all the Robot stuff happening on stage but not actually play songs off the album it represents. |
matt z 10.07.2017 14:27 |
It WAS due to their late start. In fact i saw the second bowl performance and was there well before the sun went down. Apparently they had already had to start to get the full gig in under the allotted time. I had deliberately left early and still missed the opening 3 songs It was there the second evening. But yes. .."tis' true"....so few people seemed like they knew the material but the applause WAS raucous. I didn't record much. And fear that mostly the audience would be heard on my partial recording. Anyways. ...i hope they retain the NOTW set list. Itd be even better if ANOTHER NOTW song showed up on the tour. ...not the other way around |
Cruella de Vil 11.07.2017 04:18 |
Maybe Adam's voice was under strain? Up until now, SYW and It's Late have been going great IMO, but they both lie very high in range on a number of key phrases. We will have to wait and see. |
DrumBrother 11.07.2017 11:27 |
|
DrumBrother 11.07.2017 11:30 |
If time was the issue they could have cut Get Down Make Love...probably my least favourite Queen song. To think it was left in when IL and SYW were culled is criminal in my opinion. Going to the Dublin show in November so they have until then to get their act together. |
bucsateflon 11.07.2017 14:11 |
Are they playing so fast in KC or is the video corrupt? link sounds super |
Vocal harmony 12.07.2017 09:23 |
DrumBrother wrote: If time was the issue they could have cut Get Down Make Love...probably my least favourite Queen song. . . . .But they weren't playing that show for you! They could have cut any song or songs from the set but what ever the choice was there will always be someone who would argue it should have been another song |
Krypto_98 13.07.2017 09:00 |
We would have to see what they play in Chicago to comfirm If they are taken out |
huhnad 13.07.2017 21:40 |
Listening to the Chicago stream now... "Under Pressure" into IWTBF. Could simply be an addition to the set, but I fear this might seal the deal for SYW. :( |
ggo1 13.07.2017 23:33 |
F### |
Brancelli 14.07.2017 00:02 |
Such bullshit. Get rid of the robot while you're at it. |
Brancelli 14.07.2017 00:06 |
If any song should go it's 2 fux. Gotta be Adam preserving his vocals since this is not the case. |
ActionThisDay 14.07.2017 05:24 |
I don't really see the point of playing IWTBF in the States as it wasn't well received there in the 1st place.......be like playing Body Language which was a hit, but not a song the fans over there really liked. |
cmsdrums 15.07.2017 09:18 |
It's Late and Spread Your Wings gone now (probably for good?). I knew they wouldn't last to the UK, but they been ditched even earlier than I expected :-( |
ggo1 15.07.2017 12:24 |
Brian May just liked a tweet from some guy asking for Its Late. Hope? I'm going to try it anyway. |
jabbo5150 15.07.2017 16:10 |
I just tweeted him about the Detroit show and those songs so if it was that, it was my Tweet. |
Krypto_98 15.07.2017 20:17 |
Everyone tweet at him for it's late and syw |
ggo1 16.07.2017 17:17 |
jabbo5150 wrote: I just tweeted him about the Detroit show and those songs so if it was that, it was my Tweet.No it was someone tweeting about Nashville... so that makes at least 3 of us. but all asking for different shows. I think we need a bit more effort to get it going viral. |
Krypto_98 16.07.2017 18:50 |
Everyone tweet for Toronto, i Instagram at his last post |
Grantcdn1 16.07.2017 21:37 |
I'm going to have to join twitter, instagram etc but agree we should let them know with whatever means we have that we want "It's Late"...before it's all too Late.... really hoping for it at the Toronto show |
flash00. 17.07.2017 21:15 |
Clearly Brian and Roger feel that the rock classic with the haunting lyrics Two Flux is a far more important track on this tour.....fascinating. |
The Real Wizard 18.07.2017 11:07 |
I was at the Montreal show last night. I'm a bit disappointed that It's Late and Spread Your Wings have been dropped. I share and empathize with a lot of the feelings that I'm reading about here. But I'm going to attempt to bring some grander perspective into the discussion: How many successful 1970s acts survived the 1980s, commercially speaking? I think we can we count them on one hand. The LP as a medium peaked in the early to mid 70s, but was in decline by the late 70s. To survive the 1980s, it became all about the single, to get played on the radio and on MTV. Peter Gabriel stuck to albums, and coincidentally by 1982 he was flat broke, to the point that Genesis had to reunite with him for a show at the Milton Keynes bowl to bail him out. If Queen had broken up in 1979 and did a reunion tour in the 2000s, they'd probably be doing theatres and playing mostly album tracks. But for a moment in 1980, Queen were the biggest act in the US - not because of an album, but because of two hit songs. From then onward, with occasional exceptions, earlier material was axed in their setlists in favour of new songs, but the hits more or less remained the dominant part of their show. Here's one of those exceptions - in 1982, they played Liar for a few weeks at the beginning of the tour. It sounded fresh and exciting. But listen to the tapes - their audience had changed. Most people didn't know the song. The band clued in, and they dropped it. The only difference between then and now is there was no internet. Bootleg tapes circulated, but it usually took months or even years for that to happen. So people just went to the shows and generally had a great time without expectations. It was only a small minority who'd say "they aren't playing the old songs anymore." For the past 40 years or so, to most people Queen have been a hits band. How do we know that? Greatest Hits has sold better than all of their studio albums combined. Let that sink in. And a slightly more anecdotal citing - in those "guitar heroes" type books, on every guitarist's page it names three albums that best encapsulate their work. For literally every other rock player there are three studio albums, but for Brian May it's usually Sheer Heart Attack, A Night At The Opera, and Greatest Hits. But this is the path they've chosen. Maybe "Two Fux" is more important than two classics. Or maybe it's as simple as the fact that they have a fuck ton of hits to pick from, and that they've willingly chosen the flock over the few. My vote is for the latter. But let's not pretend that this sensitivity for their audience is a sudden development. It's been in their consciousness since before plenty of us reading this post were born. To people who post on forums like this, the first six Queen albums are cherished artistic statements. Connoisseurs of music see that 73-77 period as a big deal. But to Brian and Roger who have known each other for about 50 years, that's 10% of that time. As the artists who have invested themselves into this music for so many years and in so many different ways, we can't even begin to psychoanalyze them and their choices (nor should we). It may well be that those album tracks just may not matter as much to them as many of us think they do. Maybe they're happy watching people enjoy themselves to the hits, because that's what most people identify with. The arenas are full tour after tour, even if the setlist is barely different from the last time, but the production is completely different. Shows are about the events as much as the songs. Adam Lambert riding a bicycle will be far more memorable to most people than which 1977 song they played half way through the show. The fact that they're still filling arenas despite having not released an album in over 20 years probably means Brian and Roger understand the dynamics of performance art far more than many people here are giving them credit for. |
jabbo5150 18.07.2017 13:23 |
Totally understand where you are coming from with your post and while it probably does make more sense to the band, it makes it no less frustrating as a fan, especially considering those songs were in the setlist as of what, two weeks ago? It's kind of like when I saw Guns N Roses in 1993, only to miss Brian May as the opener by like a week. We instead got Blind Melon (Who were awful) and Shannon Hoon tripped over his own feet and fell on stage. The Detroit show on Thursday will still be great I am sure and I am looking forward to it, but it's a what could have been thing for me at least. I am still tweeting all of them to add it back in, though I am sure it will fall on deaf ears. How was the show? |
The Real Wizard 18.07.2017 13:30 |
Of course it was amazing, all things considered. The production is ridiculously good, and the show is very well paced. It's about as good as a nostalgia act show in an arena can get. |
jabbo5150 18.07.2017 13:38 |
I am looking forward to it. I suppose I should be grateful they are even outing the states again. I figured after they reconquered a few years ago it would be one and done, so I am glad they decided to come back. |
jabbo5150 18.07.2017 13:38 |
touring |
ziggy811 18.07.2017 15:20 |
I have been a fan for over thirty years and I will always remain one. The original band was just perfect ... but I also liked what they did with Paul Rodgers, and Adam is even a better fit than Paul. However, their setlists are far from adventurous. They always stick to playing it safe, and when they make some interesting choices they drop the songs after a few shows. Where is their sense of adventure, Not every fan in the arena is a newbie. Of course when you come to a Queen show you want to hear Bohemian Rhapsody, We Will Rock You, We are the Champions etc. But they have an enormous catalogue. Why don't they make a mix of the hits and some lesser known material. It will keep things interesting for the newbies, the longterm fans and themselves. For his last tour in 2003-2004 Bowie and his band rehearsed over 50 songs. The setlist changed almost every night. It was the perfect combination of hits and obscure material and the place was on fire every night. It can be done !!! |
MercurialFreddie 18.07.2017 15:25 |
Real Wizard, you forgot about the The Works Tour, they played a handful of songs from QI, QII.... but yes I agree with what you said. But it's a sad thing that without SYW and IL the whole "40th anniversary, folks!" is just pointless.... |
ggo1 18.07.2017 22:47 |
Just back from the Toronto show. Went into it disappointed they dropped saw and it's late, but I can see why they did. The pace of the show would have been adversely affected. Get down make love was wonderful, I thoroughly enjoyed it, but everyone around me sat down for that. And Two Fux for that matter. Visually, this is the best Queen show ever. And even though it seems like it's the same songs as last time, it's really not. At least it's not the same as the last NA tour, maybe it's closer to the last European tour. Anyway, bottom line is I really enjoyed the show, the use of Frank was excellent and provided me with one genuine laugh out loud moment. We got to sing happy birthday to Brian which was unique. Deliberately terrible graphic on the video screens for that. It's a good show, I won't remember it with the same fondness I have for the crazy tour shows I saw, or Brussels in 84 or Leeds in 82, but it's still a good show. I will say Brian missed a few notes and I thought he was limping. Roger is in fine form and looks pretty good. Adam is a good frontman but i know not everyone here agrees so thats fine, we can disagree. Didnt notice songs being played slow apart from FBG which really crawled along at a snails pace. Maybe they dropped its late because at that speed it would be 12 minutes long. Ears still ringing. Hotel bed looks comfy. |
Grantcdn1 19.07.2017 00:23 |
Agree the show was great. Brian and Roger were spectacular. Production fantastic - especially the opening sequence and during the guitar solo. Adam makes me cringe at some points but while he doesn't sound like Freddie he can hit the notes...at least I am still getting a show. I would still prefer they added a classic like Its Late or Spread Your Wings in...especially because of the 40th anniversary....perhaps it is also how much they can physically endure....if anything Show Must Go On would be a better fill in than IWTBF |
JomaDuckSoup 19.07.2017 06:19 |
The Real Wizard wrote: I was at the Montreal show last night. I'm a bit disappointed that It's Late and Spread Your Wings have been dropped. I share and empathize with a lot of the feelings that I'm reading about here. But I'm going to attempt to bring some grander perspective into the discussion: How many successful 1970s acts survived the 1980s, commercially speaking? I think we can we count them on one hand. The LP as a medium peaked in the early to mid 70s, but was in decline by the late 70s. To survive the 1980s, it became all about the single, to get played on the radio and on MTV. Peter Gabriel stuck to albums, and coincidentally by 1982 he was flat broke, to the point that Genesis had to reunite with him for a show at the Milton Keynes bowl to bail him out. If Queen had broken up in 1979 and did a reunion tour in the 2000s, they'd probably be doing theatres and playing mostly album tracks. But for a moment in 1980, Queen were the biggest act in the US - not because of an album, but because of two hit songs. From then onward, with occasional exceptions, earlier material was axed in their setlists in favour of new songs, but the hits more or less remained the dominant part of their show. Here's one of those exceptions - in 1982, they played Liar for a few weeks at the beginning of the tour. It sounded fresh and exciting. But listen to the tapes - their audience had changed. Most people didn't know the song. The band clued in, and they dropped it. The only difference between then and now is there was no internet. Bootleg tapes circulated, but it usually took months or even years for that to happen. So people just went to the shows and generally had a great time without expectations. It was only a small minority who'd say "they aren't playing the old songs anymore." For the past 40 years or so, to most people Queen have been a hits band. How do we know that? Greatest Hits has sold better than all of their studio albums combined. Let that sink in. And a slightly more anecdotal citing - in those "guitar heroes" type books, on every guitarist's page it names three albums that best encapsulate their work. For literally every other rock player there are three studio albums, but for Brian May it's usually Sheer Heart Attack, A Night At The Opera, and Greatest Hits. But this is the path they've chosen. Maybe "Two Fux" is more important than two classics. Or maybe it's as simple as the fact that they have a fuck ton of hits to pick from, and that they've willingly chosen the flock over the few. My vote is for the latter. But let's not pretend that this sensitivity for their audience is a sudden development. It's been in their consciousness since before plenty of us reading this post were born. To people who post on forums like this, the first six Queen albums are cherished artistic statements. Connoisseurs of music see that 73-77 period as a big deal. But to Brian and Roger who have known each other for about 50 years, that's 10% of that time. As the artists who have invested themselves into this music for so many years and in so many different ways, we can't even begin to psychoanalyze them and their choices (nor should we). It may well be that those album tracks just may not matter as much to them as many of us think they do. Maybe they're happy watching people enjoy themselves to the hits, because that's what most people identify with. The arenas are full tour after tour, even if the setlist is barely different from the last time, but the production is completely different. Shows are about the events as much as the songs. Adam Lambert riding a bicycle will be far more memorable to most people than which 1977 song they played half way through the show. The fact that they're still filling arenas despite having not released an album in over 20 years probably means Brian and Roger understand the dynamics of performance art far more than many people here are giving them credit for.Very well said! |
Krypto_98 19.07.2017 07:21 |
Also i have to blame the arena. We ended up starting at 8:40 |
GonnaUseMyPrisoners 20.07.2017 09:02 |
Real Wizard: "we can't even begin to psychoanalyze them and their choices" - but you certainly gave it your best shot. Look, not trying to jump all over you, but every one of your opinions, although suppported in one way, can be simply disputed. "Singles band"? I remember a lot of statements from them saying the opposite: "album band". etc. Not going to sit there and pedantically counter all your arguments, though I'm tempted... the album "anecdote" is particularly malodorous. I see your points, though, I do. The show wasn't all bad. But you did more ""psychoanalyzing" than most, to be blunt, and I don't think that's possible from our vantage point. Legitimately, I think we can observe what is done in the shows and what is not. We can be happy or not with the energy, accuracy, visuals, sound, etc. from the fan's perspective. We can try to express why certain performances resonated with us, or didn't. And when it comes to song selection, you can't please everyone, no argument. But certainly you get the irony in the band making press statements about certain album anniversary & tracks, screen captures of Lamberts phone playlist, and setting precendents in early shows, seemingly aimed to bring a certain fan base out to the shows. So we buy the tix, and then the carpet's pulled out. There's no psychoanalysis there, it's just abject disappointment for a lot of the diehards - the older fans who don't listen to the Greatest Hits album because we like the studio albums better. BTW, the Chicago show was NOT a sellout - there were blocks of main floor seats (within eyesight from my seat) that went unsold (released the week before the show, and yes I kept checking), and it's not that big an arena (12,400 seats?). My prognosis? A little less script and a little more "danger" (Brian's word again) might keep things lively, where the current formula delivers, but may not excite. Certainly, wondering whether Roger could handle the power and pace of It's Late (particularly the ending) would deliver the excitement for me. |
Krypto_98 20.07.2017 12:34 |
ggo1 wrote: Just back from the Toronto show. Went into it disappointed they dropped saw and it's late, but I can see why they did. The pace of the show would have been adversely affected. Get down make love was wonderful, I thoroughly enjoyed it, but everyone around me sat down for that. And Two Fux for that matter. Visually, this is the best Queen show ever. And even though it seems like it's the same songs as last time, it's really not. At least it's not the same as the last NA tour, maybe it's closer to the last European tour. Anyway, bottom line is I really enjoyed the show, the use of Frank was excellent and provided me with one genuine laugh out loud moment. We got to sing happy birthday to Brian which was unique. Deliberately terrible graphic on the video screens for that. It's a good show, I won't remember it with the same fondness I have for the crazy tour shows I saw, or Brussels in 84 or Leeds in 82, but it's still a good show. I will say Brian missed a few notes and I thought he was limping. Roger is in fine form and looks pretty good. Adam is a good frontman but i know not everyone here agrees so thats fine, we can disagree. Didnt notice songs being played slow apart from FBG which really crawled along at a snails pace. Maybe they dropped its late because at that speed it would be 12 minutes long. Ears still ringing. Hotel bed looks comfy.One thing i didn't like is that we started 40 minutes late from the listed start time. It's kinda sad to see people next to you arrive at their seats 35 minutes after the show is supposed to start |
The Real Wizard 20.07.2017 13:25 |
GonnaUseMyPrisoners wrote: A little less script and a little more "danger" (Brian's word again) might keep things lively, where the current formula delivers, but may not excite.Excite whom, though? Your thoughts are completely correct and legitimate for you, the fan who knows every note of their music. But I suspect you represent less than 1% of the audience. There are people who saw some of the earlier shows, on their way out of the venue, saying the band played too many deep cuts. Friends of mine heard it with their own ears. Of course this is all anecdotal. But judging by the audience response throughout the shows I saw, I'd say people were pretty satisfied overall at what they heard. At both shows I saw, a ton of people were talking throughout Love Of My Life. If they don't know that song enough to shut up and listen and experience what it means, then they sure aren't going to know It's Late. This is why the next song after LOML is Somebody to Love - in case they lost anyone, they'll play a song that literally everyone knows. The flow of the show is paramount. I know many hardcore Queen fans who saw them for the first time on this tour, and they walked away completely satisfied. One of them was a bit disappointed that they didn't play Tie Your Mother Down, but he was too busy being blown away by the production and simply hearing Brian May live to care. Uber-hardcore fans who are hoping for obscure songs tend to miss the bigger picture. And it's their loss. Myself, I'm glad I saw the show twice - it really made me appreciate how good it is. A show is about so much more than the songs. It's the events. It's the builds to peaks. This has been their philosophy since the mid 70s, and applied to them now as a nostalgia act, they have perfected it. They have brought new life to these old songs. The show is like a movie. There are scene changes and plot twists. It is so well engineered to create excitement in as many people as possible. Indeed, you can't please everyone - but to create something that 99% of your audience enjoys, that is an art. And as much as I love the early albums - playing It's Late wouldn't have enhanced the experience for that 99%. And that's why they've dropped it. They had it in the setlist with good intentions, but it's gone for an equally good reason. |
ggo1 20.07.2017 13:40 |
No clue what happened there... my essay disappeared. |
soxtalon 22.07.2017 12:09 |
I think a nice compromise and something to fit the 40th anniversary is if they did a rotating NOTW track...One gig gets It's Late, one gets SYW, one could even get Fight From The Inside...Surely one track wouldn't disrupt everything.... |
bucsateflon 22.07.2017 15:03 |
"Fight From The Inside" ...there is no measure in absurdity around this forum. |
ggo1 22.07.2017 17:23 |
I like the rotating track in the moddle of the set idea. It's Late, Spread Your Wings, Sleeping on The Sidewalk, Who needs You, My Melancholy Blues, Sheer Heart Attack? - Probably not that one in the middle of the set. TBH - Even if they don't like doing Its Late, and SYW was dropped because they want something everyone knows for the Encore, they could very easily put SYW where It's Late used to be without upsetting the flow. And Off Topic... Adam was brilliant with Who Wants To Live Forever in Toronto. Best live version I've heard. |
Wiley 22.07.2017 21:05 |
I'm sure the show will blow me and my wife away. I've only seen the odd photo here and there, zero video. Still, I can't help but think that dropping both SYW and It's Late in favor of I want to break free is a safe & boring move. If Brian was truly worried about pacing he wouldn't play a 10 min solo. More like pacing themselves -I think- by removing one truly challenging and physically demanding song with one they can play in their sleep. If stamina is the issue, that would explain It's late, I think, but not Spread Your Wings. I can imagine people getting bored with the full version of its late but SYW is very accessible and the chorus is pure magic. Had they played the current setlist from the first night I wouldn't be complaining at all but they spoilt us showing us what a proper NOTW anniversary show could be... :S I'm sure the minute I see the show's intro I'll forget about even having written this, hehe :) |
The Real Wizard 23.07.2017 16:09 |
ggo1 wrote: No clue what happened there... my essay disappeared.link ^ see here. |
Nitroboy 26.07.2017 17:56 |
@The Real Wizard - I think the biggest disappointement is that Brian spent so much time hyping the shows with a setlist containing "deep cuts", and now just a couple of shows in, those songs are pulled, and replaced by Greatest Hits stuff. Saying I'm disappointed in their decision and false advertising, is putting it mildly. Hopefully they get wiser once their European tour starts. |
Wiley 27.07.2017 05:34 |
Just came back from the Jersey show. Like in 2014, shitty crowd. Great production, video, lights, lasers and spectacle. Every second with FRANK was amazing. Great concept and execution. Too bad they dropped those two songs. I fucking hated it when I heard the opening chords to Break Free because it reminded me of what had been dropped. On the other side I really enjoyed Get Down Make Love (usually don't care for it much), Hammer to Fall (surprise, surprise, it works), and I'm in love with my car. Even Brian's solo was enjoyable. I Want it all and Love of my life, two of my highlights from the 2005 tour, were dull, dull, dull... they should now be retired and never be played in the U.S. again. |
Vocal harmony 27.07.2017 14:43 |
Wiley wrote: Just came back from the Jersey show. Like in 2014, shitty crowd. Great production, video, lights, lasers and spectacle. Every second with FRANK was amazing. Great concept and execution. Too bad they dropped those two songs. I fucking hated it when I heard the opening chords to Break Free because it reminded me of what had been dropped. On the other side I really enjoyed Get Down Make Love (usually don't care for it much), Hammer to Fall (surprise, surprise, it works), and I'm in love with my car. Even Brian's solo was enjoyable. I Want it all and Love of my life, two of my highlights from the 2005 tour, were dull, dull, dull... they should now be retired and never be played in the U.S. again.Glad you enjoyed the show, but wasn't it in New Jersey? Jersey is a small island in the English Channel ;) |
LOTV 27.07.2017 16:18 |
New here. How refreshing to read some honest difference of opinion between fans. Not just Adam is shit and no Freddie or unadulterated arse and smoke blowing. I've seen them twice with Adam and both times they were great. Once up in the Gods in Chicago in 2014 and actually the set list was more for the fans than the current greatest hits one and once in Nottingham, right at the front which was brilliant. On both occasions they were loud and very rocky, despite that Adam is clearly a pop or musical singer. I'm a little concerned at some of the reviews on here, it really does sound like they've got a bit boring and stayed. Have to say there's a couple of versions I've seen on you tube that are a bit dull, I don't like the STL at the moment. I've seen a couple of good renditions of other songs though. Which brings us on the matter in hand. I was chuffed to bits when I saw IL and SYW were on the set list, genuinely excited. I think Adam sang them pretty well too especially as someone getting to grips with them. Dropping them for a song the Americans hated is bizarre and an own goal I hope they correct for the UK leg. The criticism of Brian selling a deeper cuts set list is a just one, Christ I even fantasized about about SASS and Sheer Heart Attack being included. For me I couldn't care less if they fucked off Radio Ga Ga, though that will never happen. Lets face it UK fans are different and will be there to hear Queen's music not Adam's so there's no need to market and appeal to Glamberts and play Two Fux for a start. As I'm going to the Newcastle gig I'm hoping by then the excitement will be back and the set list more interesting. And one final suggestion which will never be taken on board - why not finish in a different way? Everyone knows what's coming and it's frankly boring. Why not mix it up and play Champions and WWRY (if the bloody thing has to be played) at different stages of the set and end with some other combinations? Wouldn't it be great to end with Laps of the Gods? |
oliverd05 01.08.2017 01:08 |
well having travelled from the UK to the Brooklyn show I was rather excited echoing what everyones said, the production is I think the best they've done, the use of Frank was genius, the band were exceptionally loud I thought, way louder than the last time I seen them in 2015 now onto the slight negatives, yes the tour was hyped as an anniversary tour for NOTW and we got 1 new song which was GDML, and also agreeing what Wiley said I did feel a disappointment of sorts when IWTBF started coz I knew thats where Its Late used to be! Got 3 shows booked for the UK tour so hopefully with the new boxset of NOTW coming out in November, they'll put those 2 songs back in as those were on the Live Killers album that was the 79 European tour, so hopefully the band think they're more well known in Europe coz of that album |
LOTV 01.08.2017 15:39 |
It's Late isn't on my copy of Live Killers. |
Vocal harmony 01.08.2017 22:14 |
Not on mine either, and I'm not sure what Live Killers has to do with News Of The World |
LOTV 02.08.2017 14:15 |
".....they'll put those 2 songs back in as those were on the Live Killers album that was the 79 European tour..." Those 2 songs weren't on the Live Killers album. So on the American tour IL and SYW lasted 2 nights. |
Rick McKeithan 03.08.2017 06:39 |
The last show with both SYW and It's Late was in Denver, July 6th. I really enjoyed the production and feel fortunate they played those songs. |
oliverd05 04.08.2017 08:59 |
Ok yeah my mistake It's late wasn't on live killers album but it was played on the live killers tour! That's a mixup on my part, I always felt with the recordings available both Its Late and Spread your wings were better received by the European audiences, especially Spread your wings as per the live killers version with the audience singing along so hopefully we get those back for our 2017 European tour! |
Vocal harmony 04.08.2017 14:37 |
On the last US tour the show opened with Now I'm Here. By the time they reached UK and European arenas it was dropped in favour of One Vision. This doesn't look good for anyone hoping that It's Late and Spread Your Wings will return later in the year, if anything I have a feeling Get Down Make Love will fade away too. While I agree for the most part with Real Wizard's post about playing the hits to an arena filled hits market I can't help noticing that along with Now I'm Here, Stone Cold Crazy was added but has remained. Surely to the greatest hits fan that is just as obscure as any other none single track. Both Roger and Brian have said that deep cuts will be played but they continue to step back from that statement. It would be better if they didn't say stuff like this and then surprise people if they decided to include something different. I'm still looking forward to seeing them, I'm quite excited about it, but I'm a little disappointed by the fact that the bands promise that they would dig deeper into the catalogue at this point has only resulted in a snippet of Bicycle Race, a song they played last time around two songs which they've dropped and one real surprise! |
queenUSA 04.08.2017 18:32 |
Nitroboy wrote: @The Real Wizard - I think the biggest disappointement is that Brian spent so much time hyping the shows with a setlist containing "deep cuts", and now just a couple of shows in, those songs are pulled, and replaced by Greatest Hits stuff. Saying I'm disappointed in their decision and false advertising, is putting it mildly. Hopefully they get wiser once their European tour starts.Everyone will make up their own mind as to whether "the deep cuts" delivered matches their own expectation for the tour. I went to the DC show and was very pleased with the inclusion of SCC, BR and GDML. A pretty good haul I thought. I also have to give credit for a transition that occurred that used the intro to YTMBA. While lost on most glambert fans and casual Queen fans, your more substantial Queen fan is going to enjoy bits like that and it does count toward a deep cut in my book, even though it was a taped version. While the concert clock ticks there is only so much program time to devote. Sadly. |
LOTV 07.08.2017 11:19 |
TYMD from Houston sounds pretty good. Slightly different tempo but plenty of balls. Adam sings it like a rock singer not a pop singer too. |
The Real Wizard 07.08.2017 15:14 |
And between Rock You and Champions - neat location for it. |
AlexRocks 08.08.2017 02:36 |
What are you all talking about? TYMD from Houston. In the 1970's? On this tour? When was it between those two songs? |
The Real Wizard 08.08.2017 06:26 |
link A couple nights ago. |